N64: 32 million http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nintendo_64
PS1: 102 million http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PlayStation_(console)
Its funny, I remember everyone having an N64, not a PS1.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
N64: 32 million http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nintendo_64
PS1: 102 million http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PlayStation_(console)
Its funny, I remember everyone having an N64, not a PS1.
The PS1 outsold the N64, that's common knowledge.tagyhagIt is but when it wasn't when I was new to Gamespot because everyone I knew had an N64 and I was the only one I knew with both an N64 and a PS1.
Hardly anybody had a PS1 in my area the only other people I knew that had a PS1 their parents worked at the Sony plant that was a few miles from my house but in 2006 or 2007 they shut that plant down.
I didn't know anyone with a PS1. I guess it was because I was a kid and everyone I knew was a kid. PS1 probably was for the more adult crowd and adults usually like terrible games as long as there's some kind of gore in em.IAMSERIALlolwut, the PS1 had a great library.
[QUOTE="IAMSERIAL"]I didn't know anyone with a PS1. I guess it was because I was a kid and everyone I knew was a kid. PS1 probably was for the more adult crowd and adults usually like terrible games as long as there's some kind of gore in em.siLVURcrosslolwut, the PS1 had a great library. Yeah and we all saw how that library aged. It didn't have a great library, just a bigger library.
[QUOTE="IAMSERIAL"]I didn't know anyone with a PS1. I guess it was because I was a kid and everyone I knew was a kid. PS1 probably was for the more adult crowd and adults usually like terrible games as long as there's some kind of gore in em.siLVURcrosslolwut, the PS1 had a great library. Ps1 had terrible games? lol PS1 had a better games than the N64
lolwut, the PS1 had a great library. Yeah and we all saw how that library aged. It didn't have a great library, just a bigger library. Yea it aged fine, I still play quite a few PS classics and enjoy them none the less :|[QUOTE="siLVURcross"][QUOTE="IAMSERIAL"]I didn't know anyone with a PS1. I guess it was because I was a kid and everyone I knew was a kid. PS1 probably was for the more adult crowd and adults usually like terrible games as long as there's some kind of gore in em.IAMSERIAL
[QUOTE="siLVURcross"][QUOTE="IAMSERIAL"]I didn't know anyone with a PS1. I guess it was because I was a kid and everyone I knew was a kid. PS1 probably was for the more adult crowd and adults usually like terrible games as long as there's some kind of gore in em.J-WOWlolwut, the PS1 had a great library. Ps1 had terrible games? lol PS1 had a better games than the N64 That's got to be the biggest joke post I've read in this monotonous board.
[QUOTE="J-WOW"][QUOTE="siLVURcross"] lolwut, the PS1 had a great library.IAMSERIALPs1 had terrible games? lol PS1 had a better games than the N64 That's got to be the biggest joke post I've read in this monotonous board. Not as big of a joke post as your original post.
please tell me what it was lacking, ps1 had basically every type of genre and game type you could possibly want, it outsold the n64 for a reason. Other than mario, zelda, starfox the N64 was lackingPS1 had a pretty bad library. Other then its RPGs it was lacking.
magnax1
[QUOTE="magnax1"]please tell me what it was lacking, ps1 had basically every type of genre and game type you could possibly want, it outsold the n64 for a reason. Other than mario, zelda, starfox the N64 was lackingPS1 had a pretty bad library. Other then its RPGs it was lacking.
Chris_Williams
Goldeneye, Perfect Dark, and anything else Rare did....
A lot of people had N64 where I lived. It was popular with the boys I knew. But you're right, it was outsold by the PS1 by a large margin and even had a far wider selection of quality games.
[QUOTE="magnax1"]please tell me what it was lacking, ps1 had basically every type of genre and game type you could possibly want, it outsold the n64 for a reason. Other than mario, zelda, starfox the N64 was lackingPS1 had a pretty bad library. Other then its RPGs it was lacking.
Chris_Williams
N64 had a better library in every genre except fighter and RPGS
Turok 1-3, DK64, Banjo 1 &2 Conker, Zelda OOT and MM, Rogue Squadron, Perfect dark, Goldeneye, Smash bros, Starfox, Kirby, Mario Kart, epsisode 1 racer, FZero, World Driver, Blast Corps, jet force gemini,excite bike, and 1080. The amount of PS1 games anywhere near as good as those in their genres is so miniscule. The PS1 was pretty bad, especially compared to its N64 counterpart.
lolwut, the PS1 had a great library. Yeah and we all saw how that library aged. It didn't have a great library, just a bigger library.[QUOTE="siLVURcross"][QUOTE="IAMSERIAL"]I didn't know anyone with a PS1. I guess it was because I was a kid and everyone I knew was a kid. PS1 probably was for the more adult crowd and adults usually like terrible games as long as there's some kind of gore in em.IAMSERIAL
On gamestop, PS1 had far more AAA and AA games than N64. By a huge margin. It was the superior console.
Nintendo got spanked because they didn't use CDs, which gave the PS1 a huge advantage. Developers could make more complex games with higher production values, and they were cheaper for the customer since they didn't have to pay for an expensive Nintendo-made cartridge. On N64, games would cost anywhere from $60 to $80, while on the PS1 the most they'd ever cost was $50. Publishers saved money on not having to buy and sell the carts, and they passed the savings on to the customers.
I remember getting really annoyed late in the N64's lifespan because of how rare new games of high quality were getting. It was like, only a couple of good releases a year and that was it. Granted I didn't have a lot of money back then anyway, but even so, the N64 had a hard time keeping up with players' desire to play new games. Nintendo was very much still following the "killer app" business model of having a couple games that people really wanted to play which would last the entire generation, rather than maintaining a steady flow of monthly releases.
Nintendo got spanked because they didn't use CDs, which gave the PS1 a huge advantage. Developers could make more complex games with higher production values, and they were cheaper for the customer since they didn't have to pay for an expensive Nintendo-made cartridge. On N64, games would cost anywhere from $60 to $80, while on the PS1 the most they'd ever cost was $50. Publishers saved money on not having to buy and sell the carts, and they passed the savings on to the customers.
Timstuff
This and Nintendo's business practices during the SNES era. Nintendo viewed 3rd party developers as competition. Because they had direct control over how many games developers could produce, how big of cartridges they could use, etc, they could limit the capabilities of 3rd parties like Square. And that's what they did. Moreover, they charged 3rd parties far more than SEGA because they "were Nintendo." The painstaking localization process of removing anything that Nintendo thought might offend the American public, such as "pub" becoming "cafe" helped pave the way for developers to crave another system to work on.
The Saturn was too much of a mess to develop for, the N64 used cartridges and it was a Nintendo console, so basically Sony couldn't have chosen a better time to enter the market.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment