PS3 10 times stronger than Xbox 360 and 5 times stronger than 8800 GTS

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=9414174&postcount=476

uhhh.....ok? i dont get it:question:

but here for the lazy

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=9414174&postcount=476

I'm no technical boffin but doesn't that mean it loads quicker, not it's more powerful...

Call me when theres a PS3 game which looks 5 times better than Crysis and 10 times better than Bioshock.whocares4peace

In 2008 it is gonna happen

Call me when theres a PS3 game which looks 5 times better than Crysis and 10 times better than Bioshock.whocares4peace

There are PS3 games that clearly look better then Bioshock not 10x better but quite a bit better.

I have seen you post on n4g.com where you do nothing but bash the 360. But no where does it state the ps3 is x10 more powerfull than the 360! It loaded some textures faster WOW:roll: before making wild claims prove it properly please.Duckyindiana

What does that mean ? That mean it's more powerful lol.

[QUOTE="whocares4peace"]Call me when theres a PS3 game which looks 5 times better than Crysis and 10 times better than Bioshock.Polaris_choice

There are PS3 games that clearly look better then Bioshock not 10x better but quite a bit better.

Yes ! Uncharted, GT5

there are more

Too bad ray-tracing isn't used for games.

Isn't the TC the same guy that made a post that linked to his own blog on N4G yesterday? I think he is. Now we get to watch him link to a forum post on another board. Super!

[QUOTE="Polaris_choice"]

[QUOTE="whocares4peace"]Call me when theres a PS3 game which looks 5 times better than Crysis and 10 times better than Bioshock.Hydrolex

There are PS3 games that clearly look better then Bioshock not 10x better but quite a bit better.

Yes ! Uncharted, GT5

there are more

oh god :|

[QUOTE="whocares4peace"]Call me when theres a PS3 game which looks 5 times better than Crysis and 10 times better than Bioshock.Hydrolex

In 2008 it is gonna happen

good for you.

i remember seeing one of TC's quotes in someone's sig saying "ps3 never has framerate issues" :|

:lol:...the 360 is more powerful.

Thats a fact and it has better memory usage.

[QUOTE="Duckyindiana"]I have seen you post on n4g.com where you do nothing but bash the 360. But no where does it state the ps3 is x10 more powerfull than the 360! It loaded some textures faster WOW:roll: before making wild claims prove it properly please.Hydrolex

What does that mean ? That mean it's more powerful lol.

i really hope you're a fakeboy because you're making all cows look bad.

:lol:

No, just no.

Too bad ray-tracing isn't used for games.

Isn't the TC the same guy that made a post that linked to his own blog on N4G yesterday? I think he is. Now we get to watch him link to a forum post on another board. Super!

Bgrngod

:lol:...the 360 is more powerful.

Thats a fact and it has better memory usage.

-Ninja_Dog-

YEs ! it is more powerful than PS3 but in dream. Don't try to be marther luther king

:lol:...the 360 is more powerful.

Thats a fact and it has better memory usage.

-Ninja_Dog-

[QUOTE="Hydrolex"]

[QUOTE="Duckyindiana"]I have seen you post on n4g.com where you do nothing but bash the 360. But no where does it state the ps3 is x10 more powerfull than the 360! It loaded some textures faster WOW:roll: before making wild claims prove it properly please.shoeman12

What does that mean ? That mean it's more powerful lol.

i really hope you're a fakeboy because you're making all cows look bad.

No ! I hope you are not a 360 fan because you make them look bad. but you are a 360 fan

http://www.gamespot.com/users/shoeman12/games

PS3 is way powerful than 360. everyone knows except fanboys

[QUOTE="-Ninja_Dog-"]

:lol:...the 360 is more powerful.

Thats a fact and it has better memory usage.

Hydrolex

YEs ! it is more powerful than PS3 but in dream. Don't try to be marther luther king

never heard of him but i know martin luther king jr.

[QUOTE="Duckyindiana"]I have seen you post on n4g.com where you do nothing but bash the 360. But no where does it state the ps3 is x10 more powerfull than the 360! It loaded some textures faster WOW:roll: before making wild claims prove it properly please.Hydrolex

What does that mean ? That mean it's more powerful lol.

It doesn't mean it will produce better graphics. You need to start studying proper English before you will come here and argue about something you have no actual knowledege of.

[QUOTE="-Ninja_Dog-"]

:lol:...the 360 is more powerful.

Thats a fact and it has better memory usage.

Hydrolex

YEs ! it is more powerful than PS3 but in dream. Don't try to be marther luther king

ok :| :lol:

If there was ever a facepalm moment, this would be it...nicenator

im massive facepalming right now

[QUOTE="Bgrngod"]

Too bad ray-tracing isn't used for games.

Isn't the TC the same guy that made a post that linked to his own blog on N4G yesterday? I think he is. Now we get to watch him link to a forum post on another board. Super!

stereointegrity

I'd love to see a link proving that. Ray-Tracing is not something done for partial images, of which clouds would be part of. It is done for calculating lighting as accurately as possible. It's an extremely intensive process that runs entirely differently then 3D rendering done in games.

[QUOTE="Hydrolex"]

[QUOTE="Duckyindiana"]I have seen you post on n4g.com where you do nothing but bash the 360. But no where does it state the ps3 is x10 more powerfull than the 360! It loaded some textures faster WOW:roll: before making wild claims prove it properly please.Supafly1

What does that mean ? That mean it's more powerful lol.

It doesn't mean it will produce better graphics. You need to start studying proper English before you will come here and argue about something you have no actual knowledege of.

Um the PS3 is already producing better visuals and if you look at the titles coming out this year is pretty evident which is more powerful . I dont see why this is even up for debate. I own both platforms im sick of people calling me a cow because I defend the PS3. But the fact is I defend what is rightfully better. And in the area of visuals its pretty obvious. Yes the 360 has some superior( low quality) multiplats. But if you notice higher quality multiplats either look as good or better on the PS3 and the exclusives really seal the deal.

[QUOTE="stereointegrity"][QUOTE="Bgrngod"]

Too bad ray-tracing isn't used for games.

Isn't the TC the same guy that made a post that linked to his own blog on N4G yesterday? I think he is. Now we get to watch him link to a forum post on another board. Super!

Bgrngod

I'd love to see a link proving that. Ray-Tracing is not something done for partial images, of which clouds would be part of. It is done for calculating lighting as accurately as possible. It's an extremely intensive process that runs entirely differently then 3D rendering done in games.

Looks like 360 fans don't like to post somethingHydrolex

looks like most people know more than you do...

[QUOTE="shoeman12"][QUOTE="Hydrolex"]

[QUOTE="Duckyindiana"]I have seen you post on n4g.com where you do nothing but bash the 360. But no where does it state the ps3 is x10 more powerfull than the 360! It loaded some textures faster WOW:roll: before making wild claims prove it properly please.Hydrolex

What does that mean ? That mean it's more powerful lol.

i really hope you're a fakeboy because you're making all cows look bad.

No ! I hope you are not a 360 fan because you make them look bad. but you are a 360 fan

http://www.gamespot.com/users/shoeman12/games

PS3 is way powerful than 360. everyone knows except fanboys

I'm seeing a lot of GC games and a few Wii games in his collection. What is bad about being a 360 fan? Any real gamer would be one. Or do you not understand the difference between fakeboy, fanboy and fan? You need to spend more time READING in these forums instead of posting. It would do you a lot of good.

is this thread a joke? we all know ps3 is more powerful then God so why compare it with xflop 360?mingo123

Yes ! bro. I was here to proof it but damn ! they don't like to believe the truth.

is this thread a joke? we all know ps3 is more powerful then God so why compare it with xflop 360?mingo123

dont forget allah, l. ron hubbard, joseph smith, and ganesha.

lol do u know what that is talking about? BTW neogaf is a rumor mill site, they do alot to get ppl coming to their site...ps that isn't that it loads X textures in Y time... that is FLOATING point calculations done by the gpu, that means nothing in graphics....tsk.LibertySaint

OK Neogaf is BS

but do you agree PS3's cell is way powerful than 360's cell + ram ?

do you also agree

GPU Core clock speeds....

PS3's 550mhz

360's 500mhz

?

[QUOTE="LibertySaint"]lol do u know what that is talking about? BTW neogaf is a rumor mill site, they do alot to get ppl coming to their site...ps that isn't that it loads X textures in Y time... that is FLOATING point calculations done by the gpu, that means nothing in graphics....tsk.Hydrolex

OK Neogaf is BS

but do you agree PS3's cell is way powerful than 360's cell + ram ?

do you also agree

GPU Core clock speeds....

PS3's 550mhz

360's 500mhz

?

teh cell? that useless thing sony abandoned?

one and its on a graphic engine, the ps3 does that on the pro fx graphics engine, so obviously that engine is optimized for the ps3. its like the unreal engine is diffrent, like listed in that forums there in the screens of that porgram, u choose what engine to run the textures in, apprently the ps3 load textures in the pro fx engine in that time while the others don;t. In engine like unreal its reverse with gts on tope, 360 then ps3....so yeah...tsk....u don't even know what the screens are about the forum is about. u just see ps3 performing well and the cow goes wild! just like the floating point calcualations that barely matter.

lol look at this screen, this program and engine was based from the ps3. that means the 360 and gts are simulating that ps3 at those times, meaning ported to those without optimzation, this thing is for the ps3 i'll prove it. here is a screen and look at the sony logo at the botom. Sony made this to be used for devs, like dev kits, but this can be used for middle war as well...LOl u fail

[QUOTE="mingo123"]is this thread a joke? we all know ps3 is more powerful then God so why compare it with xflop 360?istreakforfood

dont forget allah, l. ron hubbard, joseph smith, and ganesha.

OK Neogaf is BS

but do you agree PS3's cell is way powerful than 360's cell + ram ?

do you also agree

GPU Core clock speeds....

PS3's 550mhz

360's 500mhz

?

Hydrolex

Do you even know what that means ?

Given Mass Effect is BY MILES the best looking console title, AND is not even made for 360 ground up, but uses a licensed multiplatform engine that Bioware had no control over, then what is there to say ?

360 is CLEARLY vastly superior to PS3 from what i SEE, i do not care if you give 1000 links with specs and white papers, when in games i see 360 going VASTLY ahead of anything PS3 can come up with

Really sad for a 500$ machine