Ps1 has Spyro, Crash Bandicoot, Croc, Tomb Raider, MGS1, Silent Hill, RE123, FF7, FF8, FFT, Tekken 123, Twisted Metal Ps2 butchered all these franchises, and added one good one, GoW Ps3 has Uncharted, R&C, The Last Guardian, Demon's Souls, Fat Princess, Valkarie Chronicles and a few others coming out so, Ps1 > Ps3 > Ps2
Actually bub Tomb Raider was on the Dreamcast as well...and by last gen most of those games series have been on other platforms...uh FF on snes was better even without all the graphics I mean every ff after 2 has the same anti-government plot and generic big ass sword/created/lost memories char. The newest one is a more female like cloud for god's sake. Yet I agree Ps1>Ps2>Ps3...see what I did there?
PS2>PS1>PS3 Believe me I was there. PS3 is not superior to either of its predecessors, which dominated the industry and expanded it to ridiculous depths. The first Playstation sold a hundred million GD consoles and the second one surpassed it. Those game systems were absolute phenomenons, whereas the PS3 is just a really solid system, although that's almost entirely because of the incredible first-party support. But, gee, let's see, first party support compared to the support of every third-party developer from every region in the world like the PS2 or PS1 had.
PS2>PS1>PS3 Believe me I was there. PS3 is not superior to either of its predecessors, which dominated the industry and expanded it to ridiculous depths. The first Playstation sold a hundred million GD consoles and the second one surpassed it. Those game systems were absolute phenomenons, whereas the PS3 is just a really solid system, although that's almost entirely because of the incredible first-party support. But, gee, let's see, first party support compared to the support of every third-party developer from every region in the world like the PS2 or PS1 had.Brownesque
[QUOTE="Brownesque"]PS2>PS1>PS3 Believe me I was there. PS3 is not superior to either of its predecessors, which dominated the industry and expanded it to ridiculous depths. The first Playstation sold a hundred million GD consoles and the second one surpassed it. Those game systems were absolute phenomenons, whereas the PS3 is just a really solid system, although that's almost entirely because of the incredible first-party support. But, gee, let's see, first party support compared to the support of every third-party developer from every region in the world like the PS2 or PS1 had.HumanoMexicano
Back then Sony was god.
Combine the market saturation of the NES with the market penetration of the Wii and you have the PS1/PS2.
[QUOTE="Brownesque"]PS2>PS1>PS3 Believe me I was there. PS3 is not superior to either of its predecessors, which dominated the industry and expanded it to ridiculous depths. The first Playstation sold a hundred million GD consoles and the second one surpassed it. Those game systems were absolute phenomenons, whereas the PS3 is just a really solid system, although that's almost entirely because of the incredible first-party support. But, gee, let's see, first party support compared to the support of every third-party developer from every region in the world like the PS2 or PS1 had.Brownesque
Back then Sony was god.
Combine the market saturation of the NES with the market penetration of the Wii and you have the PS1/PS2.
God. NO WONDER IT IS STILL SELLING. Yet some people say the ps3 is better. pfff.
[QUOTE="Brownesque"]PS2>PS1>PS3 Believe me I was there. PS3 is not superior to either of its predecessors, which dominated the industry and expanded it to ridiculous depths. The first Playstation sold a hundred million GD consoles and the second one surpassed it. Those game systems were absolute phenomenons, whereas the PS3 is just a really solid system, although that's almost entirely because of the incredible first-party support. But, gee, let's see, first party support compared to the support of every third-party developer from every region in the world like the PS2 or PS1 had. It's Sony's fault for ignoring the third console curse.
Ps2 had alot of developers, but the quality of games compared to the Ps1 was worsecubemovies
Ok, that's your opinion, but you're in the minority. Most people think the PS2 was better then the PS1. It had many great quality games and btw, the Twisted Metal franchise died on the PS1 with crap like TM3. It was only brought back to life in all it's glory on the PS2 with the great Twisted Metal Black.
Yeah in backwards land. in reality they are all equally the best systems of their time, but for modern days sake PS3 comes first, then PS1 for nostalgia, and PS2 comes last for collecting the most dust since i bought it on launch.
Yeah in backwards land. in reality they are all equally the best systems of their time, but for modern days sake PS3 comes first, then PS1 for nostalgia, and PS2 comes last for collecting the most dust since i bought it on launch. frikin finally
[QUOTE="TheCoreGamer_"][QUOTE="Fried_Shrimp"] Yeah in backwards land.cubemovies
in reality they are all equally the best systems of their time, but for modern days sake PS3 comes first, then PS1 for nostalgia, and PS2 comes last for collecting the most dust since i bought it on launch. frikin finally So you ignore anyone who has a different opinion then yours or calls you out?
Yeah in backwards land. in reality they are all equally the best systems of their time, but for modern days sake PS3 comes first, then PS1 for nostalgia, and PS2 comes last for collecting the most dust since i bought it on launch.
Ps3 first? Please, it isn't even the best in this gen.
Believe me I was there. PS3 is not superior to either of its predecessors, which dominated the industry and expanded it to ridiculous depths. The first Playstation sold a hundred million GD consoles and the second one surpassed it. Those game systems were absolute phenomenons, whereas the PS3 is just a really solid system, although that's almost entirely because of the incredible first-party support. But, gee, let's see, first party support compared to the support of every third-party developer from every region in the world like the PS2 or PS1 had.Brownesque
The PS2 is a much better system than the PS1. To be honest, outside of Castlevania:STON, Resident Evil 2 and 3, Final Fantasy VIII, Final Fantasy IX, and the two Lunar games, there was little on the PS1 that ever got me into the system.
I can't judge the PS3 since I don't own one, but from what I've seen, I would rank it above the PS1.
How can the PS3 possible be better than either the PS1 or PS2? It has a fraction of the third-party support, and it's clearly the least succesful of the trio in terms of titles and profitability for its company. If anything, the PS3 is an unworthy successor to those two gaming pinnacles.
Log in to comment