This topic is locked from further discussion.
I'm no technical boffin but doesn't that mean it loads quicker, not it's more powerful...
bobbetybob
Doesn't faster loading take a faster processing unit?
[QUOTE="NWA_31"]Texture generation time =/= power... :|:?:lol:Hydrolex
3 red rings of death = POWER
:lol: TC admits defeat on the first page.
Umm...err... think I've lost the arguement. "The 360 gets RROD" ha ha I win.
well first off u got the math wrong, dee duh dee
1 min =/= 10 times 10 sec.... with that data (if correct) its 6X .... my god what has system wars come to ?
[QUOTE="Polaris_choice"][QUOTE="whocares4peace"]Call me when theres a PS3 game which looks 5 times better than Crysis and 10 times better than Bioshock.Hydrolex
There are PS3 games that clearly look better then Bioshock not 10x better but quite a bit better.
Yes ! Uncharted, GT5
there are more
gta 5 isnt even out, so dont bother posting it
[QUOTE="NWA_31"]Texture generation time =/= power... :|:?:lol:Hydrolex
3 red rings of death = POWER
Non-sequitur FTL
[QUOTE="whocares4peace"]Call me when theres a PS3 game which looks 5 times better than Crysis and 10 times better than Bioshock.Hydrolex
In 2008 it is gonna happen
this post is full of win. sig'ed
This is the 8800GTS running CoD4 @ a little over 1080p native with 4xAA and 16xAF, now the PS3 runs it @ 600p 2xAA and 0xAF, note the PS3 runs CoD4 no where even close to the 8800GTS. Where is the 5x the power.muscleserge
Um does COD4 use the tech being talked about..no
[QUOTE="muscleserge"] This is the 8800GTS running CoD4 @ a little over 1080p native with 4xAA and 16xAF, now the PS3 runs it @ 600p 2xAA and 0xAF, note the PS3 runs CoD4 no where even close to the 8800GTS. Where is the 5x the power.killzowned24
Um does COD4 use the tech being talked about..no
umm who cares the 8800gts model used in this chart isn't even as good as a 8800gt which the TC was talking about you'd get better frames then whats posted here so big deal its not going to help his pointCall me when theres a PS3 game which looks 5 times better than Crysis and 10 times better than Bioshock.whocares4peace
amazing... end of thread...
[QUOTE="whocares4peace"]Call me when theres a PS3 game which looks 5 times better than Crysis and 10 times better than Bioshock.colmusterd28
amazing... end of thread...
Topic started again
Uncharted Drakes Fortune looks 10 times better than Bioshock.
Crysis cannot run at high settings with an 8800 GTs so YES Uncharted pwns both of them
[QUOTE="colmusterd28"][QUOTE="whocares4peace"]Call me when theres a PS3 game which looks 5 times better than Crysis and 10 times better than Bioshock.Hydrolex
amazing... end of thread...
Topic started again
Uncharted Drakes Fortune looks 10 times better than Bioshock.
Crysis cannot run at high settings with an 8800 GTs so YES Uncharted pwns both of them
yes it can....and Crysis looks better than uncharted even at a lower setting.
[QUOTE="NWA_31"]Texture generation time =/= power... :|:?:lol:Hydrolex
3 red rings of death = POWER
since when did the 8800gts get the rrod? no ps3 will ever beat what the 8800gts can do
[QUOTE="Polaris_choice"][QUOTE="whocares4peace"]Call me when theres a PS3 game which looks 5 times better than Crysis and 10 times better than Bioshock.Hydrolex
There are PS3 games that clearly look better then Bioshock not 10x better but quite a bit better.
Yes ! Uncharted, GT5
there are more
hardly, they both look awesome, and crysis? ps3 can't do that while the 8800gts can.
[QUOTE="whocares4peace"]Call me when theres a PS3 game which looks 5 times better than Crysis and 10 times better than Bioshock.Hydrolex
In 2008 it is gonna happen
LOL.. no matter how many times a read a post like that I must laugh. I HOPE it's gonna finaly happen for you ps3 gamers. Then hopefuly you can all go away and play games and stop posting about how much better the ps3 is. I don't even think people care anymore if the ps3 is better..
[QUOTE="Hydrolex"][QUOTE="NWA_31"]Texture generation time =/= power... :|:?:lol:imprezawrx500
3 red rings of death = POWER
since when did the 8800gts get the rrod? no ps3 will ever beat what the 8800gts can do
our sigs have something in common :lol:
[QUOTE="Supafly1"][QUOTE="Hydrolex"][QUOTE="Duckyindiana"]I have seen you post on n4g.com where you do nothing but bash the 360. But no where does it state the ps3 is x10 more powerfull than the 360! It loaded some textures faster WOW:roll: before making wild claims prove it properly please.Hydrolex
What does that mean ? That mean it's more powerful lol.
It doesn't mean it will produce better graphics. You need to start studying proper English before you will come here and argue about something you have no actual knowledege of.
well, another lemming. all 360 fans think they have knowledege. It's not new
most cows don't have a clue what they are talking about
Looks like 360 fans don't like to post somethingHydrolexTo be fair, you waited an entire 4 minutes before posting the quoted comment.
Anyway, this is so obvious that you should be embarrassed for making such a big deal of it. Procedural content generation is highly parallel - just start a worker thread for every core you want to dedicate to it loaded with the functions you'll be using (you know the composition of the workload beforehand, so you know how many threads to dedicate to each function), and start feeding them the workload (again, you know the composition beforehand, so you can organize the needed data in memory). However, if your code doesn't lend itself so well to threading, you're not going to see this level of performance - anything that introduces resource contention or steps that must be performed serially, and your beautiful vision of 6 threads churning away falls apart fast.
So, the question I put to you: what parts of game code are similar to this task?
wow hydolex really needs to learn to stop and learn to be defeated, the ps3 isn't some amazing powerful machine, its like any other gaming machine and it doesn't outperform anything by what your trying to say. its equal, worse and better in some parts, just like the 360 and the pc. heck pc hardware is superior but games aren't always frequent on pc, but when it does get games, they are awsome, i'l takin the witcher, crysis, ut 3...which the ps3 got a port of...which runs at a lock ed 30 fp...with less polygons....so said by mark rein...thats how the optimized the ps3. took out polys no one would notice until the took apart the ps3 game. its not a bad things it s agood thing cows, because u get ut 3 and it looks good unless u critque it and compare with the pc....anyways....
ps tc...if this is true, why does ut 3 on ps3 not look better then a comp running it on a 8800gts at 110fps. when the ps3 gets only 30....hmmm oh and 60 in MP,. 30 in SP. look it up.
[QUOTE="colmusterd28"][QUOTE="whocares4peace"]Call me when theres a PS3 game which looks 5 times better than Crysis and 10 times better than Bioshock.Hydrolex
amazing... end of thread...
Topic started again
Uncharted Drakes Fortune looks 10 times better than Bioshock.
Crysis cannot run at high settings with an 8800 GTs so YES Uncharted pwns both of them
if you play it at 720p you can get very high settings what are you talking about ?The PS3 has better hardware than the 360.. that is a fact that no one can deny, better processor, better graphics card and better storage media (blue-ray) which can carry more than "TWICE" the data a double layer HdDVD, thus there is more potential.
how ever, if game designers dont take advantage of that and use it properly.. that isn't the machines fault, the PS3 has more potential than the 360 and with time game designers will take advantage of that and then we will see the true difference between the 2 machines..
btw.. the 360's controller works on batteries !! seriously :P lolThis is using what the Cell is good at in a very unfair manner, and not only that, this is like really, really old, as this was brought up in 2007.
EDIT: Joke is on me, this is from just about 2007....
QUIT BUMPING OLD THREADS!
[QUOTE="Hydrolex"][QUOTE="LibertySaint"]lol do u know what that is talking about? BTW neogaf is a rumor mill site, they do alot to get ppl coming to their site...ps that isn't that it loads X textures in Y time... that is FLOATING point calculations done by the gpu, that means nothing in graphics....tsk.LibertySaint
OK Neogaf is BS
but do you agree PS3's cell is way powerful than 360's cell + ram ?
do you also agree
GPU Core clock speeds....
PS3's 550mhz
360's 500mhz
?
No i don;t agree because the core cloe speed for the 360's gpu is 700 mhz...u fail the ps3's is 550 tho yes. and no the ps3 is's cell is not way more power then thes 360's cell because the 360 doesn't have one! its has a custom based pc cpu. the ram is shared and doesn't have dos ram or main ram like the ps3 which goes at a speed of 3.2gz its xdr ram the cell uses for its main ram and its crap for gomtery memory storing. its only used for the cell and there for is used for ai, physics and if the cell does do rendering it is generall lightig because the cell bottle necks to much, so if it has to do ai, physics and rendering the cell would drag the game down to a 5 fps thing.
The core speed for the Xenos is 500Mhz, the RAM clock speed is 700Mhz.
EDIT: But either way, this Hydro dude has no clue what hes talking about, clock speed doesn't mean something is more powerfull.
We all know the PS3 is more powerful but as we learned in the last gen that its not who has the most powerful hardware that is important its what console has the most games that gamer wants to play
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment