PS3 vs PC....really? Cmon, time for a reality check (56K GO AWAY)

  • 106 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for moistsandwich
moistsandwich

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 moistsandwich
Member since 2009 • 25 Posts

Can any of you cows show me a PS3 game that...

is 500 square miles

runs at 60fps

@ 1080p

and looks like this....

no... you can't, because it doesn't and can't exist. Please someone post some PS3 screens of the same game... so we can all have a good laugh.

Avatar image for Silenthps
Silenthps

7302

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#2 Silenthps
Member since 2006 • 7302 Posts
nice sigs :)
Avatar image for Ragnarok1051
Ragnarok1051

20238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Ragnarok1051
Member since 2007 • 20238 Posts

I think its funny that you believe fanboys.

Avatar image for DontBeHatin1983
DontBeHatin1983

1044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 DontBeHatin1983
Member since 2008 • 1044 Posts

you know what the difference between the PS3 and PC is while every PS3 is the same the PC isnt not every one has a high end PC so i can say JC2 looks better on PS3 and put some low qualty pics from PC. you cant say its not from PC cuz it is

Avatar image for Erik2393
Erik2393

57

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Erik2393
Member since 2009 • 57 Posts

No pictures to post but fully agreed. The PC is a better system and often times has the best of both worlds as far as games but sadly it is not a casual gaming system. They are too expensive to buy in store, unlike a $300 ps3, and most people won't spend the time researching and building a PC. Which for anyone out there is has wondered building a PC is not that difficult and is one of the better projects and purchases I have made. Back to the topic though, I really hope we will see a turn around in PC gaming because companies just don't focus enough on the most powerful and arguably easiest system to program for.

****So coming from someone who owns and plays both PS3 and PC, the PC is better but sadly does not have as large a community as a console that is an easier for the average person purchase.****

Avatar image for forgot_it
forgot_it

6756

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 forgot_it
Member since 2004 • 6756 Posts
Are your 3rd and 5th screens from the 360 version?
Avatar image for Bangerman15
Bangerman15

1978

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Bangerman15
Member since 2010 • 1978 Posts
green A button and a LB??? 360 pics??
Avatar image for moistsandwich
moistsandwich

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 moistsandwich
Member since 2009 • 25 Posts

Are your 3rd and 5th screens from the 360 version?forgot_it

nah... just using a 360/PC gamepad on my PC... for some games it just feels better.... Just Cause 2 & Batman: AA for example.

Avatar image for windsquid9000
windsquid9000

3206

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 windsquid9000
Member since 2009 • 3206 Posts

Are your 3rd and 5th screens from the 360 version?forgot_it
Could be the PC version with a 360 remote.

Avatar image for moistsandwich
moistsandwich

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 moistsandwich
Member since 2009 • 25 Posts

you know what the difference between the PS3 and PC is while every PS3 is the same the PC isnt not every one has a high end PC so i can say JC2 looks better on PS3 and put some low qualty pics from PC. you cant say its not from PC cuz it is

DontBeHatin1983

So we should judge PC's by the lowest common denominator? Yeah that makes sense.... :roll:

Your "logic" is like saying the PS3 is terrible because someone doesn't own it. I'd like to say nice try, but that would be lying.

SO these are pics of the game running on MY PC... please show me what the game will look like on YOUR PS3.

Avatar image for moistsandwich
moistsandwich

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 moistsandwich
Member since 2009 • 25 Posts

I think its funny that you believe fanboys.

Ragnarok1051

How do I believe fanboys, when the purpose of my thread is to show them they are wrong?

Avatar image for Androvinus
Androvinus

5796

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#12 Androvinus
Member since 2008 • 5796 Posts
are these graphics really supposed to knock our socks off ?
Avatar image for moistsandwich
moistsandwich

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 moistsandwich
Member since 2009 • 25 Posts

are these graphics really supposed to knock our socks off ?Androvinus

If not... then you must be really sad everytime you fire up your PS3.

Avatar image for Ragnarok1051
Ragnarok1051

20238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 Ragnarok1051
Member since 2007 • 20238 Posts

[QUOTE="Ragnarok1051"]

I think its funny that you believe fanboys.

moistsandwich

How do I believe fanboys, when the purpose of my thread is to show them they are wrong?

They're fanboys of course they're wrong. Besides do you really think they believe what they say.
Avatar image for moistsandwich
moistsandwich

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 moistsandwich
Member since 2009 • 25 Posts

[QUOTE="moistsandwich"]

[QUOTE="Ragnarok1051"]

I think its funny that you believe fanboys.

Ragnarok1051

How do I believe fanboys, when the purpose of my thread is to show them they are wrong?

They're fanboys of course they're wrong. Besides do you really think they believe what they say.

I see your point...

well I hope they don't believe their own nonsense... but hey... there are alot of blind nuts out there, and they can often be found on the internet.

Avatar image for muscleserge
muscleserge

3307

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#16 muscleserge
Member since 2005 • 3307 Posts
Well technically, the PS3 wouldn't be even remotely close to running Just Cause 2 like a PC, simply because JC2 on PC is DX10 only, and PS3 can't render images of that quality at that resolution with those filters, well it can but at about 1-2fps. My 8800GT runs JC2 with everything on highest except shadow on med, and gpu water simulation off @ 1680x1050 40fps. Comparing PS3 to PC is very stupid, PC tech even from 06 is superior to the PS3.
Avatar image for chronocross668
chronocross668

530

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 chronocross668
Member since 2009 • 530 Posts

looks like ps2 game lol

Avatar image for lordreaven
lordreaven

7239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 lordreaven
Member since 2005 • 7239 Posts

looks like ps2 game lol

chronocross668
Gameplay my friend. Had a ****load of fun with the demo
Avatar image for stiggy321
stiggy321

609

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 stiggy321
Member since 2009 • 609 Posts
[QUOTE="moistsandwich"]

[QUOTE="DontBeHatin1983"]

you know what the difference between the PS3 and PC is while every PS3 is the same the PC isnt not every one has a high end PC so i can say JC2 looks better on PS3 and put some low qualty pics from PC. you cant say its not from PC cuz it is

So we should judge PC's by the lowest common denominator? Yeah that makes sense.... :roll:

Your "logic" is like saying the PS3 is terrible because someone doesn't own it. I'd like to say nice try, but that would be lying.

SO these are pics of the game running on MY PC... please show me what the game will look like on YOUR PS3.

May I ask what you paid for your PC? Also, does it have a blu-ray drive, audio optical out or comparable sound card (capable of supporting 7 channels of sound and a subwoofer), or can it play the only other 10 on gamespot this generation... the same 10 that won best graphics of 2008? The answers are probably: A lot more than 300 dollars, no, no, and of course not that game sucks though. Yeah, I thought so.
Avatar image for TheSterls
TheSterls

3117

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 TheSterls
Member since 2009 • 3117 Posts

[QUOTE="chronocross668"]

looks like ps2 game lol

lordreaven

Gameplay my friend. Had a ****load of fun with the demo

I think this is hillarious. GOW3 stomps JC2 from a visual perspective. Is it on the same scale? No but its pushing far higher polys in each models better lighting and nicer textures. So yes I can fire up my PS3 and find better visuals then some crap console port that is Jc2 . If I want a good pc expereince ill fire up Crysis on my GTX285.

Avatar image for Phazevariance
Phazevariance

12356

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 Phazevariance
Member since 2003 • 12356 Posts
[QUOTE="gangster480"]

[QUOTE="moistsandwich"]

Can any of you cows show me a PS3 game that...

is 500 square miles

runs at 60fps

@ 1080p

and looks like this....

no... you can't, because it doesn't and can't exist. Please someone post some PS3 screens of the same game... so we can all have a good laugh.

check this gow 3 vid out. spoilers btw and its in a different language. and it is captured poorly.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EuTKmYYlPqE

its 1080p

its A LOT more than 500 square mile.

its most of the time 60 frames.

all on a 299 dollars ps3 ladies and gents

Don't lie... GOW3 is 720p native with 1080p support... that means UPSCALES to 1080p. Sorry to burst your bubble there, but you're basing your argument on old information.
Avatar image for Dataleak
Dataleak

1737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 Dataleak
Member since 2010 • 1737 Posts

looks like ps2 game lol

chronocross668

Thank you. Someone else who agrees with me. I honestly can't tell the difference between GOW3 to GOW2. It looks good until the actual gameplay. This isn't fanboy ranted because I absolutely love the GOW series, (I've even finished Chains Of Olympus), but GOW3 just doesn't impress me visually.

Avatar image for Androvinus
Androvinus

5796

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#25 Androvinus
Member since 2008 • 5796 Posts

[QUOTE="chronocross668"]

looks like ps2 game lol

Dataleak

Thank you. Someone else who agrees with me. I honestly can't tell the difference between GOW3 to GOW2. It looks good until the actual gameplay. This isn't fanboy ranted because I absolutely love the GOW series, (I've even finished Chains Of Olympus), but GOW3 just doesn't impress me visually.

you obviously arnt playing in hd. or u havent played gow 2 in years
Avatar image for moistsandwich
moistsandwich

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 moistsandwich
Member since 2009 • 25 Posts

[QUOTE="moistsandwich"]

Can any of you cows show me a PS3 game that...

is 500 square miles

runs at 60fps

@ 1080p

and looks like this....

no... you can't, because it doesn't and can't exist. Please someone post some PS3 screens of the same game... so we can all have a good laugh.

gangster480

check this gow 3 vid out. spoilers btw and its in a different language. and it is captured poorly.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EuTKmYYlPqE

its 1080p

its A LOT more than 500 square mile.

its most of the time 60 frames.

all on a 299 dollars ps3 ladies and gents

Wait... You think GoW3 is 500 square miles in the size of its map/s? LOL... UBER FAIL!

I've seen recent GoW3 vids... I don't want to watch any with spoilers thx... As I'm going to buy the game, play it, and enjoy it... but at the same time, not be in denial about whether it outperforms the PC in visuals or not.

LOL... Can't believe you're trying to compare GOW3's small areas, with 500 fricken square miles of OPEN terrain to explore.

Avatar image for lordreaven
lordreaven

7239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 lordreaven
Member since 2005 • 7239 Posts
[QUOTE="TheSterls"]

[QUOTE="lordreaven"][QUOTE="chronocross668"]

looks like ps2 game lol

Gameplay my friend. Had a ****load of fun with the demo

I think this is hillarious. GOW3 stomps JC2 from a visual perspective. Is it on the same scale? No but its pushing far higher polys in each models better lighting and nicer textures. So yes I can fire up my PS3 and find better visuals then some crap console port that is Jc2 . If I want a good pc expereince ill fire up Crysis on my GTX285.

I'm talking about gameplay..................I honestly found GoW boring.
Avatar image for moistsandwich
moistsandwich

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 moistsandwich
Member since 2009 • 25 Posts

To help put things in perspective a little bit....

Avatar image for Mr_BillGates
Mr_BillGates

3211

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#29 Mr_BillGates
Member since 2005 • 3211 Posts

[QUOTE="moistsandwich"]

Can any of you cows show me a PS3 game that...

is 500 square miles

runs at 60fps

@ 1080p

and looks like this....

no... you can't, because it doesn't and can't exist. Please someone post some PS3 screens of the same game... so we can all have a good laugh.

gangster480

check this gow 3 vid out. spoilers btw and its in a different language. and it is captured poorly.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EuTKmYYlPqE

its 1080p

its A LOT more than 500 square mile.

its most of the time 60 frames.

all on a 299 dollars ps3 ladies and gents

1) PS3's gaming native output is 720p. 1080p is marketing BS. 2) It's a small scaled game, because of hardware limitation. 3) You can't prove it's running 60 FPS, but neither can anyone who is not working for the company 4) Mainstream system created lower standards for graphics among it's fans. They'll be impressed by anything!

