PS3 MOVE or XBOX 360 Kinect

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for megadeth1984
megadeth1984

134

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#1 megadeth1984
Member since 2009 • 134 Posts

Which one would you get and why? I am trying to put up comparison list to help me and all of us choose.

Avatar image for Kashiwaba
Kashiwaba

8059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Kashiwaba
Member since 2005 • 8059 Posts

I might get MOVE if Sony showed some good support and games for it but Kinect can go to hell I almost slept during MS conference in E3 when they showed it and I don't see it being practical for real games at all.

Avatar image for SolidTy
SolidTy

49991

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#3 SolidTy
Member since 2005 • 49991 Posts

I've studied the games so far, and I'm not sold on either...but Kinect right now by far seems much worse library and direction wise.

I'm not a fan of the pricing of Kinect games (3 $50 ones, the rest $60) vs. the Move $40 games.

Also, I bought a PSEye, long ago, and just buy bying a Wand, i'm good to go with Move.

The separate Sub controller used in some MOVE games is NOT needed for Move at all as you can interchange a Sixaxis/Dualshock 3 with the subcontroller.

I've weighed in on all of game catalogs, the pricing, but still, I'm not sold either one yet. I already have a Wii I'm satisfied with (Ironically, most of my fave Wii games hardly use the Wii's motion, or it's tacked on like NSMW's spin move.)

In the end, It's about EXCLUSIVE AA-AAA games for me, in genres I'm interested in...so, I put this back on both companies to deliver.

Avatar image for my_name_is_ron
my_name_is_ron

5549

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 my_name_is_ron
Member since 2005 • 5549 Posts

i'll save my money anD stick to controllers. waving your arms around infront of the telly just isn't videogaming to me. nothing beats sitting alone in a dark, dank bedroom for hours on end playing single player. OLD SCHOOL!!!!!

Avatar image for killzowned24
killzowned24

7345

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 killzowned24
Member since 2007 • 7345 Posts

Which one would you get and why? I am trying to put up comparison list to help me and all of us choose.

megadeth1984
Get PS Move. Very precise games that are not on rails rumble/color orb feedback does the casual camera flail games with PS Eye Around 50 Move games announced compared to around 25 kinect games
Avatar image for deactivated-5c8e4e07d5510
deactivated-5c8e4e07d5510

17401

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 deactivated-5c8e4e07d5510
Member since 2007 • 17401 Posts
I think both look lame. Every game that they've shown for Kinect and Move look like they could be played better with a regular controller. Motion controls just seem like a fancy, sometimes unresponsive button.
Avatar image for agarwal_a
agarwal_a

97

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#7 agarwal_a
Member since 2009 • 97 Posts

Firstly, both suck. Move is awesome, but if anybody is a Wii fan or Hcore Gmr(me) it is s**t Kincket(whatever) is really cool for the first time you see it but no one would like to jump up-down thier living room, the best controller in my consideration is the Sixaxis Dualshock 3 controller, it packs light motion capabilities with great controls and very responsive buttons. No fanboys please I've got both PS3 and 360 and on a better screen with 1080p, you'll always love PS3 games.

Avatar image for WilliamRLBaker
WilliamRLBaker

28915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 WilliamRLBaker
Member since 2006 • 28915 Posts

neither.

And why? because both are unappealing to me.

Avatar image for freetoex
freetoex

300

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 freetoex
Member since 2009 • 300 Posts

Move for sure.
Because I like buttons.
Because if done correctly motion controls can be alot of fun. (IMO)
Because I want to play that wizard game.
Kinect looks horrible.
I love my new 360 s, but I didn't get it for Kinect.
I hope MS does well, it doesn't look like they are spending to much money on it, so perhaps it not that big of a risk for them.

Avatar image for tryagainlater
tryagainlater

7446

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#10 tryagainlater
Member since 2005 • 7446 Posts

Neither of them particularly appeal to me at the moment but if I had to pick one, I'd go with Move. I guess I could replay Heavy Rain with the motion controls rather then play some shovelware. I do honestly believe that Kinect or some other similiar product will be great eventually but certainly not any time soon.

Avatar image for tubbyc
tubbyc

4004

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 tubbyc
Member since 2005 • 4004 Posts

Probably both eventually but not straight away. I've had some good experiences with the Wii and these other two seem quite a bit more advanced. MS have said they DO plan to have some games use a controller or peripheral in combination with Kinect, so there's some hope there.

Avatar image for farnham
farnham

21147

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 farnham
Member since 2003 • 21147 Posts

I would wait at least a year on both products as the success will be determined by casuals picking it up or not.

And i dont think casuals will pay the price for those devices. For a casual that has no game console yet the PS3 with move will cost (300 (PS3) + 100 (move+ EYe) + 30 (navicon) = 430 dollars + additional 80 dollars for another controller). A 360 with kinect will cost (300 (360) + 150 (kinect) = 450 dollars). A Wii will cost 200 dollars and an additional controller with motion plus and nunchuck will cost 70 dollars.


Either way buying a Wii is much cheaper and it also has Wii Fit which seams to be a phenomenon of its own.

Avatar image for deactivated-57ad0e5285d73
deactivated-57ad0e5285d73

21398

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 deactivated-57ad0e5285d73
Member since 2009 • 21398 Posts

Whatever happened to hand/eye coordination?

Avatar image for hiryu3
hiryu3

7313

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#14 hiryu3
Member since 2003 • 7313 Posts
I am getting Move because of the games that I already own that are getting patched as well as the upcoming games for it interest me more than anything M$ showed with Kinect
Avatar image for DeanG642
DeanG642

595

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#15 DeanG642
Member since 2009 • 595 Posts
Ps move is nothing new, its a wii rip off. Kinect doesnt use a controller, and its completely new and technological. So Kinect. However, the PS move also will have a better collection of games, and the Kinect games Ive seen so far look completely ridiculous....So I dont know....
Avatar image for LovePotionNo9
LovePotionNo9

4751

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 LovePotionNo9
Member since 2010 • 4751 Posts

They both look uninteresting and bland.

Avatar image for SapSacPrime
SapSacPrime

8925

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#17 SapSacPrime
Member since 2004 • 8925 Posts

Ill stick with the Wii thanks and pick up motion+ at some point... there won't be anything decent on the other two for ages anyway.

Avatar image for NielsNL
NielsNL

4346

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 NielsNL
Member since 2005 • 4346 Posts

Kinect is really not made for us SW posters (unless you do own Wii fit). It's going after the Nintendo casuals, and will fail hard, because Nintendo already has the Nintendo casuals.

Not interested in Move either for now, but with the right support at least that has the potential to be interesting to me.

Avatar image for loadedboon
loadedboon

1986

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 loadedboon
Member since 2004 • 1986 Posts

Ps move is nothing new, its a wii rip off. Kinect doesnt use a controller, and its completely new and technological. So Kinect. However, the PS move also will have a better collection of games, and the Kinect games Ive seen so far look completely ridiculous....So I dont know....DeanG642

The Kinect is nothing new either it's just a PS Eye-Toy ripoff.

Avatar image for freetoex
freetoex

300

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 freetoex
Member since 2009 • 300 Posts

I would wait at least a year on both products as the success will be determined by casuals picking it up or not.

And i dont think casuals will pay the price for those devices. For a casual that has no game console yet the PS3 with move will cost (300 (PS3) + 100 (move+ EYe) + 30 (navicon) = 430 dollars + additional 80 dollars for another controller). A 360 with kinect will cost (300 (360) + 150 (kinect) = 450 dollars). A Wii will cost 200 dollars and an additional controller with motion plus and nunchuck will cost 70 dollars.


Either way buying a Wii is much cheaper and it also has Wii Fit which seams to be a phenomenon of its own.

farnham

PS3 + Move bundle (100) = 400. you don't need the "navicon" but yes still expensive.

Avatar image for mayceV
mayceV

4633

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#21 mayceV
Member since 2008 • 4633 Posts
depends maybe later on down the road I'd look into them. right now MS chose the casual crowd apperantly to work out better software to eliminated the lag. so if lag was fixed later down the road and more core games showed up, everyone else starts picking up on better techniques onn control and hybrids showed up then I'll get kinect (and if it felt good to play) . move more than likely never. I hated the wii- SO MUCH (sorry ninntendo :( ) so kinect is a possiblity (althouh a very slim one) but I would et kinect immediatly if a conker hybrid wa involved.
Avatar image for farnham
farnham

21147

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 farnham
Member since 2003 • 21147 Posts

[QUOTE="farnham"]

I would wait at least a year on both products as the success will be determined by casuals picking it up or not.

And i dont think casuals will pay the price for those devices. For a casual that has no game console yet the PS3 with move will cost (300 (PS3) + 100 (move+ EYe) + 30 (navicon) = 430 dollars + additional 80 dollars for another controller). A 360 with kinect will cost (300 (360) + 150 (kinect) = 450 dollars). A Wii will cost 200 dollars and an additional controller with motion plus and nunchuck will cost 70 dollars.


Either way buying a Wii is much cheaper and it also has Wii Fit which seams to be a phenomenon of its own.

freetoex

PS3 + Move bundle (100) = 400. you don't need the "navicon" but yes still expensive.

well if you want to hold a dual shock controller on one hand then you dont need it

Avatar image for farnham
farnham

21147

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 farnham
Member since 2003 • 21147 Posts
depends maybe later on down the road I'd look into them. right now MS chose the casual crowd apperantly to work out better software to eliminated the lag. so if lag was fixed later down the road and more core games showed up, everyone else starts picking up on better techniques onn control and hybrids showed up then I'll get kinect (and if it felt good to play) . move more than likely never. I hated the wii- SO MUCH (sorry ninntendo :( ) so kinect is a possiblity (althouh a very slim one) but I would et kinect immediatly if a conker hybrid wa involved.mayceV
i see almost no chance for kinect to sell decent numbers
Avatar image for ProjectNatalFan
ProjectNatalFan

2471

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 ProjectNatalFan
Member since 2010 • 2471 Posts

Kinect of course because of revolutionary motion controls.

Avatar image for hexashadow13
hexashadow13

5157

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 hexashadow13
Member since 2010 • 5157 Posts
Move prolly for my sister but I'm hoping it'll at least give me something eventually. Kinect just seems bad.
Avatar image for Eltormo
Eltormo

990

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 Eltormo
Member since 2010 • 990 Posts

Ps move is nothing new, its a wii rip off. Kinect doesnt use a controller, and its completely new and technological. So Kinect. However, the PS move also will have a better collection of games, and the Kinect games Ive seen so far look completely ridiculous....So I dont know....DeanG642

MOve is a more advance version of the Wii controller just like Kinect is a more advance version of the PS3 eye,non are revolutionary or new.

Avatar image for farnham
farnham

21147

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 farnham
Member since 2003 • 21147 Posts

[QUOTE="DeanG642"]Ps move is nothing new, its a wii rip off. Kinect doesnt use a controller, and its completely new and technological. So Kinect. However, the PS move also will have a better collection of games, and the Kinect games Ive seen so far look completely ridiculous....So I dont know....Eltormo

MOve is a more advance version of the Wii controller just like Kinect is a more advance version of the PS3 eye,non are revolutionary or new.

is it advanced though ? there are a lot of problems reported that dont exist on the wii (input lag being one)

also the move has no mario galaxy or wii sports resort.

Avatar image for Ravenlore_basic
Ravenlore_basic

4319

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#28 Ravenlore_basic
Member since 2003 • 4319 Posts

Which one would you get and why? I am trying to put up comparison list to help me and all of us choose.

megadeth1984

Just wait till they come out then compare

Avatar image for Diviniuz
Diviniuz

6460

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 73

User Lists: 0

#29 Diviniuz
Member since 2009 • 6460 Posts
Neither, but gun to my head, it would be Move
Avatar image for Eltormo
Eltormo

990

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 Eltormo
Member since 2010 • 990 Posts

[QUOTE="Eltormo"]

[QUOTE="DeanG642"]Ps move is nothing new, its a wii rip off. Kinect doesnt use a controller, and its completely new and technological. So Kinect. However, the PS move also will have a better collection of games, and the Kinect games Ive seen so far look completely ridiculous....So I dont know....farnham

MOve is a more advance version of the Wii controller just like Kinect is a more advance version of the PS3 eye,non are revolutionary or new.

is it advanced though ? there are a lot of problems reported that dont exist on the wii (input lag being one)

also the move has no mario galaxy or wii sports resort.

I think you are tech confused,Kinect is the one with lag,from what i read Move has been pretty much lag free,but how would that be different from the PS3 Eye and Kinect since the PS3 eye can do 60 FPS at 640 X 480,and Kinect can only do 30 FPS.

Since when sony need a Mario game to win a generation,didn't they win in a row without mario.?

Avatar image for farnham
farnham

21147

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 farnham
Member since 2003 • 21147 Posts

[QUOTE="farnham"]

[QUOTE="Eltormo"]

MOve is a more advance version of the Wii controller just like Kinect is a more advance version of the PS3 eye,non are revolutionary or new.

Eltormo

is it advanced though ? there are a lot of problems reported that dont exist on the wii (input lag being one)

also the move has no mario galaxy or wii sports resort.

I think you are tech confused,Kinect is the one with lag,from what i read Move has been pretty much lag free,but how would that be different from the PS3 Eye and Kinect since the PS3 eye can do 60 FPS at 640 X 480,and Kinect can only do 30 FPS.

Since when sony need a Mario game to win a generation,didn't they win in a row without mario.?

orly http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EyRe9-QX8C4
Avatar image for LP4EVA2005
LP4EVA2005

8585

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 LP4EVA2005
Member since 2004 • 8585 Posts
im getting Move. im sold on Sorcery and Ape Escape 4
Avatar image for qbell
qbell

1035

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#35 qbell
Member since 2006 • 1035 Posts
kinect cuz i had a wii so i did my wand waggle
Avatar image for Eltormo
Eltormo

990

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 Eltormo
Member since 2010 • 990 Posts

orly http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EyRe9-QX8C4farnham

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8FMl_w4j_-I

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UtNJu31Q8PI

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=210dcx2bA3g

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QinDFos0AtY&feature=related

orly in deed.

Avatar image for farnham
farnham

21147

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 farnham
Member since 2003 • 21147 Posts

[QUOTE="farnham"]orly http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EyRe9-QX8C4Eltormo

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8FMl_w4j_-I

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UtNJu31Q8PI

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=210dcx2bA3g

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QinDFos0AtY&feature=related

orly in deed.

never said that kinect has no lag i was just pointing out that move has lag
Avatar image for kejigoto
kejigoto

2735

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#38 kejigoto
Member since 2004 • 2735 Posts
Neither.
Avatar image for megadeth1984
megadeth1984

134

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#39 megadeth1984
Member since 2009 • 134 Posts

after reading all the posts. i can see that most of you guys are like me and have an incline towards the move for price, games and performance. But i think we still need to wait a few more months to see what each piece of technology actually hold true. I am putting down some questions and problems each might have, lets see were it leads us.

A few problems Kinect might have:

Since there are no controllers if you have a lot of friends over, won't movement effect game play (since it doesn't have any registered tracing)? does it really have that good movement recognizing and tracking system as shown in the promo vids, i doubt it.

Ok moving arms and upper body is one thing. but how long can you jump around? even if the experience is a lot of fun. Given that we play games to relax and entertain ourselves.

Since this is a first, the technology might have lag and/or other problems with it, and if that happens you could have to get a new kinect (given our experience with Xbox's red ring of death) its not very promising reliability wise.

Plus the games are more expensive then Moves' ones.

As gamers we have gotten used to some sort of controller or keyboard or joystick or whatever it might be, as it makes us feel a part of the experience and greater sense of control, will the Kinect actually be able to make us feel the same way without any controllers. I mean if we are playing say football on Kinect, instead of kicking air in your living room and possibly breaking something, wouldn't we prefer to actually go out and play football with a real ball? Since we are doing most of the stuff anyway?

A few problems Move might have:

The controllers might breakdown, as chances of us throwing it around are high.

Might be hard to play with it for a longer period of time.

Might have lag if two + players are playing simultaneously.

Will other lights in the background distract it?

(i cant think of anymore right now if you can then add it)

Avatar image for gundaicut
gundaicut

456

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 gundaicut
Member since 2010 • 456 Posts
kinect because i already got a stupid Wii

neither.

And why? because both are unappealing to me.

WilliamRLBaker
i agree with this guy
Avatar image for KinectISLife
KinectISLife

199

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 KinectISLife
Member since 2010 • 199 Posts
The only motion controlled game i want is Child of Eden, so i will go for Kinect, i am dont consider buying Move at all
Avatar image for SolidTy
SolidTy

49991

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#42 SolidTy
Member since 2005 • 49991 Posts

The only motion controlled game i want is Child of Eden, so i will go for Kinect, i am dont consider buying Move at allKinectISLife

Just so you know, Child of Eden is for both Move and Kinect...and it also supports the 360 standard controller, and PS3 standard controller.

I just saved you $150 dollars for Kinect now since that's the only motion game you wanted, or showed you a reason to like Move.:P

---------

Also, Welcome to SW and GS forums, KinectISLife! Hope you have fun here.

Avatar image for shinrabanshou
shinrabanshou

8458

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 shinrabanshou
Member since 2009 • 8458 Posts

[QUOTE="KinectISLife"]The only motion controlled game i want is Child of Eden, so i will go for Kinect, i am dont consider buying Move at allSolidTy

Just so you know, Child of Eden is for both Move and Kinect...and it also supports the 360 standard controller, and PS3 standard controller.

I just saved you $150 dollars, or showed you a reason to like Move.:P

I don't think it does actually support Move as yet, as it's apparently being "looked into."

Presumably it will unless moneyhats are involved as what is at it's core an on-rails shooter, Move should not be difficult to implement.

But really even if it did support Move, it's not like theseekar cares.

Avatar image for Pug-Nasty
Pug-Nasty

8508

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#44 Pug-Nasty
Member since 2009 • 8508 Posts

Neither. But, if Move support is added to Hustle Kings I may get it. But, then again, the real problem I have with it would probably be solved with 3d support, which I'm not ready for, so maybe not.

Avatar image for PAL360
PAL360

30574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

#45 PAL360
Member since 2007 • 30574 Posts

Kinect looks better in everything except the games. Maybe MS announce some cool ones next tuesday.

Avatar image for JStroud88
JStroud88

626

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#46 JStroud88
Member since 2009 • 626 Posts

Kinect definitely, had a chance to get my hands on it and it worked great. I noticed any problems people were having with it at the Microsoft store were user error.

Plus it's already selling like crazy, so the support will be there. Plus, I have a Wii and don't want to have to get a PS3.

Avatar image for badtaker
badtaker

3806

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 badtaker
Member since 2009 • 3806 Posts

[QUOTE="DeanG642"]Ps move is nothing new, its a wii rip off. Kinect doesnt use a controller, and its completely new and technological. So Kinect. However, the PS move also will have a better collection of games, and the Kinect games Ive seen so far look completely ridiculous....So I dont know....loadedboon

The Kinect is nothing new either it's just a PS Eye-Toy ripoff.

you mean PS sextoy :P
Avatar image for soulitane
soulitane

15091

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#48 soulitane
Member since 2010 • 15091 Posts
If I had to get one, I guess I would get kinect because I don't have a ps3 :P
Avatar image for SecretPolice
SecretPolice

45558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 SecretPolice
Member since 2007 • 45558 Posts

I'll be picking up the 360 S Kinect bundle.