PS2 is still the KING of consoles today, PS3 is the KING of the future!

How can anyone deny that?

its clear as ice.

yes.  If the ps3 is getting this many exclusive AAA games now, imagine what they will be getting in the future......

How can anyone deny that?

its clear as ice.

GermanShepard06

Ps2 is good, Ps3 is crapJewish_GameBoy

My piece of ice rather foggy.

clear as day , cool as ice

    Sure...if you say so :roll:

    Wait a sec, aren't you the same person who tried to say that computers couldn't do 1080p? 

PS2 is no doubt the KING of all consoles out now.

 PS3 is set up to be that when the prices come down and game makers will show why DVD9 is not the way to go.

Ice is foggy...Hewkii

[QUOTE="GermanShepard06"]

How can anyone deny that?

its clear as ice.

magus-21

u can pull out all the present numbers all u want but nothing can change the fact that the future belongs to PS3.

[QUOTE="magus-21"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"]

How can anyone deny that?

its clear as ice.

GermanShepard06

u can pull out all the present numbers all u want but nothing can change the fact that the future belongs to PS3.

    Sure...if you say so :roll:

    Wait a sec, aren't you the same person who tried to say that computers couldn't do 1080p? 

SpruceCaboose

hahahaha ur soo funny, ummmmm NO!

[QUOTE="GermanShepard06"][QUOTE="magus-21"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"]

How can anyone deny that?

its clear as ice.

magus-21

u can pull out all the present numbers all u want but nothing can change the fact that the future belongs to PS3.

u meam like the momentum that dreamcast had and the next day it was like it never existed?

rofl....

[QUOTE="magus-21"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"]

How can anyone deny that?

its clear as ice.

GermanShepard06

u can pull out all the present numbers all u want but nothing can change the fact that the future belongs to PS3.

Can I borrow your crystal ball? I wanna check next week's lotterry numbers.

[QUOTE="magus-21"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"]

How can anyone deny that?

its clear as ice.

GermanShepard06

u can pull out all the present numbers all u want but nothing can change the fact that the future belongs to PS3.

    Your crystal ball is simply amazing.

    See, most of us people who live in the real world rely on current numbers, as "future" numbers don't, you know, exist.

[QUOTE="magus-21"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"][QUOTE="magus-21"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"]

How can anyone deny that?

its clear as ice.

GermanShepard06

u can pull out all the present numbers all u want but nothing can change the fact that the future belongs to PS3.

u meam like the momentum that dreamcast had and the next day it was like it never existed?

rofl....

[QUOTE="GermanShepard06"][QUOTE="magus-21"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"]

How can anyone deny that?

its clear as ice.

SpruceCaboose

u can pull out all the present numbers all u want but nothing can change the fact that the future belongs to PS3.

    Your crystal ball is simply amazing.

    See, most of us people who live in the real world rely on current numbers, as "future" numbers don't, you know, exist.

ever wonder why zombies crave for brains in the movies? ummmm im sure u know why.

[QUOTE="GermanShepard06"][QUOTE="magus-21"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"][QUOTE="magus-21"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"]

How can anyone deny that?

its clear as ice.

magus-21

u can pull out all the present numbers all u want but nothing can change the fact that the future belongs to PS3.

u meam like the momentum that dreamcast had and the next day it was like it never existed?

rofl....

it did, ask anyone, it was selling like hot cakes when it came out and thru the entire year until the judgment day came.

[QUOTE="magus-21"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"][QUOTE="magus-21"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"]

How can anyone deny that?

its clear as ice.

GermanShepard06

u can pull out all the present numbers all u want but nothing can change the fact that the future belongs to PS3.

u meam like the momentum that dreamcast had and the next day it was like it never existed?

rofl....

Dreamcast never have momentum. PS1 was still destroying it's parade. Dreamcast was not as successful as the Wii. Dreamcast barely sold 12 million by the way.

[QUOTE="SpruceCaboose"]

Sure...if you say so :roll:

Wait a sec, aren't you the same person who tried to say that computers couldn't do 1080p?

GermanShepard06

hahahaha ur soo funny, ummmmm NO!

    Actually you did 

[QUOTE="GermanShepard06"][QUOTE="SpruceCaboose"]

Actually, you have little knowledge of resolution. 1080p has been around for ages, on PC. And you know what? PCs don't need Blu-Ray to do it. 1080p is not some magic resolution. The 360 can do it just as well as the PS3 can. Stop trying to tout Blu-Ray as needed. It clearly is not needed.

Also, you keep saying inferior version, and the 360 is not capable of doing it. You got a source that actually says either of those things?

SpruceCaboose

1080p is widescreen, pc's didnt have them for ages. Games on PC just started to support widescreen format.

self owned.

I am self-owned? I will own you twice in one thread. Ready?

Cathode ray tube (CRT) computer monitors have long been capable of displaying (and exceeding) 1080p, albeit as a non-standard resolution since most CRT monitors have an aspect ratio of 4:3 (and those that are widescreen have a ratio of 16:10, not 16:9). Most 17-inch computer monitors which support 1280 × 1024 at 60 Hz will accept an input signal at 1920 × 1080 at 60 Hz, although the projected resolution will exceed the physical limitations of the display screen itself, which for CRT devices is commonly documented as phosphor dot pitch. Some modern widescreen liquid crystal display (LCD) monitors can also natively display 1080p content. Widescreen WUXGA monitors for example support 1920x1200 resolution, which can display a pixel for pixel reproduction of the 1080p (1920x1080) format. These resolutions are supported by several laptops with 15.4 and 17 inch displays. Additionally, many 24 inch widescreen LCD displays use 1920x1200 as their native resolution. Other 1080p-compatible LCDs, on the other hand, have lower than 1920x1080 native resolution and cannot display 1080p pixel for pixel. The output is resized; though it may not be noticeable to the viewer, what is seen is a slightly degraded version of the original image.

[QUOTE="GermanShepard06"][QUOTE="magus-21"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"][QUOTE="magus-21"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"]

How can anyone deny that?

its clear as ice.

Zaistev_basic

u can pull out all the present numbers all u want but nothing can change the fact that the future belongs to PS3.

u meam like the momentum that dreamcast had and the next day it was like it never existed?

rofl....

Dreamcast never have momentum. PS1 was still destroying it's parade. Dreamcast was not as successful as the Wii. Dreamcast barely sold 12 million by the way.

do you even know what momentum is or stands for?

my guess is u dont.

[QUOTE="magus-21"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"][QUOTE="magus-21"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"][QUOTE="magus-21"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"]

How can anyone deny that?

its clear as ice.

GermanShepard06

u can pull out all the present numbers all u want but nothing can change the fact that the future belongs to PS3.

u meam like the momentum that dreamcast had and the next day it was like it never existed?

rofl....

it did, ask anyone, it was selling like hot cakes when it came out and thru the entire year until the judgment day came.

Dreamcast ain't selling hotcakes because you can buy one from the store right away during it's launch because I was one of those people who purchased it. It has good games, buy it was piracy that killed it and the PS1 was still very well alive.

[QUOTE="magus-21"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"][QUOTE="magus-21"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"][QUOTE="magus-21"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"]

How can anyone deny that?

its clear as ice.

GermanShepard06

u can pull out all the present numbers all u want but nothing can change the fact that the future belongs to PS3.

u meam like the momentum that dreamcast had and the next day it was like it never existed?

rofl....

it did, ask anyone, it was selling like hot cakes when it came out and thru the entire year until the judgment day came.

In April 1999, Sony announced its PlayStation 2. The actual release of the PS2 was not until March 2000 in Japan, and late-October 2000 in the United States. Sony's press release, despite being a year ahead of the launch of the PS2, was enough to divert a lot of attention from Sega. With the looming PS2 launch in Japan, Dreamcast was largely ignored in that territory. Dreamcast had great initial success in the United States, but had trouble maintaining this momentum after news of the PS2's release.

Ice is foggy...Hewkii

LoL /thread

[QUOTE="SpruceCaboose"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"][QUOTE="magus-21"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"]

How can anyone deny that?

its clear as ice.

GermanShepard06

u can pull out all the present numbers all u want but nothing can change the fact that the future belongs to PS3.

Your crystal ball is simply amazing.

See, most of us people who live in the real world rely on current numbers, as "future" numbers don't, you know, exist.

ever wonder why zombies crave for brains in the movies? ummmm im sure u know why.

    Actually, zombies are fictitious beings, and as such, have multiple different interpretations. You are referring to the most popular one, in which zombies crave flesh to live, often depicted as "brains" in pop-culture, sometimes thought to be a play on the fact that zombies appear to lack an "intelligence" in their actions.

    That still does not address how you can see into the future though.

[QUOTE="GermanShepard06"][QUOTE="SpruceCaboose"]

Sure...if you say so :roll:

Wait a sec, aren't you the same person who tried to say that computers couldn't do 1080p?

SpruceCaboose

hahahaha ur soo funny, ummmmm NO!

    Actually you did 

[QUOTE="GermanShepard06"][QUOTE="SpruceCaboose"]

Actually, you have little knowledge of resolution. 1080p has been around for ages, on PC. And you know what? PCs don't need Blu-Ray to do it. 1080p is not some magic resolution. The 360 can do it just as well as the PS3 can. Stop trying to tout Blu-Ray as needed. It clearly is not needed.

Also, you keep saying inferior version, and the 360 is not capable of doing it. You got a source that actually says either of those things?

SpruceCaboose

1080p is widescreen, pc's didnt have them for ages. Games on PC just started to support widescreen format.

self owned.

I am self-owned? I will own you twice in one thread. Ready?

Cathode ray tube (CRT) computer monitors have long been capable of displaying (and exceeding) 1080p, albeit as a non-standard resolution since most CRT monitors have an aspect ratio of 4:3 (and those that are widescreen have a ratio of 16:10, not 16:9). Most 17-inch computer monitors which support 1280 × 1024 at 60 Hz will accept an input signal at 1920 × 1080 at 60 Hz, although the projected resolution will exceed the physical limitations of the display screen itself, which for CRT devices is commonly documented as phosphor dot pitch. Some modern widescreen liquid crystal display (LCD) monitors can also natively display 1080p content. Widescreen WUXGA monitors for example support 1920x1200 resolution, which can display a pixel for pixel reproduction of the 1080p (1920x1080) format. These resolutions are supported by several laptops with 15.4 and 17 inch displays. Additionally, many 24 inch widescreen LCD displays use 1920x1200 as their native resolution. Other 1080p-compatible LCDs, on the other hand, have lower than 1920x1080 native resolution and cannot display 1080p pixel for pixel. The output is resized; though it may not be noticeable to the viewer, what is seen is a slightly degraded version of the original image.

:lol:

[QUOTE="Zaistev_basic"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"][QUOTE="magus-21"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"][QUOTE="magus-21"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"]

How can anyone deny that?

its clear as ice.

GermanShepard06

u can pull out all the present numbers all u want but nothing can change the fact that the future belongs to PS3.

u meam like the momentum that dreamcast had and the next day it was like it never existed?

rofl....

Dreamcast never have momentum. PS1 was still destroying it's parade. Dreamcast was not as successful as the Wii. Dreamcast barely sold 12 million by the way.

do you even know what momentum is or stands for?

my guess is u dont.

momentum has two meanings. One is about physics and one about the state of description. Regardless, of you want to generalize momentum, comparing Dreamcast momentum and Wii momentum is a wrong comparison because one is way better than the other. Wrong guess! Nevertheless, Dreamcast did not have momentum because IT DID NOT OUTSOLD ITS COMPETITION both N64 and PSone for a month except launch. During that time, a lot of consumer are skeptical about DC because of the Saturn and the Sega Add-ons like Sega CD.

[QUOTE="GermanShepard06"][QUOTE="SpruceCaboose"]

Sure...if you say so :roll:

Wait a sec, aren't you the same person who tried to say that computers couldn't do 1080p?

SpruceCaboose

hahahaha ur soo funny, ummmmm NO!

    Actually you did 

[QUOTE="GermanShepard06"][QUOTE="SpruceCaboose"]

Actually, you have little knowledge of resolution. 1080p has been around for ages, on PC. And you know what? PCs don't need Blu-Ray to do it. 1080p is not some magic resolution. The 360 can do it just as well as the PS3 can. Stop trying to tout Blu-Ray as needed. It clearly is not needed.

Also, you keep saying inferior version, and the 360 is not capable of doing it. You got a source that actually says either of those things?

SpruceCaboose

1080p is widescreen, pc's didnt have them for ages. Games on PC just started to support widescreen format.

self owned.

I am self-owned? I will own you twice in one thread. Ready?

Cathode ray tube (CRT) computer monitors have long been capable of displaying (and exceeding) 1080p, albeit as a non-standard resolution since most CRT monitors have an aspect ratio of 4:3 (and those that are widescreen have a ratio of 16:10, not 16:9). Most 17-inch computer monitors which support 1280 × 1024 at 60 Hz will accept an input signal at 1920 × 1080 at 60 Hz, although the projected resolution will exceed the physical limitations of the display screen itself, which for CRT devices is commonly documented as phosphor dot pitch. Some modern widescreen liquid crystal display (LCD) monitors can also natively display 1080p content. Widescreen WUXGA monitors for example support 1920x1200 resolution, which can display a pixel for pixel reproduction of the 1080p (1920x1080) format. These resolutions are supported by several laptops with 15.4 and 17 inch displays. Additionally, many 24 inch widescreen LCD displays use 1920x1200 as their native resolution. Other 1080p-compatible LCDs, on the other hand, have lower than 1920x1080 native resolution and cannot display 1080p pixel for pixel. The output is resized; though it may not be noticeable to the viewer, what is seen is a slightly degraded version of the original image.

Wow Germanshepard must be five years old if he didn't know that or not the brightest lightbulb in the pack.

[QUOTE="SpruceCaboose"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"][QUOTE="SpruceCaboose"]

Sure...if you say so :roll:

Wait a sec, aren't you the same person who tried to say that computers couldn't do 1080p?

The_Game21x

hahahaha ur soo funny, ummmmm NO!

    Actually you did 

[QUOTE="GermanShepard06"][QUOTE="SpruceCaboose"]

Actually, you have little knowledge of resolution. 1080p has been around for ages, on PC. And you know what? PCs don't need Blu-Ray to do it. 1080p is not some magic resolution. The 360 can do it just as well as the PS3 can. Stop trying to tout Blu-Ray as needed. It clearly is not needed.

Also, you keep saying inferior version, and the 360 is not capable of doing it. You got a source that actually says either of those things?

SpruceCaboose

1080p is widescreen, pc's didnt have them for ages. Games on PC just started to support widescreen format.

self owned.

I am self-owned? I will own you twice in one thread. Ready?

Cathode ray tube (CRT) computer monitors have long been capable of displaying (and exceeding) 1080p, albeit as a non-standard resolution since most CRT monitors have an aspect ratio of 4:3 (and those that are widescreen have a ratio of 16:10, not 16:9). Most 17-inch computer monitors which support 1280 × 1024 at 60 Hz will accept an input signal at 1920 × 1080 at 60 Hz, although the projected resolution will exceed the physical limitations of the display screen itself, which for CRT devices is commonly documented as phosphor dot pitch. Some modern widescreen liquid crystal display (LCD) monitors can also natively display 1080p content. Widescreen WUXGA monitors for example support 1920x1200 resolution, which can display a pixel for pixel reproduction of the 1080p (1920x1080) format. These resolutions are supported by several laptops with 15.4 and 17 inch displays. Additionally, many 24 inch widescreen LCD displays use 1920x1200 as their native resolution. Other 1080p-compatible LCDs, on the other hand, have lower than 1920x1080 native resolution and cannot display 1080p pixel for pixel. The output is resized; though it may not be noticeable to the viewer, what is seen is a slightly degraded version of the original image.

:lol:

guess what, i dont know what ur talking about cuz i never said computer cant do 1080p, ur confused with someone else. I was talking about monitors with true 1080p.

[QUOTE="SpruceCaboose"]

    Sure...if you say so :roll:

    Wait a sec, aren't you the same person who tried to say that computers couldn't do 1080p? 

GermanShepard06

hahahaha ur soo funny, ummmmm NO!

no..he's the same guy who said he bought a 360 but returned it because MS failed to steal MGS and Final fantasy from Sony.

Or perhaps..he's the same guy.

[QUOTE="The_Game21x"][QUOTE="SpruceCaboose"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"][QUOTE="SpruceCaboose"]

Sure...if you say so :roll:

Wait a sec, aren't you the same person who tried to say that computers couldn't do 1080p?

GermanShepard06

hahahaha ur soo funny, ummmmm NO!

[QUOTE="GermanShepard06"][QUOTE="SpruceCaboose"]

Actually, you have little knowledge of resolution. 1080p has been around for ages, on PC. And you know what? PCs don't need Blu-Ray to do it. 1080p is not some magic resolution. The 360 can do it just as well as the PS3 can. Stop trying to tout Blu-Ray as needed. It clearly is not needed.

Also, you keep saying inferior version, and the 360 is not capable of doing it. You got a source that actually says either of those things?

SpruceCaboose

1080p is widescreen, pc's didnt have them for ages. Games on PC just started to support widescreen format.

self owned.

I am self-owned? I will own you twice in one thread. Ready?

Cathode ray tube (CRT) computer monitors have long been capable of displaying (and exceeding) 1080p, albeit as a non-standard resolution since most CRT monitors have an aspect ratio of 4:3 (and those that are widescreen have a ratio of 16:10, not 16:9). Most 17-inch computer monitors which support 1280 × 1024 at 60 Hz will accept an input signal at 1920 × 1080 at 60 Hz, although the projected resolution will exceed the physical limitations of the display screen itself, which for CRT devices is commonly documented as phosphor dot pitch. Some modern widescreen liquid crystal display (LCD) monitors can also natively display 1080p content. Widescreen WUXGA monitors for example support 1920x1200 resolution, which can display a pixel for pixel reproduction of the 1080p (1920x1080) format. These resolutions are supported by several laptops with 15.4 and 17 inch displays. Additionally, many 24 inch widescreen LCD displays use 1920x1200 as their native resolution. Other 1080p-compatible LCDs, on the other hand, have lower than 1920x1080 native resolution and cannot display 1080p pixel for pixel. The output is resized; though it may not be noticeable to the viewer, what is seen is a slightly degraded version of the original image.

:lol:

guess what, i dont know what ur talking about cuz i never said computer cant do 1080p, ur confused with someone else. I was talking about monitors with true 1080p.

lol I love how you support the argument first, and than once you are owned you go back and say that you never said it.

Great stuff.

guess what, i dont know what ur talking about cuz i never said computer cant do 1080p, ur confused with someone else.

GermanShepard06

    Then someone hacked your account :roll: I just linked you to the whole thread where you can read the whole thing for yourself, if you are so sure I changed quote tags (which I didn't). I can even make it simpler for you. It occured RIGHT HERE, on page 4 of the thread, and continues to page 6.

[QUOTE="GermanShepard06"][QUOTE="The_Game21x"][QUOTE="SpruceCaboose"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"][QUOTE="SpruceCaboose"]

Sure...if you say so :roll:

Wait a sec, aren't you the same person who tried to say that computers couldn't do 1080p?

bezaire2005

hahahaha ur soo funny, ummmmm NO!

[QUOTE="GermanShepard06"][QUOTE="SpruceCaboose"]

Actually, you have little knowledge of resolution. 1080p has been around for ages, on PC. And you know what? PCs don't need Blu-Ray to do it. 1080p is not some magic resolution. The 360 can do it just as well as the PS3 can. Stop trying to tout Blu-Ray as needed. It clearly is not needed.

Also, you keep saying inferior version, and the 360 is not capable of doing it. You got a source that actually says either of those things?

SpruceCaboose

1080p is widescreen, pc's didnt have them for ages. Games on PC just started to support widescreen format.

self owned.

I am self-owned? I will own you twice in one thread. Ready?

Cathode ray tube (CRT) computer monitors have long been capable of displaying (and exceeding) 1080p, albeit as a non-standard resolution since most CRT monitors have an aspect ratio of 4:3 (and those that are widescreen have a ratio of 16:10, not 16:9). Most 17-inch computer monitors which support 1280 × 1024 at 60 Hz will accept an input signal at 1920 × 1080 at 60 Hz, although the projected resolution will exceed the physical limitations of the display screen itself, which for CRT devices is commonly documented as phosphor dot pitch. Some modern widescreen liquid crystal display (LCD) monitors can also natively display 1080p content. Widescreen WUXGA monitors for example support 1920x1200 resolution, which can display a pixel for pixel reproduction of the 1080p (1920x1080) format. These resolutions are supported by several laptops with 15.4 and 17 inch displays. Additionally, many 24 inch widescreen LCD displays use 1920x1200 as their native resolution. Other 1080p-compatible LCDs, on the other hand, have lower than 1920x1080 native resolution and cannot display 1080p pixel for pixel. The output is resized; though it may not be noticeable to the viewer, what is seen is a slightly degraded version of the original image.

:lol:

guess what, i dont know what ur talking about cuz i never said computer cant do 1080p, ur confused with someone else. I was talking about monitors with true 1080p.

lol I love how you support the argument first, and than once you are owned you go back and say that you never said it.

****c.

how about u go to first grade and learn to read first before trying to insult someone by putting ur own words in someone's mouth.

where did i say computers cant do 1080p? post the link here and ill give u $600 dollars so u can escape from the rings of death.

where did i say computers cant do 1080p? post the link here and ill give u $600 dollars so u can escape from the rings of death.

GermanShepard06

how about u go to first grade and learn to read first before trying to insult someone by putting ur own words in someone's mouth.

where did i say computers cant do 1080p? post the link here and ill give u $600 dollars so u can escape from the rings of death.

GermanShepard06

    I did. I prefer my $600 as a cashiers check. Or you could FedEx me a PS3, whichever you prefer. 

[QUOTE="Hewkii"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"]

where did i say computers cant do 1080p? post the link here and ill give u $600 dollars so u can escape from the rings of death.

GermanShepard06

MONITORS, repeat after me, MONITORS......

NOT COMPUTERS you 1st grade drop out.

[QUOTE="Hewkii"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"]

where did i say computers cant do 1080p? post the link here and ill give u $600 dollars so u can escape from the rings of death.

GermanShepard06

MONITORS, repeat after me, MONITORS......

NOT COMPUTERS you 1st grade drop out.

    If not monitors, what have you used for your PCs display before HDTVs? Did you just look at the chasis and marvel at the noise the cooling fans make?

    And chill the insults, since it makes you look foolish.

[QUOTE="Hewkii"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"]

where did i say computers cant do 1080p? post the link here and ill give u $600 dollars so u can escape from the rings of death.

GermanShepard06

MONITORS, repeat after me, MONITORS......

NOT COMPUTERS you 1st grade drop out.

:lol: Now you're just getting desperate.

[QUOTE="GermanShepard06"][QUOTE="Hewkii"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"]

where did i say computers cant do 1080p? post the link here and ill give u $600 dollars so u can escape from the rings of death.

Hewkii

MONITORS, repeat after me, MONITORS......

NOT COMPUTERS you 1st grade drop out.

i dont think i have seen someone go this low in any forum i ever visited.

[QUOTE="Hewkii"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"][QUOTE="Hewkii"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"]

where did i say computers cant do 1080p? post the link here and ill give u $600 dollars so u can escape from the rings of death.

GermanShepard06

MONITORS, repeat after me, MONITORS......

NOT COMPUTERS you 1st grade drop out.

i dont think i have seen someone go this low in any forum i ever visited.

Did you not say that in your own post? :|

You like owning yourself don't you?

i dont think i have seen someone go this low in any forum i ever visited.

GermanShepard06