Avatar image for Lantern-Cusp
Lantern-Cusp

739

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#30 Lantern-Cusp
Member since 2009 • 739 Posts

LMAO playing that demo on my ps3 looks better than the screen shotsyou posted......actually i have never seen a screenshot of a pc game that looks better then the best looking ps3 games when playing live on my HDTV, must be a live in your face thing.

Avatar image for Mr_BillGates
Mr_BillGates

3211

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#31 Mr_BillGates
Member since 2005 • 3211 Posts

LMAO playing that demo on my ps3 looks better than the screen shotsyou posted......actually i have never seen a screenshot of a pc game that looks better then the best looking ps3 games when playing live on my HDTV, must be a live in your face thing.

Lantern-Cusp
You have just confirmed that most PS3 fans have lower graphic standards.
Avatar image for DontBeHatin1983
DontBeHatin1983

1044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 DontBeHatin1983
Member since 2008 • 1044 Posts

[QUOTE="DontBeHatin1983"]

you know what the difference between the PS3 and PC is while every PS3 is the same the PC isnt not every one has a high end PC so i can say JC2 looks better on PS3 and put some low qualty pics from PC. you cant say its not from PC cuz it is

moistsandwich

So we should judge PC's by the lowest common denominator? Yeah that makes sense.... :roll:

Your "logic" is like saying the PS3 is terrible because someone doesn't own it. I'd like to say nice try, but that would be lying.

SO these are pics of the game running on MY PC... please show me what the game will look like on YOUR PS3.

i always get multiplats on the PC, you cant upgrade consoles so to make fair use what was available for the PC in 2006/7 whenever the ps3 came out or lets say build a PC for $300 from ground up. thats why fanboys should stop comparing PC to consoles its not the same and PC gamers should stop crysis pics if its xbox vs ps3 fanboys we all know it looks good but still i had more fun playing KZ2 then Crysis

Avatar image for Mr_BillGates
Mr_BillGates

3211

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#34 Mr_BillGates
Member since 2005 • 3211 Posts

[QUOTE="Mr_BillGates"][QUOTE="Lantern-Cusp"]

LMAO playing that demo on my ps3 looks better than the screen shotsyou posted......actually i have never seen a screenshot of a pc game that looks better then the best looking ps3 games when playing live on my HDTV, must be a live in your face thing.

Lantern-Cusp

You have just confirmed that most PS3 fans have lower graphic standards.



are you an idiot?

I'm not the idiot saying his PS3 looks better than the PC version.

Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#35 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

[QUOTE="moistsandwich"]

Can any of you cows show me a PS3 game that...

is 500 square miles

runs at 60fps

@ 1080p

and looks like this....

no... you can't, because it doesn't and can't exist. Please someone post some PS3 screens of the same game... so we can all have a good laugh.

gangster480

check this gow 3 vid out. spoilers btw and its in a different language. and it is captured poorly.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EuTKmYYlPqE

its 1080p

its A LOT more than 500 square mile.

its most of the time 60 frames.

all on a 299 dollars ps3 ladies and gents

Correction: Runs in 720p, has MLAA, runs around 40-50 frames most of the time and will go as high as 60 and low as 30, and what I highlighted in red is not confirmed and false, this isn't a open world game.

Avatar image for gangster480
gangster480

856

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#36 gangster480
Member since 2006 • 856 Posts

[QUOTE="gangster480"]

[QUOTE="moistsandwich"]

Can any of you cows show me a PS3 game that...

is 500 square miles

runs at 60fps

@ 1080p

and looks like this....

no... you can't, because it doesn't and can't exist. Please someone post some PS3 screens of the same game... so we can all have a good laugh.

lordreaven

check this gow 3 vid out. spoilers btw and its in a different language. and it is captured poorly.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EuTKmYYlPqE

its 1080p

its A LOT more than 500 square mile.

its most of the time 60 frames.

all on a 299 dollars ps3 ladies and gents

$299 that can't play anything untill you buy a tv for it.

lmao u got a point but the same thing could be said for pc. u can have the best one in the world but its useless with out a decent monitor and mouse and keyboard. and the tv is a better investment because you can get cable, plug in a few game consoles, watch movies, and hell even connect a pc to it.

Avatar image for moistsandwich
moistsandwich

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 moistsandwich
Member since 2009 • 25 Posts

LMAO playing that demo on my ps3 looks better than the screen shotsyou posted......actually i have never seen a screenshot of a pc game that looks better then the best looking ps3 games when playing live on my HDTV, must be a live in your face thing.

Lantern-Cusp

LOL... I bet it does... I provided evidence of the game on my system... where are your pics? Also... so your PS3 is special and running the game in DX10? 45-60 fps, with 4x AA @ 1080p ? LOL at the PS3 version looking better... Time to remove your head from Sony's bottom and see the world realisticly.

Avatar image for agentfred
agentfred

5666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#38 agentfred
Member since 2003 • 5666 Posts
its A LOT more than 500 square mile.gangster480
How much more?
Avatar image for moistsandwich
moistsandwich

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 moistsandwich
Member since 2009 • 25 Posts

[QUOTE="moistsandwich"]

[QUOTE="DontBeHatin1983"]

you know what the difference between the PS3 and PC is while every PS3 is the same the PC isnt not every one has a high end PC so i can say JC2 looks better on PS3 and put some low qualty pics from PC. you cant say its not from PC cuz it is

DontBeHatin1983

So we should judge PC's by the lowest common denominator? Yeah that makes sense.... :roll:

Your "logic" is like saying the PS3 is terrible because someone doesn't own it. I'd like to say nice try, but that would be lying.

SO these are pics of the game running on MY PC... please show me what the game will look like on YOUR PS3.

i always get multiplats on the PC, you cant upgrade consoles so to make fair use what was available for the PC in 2006/7 whenever the ps3 came out or lets say build a PC for $300 from ground up. thats why fanboys should stop comparing PC to consoles its not the same and PC gamers should stop crysis pics if its xbox vs ps3 fanboys we all know it looks good but still i had more fun playing KZ2 then Crysis

Umm... those pics aren't Crysis.

Avatar image for Human-after-all
Human-after-all

2972

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 Human-after-all
Member since 2009 • 2972 Posts

[QUOTE="moistsandwich"]

Can any of you cows show me a PS3 game that...

is 500 square miles

runs at 60fps

@ 1080p

and looks like this....

no... you can't, because it doesn't and can't exist. Please someone post some PS3 screens of the same game... so we can all have a good laugh.

gangster480

check this gow 3 vid out. spoilers btw and its in a different language. and it is captured poorly.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EuTKmYYlPqE

its 1080p

its A LOT more than 500 square mile.

its most of the time 60 frames.

all on a 299 dollars ps3 ladies and gents

Ahaha I doubt that.

Avatar image for moistsandwich
moistsandwich

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 moistsandwich
Member since 2009 • 25 Posts

[QUOTE="gangster480"]its A LOT more than 500 square mile.agentfred
How much more?

Dude... weren't you paying attention.... ALOT DUDE... ALOT.... he be dropping truth bombs EVWYWARE! Cows tend to get technical like that... don't feel bad if you can't keep up.

Avatar image for lordreaven
lordreaven

7239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 lordreaven
Member since 2005 • 7239 Posts
[QUOTE="gangster480"]

[QUOTE="lordreaven"][QUOTE="gangster480"]

check this gow 3 vid out. spoilers btw and its in a different language. and it is captured poorly.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EuTKmYYlPqE

its 1080p

its A LOT more than 500 square mile.

its most of the time 60 frames.

all on a 299 dollars ps3 ladies and gents

$299 that can't play anything untill you buy a tv for it.

lmao u got a point but the same thing could be said for pc. u can have the best one in the world but its useless with out a decent monitor and mouse and keyboard. and the tv is a better investment because you can get cable, plug in a few game consoles, watch movies, and hell even connect a pc to it.

But my pc has a tv tuner so i get cable (tv tuner was only $40. I'll admit thta i payed $399 for my moniter though (24" LCD Samsung SyncMaster2493HM) So we have ourselves a stalemate.
Avatar image for lordreaven
lordreaven

7239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 lordreaven
Member since 2005 • 7239 Posts

To help put things in perspective a little bit....

moistsandwich

:o

Avatar image for gangster480
gangster480

856

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#44 gangster480
Member since 2006 • 856 Posts

wait a minute, gow 3 isnta 1080p game? ithought it was confirmed a long time ago that it was.:o

Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#45 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

wait a minute, gow 3 isnta 1080p game? ithought it was confirmed a long time ago that it was.:o

gangster480

That was a rumor, and on a PS site, they confirmed 720p and disappointed people.

Avatar image for gangster480
gangster480

856

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#46 gangster480
Member since 2006 • 856 Posts

[QUOTE="gangster480"]its A LOT more than 500 square mile.agentfred
How much more?

A LOT more. lol:P

in all seriousness, when he said its 500 miles square it isnt all rendered at the same time. it only renders the part that you see on your monitor. and that i think that kind of scale could be done last gen like gta san andreas. where as god of warzooms out andkratos is a dotand its a bunch of titans climbingup olympus.

Avatar image for gangster480
gangster480

856

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#47 gangster480
Member since 2006 • 856 Posts

[QUOTE="gangster480"]

[QUOTE="lordreaven"] $299 that can't play anything untill you buy a tv for it.lordreaven

lmao u got a point but the same thing could be said for pc. u can have the best one in the world but its useless with out a decent monitor and mouse and keyboard. and the tv is a better investment because you can get cable, plug in a few game consoles, watch movies, and hell even connect a pc to it.

But my pc has a tv tuner so i get cable (tv tuner was only $40. I'll admit thta i payed $399 for my moniter though (24" LCD Samsung SyncMaster2493HM) So we have ourselves a stalemate.

well played

Avatar image for washd123
washd123

3418

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 washd123
Member since 2003 • 3418 Posts

[QUOTE="agentfred"][QUOTE="gangster480"]its A LOT more than 500 square mile.gangster480

How much more?

A LOT more. lol:P

in all seriousness, when he said its 500 miles square it isnt all rendered at the same time. it only renders the part that you see on your monitor. and that i think that kind of scale could be done last gen like gta san andreas. where as god of warzooms out andkratos is a dotand its a bunch of titans climbingup olympus.

actually you have it backwards

GOW3 even though you may be seeing a large titan or a large area the actual play area is very small. its akin to games of old which had a lot of crap in the backgrounds but its was simple sprites with animations. its moved a step foreward but even though it seems like it has a massive scale its a smoke and mirror trick. there is no massive scale.

however with JC2 the entire area is playable and active. theres no cells like in FC2 theres not just background areas like GOW3 or most games.

the actual playable and rendered scale darwfs pretty much every game out there right now

Avatar image for Jesus_on_fire
Jesus_on_fire

2022

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 Jesus_on_fire
Member since 2008 • 2022 Posts

Can any of you cows show me a PS3 game that...

is 500 square miles

runs at 60fps

@ 1080p

and looks like this....

no... you can't, because it doesn't and can't exist. Please someone post some PS3 screens of the same game... so we can all have a good laugh.

moistsandwich

What is the specs of your pc?, if you dont mind me asking. Just curious

Avatar image for Lantern-Cusp
Lantern-Cusp

739

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#50 Lantern-Cusp
Member since 2009 • 739 Posts

[QUOTE="Lantern-Cusp"]

[QUOTE="Mr_BillGates"] You have just confirmed that most PS3 fans have lower graphic standards.Mr_BillGates



are you an idiot?

I'm not the idiot saying his PS3 looks better than the PC version.



All I am saying is by looking at these screenshots and looking up right at my TV, the images on my TV look better. I have never been fond of screenshots, I feel they never do games justice. Games will always look better when playing them live, thats all I was saying.