This topic is locked from further discussion.
Totally Pro PS# article, biased, childish and unfunded, Downgrade??, what are they talking about?
Don't believe a single word
Lol, 360 fanboys have completely been owned now. be careful TC because you are about to be hit with some angry fanboys.
We all know that the PS3 is a very powerful system though, it just have not been out long enough for the devs to figure it outcompletely. The truth is that you have to give it some time and I sure am giving time. I know the fanboys are going to say "look at the multiplats", but sorry guys the truth is that Devs are not taking their time developing for the PS3, rather they are doing a crappy port to save time and money and that's why some of the multiplats look and operate better on the 360, but the truth is that when Devs take their time to develop the game on the PS3, the game almost alwasy comes out better on the PS3 and a perfect example of that is games like Oblivion and Dirt.
Lol, 360 fanboys have completely been owned now. be careful TC because you are about to be hit with some angry fanboys.
We all know that the PS3 is a very powerful system though, it just have not been out long enough for the devs to figure it outcompletely. The truth is that you have to give it some time and I sure am giving time. I know the fanboys are going to say "look at the multiplats", but sorry guys the truth is that Devs are not taking their time developing for the PS3, rather they are doing a crappy port to save time and money and that's why some of the multiplats look and operate better on the 360, but the truth is that when Devs take their time to develop the game on the PS3, the game almost alwasy comes out better on the PS3 and a perfect example of that is games like Oblivion and Dirt.
The_Gamer81
Excuse me???, did you say oblivion??!!!, check the reviews and the critics opinion mate, oblivion for the 360 is better thatn the Ps3, get a job!
"undisclosed developer" = complete fabrication.
How can anyone say 360 titles are only "keeping up" and still have a straight face.
Lol, 360 fanboys have completely been owned now. be careful TC because you are about to be hit with some angry fanboys.
We all know that the PS3 is a very powerful system though, it just have not been out long enough for the devs to figure it outcompletely. The truth is that you have to give it some time and I sure am giving time. I know the fanboys are going to say "look at the multiplats", but sorry guys the truth is that Devs are not taking their time developing for the PS3, rather they are doing a crappy port to save time and money and that's why some of the multiplats look and operate better on the 360, but the truth is that when Devs take their time to develop the game on the PS3, the game almost alwasy comes out better on the PS3 and a perfect example of that is games like Oblivion and Dirt.
The_Gamer81
Pound for pound, the PS3 is probably slightly more powerful than the Xbox 360. However, mysterious claims by non-specific "developers" are not only not ownage, but they aren't at all credible, either. Your argument about PS3-360 multiplats seems to be the following: If the game is worse on the PS3, it was a rushed port. If it's better, it's clear indication that the PS3 is more powerful. Give me a break. Whether or not this is true, that's a pretty biased way to look at the issue. Instead of picking and choosing which multiplats support your argument, maybe we should wait a couple years, and see if the games are still fairly even on both sides.
[QUOTE="Cloud313"]suck that they dont name the developerSeanBond
Because the developer is either owned by Sony, or is imaginary.
What a load.
yup with out knowing who the developer this article can be easily ignored. At lest if they gave the name of the developer you could get some sort of accuracy from it
[QUOTE="The_Gamer81"]Lol, 360 fanboys have completely been owned now. be careful TC because you are about to be hit with some angry fanboys.
We all know that the PS3 is a very powerful system though, it just have not been out long enough for the devs to figure it outcompletely. The truth is that you have to give it some time and I sure am giving time. I know the fanboys are going to say "look at the multiplats", but sorry guys the truth is that Devs are not taking their time developing for the PS3, rather they are doing a crappy port to save time and money and that's why some of the multiplats look and operate better on the 360, but the truth is that when Devs take their time to develop the game on the PS3, the game almost alwasy comes out better on the PS3 and a perfect example of that is games like Oblivion and Dirt.
cocomacoco
Excuse me???, did you say oblivion??!!!, check the reviews and the critics opinion mate, oblivion for the 360 is better thatn the Ps3, get a job!
Ummm no sir. They say Oblivion looks better on PS3. What info are you looking at son?
[QUOTE="The_Gamer81"]Lol, 360 fanboys have completely been owned now. be careful TC because you are about to be hit with some angry fanboys.
We all know that the PS3 is a very powerful system though, it just have not been out long enough for the devs to figure it outcompletely. The truth is that you have to give it some time and I sure am giving time. I know the fanboys are going to say "look at the multiplats", but sorry guys the truth is that Devs are not taking their time developing for the PS3, rather they are doing a crappy port to save time and money and that's why some of the multiplats look and operate better on the 360, but the truth is that when Devs take their time to develop the game on the PS3, the game almost alwasy comes out better on the PS3 and a perfect example of that is games like Oblivion and Dirt.
cocomacoco
Excuse me???, did you say oblivion??!!!, check the reviews and the critics opinion mate, oblivion for the 360 is better thatn the Ps3, get a job!
according to Gamespot's review, Oblivion has better graphics on the PS3 and the game plays better all together. Please watch the PS3's Oblivion review. the score means nothing because the game for the xbox was reviewed long before the PS3's. standards and expectations for games go up in time. for example if BioShock was released a year ago, it would have gotten almost a perfect score. There are PS2 games out there that got a perfect score of 10 AAAA in 2001, does that mean they are better than Oblivion? of course not. Standards just change. The game is definitely better on the PS3 buddy.
[QUOTE="The_Gamer81"]Lol, 360 fanboys have completely been owned now. be careful TC because you are about to be hit with some angry fanboys.
We all know that the PS3 is a very powerful system though, it just have not been out long enough for the devs to figure it outcompletely. The truth is that you have to give it some time and I sure am giving time. I know the fanboys are going to say "look at the multiplats", but sorry guys the truth is that Devs are not taking their time developing for the PS3, rather they are doing a crappy port to save time and money and that's why some of the multiplats look and operate better on the 360, but the truth is that when Devs take their time to develop the game on the PS3, the game almost alwasy comes out better on the PS3 and a perfect example of that is games like Oblivion and Dirt.
SeanBond
Pound for pound, the PS3 is probably slightly more powerful than the Xbox 360. However, mysterious claims by non-specific "developers" are not only not ownage, but they aren't at all credible, either. Your argument about PS3-360 multiplats seems to be the following: If the game is worse on the PS3, it was a rushed port. If it's better, it's clear indication that the PS3 is more powerful. Give me a break. Whether or not this is true, that's a pretty biased way to look at the issue. Instead of picking and choosing which multiplats support your argument, maybe we should wait a couple years, and see if the games are still fairly even on both sides.
no sir, that wasn't my argument. Let me give you an example, the recent Madden game ran at 60FPS on the 360 and 30fps on the PS3. We all know that the PS3 can easily handle 60fps (e.g. MotorStorm and NGS), so it's very obvious then that the devs didn't take there time developing the game for the PS3, rather it's just a crappy port. that's what I am saying. Games that are developed specifically for the PS3 run very nicely on it and have amazing graphics.
Wow really? Oblivion looks better on the PS frickin 3? wow it only came out over a year later.. hope they made it a little better for christs sake
tccavey2
no ture development for the PS3 takes more time because it's a newer system and has completely newer technology.
[QUOTE="SeanBond"][QUOTE="The_Gamer81"]Lol, 360 fanboys have completely been owned now. be careful TC because you are about to be hit with some angry fanboys.
We all know that the PS3 is a very powerful system though, it just have not been out long enough for the devs to figure it outcompletely. The truth is that you have to give it some time and I sure am giving time. I know the fanboys are going to say "look at the multiplats", but sorry guys the truth is that Devs are not taking their time developing for the PS3, rather they are doing a crappy port to save time and money and that's why some of the multiplats look and operate better on the 360, but the truth is that when Devs take their time to develop the game on the PS3, the game almost alwasy comes out better on the PS3 and a perfect example of that is games like Oblivion and Dirt.
The_Gamer81
Pound for pound, the PS3 is probably slightly more powerful than the Xbox 360. However, mysterious claims by non-specific "developers" are not only not ownage, but they aren't at all credible, either. Your argument about PS3-360 multiplats seems to be the following: If the game is worse on the PS3, it was a rushed port. If it's better, it's clear indication that the PS3 is more powerful. Give me a break. Whether or not this is true, that's a pretty biased way to look at the issue. Instead of picking and choosing which multiplats support your argument, maybe we should wait a couple years, and see if the games are still fairly even on both sides.
no sir, that wasn't my argument. Let me give you an example, the recent Madden game ran at 60FPS on the 360 and 30fps on the PS3. We all know that the PS3 can easily handle 60fps (e.g. MotorStorm and NGS), so it's very obvious then that the devs didn't take there time developing the game for the PS3, rather it's just a crappy port. that's what I am saying. Games that are developed specifically for the PS3 run very nicely on it and have amazing graphics.
Well yeah, EA admitted that with Madden. But it's not like games like Lair are exactly overwhelming people to the PS3's possibilities, either. We all know the PS3 can do better than 30fps, but my point was that the article this thread is entirely based around is trash, because no one really knows how much better the PS3 and 360 will get.
to experience the both systems full potentual you need a 1080p HDMI TV 1st.
to me the 360 is better: hardly any glitching or lagging on-line or off-line, controling is accurate w/ headphones & mic, also has 5 games that are really good on360 and dont come out on PS3. PS3 is good for only for 1 of its game that dont come out in both 360 & PS3 (ninja gaiden)it'sblu-ray is definately better and you could surf the web.
ps: I love MY PSP
[QUOTE="hashimgillani1"]Please read the full thing, especially that last paragraph. Though this is one site opnion just like Gamespot, its aninteresting....statement. http://gamer.blorge.com/2007/09/16/developer-xbox-360-games-keeping-up-to-ps3-but-not-for-long/[/QUOTE]
Really Im an XBOX 360 fanboy because it is just better but I also own a PS3 and Wii. And I hope that the PS3 wins. Because if somehow the PS3 surpases the 360 then I really have two super great systems with great games.
There were 0 positive things about 360 and only about a 4 word sentece of negative thing to say about PS3. So that was a pretty one sided way to look at it.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment