Alright, here's my main beef lately.
How come if a cow gets ripped on because the PS3's first-year software is weak, they say "Well, this is PS3's first year, so it should be compared with 360's first year, not it's second." But, when sales numbers are brought up, 360's first year doesn't matter. PS3 sold almost a million more this year, and that's all that matters? It shouldn't go both ways. I say either choose to compare year for year, or where the consoles stand right now.
If you want to say PS3 sold more than 360 this year, then that's cool. Just accept the fact that 360 is destroying the PS3 in the number of quality games this year also. :)
Log in to comment