PS3 Lead platform - COD4 runs better on PS3

  • 74 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Hydrolex
Hydrolex

1648

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#1 Hydrolex
Member since 2007 • 1648 Posts
Finally, it appears as though a developer is taking the right approach when producing games for next-generation consoles. After almost a year of poor ports and all sorts of discussions about how multi-console games looked worse on the PS3, owners of Sony's latest home console can breathe a sigh of relief.

Infinity Ward, the developers behind the highly acclaimed Call of Duty 4: Modern Warefare, admitted in an interview that they had their best coders working on the PS3 version of one of this holiday's most anticipated games.

"We had our best programmers on the PS3 [version of Call of Duty] and it shows," commented Infinity Ward studio head Vince Zampella.

This has also been part of the reason why Sony's version of the game has a bigger online capacity (24 maximum vs. the 360's maximum of eighteen) as well as better visuals on the PlayStation platform.

"We had two separate teams working on both versions from the start," Zampella says, adding, "Most developers only focus on a single platform, then quickly port the game over to another one. You don't get very good results that way".

This bit of information is reassuring, as hopefully more and more developers will start developing equally for both platforms and even feature the PlayStation 3 as the lead platform. Also interesting is that most of the Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare TV spots also exclusively promoted the PlayStation 3 version of the game.
Avatar image for Jynxzor
Jynxzor

9313

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#2 Jynxzor
Member since 2003 • 9313 Posts

1. Old news

2. Your going to get a flood of lems in here whinging about how, the online service was broken for a few weeks.

Avatar image for DarkRecruit
DarkRecruit

3391

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#3 DarkRecruit
Member since 2005 • 3391 Posts
My PC runs it at 1600x1200, 16x AF, all max, 4x AA with 40-60 FPS.
Avatar image for Always-Honest
Always-Honest

11261

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Always-Honest
Member since 2007 • 11261 Posts

but the 360 version looks better... and the PS3 online doesn't WORK....

this article is old and was meant to give ps3 owners hope.

Avatar image for stefanlek
stefanlek

802

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#5 stefanlek
Member since 2007 • 802 Posts
About time
Avatar image for OGTiago
OGTiago

6546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#6 OGTiago
Member since 2005 • 6546 Posts
Not from what I've read.
Avatar image for chikenfriedrice
chikenfriedrice

13561

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 chikenfriedrice
Member since 2006 • 13561 Posts
I thought the 360 version looks better????
Avatar image for VideoGameGuy
VideoGameGuy

7695

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 VideoGameGuy
Member since 2002 • 7695 Posts
Not that i care, but unspoken forum rules says you need a link for this kind of info.
Avatar image for Hydrolex
Hydrolex

1648

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#9 Hydrolex
Member since 2007 • 1648 Posts

I thought the 360 version looks better????chikenfriedrice

It looks better but not better than PS3 ahahahahah

Avatar image for ball_of_air
ball_of_air

2105

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 ball_of_air
Member since 2007 • 2105 Posts

but the 360 version looks better... and the PS3 online doesn't WORK....

this article is old and was meant to give ps3 owners hope.

Always-Honest

Seeing as how you've obviously played it (PS3) to come to that conclusion, what problems does it have for you that I haven't appeared to experience? You have played it, remember.;)

Avatar image for D_Znuhtz
D_Znuhtz

2276

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#11 D_Znuhtz
Member since 2004 • 2276 Posts

My PC runs it at 1600x1200, 16x AF, all max, 4x AA with 40-60 FPS.DarkRecruit

And hermits wonder why they aren't wanted here.

Avatar image for Always-Honest
Always-Honest

11261

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 Always-Honest
Member since 2007 • 11261 Posts
[QUOTE="Always-Honest"]

but the 360 version looks better... and the PS3 online doesn't WORK....

this article is old and was meant to give ps3 owners hope.

ball_of_air

Seeing as how you've obviously played it (PS3) to come to that conclusion, what problems does it have for you that I haven't appeared to experience? You have played it, remember.;)

it's kind of common knowledge that the PS3 version had big online problems.... are you going to deny that while it was on the boards 24/7?

Avatar image for NinjaMunkey01
NinjaMunkey01

7485

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#14 NinjaMunkey01
Member since 2007 • 7485 Posts

I thought the 360 version looks better????chikenfriedrice

The ps3 one is better, but not by much. Just play the games stop these sill y contests to see wich version has the extra frame per second, or which one has one less jaggie. JUST PLAY THE FREAKIN GAME!!!!!

Avatar image for stefanlek
stefanlek

802

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#15 stefanlek
Member since 2007 • 802 Posts
[QUOTE="ball_of_air"][QUOTE="Always-Honest"]

but the 360 version looks better... and the PS3 online doesn't WORK....

this article is old and was meant to give ps3 owners hope.

Hydrolex

Seeing as how you've obviously played it (PS3) to come to that conclusion, what problems does it have for you that I haven't appeared to experience? You have played it, remember.;)

Just ignore that that always-Honest ? Always-Liar , Always-Fanboy.

Why do you think Xbox 360 version looks better because it's darker and Ps3 looks a little bit washed out ? change your TV's gamma and you'll see PS3 looks very realastic and better

Hes not always a fanboy

Avatar image for Always-Honest
Always-Honest

11261

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 Always-Honest
Member since 2007 • 11261 Posts
[QUOTE="ball_of_air"][QUOTE="Always-Honest"]

but the 360 version looks better... and the PS3 online doesn't WORK....

this article is old and was meant to give ps3 owners hope.

Hydrolex

Seeing as how you've obviously played it (PS3) to come to that conclusion, what problems does it have for you that I haven't appeared to experience? You have played it, remember.;)

Just ignore that that always-Honest ? Always-Liar , Always-Fanboy.

Why do you think Xbox 360 version looks better because it's darker and Ps3 looks a little bit washed out ? change your TV's gamma and you'll see PS3 looks very realastic and better

always honest. but some fanboys can't stand critisism on a product they bought.

Avatar image for Koolsen
Koolsen

8054

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#17 Koolsen
Member since 2004 • 8054 Posts
They look exactly the same to me.... maybe we should call on those useless pixel counters.
Avatar image for XanderZane
XanderZane

5174

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#18 XanderZane
Member since 2006 • 5174 Posts

but the 360 version looks better... and the PS3 online doesn't WORK....

this article is old and was meant to give ps3 owners hope.

Always-Honest

Yes very old and I don't think anyone really cares to be honest. Both games are excellent on both the PS3 and the XBox 360 and that's really all that matters.

Avatar image for Hydrolex
Hydrolex

1648

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#19 Hydrolex
Member since 2007 • 1648 Posts
[QUOTE="Hydrolex"][QUOTE="ball_of_air"][QUOTE="Always-Honest"]

but the 360 version looks better... and the PS3 online doesn't WORK....

this article is old and was meant to give ps3 owners hope.

stefanlek

Seeing as how you've obviously played it (PS3) to come to that conclusion, what problems does it have for you that I haven't appeared to experience? You have played it, remember.;)

Just ignore that that always-Honest ? Always-Liar , Always-Fanboy.

Why do you think Xbox 360 version looks better because it's darker and Ps3 looks a little bit washed out ? change your TV's gamma and you'll see PS3 looks very realastic and better

Hes not always a fanboy

Ok Sometimes_Fanboy but not Always_Honest

Avatar image for Always-Honest
Always-Honest

11261

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 Always-Honest
Member since 2007 • 11261 Posts

Ok Sometimes_Fanboy but not Always_Honest

Hydrolex

Gamer_fanboy. not limited by misplaced loyalty to a product i bought. cry all you want. most know i'm criticall but unbiased.

Avatar image for Always-Honest
Always-Honest

11261

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 Always-Honest
Member since 2007 • 11261 Posts
[QUOTE="Always-Honest"]

but the 360 version looks better... and the PS3 online doesn't WORK....

this article is old and was meant to give ps3 owners hope.

XanderZane

Yes very old and I don't think anyone really cares to be honest. Both games are excellent on both the PS3 and the XBox 360 and that's really all that matters.

very true. Infinity Ward did an excellent job. The differences are only noticable when you really look for them. not when you are playing the game.

Avatar image for Always-Honest
Always-Honest

11261

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 Always-Honest
Member since 2007 • 11261 Posts

Just ignore that that always-Honest ? Always-Liar , Always-Fanboy.

Why do you think Xbox 360 version looks better because it's darker and Ps3 looks a little bit washed out ? change your TV's gamma and you'll see PS3 looks very realastic and better

Hydrolex

since we have a different opinion on what honest is, i'll say something in YOUR definition of honesty:

"CoD4 on the PS3 did NEVER have any problems online". here you go. you bought the perfect product.

Avatar image for oldskooler79
oldskooler79

1632

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 oldskooler79
Member since 2004 • 1632 Posts

LOL. I run this game at 1920x1200 on my pc with faster framerate and tons sharper visuals then any console. Before you ridicule me, I bought this game for my PS3 too. I ended up taking it back due to worse visuals then the pc counterpart, plus online and about every other aspect didn't feel as good. While I suppose it was great on PS3, in my mind it was taking a giant step backward from my rig.

Just another great title on console, and perfect on pc.

Avatar image for D_Znuhtz
D_Znuhtz

2276

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#24 D_Znuhtz
Member since 2004 • 2276 Posts
[QUOTE="Always-Honest"]

but the 360 version looks better... and the PS3 online doesn't WORK....

this article is old and was meant to give ps3 owners hope.

ball_of_air

Seeing as how you've obviously played it (PS3) to come to that conclusion, what problems does it have for you that I haven't appeared to experience? You have played it, remember.;)

It's awesome how fanboys take a rumor and run with it (it goes both ways, believe me I know). I have the PS3 version and while the servers have been going down, the online isn't "broken". Servers crash. Kind of like how "things break".

Besides the servers crashing (which has only happened to me a few times), there is nothing wrong with it. Voice works fine, no lag, no stat or rank problems, and guess what? It's free.

Avatar image for killab2oo5
killab2oo5

13621

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 killab2oo5
Member since 2005 • 13621 Posts
My PC runs it at 1600x1200, 16x AF, all max, 4x AA with 40-60 FPS.DarkRecruit
o.O Who's talking about the PC version? -.-' Ugh...annoying "hermits".
Avatar image for D_Znuhtz
D_Znuhtz

2276

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#26 D_Znuhtz
Member since 2004 • 2276 Posts

LOL. I run this game at 1920x1200 on my pc with faster framerate and tons sharper visuals then any console. Before you ridicule me, I bought this game for my PS3 too. I ended up taking it back due to worse visuals then the pc counterpart, plus online and about every other aspect didn't feel as good. While I suppose it was great on PS3, in my mind it was taking a giant step backward from my rig.

Just another great title on console, and perfect on pc.

oldskooler79

Whoa wait. Are you saying that PC's with top-end components look better than consoles?!?!?!??!! NOWAI!!

...

:lol:

/insert migraine man ASCII

Avatar image for MaximumD
MaximumD

1506

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#27 MaximumD
Member since 2007 • 1506 Posts
[QUOTE="Always-Honest"]

but the 360 version looks better... and the PS3 online doesn't WORK....

this article is old and was meant to give ps3 owners hope.

XanderZane

Yes very old and I don't think anyone really cares to be honest. Both games are excellent on both the PS3 and the XBox 360 and that's really all that matters.

Oh, but when Virtual Fighter 5 looks a little better than the PS3 versions, almost all Lemmings go crazy about it. Great sense.

Avatar image for D_Znuhtz
D_Znuhtz

2276

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#28 D_Znuhtz
Member since 2004 • 2276 Posts

[QUOTE="DarkRecruit"]My PC runs it at 1600x1200, 16x AF, all max, 4x AA with 40-60 FPS.killab2oo5
o.O Who's talking about the PC version? -.-' Ugh...annoying "hermits".

Haha. They wonder why everyone wants to kick them in the junk. "MY PC CAN DURRRR". :P

This is coming from someone who OWNS a gaming rig, and not a half bad one at that. Hermits, buy a console and join the rest of us in multiplatform gaming.

Avatar image for D_Znuhtz
D_Znuhtz

2276

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#29 D_Znuhtz
Member since 2004 • 2276 Posts
[QUOTE="XanderZane"][QUOTE="Always-Honest"]

but the 360 version looks better... and the PS3 online doesn't WORK....

this article is old and was meant to give ps3 owners hope.

MaximumD

Yes very old and I don't think anyone really cares to be honest. Both games are excellent on both the PS3 and the XBox 360 and that's really all that matters.

Oh, but when Virtual Fighter 5 looks a little better than the PS3 versions, almost all Lemmings go crazy about it. Great sense.

Just thinking about playing VF5 on that D-pad makes me vomit in my mouth a little.

Avatar image for D_Znuhtz
D_Znuhtz

2276

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#30 D_Znuhtz
Member since 2004 • 2276 Posts
[QUOTE="XanderZane"][QUOTE="Always-Honest"]

but the 360 version looks better... and the PS3 online doesn't WORK....

this article is old and was meant to give ps3 owners hope.

Always-Honest

Yes very old and I don't think anyone really cares to be honest. Both games are excellent on both the PS3 and the XBox 360 and that's really all that matters.

very true. Infinity Ward did an excellent job. The differences are only noticable when you really look for them. not when you are playing the game.

I don't even notice any when I really look for them.

Avatar image for Always-Honest
Always-Honest

11261

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 Always-Honest
Member since 2007 • 11261 Posts

It's awesome how fanboys take a rumor and run with it.

D_Znuhtz

the problems with CoD4 online on PS3 are not a rumor. they were discussed many times by concerned consumers. Saying nothing happened will not help. you payed for a product that should just work. Luckaly they can patch a lot of issues nowadays.

Avatar image for Private_Vegas
Private_Vegas

2783

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 Private_Vegas
Member since 2007 • 2783 Posts

Indeed they did get it right. Hopefully more developers get into the habit of making both versions of a multiplat at the same time instead of porting. The stark contrastin the quality of the finished product between the two methods is really something.

Avatar image for thinicer
thinicer

3704

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 thinicer
Member since 2006 • 3704 Posts

Finally, it appears as though a developer is taking the right approach when producing games for next-generation consoles. After almost a year of poor ports and all sorts of discussions about how multi-console games looked worse on the PS3, owners of Sony's latest home console can breathe a sigh of relief.

Infinity Ward, the developers behind the highly acclaimed Call of Duty 4: Modern Warefare, admitted in an interview that they had their best coders working on the PS3 version of one of this holiday's most anticipated games.

"We had our best programmers on the PS3 [version of Call of Duty] and it shows," commented Infinity Ward studio head Vince Zampella.

This has also been part of the reason why Sony's version of the game has a bigger online capacity (24 maximum vs. the 360's maximum of eighteen) as well as better visuals on the PlayStation platform.

"We had two separate teams working on both versions from the start," Zampella says, adding, "Most developers only focus on a single platform, then quickly port the game over to another one. You don't get very good results that way".

This bit of information is reassuring, as hopefully more and more developers will start developing equally for both platforms and even feature the PlayStation 3 as the lead platform. Also interesting is that most of the Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare TV spots also exclusively promoted the PlayStation 3 version of the game.Hydrolex

LOL at this post.

Look at their direct quotes. Where do they say that COD4 runs better on PS3? There are only two direct quotes from Infinity Ward. The rest of the story is the writer making sweeping assumptions and taking things out of context. When Infinity Ward says, "and it shows", they're talking about how both the Xbox 360 and PS3 versions of their game, compared to other multi-plat titles, are on parity with each other when usually it's the PS3 version of multiplats that suffers a bit in performance and graphics.

By the way, that story also mentions how the PS3 version of COD 4 is 24 players online. WTF? It's 18. Same as Xbox 360. That is purely 100% false so I find it hard to believe the rest of the article. The PC version is the only one that has more than 18 players.

We have seen side-by-side comparisons of both versions, game websites that have reviewed both versions, and everybody who has seen and played the game says that they are 100% identical. Everybody should be happy about it.

Avatar image for Always-Honest
Always-Honest

11261

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 Always-Honest
Member since 2007 • 11261 Posts

[QUOTE="Hydrolex"]Finally, it appears as though a developer is taking the right approach when producing games for next-generation consoles. After almost a year of poor ports and all sorts of discussions about how multi-console games looked worse on the PS3, owners of Sony's latest home console can breathe a sigh of relief.

Infinity Ward, the developers behind the highly acclaimed Call of Duty 4: Modern Warefare, admitted in an interview that they had their best coders working on the PS3 version of one of this holiday's most anticipated games.

"We had our best programmers on the PS3 [version of Call of Duty] and it shows," commented Infinity Ward studio head Vince Zampella.

This has also been part of the reason why Sony's version of the game has a bigger online capacity (24 maximum vs. the 360's maximum of eighteen) as well as better visuals on the PlayStation platform.

"We had two separate teams working on both versions from the start," Zampella says, adding, "Most developers only focus on a single platform, then quickly port the game over to another one. You don't get very good results that way".

This bit of information is reassuring, as hopefully more and more developers will start developing equally for both platforms and even feature the PlayStation 3 as the lead platform. Also interesting is that most of the Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare TV spots also exclusively promoted the PlayStation 3 version of the game.thinicer

LOL at this post.

Look at their direct quotes. Where do they say that COD4 runs better on PS3? There are only two direct quotes from Infinity Ward. The rest of the story is the writer making sweeping assumptions and taking things out of context. When Infinity Ward says, "and it shows", they're talking about how both the Xbox 360 and PS3 versions of their game, compared to other multi-plat titles, are on parity with each other when usually it's the PS3 version of multiplats that suffers a bit in performance and graphics.

By the way, that story also mentions how the PS3 version of COD 4 is 24 players online. WTF? It's 18. Same as Xbox 360. That is purely 100% false so I find it hard to believe the rest of the article. The PC version is the only one that has more than 18 players.

We have seen side-by-side comparisons of both versions, game websites that have reviewed both versions, and everybody who has seen and played the game says that they are 100% identical. Everybody should be happy about it.

yup.

Avatar image for Dreams-Visions
Dreams-Visions

26578

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 Dreams-Visions
Member since 2006 • 26578 Posts

^

well I guess that's that. But really, if nobody is complaining about their performance, I don't understand why this is even an issue.

Avatar image for oback
oback

7151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#36 oback
Member since 2004 • 7151 Posts

[QUOTE="DarkRecruit"]My PC runs it at 1600x1200, 16x AF, all max, 4x AA with 40-60 FPS.D_Znuhtz

And hermits wonder why they aren't wanted here.

dont be jelous

Avatar image for oldskooler79
oldskooler79

1632

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 oldskooler79
Member since 2004 • 1632 Posts

[QUOTE="killab2oo5"][QUOTE="DarkRecruit"]My PC runs it at 1600x1200, 16x AF, all max, 4x AA with 40-60 FPS.D_Znuhtz

o.O Who's talking about the PC version? -.-' Ugh...annoying "hermits".

Haha. They wonder why everyone wants to kick them in the junk. "MY PC CAN DURRRR". :P

This is coming from someone who OWNS a gaming rig, and not a half bad one at that. Hermits, buy a console and join the rest of us in multiplatform gaming.

In case you can't read...I said I return my PS3 copy due to favoring the PC version. Aren't you aware that most hermits have at least one console in their household? Guess not.

On my gaming rig, COD4 runs so much smoother with sharper visuals and better controls unlike the console counterpart which side by side realtime comparisons make me wanna vomit. It's not bad if you dont own a high end PC, but otherwise...DURRRRR!

Avatar image for hywel69
hywel69

1086

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#38 hywel69
Member since 2002 • 1086 Posts
Well at least PS3 is the lead platform on something (allegedly). Incidentally COD4 (overated), is now almost OUT of the top 10. The version that remains in the top 10 is the 360! Just lol.
Avatar image for froidnite
froidnite

2294

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#39 froidnite
Member since 2006 • 2294 Posts
Errrrr....Isn't it a bad thing that PS3 NEEDS the best programmers to work on it's games to look as good(or a tiny bit better) as X360 version
Avatar image for mingo123
mingo123

9005

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 mingo123
Member since 2007 • 9005 Posts
pretty sad IW needed best devs to work on ps3 but still 360 version looks better + has better online...and also has not-so-best devs working on it...sad indeed
Avatar image for Vitalife2
Vitalife2

212

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 Vitalife2
Member since 2006 • 212 Posts
[QUOTE="Hydrolex"][QUOTE="ball_of_air"][QUOTE="Always-Honest"]

but the 360 version looks better... and the PS3 online doesn't WORK....

this article is old and was meant to give ps3 owners hope.

Always-Honest

Seeing as how you've obviously played it (PS3) to come to that conclusion, what problems does it have for you that I haven't appeared to experience? You have played it, remember.;)

Just ignore that that always-Honest ? Always-Liar , Always-Fanboy.

Why do you think Xbox 360 version looks better because it's darker and Ps3 looks a little bit washed out ? change your TV's gamma and you'll see PS3 looks very realastic and better

always honest. but some fanboys can't stand critisism on a product they bought.

You are defending the 360 version, which you obviously have.

Avatar image for Always-Honest
Always-Honest

11261

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 Always-Honest
Member since 2007 • 11261 Posts

pretty sad IW needed best devs to work on ps3 but still 360 version looks better + has better online...and also has not-so-best devs working on it...sad indeedmingo123

sorry, but you can't speak the truth in this thread. you just can't. sorry

Avatar image for Always-Honest
Always-Honest

11261

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 Always-Honest
Member since 2007 • 11261 Posts
[

You are defending the 360 version, which you obviously have.

Vitalife2

yes i do, and for good reason. i compared both and i FOLLOW THE NEWS.

Though like i said they are VERY similar. but Cod4 ps3 had online problems, and even if they were equal, shooters play better with the 360 controller for me (and for most who know both). that's not fanboysm, thats just how it is.

Avatar image for ChartTopper93
ChartTopper93

880

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 ChartTopper93
Member since 2006 • 880 Posts

Indeed they did get it right. Hopefully more developers get into the habit of making both versions of a multiplat at the same time instead of porting. The stark contrastin the quality of the finished product between the two methods is really something.

Private_Vegas

2 teams for working on two different consoles means more people and money. not everyone has money to throw around like that, only the bigger company's. yea, its easy to say get two teams and do it but it's not just that easy. some can't afford to do that...the up and coming game makers. so you can't have a problem with them...all these big name game makers were them before they got their hit games and became big company's with money to spare. it doesn't seem right for one of them now to come out and say this like the other guys aren't putting in effort. the other big name company's, yea, they should put some more people on and work with two teams and are being greedy and lazy if they don't.

but at the same time Sony shouldn't have made this necessary to do. the console is too hard to dev for...it's causing too many problems and making a lot of people look bad that don't deserve it.

Avatar image for darthzew
darthzew

1213

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#45 darthzew
Member since 2005 • 1213 Posts
Untrue. This is old; from before CoD4's release. If you go search the boards well enough, you'll find user-made graphics comparisons: PS3 version FAILS.
Avatar image for MadExponent
MadExponent

11454

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 MadExponent
Member since 2003 • 11454 Posts

[QUOTE="DarkRecruit"]My PC runs it at 1600x1200, 16x AF, all max, 4x AA with 40-60 FPS.killab2oo5
o.O Who's talking about the PC version? -.-' Ugh...annoying "hermits".

My computer runs the game @ 1920x1080 16xQ AA (forced through control panel) 16x AF All maxed ingame with High Quality Texture Filtering enabled in control panel. I get about 70-80fps on those settings. I play the game on my 42" LCD that I play all my PC games on.

Avatar image for mingo123
mingo123

9005

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 mingo123
Member since 2007 • 9005 Posts

[QUOTE="mingo123"]pretty sad IW needed best devs to work on ps3 but still 360 version looks better + has better online...and also has not-so-best devs working on it...sad indeedAlways-Honest

sorry, but you can't speak the truth in this thread. you just can't. sorry

nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo *dies*

Avatar image for milsvaard
milsvaard

1928

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#48 milsvaard
Member since 2003 • 1928 Posts
It might be true but it runs pretty sweet on the 360.
Avatar image for KillaHalo2o9
KillaHalo2o9

5305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#49 KillaHalo2o9
Member since 2006 • 5305 Posts

We have seen comparison videos.

360>PS3

Avatar image for hyperboy152000
hyperboy152000

4815

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#50 hyperboy152000
Member since 2003 • 4815 Posts

Untrue. This is old; from before CoD4's release. If you go search the boards well enough, you'll find user-made graphics comparisons: PS3 version FAILS.darthzew

yea by having slightly more washed out colors...which is hardly a failure