check it and comment!
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=9414174&postcount=476
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Yet at the Pro FX website this article is nowhere to be found was said further on in that thread.
vaderhater
They ended up removing it back in like 2007/8.
Conspiracies range from bribing from Nvidia/MS to the simple dropping of the PS3 from the supported platforms.
Why are threads like this still flooding?
Are you that insecure about your playstation :lol:
Dead-Memories
LOL the ps3 is just a little baby.!! give it time and less hate!
Yet at the Pro FX website this article is nowhere to be found was said further on in that thread.
vaderhater
They ended up removing it back in like 2007/8.
Conspiracies range from bribing from Nvidia/MS to the simple dropping of the PS3 from the supported platforms.
[QUOTE="vaderhater"]
Yet at the Pro FX website this article is nowhere to be found was said further on in that thread.
Irick_cb
They ended up removing it back in like 2007/8.
Conspiracies range from bribing from Nvidia/MS to the simple dropping of the PS3 from the supported platforms.
Ill go with the BS factor then.[QUOTE="Irick_cb"]
[QUOTE="vaderhater"]
Yet at the Pro FX website this article is nowhere to be found was said further on in that thread.
vaderhater
They ended up removing it back in like 2007/8.
Conspiracies range from bribing from Nvidia/MS to the simple dropping of the PS3 from the supported platforms.
Ill go with the BS factor then.Right, because a massively parallel processor coupled with high memory bandwith to the GPU and rasterisers would obviously not make it a beast at procedural texture generation.
Not that is even matters in practicality, the PS3 has enough storage not to need proceduraly generated textures.
Ill go with the BS factor then.[QUOTE="vaderhater"]
[QUOTE="Irick_cb"]
They ended up removing it back in like 2007/8.
Conspiracies range from bribing from Nvidia/MS to the simple dropping of the PS3 from the supported platforms.
Irick_cb
Right, because a massively parallel processor coupled with high memory bandwith to the GPU and rasterisers would obviously not make it a beast at procedural texture generation.
Not that is even matters in practicality, the PS3 has enough storage not to need procedurally generated textures.
Show me the document at pro fx........otherwise one closed test on one aspect of graphics doesn't mean a thing. Are you trying to sell it like some kind of ownage? Also the PS3 might run into a snag memory wise concerning textures at the best of times. As well I dont remember saying anything of the sort thats highlighted in red. Lastly highlighted in blue the 360 has more memory available due to less OS overhead that it does not need procedurally generate tetures either. But Enjoy your game made of only Procedurally generated textures ok?Wow, they could've at least given us the specs of the PC. A low-end GPU like the 8800GTS isn't going to fair much better than the PS3 GPU which has more VRAM...
Now there's CPUs that are much more powerful than The Cell, and since the PS3 came out there were GPUs more powerful than the RSX (outdated when it was announced actually; it's not even the top last gen Nvidia card). So as of today, that information is useless. Also, why would Nvidia bribe the site if their GPU is the one in the PS3? I'll go with the BS theory.
And when we compare PS3 and 360 from that list, no-shortcut real time ray tracing is utterly impossible with today's hardware (there was an article on it like a month and a half ago) unless you're running a top of the line PC and even then it's incredibly taxing. Elements of it are possible on PS3 and 360, but running it full on is not doable with nearly 5 year old technology.
Wow, they could've at least given us the specs of the PC. A low-end GPU like the 8800GTS isn't going to fair much better than the PS3 GPU which has more VRAM...
Now there's CPUs that are much more powerful than The Cell, and since the PS3 came out there were GPUs more powerful than the RSX (outdated when it was announced actually; it's not even the top last gen Nvidia card). So as of today, that information is useless. Also, why would Nvidia bribe the site if their GPU is the one in the PS3? I'll go with the BS theory.
And when we compare PS3 and 360 from that list, no-shortcut real time ray tracing is utterly impossible with today's hardware (there was an article on it like a month and a half ago) unless you're running a top of the line PC and even then it's incredibly taxing. Elements of it are possible on PS3 and 360, but running it full on is not doable with nearly 5 year old technology.Saturos3091
because of the CELL. thats what the article said
have you seen the benchies of teh new ati cards? omge bro, 8800 cards are soo old tech... an ati 5850 HD which is a $250 card can run circles around the ps3. btw a 8800GT kills a ps3. That card when released by nvidia was a master piece and a advancement in gpu technology. ps3 has always been old tech.
and this has to do with gaming in what way? You wanna proof PS3 is more powerfull? Show me a good looking multiplatform game that runs better on PS3 than on my 8800gt equiped PC because unlike PS3 i can run all multiplatform games at 1080p max settings with 2-4xAA and usually framerates 40-60fps Now again what good looking ps3 games do that? You can stuck at your 600-720p res and noAA and 30fps while i will continue playing at 1920x1080 with AA and 60fpsadamosmaki
This.
You can make wild claims about the PS3's power all day, but you just aren't very convincing when the system is struggling to output visuals far below what modern PC GPUs are, even at sub-720p resolutions and relatively low framerates.
Even hardcore fanboys have realized this by now. Seems the OP didn't get the memo.
[QUOTE="adamosmaki"]and this has to do with gaming in what way? You wanna proof PS3 is more powerfull? Show me a good looking multiplatform game that runs better on PS3 than on my 8800gt equiped PC because unlike PS3 i can run all multiplatform games at 1080p max settings with 2-4xAA and usually framerates 40-60fps Now again what good looking ps3 games do that? You can stuck at your 600-720p res and noAA and 30fps while i will continue playing at 1920x1080 with AA and 60fpsVelocitas8
This.
You can make wild claims about the PS3's power all day, but you just aren't very convincing when the system is struggling to output visuals far below what modern PC GPUs are, even at sub-720p resolutions and relatively low framerates.
Even hardcore fanboys have realized this by now. Seems the OP didn't get the memo.
hey guys take it easy .remember that the ps3 is from 2006
List of PS3 games at 1080 P NATIVE (as of JAN, 2008)
http://boardsus.playstation.com/playstation/board/message?board.id=pslounge&thread.id=469951
and this has to do with gaming in what way? You wanna proof PS3 is more powerfull? Show me a good looking multiplatform game that runs better on PS3 than on my 8800gt equiped PC because unlike PS3 i can run all multiplatform games at 1080p max settings with 2-4xAA and usually framerates 40-60fps Now again what good looking ps3 games do that? You can stuck at your 600-720p res and noAA and 30fps while i will continue playing at 1920x1080 with AA and 60fpsadamosmaki
i can run games at 1080p with my 9500gt ocand so what?
that benchmark showed that the ps3 is no joke.
plus on my 65" plasma tvps3 exclusive ARE PERFECTION in picture!
and this has to do with gaming in what way? You wanna proof PS3 is more powerfull? Show me a good looking multiplatform game that runs better on PS3 than on my 8800gt equiped PC because unlike PS3 i can run all multiplatform games at 1080p max settings with 2-4xAA and usually framerates 40-60fps Now again what good looking ps3 games do that? You can stuck at your 600-720p res and noAA and 30fps while i will continue playing at 1920x1080 with AA and 60fpsadamosmaki
GT5 WILL BE 1080P NATIVE, so im not stuck at 720p as you lied.+ multiplat games suck.
[QUOTE="adamosmaki"]and this has to do with gaming in what way? You wanna proof PS3 is more powerfull? Show me a good looking multiplatform game that runs better on PS3 than on my 8800gt equiped PC because unlike PS3 i can run all multiplatform games at 1080p max settings with 2-4xAA and usually framerates 40-60fps Now again what good looking ps3 games do that? You can stuck at your 600-720p res and noAA and 30fps while i will continue playing at 1920x1080 with AA and 60fpsS3P4eeever
GT5 WILL BE 1080P NATIVE, so im not stuck at 720p as you lied.+ multiplat games suck.
Multiplats suck because they look better than some of the exclusives???[QUOTE="S3P4eeever"][QUOTE="adamosmaki"]and this has to do with gaming in what way? You wanna proof PS3 is more powerfull? Show me a good looking multiplatform game that runs better on PS3 than on my 8800gt equiped PC because unlike PS3 i can run all multiplatform games at 1080p max settings with 2-4xAA and usually framerates 40-60fps Now again what good looking ps3 games do that? You can stuck at your 600-720p res and noAA and 30fps while i will continue playing at 1920x1080 with AA and 60fpszbdyx
GT5 WILL BE 1080P NATIVE, so im not stuck at 720p as you lied.+ multiplat games suck.
Multiplats suck because they look better than some of the exclusives???they suck because they tend to be more comercial! comercial multiplat sucks
[QUOTE="adamosmaki"]and this has to do with gaming in what way? You wanna proof PS3 is more powerfull? Show me a good looking multiplatform game that runs better on PS3 than on my 8800gt equiped PC because unlike PS3 i can run all multiplatform games at 1080p max settings with 2-4xAA and usually framerates 40-60fps Now again what good looking ps3 games do that? You can stuck at your 600-720p res and noAA and 30fps while i will continue playing at 1920x1080 with AA and 60fpsS3P4eeever
GT5 WILL BE 1080P NATIVE, so im not stuck at 720p as you lied.+ multiplat games suck.
Gt5 is 1280x1080 (not sure about that). Even if thats not the case well done you got 1 decent looking game at 1080p while i'm as many pc gamers run almost all of the games at 1080p Also if you think multiplats suck then you must be satisfied with those 10-12 good exclusives sony got since 2006 and you mustn't play to often. I on the other hand i need more games than jsut 10 games in 3 years[QUOTE="S3P4eeever"][QUOTE="adamosmaki"]and this has to do with gaming in what way? You wanna proof PS3 is more powerfull? Show me a good looking multiplatform game that runs better on PS3 than on my 8800gt equiped PC because unlike PS3 i can run all multiplatform games at 1080p max settings with 2-4xAA and usually framerates 40-60fps Now again what good looking ps3 games do that? You can stuck at your 600-720p res and noAA and 30fps while i will continue playing at 1920x1080 with AA and 60fpsadamosmaki
GT5 WILL BE 1080P NATIVE, so im not stuck at 720p as you lied.+ multiplat games suck.
Gt5 is 1280x1080 (not sure about that). Even if thats not the case well done you got 1 decent looking game at 1080p while i'm as many pc gamers run almost all of the games at 1080p Also if you think multiplats suck then you must be satisfied with those 10-12 good exclusives sony got since 2006 and you mustn't play to often. I on the other hand i need more games than jsut 10 games in 3 yearsExactly, there is consistently a difference between the PS3 and a PC with an 8800GTS. DX10 + 96 Stream Processors + Higher Res Screen Resolution + More Polys being rendered etc...> RSX + Cell
[QUOTE="S3P4eeever"][QUOTE="adamosmaki"]and this has to do with gaming in what way? You wanna proof PS3 is more powerfull? Show me a good looking multiplatform game that runs better on PS3 than on my 8800gt equiped PC because unlike PS3 i can run all multiplatform games at 1080p max settings with 2-4xAA and usually framerates 40-60fps Now again what good looking ps3 games do that? You can stuck at your 600-720p res and noAA and 30fps while i will continue playing at 1920x1080 with AA and 60fpsadamosmaki
GT5 WILL BE 1080P NATIVE, so im not stuck at 720p as you lied.+ multiplat games suck.
Gt5 is 1280x1080 (not sure about that). Even if thats not the case well done you got 1 decent looking game at 1080p while i'm as many pc gamers run almost all of the games at 1080p Also if you think multiplats suck then you must be satisfied with those 10-12 good exclusives sony got since 2006 and you mustn't play to often. I on the other hand i need more games than jsut 10 games in 3 yearstruth is i dont game that much anymore thats why i like to enjoy good games. GT5 will be full 1920x1080.wikipedia
and yes i play some xbox360 xclusives with my PC.
http://www.ps3daily.co.uk/20081120/gran-turismo-5-gt5-in-4-times-the-resolution-of-full-hd/
Gt5 is 1280x1080 (not sure about that). Even if thats not the case well done you got 1 decent looking game at 1080p while i'm as many pc gamers run almost all of the games at 1080p Also if you think multiplats suck then you must be satisfied with those 10-12 good exclusives sony got since 2006 and you mustn't play to often. I on the other hand i need more games than jsut 10 games in 3 years[QUOTE="adamosmaki"][QUOTE="S3P4eeever"]
GT5 WILL BE 1080P NATIVE, so im not stuck at 720p as you lied.+ multiplat games suck.
S3P4eeever
truth is i dont game that much anymore thats why i like to enjoy good games. GT5 will be full 1920x1080.wikipedia
and yes i play some xbox360 xclusives with my PC.
it won't. only the menus will be 1920x1080, ingame it'll be 1280x1080 and upscaled horizontally.bravo, well done PS3, you can beat a single core with 1 gig of ram attached to a stock clocked 320mb 8800GTS! seriously, the ps3 is a weak piece of crap, if you can't deal with that, you're a sony fanboy my 4850 alone wold eat the ps3 as a wholeGTR2addict
lol you are dreaming indeed.
a single core pentium 4 with 8800gts better than a PS3 Pff i wont wast my time no more.
http://www.ps3daily.co.uk/20081120/gran-turismo-5-gt5-in-4-times-the-resolution-of-full-hd/
+ MY FUTURE 5870 WILL EAT YOURCHEAP 4850 FOR BREAKFAST!
Gt5 is 1280x1080 (not sure about that). Even if thats not the case well done you got 1 decent looking game at 1080p while i'm as many pc gamers run almost all of the games at 1080p Also if you think multiplats suck then you must be satisfied with those 10-12 good exclusives sony got since 2006 and you mustn't play to often. I on the other hand i need more games than jsut 10 games in 3 years[QUOTE="adamosmaki"][QUOTE="S3P4eeever"]
GT5 WILL BE 1080P NATIVE, so im not stuck at 720p as you lied.+ multiplat games suck.
S3P4eeever
truth is i dont game that much anymore thats why i like to enjoy good games. GT5 will be full 1920x1080.wikipedia
and yes i play some xbox360 xclusives with my PC.
http://www.ps3daily.co.uk/20081120/gran-turismo-5-gt5-in-4-times-the-resolution-of-full-hd/
Great now all you need is 4ps3's to get that res while a pc equiped with a single $400 5870 can pull higher resolutions than those. Dude we get it PS3 is a great console but face it hardware wise is weak ( for crying out loud it only has 256mb of ram as opposed to 2-4gb for a $400-500 pc). The hardware on pd3 was designed in 2004 2005 you think is more powerfull from a pc with a cpu and a vga that got designed in 2007 2008 or 2009?
[QUOTE="S3P4eeever"]
[QUOTE="adamosmaki"] Gt5 is 1280x1080 (not sure about that). Even if thats not the case well done you got 1 decent looking game at 1080p while i'm as many pc gamers run almost all of the games at 1080p Also if you think multiplats suck then you must be satisfied with those 10-12 good exclusives sony got since 2006 and you mustn't play to often. I on the other hand i need more games than jsut 10 games in 3 yearsadamosmaki
truth is i dont game that much anymore thats why i like to enjoy good games. GT5 will be full 1920x1080.wikipedia
and yes i play some xbox360 xclusives with my PC.
http://www.ps3daily.co.uk/20081120/gran-turismo-5-gt5-in-4-times-the-resolution-of-full-hd/
Great now all you need is 4ps3's to get that res while a pc equiped with a single $400 5870 can pull higher resolutions than those. Dude we get it PS3 is a great console but face it hardware wise is weak ( for crying out loud it only has 256mb of ram as opposed to 2-4gb for a $400-500 pc). The hardware on pd3 was designed in 2004 2005 you think is more powerfull from a pc with a cpu and a vga that got designed in 2007 2008 or 2009?
DUDE THAT SHOWS THAT GT5 WILL FULL HD... my future5870 will bring me back toreal PC gaming after 4 years. so let me enjoy my PS3 with GT5and all the others @1920x1080p on my 65" plasma which i will enjoy until 2017
lol you said that single core cpu with 8800gts is better than a ps3. please stop arguing
[QUOTE="adamosmaki"]
[QUOTE="S3P4eeever"]
truth is i dont game that much anymore thats why i like to enjoy good games. GT5 will be full 1920x1080.wikipedia
and yes i play some xbox360 xclusives with my PC.
http://www.ps3daily.co.uk/20081120/gran-turismo-5-gt5-in-4-times-the-resolution-of-full-hd/
S3P4eeever
Great now all you need is 4ps3's to get that res while a pc equiped with a single $400 5870 can pull higher resolutions than those. Dude we get it PS3 is a great console but face it hardware wise is weak ( for crying out loud it only has 256mb of ram as opposed to 2-4gb for a $400-500 pc). The hardware on pd3 was designed in 2004 2005 you think is more powerfull from a pc with a cpu and a vga that got designed in 2007 2008 or 2009?
DUDE THAT SHOWS THAT GT5 WILL FULL HD...andtherefore still play onmy65" plasma.
now that 5870 will bring me back toreal PC gaming after 4 years. so let me enjoy my PS3 with GT5 @1920x1080p
Dude read the link you posted in wikipedia about gran turismo ( although like i said wikipedia not the most credible source). It says "native resolution 1280x1024" and upscaled in replays at "1440x1080" so no is not 1080p native is only upscaled at that res[QUOTE="S3P4eeever"][QUOTE="adamosmaki"]
muahhaha got ya. it was about gt5 prologue!
Great now all you need is 4ps3's to get that res while a pc equiped with a single $400 5870 can pull higher resolutions than those. Dude we get it PS3 is a great console but face it hardware wise is weak ( for crying out loud it only has 256mb of ram as opposed to 2-4gb for a $400-500 pc). The hardware on pd3 was designed in 2004 2005 you think is more powerfull from a pc with a cpu and a vga that got designed in 2007 2008 or 2009?
adamosmaki
DUDE THAT SHOWS THAT GT5 WILL FULL HD...andtherefore still play onmy65" plasma.
now that 5870 will bring me back toreal PC gaming after 4 years. so let me enjoy my PS3 with GT5 @1920x1080p
Dude read the link you posted in wikipedia about gran turismo ( although like i said wikipedia not the most credible source). It says "native resolution 1280x1024" and upscaled in replays at "1440x1080" so no is not 1080p native is only upscaled at that resmuahhaha got ya. it was about gt5 prologue!
gt5 will be full hd and if is not it will be better than any race game you can play onyour lowend 8800gts.
Dude read the link you posted in wikipedia about gran turismo ( although like i said wikipedia not the most credible source). It says "native resolution 1280x1024" and upscaled in replays at "1440x1080" so no is not 1080p native is only upscaled at that res[QUOTE="adamosmaki"][QUOTE="S3P4eeever"]
DUDE THAT SHOWS THAT GT5 WILL FULL HD...andtherefore still play onmy65" plasma.
now that 5870 will bring me back toreal PC gaming after 4 years. so let me enjoy my PS3 with GT5 @1920x1080p
S3P4eeever
muahhaha got ya. it was about gt5 prologue!
gt5 will be full hd and if is not it will be better than any race game you can play onyour lowend 8800gts.
My low end vga can run games like burnout paradise and race driver grid at full 1080p with 4xAA and at 60fps but your almighty PS3 can handle only 720p no AA and 30fps.[QUOTE="S3P4eeever"][QUOTE="adamosmaki"] Dude read the link you posted in wikipedia about gran turismo ( although like i said wikipedia not the most credible source). It says "native resolution 1280x1024" and upscaled in replays at "1440x1080" so no is not 1080p native is only upscaled at that resadamosmaki
muahhaha got ya. it was about gt5 prologue!
gt5 will be full hd and if is not it will be better than any race game you can play onyour lowend 8800gts.
My low end vga can run games like burnout paradise and race driver grid at full 1080p with 4xAA and at 60fps but your almighty PS3 can handle only 720p no AA and 30fps.thats beacuse they suck at EA. and GT5 againts burnout will like heaven and hell, likecrysis and MARIO
My low end vga can run games like burnout paradise and race driver grid at full 1080p with 4xAA and at 60fps but your almighty PS3 can handle only 720p no AA and 30fps.[QUOTE="adamosmaki"][QUOTE="S3P4eeever"]
muahhaha got ya. it was about gt5 prologue!
gt5 will be full hd and if is not it will be better than any race game you can play onyour lowend 8800gts.
S3P4eeever
thats beacuse they suck at EA. and GT5 againts burnout will like heaven and hell, likecrysis and MARIO
Of course they suck they couldnt harness all that ps3 power and make their games at 1080p just like every good lookin ps3 exclusive. Oh wait neither is killzone 2 neither is uncharted and uncharted 2 and neither any other semi decent looking ps3 game at 1080p. So what does that says acoording to you?[QUOTE="S3P4eeever"][QUOTE="adamosmaki"] My low end vga can run games like burnout paradise and race driver grid at full 1080p with 4xAA and at 60fps but your almighty PS3 can handle only 720p no AA and 30fps.adamosmaki
thats beacuse they suck at EA. and GT5 againts burnout will like heaven and hell, likecrysis and MARIO
Of course they suck they couldnt harness all that ps3 power and make their games at 1080p just like every good lookin ps3 exclusive. Oh wait neither is killzone 2 neither is uncharted and uncharted 2 and neither any other semi decent looking ps3 game at 1080p. So what does that says acoording to you?http://boardsus.playstation.com/playstation/board/message?board.id=ps3&thread.id=3605691
list of full hd ps3 games. nothing more to say. tata
http://boardsus.playstation.com/playstation/board/message?board.id=pslounge&thread.id=469951
Of course they suck they couldnt harness all that ps3 power and make their games at 1080p just like every good lookin ps3 exclusive. Oh wait neither is killzone 2 neither is uncharted and uncharted 2 and neither any other semi decent looking ps3 game at 1080p. So what does that says acoording to you?[QUOTE="adamosmaki"][QUOTE="S3P4eeever"]
thats beacuse they suck at EA. and GT5 againts burnout will like heaven and hell, likecrysis and MARIO
S3P4eeever
http://boardsus.playstation.com/playstation/board/message?board.id=ps3&thread.id=3605691
list of full hd ps3 games. nothing more to say. tata
Wolf of the Battlefield: Commando 3 = 1920×1080 lol a arcade game.
Wipeout HD = 1920×1080 uses psp assets.
Go Puzzle = 1920×1080 lol an arcade game
GT5 Prologue = 1920×1080 lies
Lair = 800×1080/1600×1080 no no no, 1920x1080 is the only true 1080p
Ridge Racer 7 = 1920×1080
NBA07 = 1920×1080
NBA08 = 1920×1080
Blast Factor = 1920×1080
Calling All Cars = 1920×1080
Echochrome = 1920×1080
Elefunk = 1920×1080
High Velocity Bowling = 1920×1080
Locoroco Cocoreccho = 1920×1080
Mainichi Issyo = 1440×1080
Pixel Junk Monsters/Racers/Eden = 1920×1080
Rub'a'dub = 1600×1080
Snakeball = 1280×1080
Stardust HD = 1280×1080
Sudoku = 1920×1080
Super Rub-a-Dub = 1600×1080
Tekken 5 Dark Resurrection = 1920×1080
nearly every thing you've shown is a psn arcade games others aren't true 1080p and others are outright lies.
Of course they suck they couldnt harness all that ps3 power and make their games at 1080p just like every good lookin ps3 exclusive. Oh wait neither is killzone 2 neither is uncharted and uncharted 2 and neither any other semi decent looking ps3 game at 1080p. So what does that says acoording to you?[QUOTE="adamosmaki"][QUOTE="S3P4eeever"]
thats beacuse they suck at EA. and GT5 againts burnout will like heaven and hell, likecrysis and MARIO
S3P4eeever
http://boardsus.playstation.com/playstation/board/message?board.id=ps3&thread.id=3605691
list of full hd ps3 games. nothing more to say. tata
All i see is 15 games neither of which is something special graphics wise running at 1080p out of how many ps3 games total 500-600-700? Now shall we compare that to what 200-300-400 games that came out on 2006 and later that my 8800gt can play at 1080p?[QUOTE="GTR2addict"]bravo, well done PS3, you can beat a single core with 1 gig of ram attached to a stock clocked 320mb 8800GTS! seriously, the ps3 is a weak piece of crap, if you can't deal with that, you're a sony fanboy my 4850 alone wold eat the ps3 as a wholeS3P4eeever
lol you are dreaming indeed.
a single core pentium 4 with 8800gts better than a PS3 Pff i wont wast my time no more.
http://www.ps3daily.co.uk/20081120/gran-turismo-5-gt5-in-4-times-the-resolution-of-full-hd/
+ MY FUTURE 5870 WILL EAT YOURCHEAP 4850 FOR BREAKFAST!
my future crossfire 5850's will eat your 5870 for lunch :lol:[QUOTE="S3P4eeever"][QUOTE="GTR2addict"]bravo, well done PS3, you can beat a single core with 1 gig of ram attached to a stock clocked 320mb 8800GTS! seriously, the ps3 is a weak piece of crap, if you can't deal with that, you're a sony fanboy my 4850 alone wold eat the ps3 as a wholeGTR2addict
lol you are dreaming indeed.
a single core pentium 4 with 8800gts better than a PS3 Pff i wont wast my time no more.
http://www.ps3daily.co.uk/20081120/gran-turismo-5-gt5-in-4-times-the-resolution-of-full-hd/
+ MY FUTURE 5870 WILL EAT YOURCHEAP 4850 FOR BREAKFAST!
my future crossfire 5850's will eat your 5870 for lunch :lol:lolollolo my future 5890x2 crossfire will blow the roof of the dump.
[QUOTE="S3P4eeever"][QUOTE="adamosmaki"] Of course they suck they couldnt harness all that ps3 power and make their games at 1080p just like every good lookin ps3 exclusive. Oh wait neither is killzone 2 neither is uncharted and uncharted 2 and neither any other semi decent looking ps3 game at 1080p. So what does that says acoording to you?adamosmaki
http://boardsus.playstation.com/playstation/board/message?board.id=ps3&thread.id=3605691
list of full hd ps3 games. nothing more to say. tata
All i see is 15 games neither of which is something special graphics wise running at 1080p out of how many ps3 games total 500-600-700? Now shall we compare that to what 200-300-400 games that came out on 2006 and later that my 8800gt can play at 1080p?hey im a pc gamer as well dont try to say to me that your 8800gt is gonna be better tan my ps3. i will still be sucking thejuice out my ps3 while your card will be useless
All i see is 15 games neither of which is something special graphics wise running at 1080p out of how many ps3 games total 500-600-700? Now shall we compare that to what 200-300-400 games that came out on 2006 and later that my 8800gt can play at 1080p?[QUOTE="adamosmaki"][QUOTE="S3P4eeever"]
http://boardsus.playstation.com/playstation/board/message?board.id=ps3&thread.id=3605691
list of full hd ps3 games. nothing more to say. tata
S3P4eeever
hey im a pc gamer as well dont try to say to me that your 8800gt is gonna be better tan my ps3. i will still be sucking thejuice out my ps3 while your card will be useless
you see it is already better because ps3 cant all of magically transform that 7800gtx call me RSX to a better vga. You can optimize a game on PS3 as much as you want but fact is that a ps3 game will never look as good as the same game on a pc equiped with an 8800gt and a decent CPU. The only way to measure performance between the 2 platforms are multiplats games and like i said a mere 8800gt can run those games at 2,5x the resolution the PS3 can and usually with AA something that is only theoritacally possible on Ps3 because games that use more than 2xMsAA on PS3 are non existant Also why my card will be useless i dont get your point here[QUOTE="S3P4eeever"][QUOTE="adamosmaki"] All i see is 15 games neither of which is something special graphics wise running at 1080p out of how many ps3 games total 500-600-700? Now shall we compare that to what 200-300-400 games that came out on 2006 and later that my 8800gt can play at 1080p?adamosmaki
hey im a pc gamer as well dont try to say to me that your 8800gt is gonna be better tan my ps3. i will still be sucking thejuice out my ps3 while your card will be useless
you see it is already better because ps3 cant all of magically transform that 7800gtx call me RSX to a better vga. You can optimize a game on PS3 as much as you want but fact is that a ps3 game will never look as good as the same game on a pc equiped with an 8800gt and a decent CPU. The only way to measure performance between the 2 platforms are multiplats games and like i said a mere 8800gt can run those games at 2,5x the resolution the PS3 can and usually with AA something that is only theoritacally possible on Ps3 because games that use more than 2xMsAA on PS3 are non existant Also why my card will be useless i dont get your point hereits easy, because of the programer optimization. for example oblivion looks pretty good in 7900gt but fallout 3wont look as good in 7900gt. nowa game likeRAGE will look fine in 8800gt and will look fine in ps3, but itwont look that good on a 7900gt. later on games will look worse on 8800gt than in a ps3. sorry im not a native english speaker
Wow, cows are trying to fool people who know nothing about computers now? You think you can trick us by comparing the PS3 to a 4 year old video card? :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Tell you what, a $150 video card today is 3 times more powerful than the entire PS3.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment