I can understand why MAG looked so horrible, but geez they can't even step it up for their own flagship franchise.
Link
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Socom has never been about graphics. It's been about its great tactical gameplay.i5750at4GhzThe graphics look like ass. So it better be priced at $20.
Yes because Socom Confrontation (not Zipper I know) and MAG had some good gameplay, right?Blixxed
MAG is a great game overall and as far as Confrontation goes, it had great gameplay as well.
Confrontation had the gameplay department on lock down, it was just everything else that sucked: Laggy menus, numerous bugs and glitches, missing standard shooter features, missing features advertised on the box (lol).
maybe its a bomb-proof suit:Why is the guys face so small behind the mask in the second pic??
noodlevixen
havent played mag , but yes confrontation has great gameplay Mag had great gameplay. I think people just mainly bash it because it's not Call of Duty and you can't be a one man wrecking crew.[QUOTE="Blixxed"]Yes because Socom Confrontation (not Zipper I know) and MAG had some good gameplay, right?ultraking
[QUOTE="noodlevixen"]maybe its a bomb-proof suit:Why is the guys face so small behind the mask in the second pic??
raskullibur
The graphics are fine and the game looks ok but to name this Socom is the problem it looks horrible for a Socom game. Straight bastardization of the once great Socom 2 sigh...It'll look better in motion.
anotherone10
In this day and age all games look just fine to me. 20 years ago we would've peed on ourselves if we would've known the visual quality of modern games.
Because Sony doesn't care about SOCOM anymore.
It died when PS3 was announced because they shifted their focus to garbage FPS games like Killzone, MAG and Resistance.
RIP SOCOM. Gave me great memoriess during the PS2 era..
Well I'm sure the people who enjoy the semi-realistic gameplay will still enjoy it.tagyhag
No they wont Zipper doesnt care about the real Socom fans they are just trying to apeal to the CoD crowd
[QUOTE="tagyhag"]Well I'm sure the people who enjoy the semi-realistic gameplay will still enjoy it._Judge_Gabranth
No they wont Zipper doesnt care about the real Socom fans they are just trying to apeal to the CoD crowd
Theres a Classic Game Mode in SOCOM 4. What does COD have to do with a TPS ?Socom has never been about graphics. It's been about its great tactical gameplay.i5750at4Ghzgameplay should always come before graphics imo, if you can have nice graphics to then thats a bonus, but if the gameplay is solid then theres no point in bashing the graphics
[QUOTE="i5750at4Ghz"]Socom has never been about graphics. It's been about its great tactical gameplay.Locutus_PicardThe graphics look like ass. So it better be priced at $20.
I bet if they added some blur, MLAA, more blur, and made it linear it'd be one of the best lookin games on the PS3.
:P
huh? that doesnt make any sense.[QUOTE="xsatyr86"]
Bad graphics or not thegame looks like trash.
ultraking
Sry should clarify. I mean looks like trash as in the game is going to suck. I was not referring to aesthetics.
Edit: So basically bad graphics or not the game is going to suck.
[QUOTE="BedBugMan"]So when Sony launches a graphical beast (UC, KZ) cows get flamed for flaunting the graphics... but when Sony launches an average looking game, they get bashed...xsatyr86
They get flamed for claiming console graphics king, second place is cool...
Second place to the PC in graphics you mean?Good gameplay doesn't take up all the dev time, Socom will probably turn out to be rushed trash and flop along with GT ad Killzone.Blixxed
Bad graphics or not thegame looks like trash.
xsatyr86
how nice of both of you to have such positive thoughts about a game which many people put hours into make, how lovely it is that you feel like supporting the game industry is best achieved by bashing a game which you have never got your hands on
[QUOTE="Blixxed"]Good gameplay doesn't take up all the dev time, Socom will probably turn out to be rushed trash and flop along with GT ad Killzone.linkin_guy109
Bad graphics or not thegame looks like trash.
xsatyr86
how nice of both of you to have such positive thoughts about a game which many people put hours into make, how lovely it is that you feel like supporting the game industry is best achieved by bashing a game which you have never got your hands on
In my life I put many hours in quite a few things that did not pan out. So I don't care about the hours put into the game if it still looks stale. Also I do not see what is wrong with having a negative opinion about a game so don't question my support. The way I support the game industry is by buying games I like, thx for playing.
[QUOTE="xsatyr86"][QUOTE="BedBugMan"]So when Sony launches a graphical beast (UC, KZ) cows get flamed for flaunting the graphics... but when Sony launches an average looking game, they get bashed...BedBugMan
They get flamed for claiming console graphics king, second place is cool...
Second place to the PC in graphics you mean?No to the wii...
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment