This topic is locked from further discussion.
So?web966
one PS3> 25 PCs :D THHBO
606 (ps3 tflops) / 152 (windows pc tflops) = 4
4 * 159823(active pcs) = 639292 (# of pcs to do 606 tflops)
639292 / 24747 (active ps3s) = 25.8 windows Pcs per 1 ps3
[QUOTE="wolverine4262"]What does this have to do with gaming!?kentlucky
No games to play=lots of time for folding. ;)
Actually, if you learn to read charts, there have only been a little over 26,000 PS3 folders. Which is a fraction of the PS3 user base. Which is somewhat sad, since people should definitely run the program when they can, but it just destroys your argument.[QUOTE="web966"]So?xxxxThe_GoaTxxx
[QUOTE="kentlucky"][QUOTE="wolverine4262"]What does this have to do with gaming!?KeyWii
No games to play=lots of time for folding. ;)
Actually, if you learn to read charts, there have only been a little over 26,000 PS3 folders. Which is a fraction of the PS3 user base. my point is that what place does this have on SW? Why does it matter?[QUOTE="wolverine4262"]What does this have to do with gaming!?-KinGz-IT HELPS, I actually like this don't be like that! No.... NO.... I'm not saying it shouldn't be done, I just don't see why it needs to be on here.....
[QUOTE="kentlucky"][QUOTE="wolverine4262"]What does this have to do with gaming!?KeyWii
No games to play=lots of time for folding. ;)
Actually, if you learn to read charts, there have only been a little over 26,000 PS3 folders. Which is a fraction of the PS3 user base. Which is somewhat sad, since people should definitely run the program when they can, but it just destroys your argument. Relax dude, it was just a joke. Methinks you take your loyalty to your little black folding box waaaay too seriously. Â
[QUOTE="KeyWii"][QUOTE="kentlucky"][QUOTE="wolverine4262"]What does this have to do with gaming!?kentlucky
No games to play=lots of time for folding. ;)
Actually, if you learn to read charts, there have only been a little over 26,000 PS3 folders. Which is a fraction of the PS3 user base. Which is somewhat sad, since people should definitely run the program when they can, but it just destroys your argument.Relax dude, it was just a joke. Methinks you take your loyalty to your little black folding box waaaay too seriously.
It's a joke thats repeated so often by fanboys it's become more of a mantra.[QUOTE="kentlucky"][QUOTE="KeyWii"][QUOTE="kentlucky"][QUOTE="wolverine4262"]What does this have to do with gaming!?KeyWii
No games to play=lots of time for folding. ;)
Actually, if you learn to read charts, there have only been a little over 26,000 PS3 folders. Which is a fraction of the PS3 user base. Which is somewhat sad, since people should definitely run the program when they can, but it just destroys your argument.Relax dude, it was just a joke. Methinks you take your loyalty to your little black folding box waaaay too seriously.
It's a joke thats repeated so often by fanboys it's become more of a mantra. you know, most of the time, I frankly think you're talking madness keywii...but, for once, I utterly, completely agree with this thread. hell will soon start to freeze over, I'm sure of it.one PS3> 25 PCs :D THHBO
606 (ps3 tflops) / 152 (windows pc tflops) = 4
4 * 159823(active pcs) = 639292 (# of pcs to do 606 tflops)
639292 / 24747 (active ps3s) = 25.8 windows Pcs per 1 ps3
ultima-flare
 Thats because PC's use general purpose CPU's not cut down graphics cards. If you look at the GPU section of the numbers http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=6609
You will see that GPU's are averaging more then twice the GFlops as the PS3's. Once Nvidia cards can do this and more people upgrade to the x19xx/X20xx/8xxx series of GPU's (there are only 700 folding right now) They will totally destroy the PS3's.
Nah, they got a bit less than half of what the PC graphics cards are doing. 40.1 PS3s per tflop, 17 graphics cards per tflop - compared to 151 PC CPUs per tflop haha. Nice try, though! And the graphics cards are doing it with only one core @ 500-700mhz vs. the PS3's ~3200MHz and one core + SPE's, while the GPU by itself is also drawing less power than the PS3 as a whole. :D It just mostly illustrates architecture differences, like I said in the other thread.Just 25000 ps3 and it still more than doubled every other folding at home device's combined power...
munu9
[QUOTE="munu9"]Nah, they got a bit less than half of what the PC graphics cards are doing. 40.1 PS3s per tflop, 17 graphics cards per tflop - compared to 151 PC CPUs per tflop haha. Nice try, though! And the graphics cards are doing it with only one core @ 500-700mhz vs. the PS3's ~3200MHz and one core + SPE's, while the GPU by itself is also drawing less power than the PS3 as a whole. :D It just mostly illustrates architecture differences, like I said in the other thread.Just 25000 ps3 and it still more than doubled every other folding at home device's combined power...
Makari
Â
Yep I have been saying this for a while. Its all about architecture. Remember the Cell was originally intended to do all the graphics processign itself so its alot like a GPU in design. PC CPU's are intended only for general purpose code. The heavy math stuff is offloaded to the GPU.
Good but, the 360s GPU is still better :PKillaHalo2o9
Â
Its about equal to the X1900's doing the folding. The PS3's GPU is a G70 derivative so it cant do Folding@Home. If they made a program like this for the 360 it they could probably use the GPU so it would destroy the PS3 cell or no cell. I doubt its possible unless MS allows general internet access from the Xbox 360 though.Â
they cured cancer on a mouse using some weird indian spice. Indian spice PWNZ PSFl0P!!!!!!11111 LOLoLOLOLollOlOL
Calm, down keywii....I'm kidding
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment