PS3/XBOX vs 6 year old gaming PC?

  • 112 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for charlesdarwin55
charlesdarwin55

2651

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 charlesdarwin55
Member since 2010 • 2651 Posts

So what is better; powerful 6 year old PC or PS3/Xbox?

Avatar image for DreamCryotank
DreamCryotank

1829

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 DreamCryotank
Member since 2011 • 1829 Posts

PC

Avatar image for Vinegar_Strokes
Vinegar_Strokes

3401

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Vinegar_Strokes
Member since 2010 • 3401 Posts

it depend how much and how good that PC was when it was first purchased.

Avatar image for skrat_01
skrat_01

33767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 skrat_01
Member since 2007 • 33767 Posts
Plenty of variables price hardware etc, and if the PC itself is running on similar visual settings and resolution. Silly question.
Avatar image for UC3Drake
UC3Drake

453

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 UC3Drake
Member since 2010 • 453 Posts

2011 - 6 = 2005

You could still own a computer with an amazing graphics card. So PC.

Avatar image for AnnoyedDragon
AnnoyedDragon

9948

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 AnnoyedDragon
Member since 2006 • 9948 Posts

We're talking about the same hardware that is in use in consoles right now, minus the performance advantages of fixed hardware.

So consoles would perform better, but that isn't really saying anything.

Avatar image for markinthedark
markinthedark

3676

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 markinthedark
Member since 2005 • 3676 Posts

2011 - 6 = 2005

You could still own a computer with an amazing graphics card. So PC.

UC3Drake

7800 GTX was the best card on the market in 2005, and it was incredibly expensive.... and i would imagine it falls below the minimum requirements for alot of recent games.

Avatar image for SecretPolice
SecretPolice

45558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 SecretPolice
Member since 2007 • 45558 Posts

I'd say that the number of gamers with a PC in Nov. 2005 that could out perform the 360's capabilities was minuscule. :P

Kameo: Elements of Power Picture

Kameo: Elements of Power Picture

Avatar image for Vadamee
Vadamee

1195

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Vadamee
Member since 2009 • 1195 Posts
Consoles. It would take more powerful PC hardware to run games at comparable visual quality to consoles. You must take into account the overhead that developers are faced with on PC and the fact that PC hardware of today may have 10-30x the throughput of consoles, they certainly don't have games that look 10-30x better. Perhaps more along the lines of 2-4x the resolution, AF, and anti-aliasing with no new geometry or shaders. PC's greatest advantage is that it is a platform with infinite options. Unfortunately, this is also its greatest weakness as it makes targeting certain hardware to achieve a certain level of quality extremely difficult because as a developer, we don't want to alienate certain gamers who may not have the latest card with the latest DirectX API. That is the whole idea behind minimum and recommended system specifications which, in a way, is PC trying to be like consoles.
Avatar image for Kinthalis
Kinthalis

5503

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#10 Kinthalis
Member since 2002 • 5503 Posts

I think performance would be about the same. You'd be playing today's games at sub 720p on a 2005 high end PC, just like you do with the consoles.

BUT

Unlike a console, you can always upgrade a PC. For like $80 you could turn that 2005 PC into somethign that performs BETTER than modern consoles.

So if your frame rate in Crysis 2 is dropping to 20-25 fps from time to time even though it's rendering the game at just barely 720p with low rez textures, small amount of dynamic lights, etc, on a console you're stuck. Can't do nothing about it.

On the PC $80 nets you 1680x1050, higher rez textures, more dynamic lights/better quality shadows and shaders and a solid 30 fps+. And of course Star Crfat II, Shogun 2, Witcher 2, Diablo 3, and all the rest of the cool PC exclusives + mods.

And it's a PC, it's not just a game box. You can do all your other PC related things with it.

So, yeah, I'd dake a 2005 gaming rig over a console any day.

Hell, That's exactly what I did do. I had an old 2005 PC. I upgraded the CPU and GPU and tossed in a TV tuner for like $180. Now it's my Home Theater PC. It records all my HD shows, holds my entire DVD/Blu-Ray library, streams netflix, hulu, youtube, etc, and transcodes and streams my audio and video entertainment accross the internet. Of course it also plays games at 1080p on my HD TV.

You can't do that with a console.

Avatar image for MK-Professor
MK-Professor

4218

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#11 MK-Professor
Member since 2009 • 4218 Posts

Back in 2006 I had a QX6700, 4GB ram, 8800GTX and this old pc still play multiplats better than 360/ps3. Of course i have upgraded many times since then but that is a different story.

Avatar image for blue_hazy_basic
blue_hazy_basic

30854

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#12 blue_hazy_basic  Moderator
Member since 2002 • 30854 Posts
lol how many 6 year old xboxes are there? :P
Avatar image for hiiijack
hiiijack

42

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 hiiijack
Member since 2009 • 42 Posts

Back in 2006 I had a QX6700, 4GB ram, 8800GTX and this old pc still play multiplats better than 360/ps3. Of course i have upgraded many times since then but that is a different story.

MK-Professor

How much did that cost back then?

Avatar image for VanDammFan
VanDammFan

4783

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#14 VanDammFan
Member since 2009 • 4783 Posts

[QUOTE="MK-Professor"]

Back in 2006 I had a QX6700, 4GB ram, 8800GTX and this old pc still play multiplats better than 360/ps3. Of course i have upgraded many times since then but that is a different story.

hiiijack

How much did that cost back then?

The OS alone cost at least 100$..The video card probably 200$-250$...RAM I would say 100$..So far we're up there pretty good..still have case,ROM,motherboard,PSU,processor,ect ect..

Avatar image for Heyhuub
Heyhuub

317

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 Heyhuub
Member since 2010 • 317 Posts

I have a 6 year old mid-range pc here. Pentium 4 3.0, 1.5gb. Recently upgraded it with a 65 euro HD5670 and it now runs a lot of games very decently.

Runs Resident Evil 5 @ 30fps @ 1680*1050, which is better than my PS3 i believe. It can also run Stalker COP, albeit with lowered detail, it runs into trouble with cpu heavy games though. Haven't really tried newer games on it seeing as i have a new pc for that.

Avatar image for hiiijack
hiiijack

42

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 hiiijack
Member since 2009 • 42 Posts

[QUOTE="hiiijack"]

[QUOTE="MK-Professor"]

Back in 2006 I had a QX6700, 4GB ram, 8800GTX and this old pc still play multiplats better than 360/ps3. Of course i have upgraded many times since then but that is a different story.

VanDammFan

How much did that cost back then?

The OS alone cost at least 100$..The video card probably 200$-250$...RAM I would say 100$..So far we're up there pretty good..still have case,ROM,motherboard,PSU,processor,ect ect..

Thats what I was thinking.. Can we compare a 2005 $400 dollar pc to the 360? I really don't have a clue about pc costs.

Avatar image for blue_hazy_basic
blue_hazy_basic

30854

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#17 blue_hazy_basic  Moderator
Member since 2002 • 30854 Posts
[QUOTE="hiiijack"]

[QUOTE="VanDammFan"]

[QUOTE="hiiijack"]

How much did that cost back then?

The OS alone cost at least 100$..The video card probably 200$-250$...RAM I would say 100$..So far we're up there pretty good..still have case,ROM,motherboard,PSU,processor,ect ect..

Thats what I was thinking.. Can we compare a 2005 $400 dollar pc to the 360? I really don't have a clue about pc costs.

Well with 6 yrs of xbox live & 6 years of more expensive games (at say 1 game a month) I reckon thats about $1000 right there - not including the original hardware or the HDTV you need to play it on to get the most out of it .... Oh look thats $200 more that I paid for my brand new gaming rig and monitor! :o
Avatar image for lowkey254
lowkey254

6031

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#18 lowkey254
Member since 2004 • 6031 Posts
lol how many 6 year old xboxes are there? :Pblue_hazy_basic
Good one.
Avatar image for markinthedark
markinthedark

3676

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 markinthedark
Member since 2005 • 3676 Posts

[QUOTE="hiiijack"]

[QUOTE="MK-Professor"]

Back in 2006 I had a QX6700, 4GB ram, 8800GTX and this old pc still play multiplats better than 360/ps3. Of course i have upgraded many times since then but that is a different story.

VanDammFan

How much did that cost back then?

The OS alone cost at least 100$..The video card probably 200$-250$...RAM I would say 100$..So far we're up there pretty good..still have case,ROM,motherboard,PSU,processor,ect ect..

8800GTX for 200-300 bucks? i wish, the card came out at the tail end of 2006 and i bought one too... it cost $600.

Avatar image for GreenGoblin2099
GreenGoblin2099

16988

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 GreenGoblin2099
Member since 2004 • 16988 Posts

lol how many 6 year old xboxes are there? :Pblue_hazy_basic

you

lol nice one

Avatar image for hiiijack
hiiijack

42

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 hiiijack
Member since 2009 • 42 Posts

[QUOTE="hiiijack"]

[QUOTE="VanDammFan"]

The OS alone cost at least 100$..The video card probably 200$-250$...RAM I would say 100$..So far we're up there pretty good..still have case,ROM,motherboard,PSU,processor,ect ect..

blue_hazy_basic

Thats what I was thinking.. Can we compare a 2005 $400 dollar pc to the 360? I really don't have a clue about pc costs.

Well with 6 yrs of xbox live & 6 years of more expensive games (at say 1 game a month) I reckon thats about $1000 right there - not including the original hardware or the HDTV you need to play it on to get the most out of it .... Oh look thats $200 more that I paid for my brand new gaming rig and monitor! :o

Solid points, but how much was a comparable pc in 2005?

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#23 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62001 Posts

Solid points, but how much was a comparable pc in 2005?

hiiijack

More than the cots of a 360. Console manufacturers receive massive discounts in a number of areas (bulk orders and contractual partnerships with GPU developers) and thus the costs are significantly lowered. With PC you are buying through retail after considerable markups.

Avatar image for blue_hazy_basic
blue_hazy_basic

30854

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#24 blue_hazy_basic  Moderator
Member since 2002 • 30854 Posts
[QUOTE="hiiijack"]

[QUOTE="blue_hazy_basic"][QUOTE="hiiijack"]

Thats what I was thinking.. Can we compare a 2005 $400 dollar pc to the 360? I really don't have a clue about pc costs.

Well with 6 yrs of xbox live & 6 years of more expensive games (at say 1 game a month) I reckon thats about $1000 right there - not including the original hardware or the HDTV you need to play it on to get the most out of it .... Oh look thats $200 more that I paid for my brand new gaming rig and monitor! :o

Solid points, but how much was a comparable pc in 2005?

Well a new PC in 2005 would probably have set you back about the same, so while the initial outlay is more (if you exclude the cost of a TV) over a few years that cost is more than repaid.
Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#25 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

You can SLI a 7800 GTX for increased performance so PC.:D

Avatar image for blackace
blackace

23576

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#26 blackace
Member since 2002 • 23576 Posts

So what is better; powerful 6 year old PC or PS3/Xbox?

charlesdarwin55
Who cares. The PC still can't play exclusive XBox 360/PS3 software and that's all most people care about.
Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#27 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62001 Posts

[QUOTE="charlesdarwin55"]

So what is better; powerful 6 year old PC or PS3/Xbox?

blackace

Who cares. The PC still can't play exclusive XBox 360/PS3 software and that's all most people care about.

Just like the consoles can't play exclusive PC titles :? I don't understand the relevance of your point.

Avatar image for TheFallen5555
TheFallen5555

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 TheFallen5555
Member since 2011 • 25 Posts
There is many different answers but it depends on the PCs software and Harware
Avatar image for Vadamee
Vadamee

1195

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 Vadamee
Member since 2009 • 1195 Posts
[QUOTE="blue_hazy_basic"][QUOTE="hiiijack"]

[QUOTE="VanDammFan"]

The OS alone cost at least 100$..The video card probably 200$-250$...RAM I would say 100$..So far we're up there pretty good..still have case,ROM,motherboard,PSU,processor,ect ect..

Thats what I was thinking.. Can we compare a 2005 $400 dollar pc to the 360? I really don't have a clue about pc costs.

Well with 6 yrs of xbox live & 6 years of more expensive games (at say 1 game a month) I reckon thats about $1000 right there - not including the original hardware or the HDTV you need to play it on to get the most out of it .... Oh look thats $200 more that I paid for my brand new gaming rig and monitor! :o

Except we're talking about hardware and not accessories which have nothing to do with its ability to play games. Also, you can hook your console up to monitors just as you can hook your PC up to TVs so the point is moot.
Avatar image for blue_hazy_basic
blue_hazy_basic

30854

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#30 blue_hazy_basic  Moderator
Member since 2002 • 30854 Posts

[QUOTE="blue_hazy_basic"][QUOTE="hiiijack"]

Thats what I was thinking.. Can we compare a 2005 $400 dollar pc to the 360? I really don't have a clue about pc costs.

Vadamee

Well with 6 yrs of xbox live & 6 years of more expensive games (at say 1 game a month) I reckon thats about $1000 right there - not including the original hardware or the HDTV you need to play it on to get the most out of it .... Oh look thats $200 more that I paid for my brand new gaming rig and monitor! :o

Except we're talking about hardware and not accessories which have nothing to do with its ability to play games. Also, you can hook your console up to monitors just as you can hook your PC up to TVs so the point is moot.

Um ok, everything I said still stands ... except the saving would be about $150 for the PC as I don't need to include the monitor price ... :?

Avatar image for ImportBMWRacer
ImportBMWRacer

850

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 ImportBMWRacer
Member since 2006 • 850 Posts
[QUOTE="blue_hazy_basic"][QUOTE="hiiijack"]

[QUOTE="VanDammFan"]

The OS alone cost at least 100$..The video card probably 200$-250$...RAM I would say 100$..So far we're up there pretty good..still have case,ROM,motherboard,PSU,processor,ect ect..

Thats what I was thinking.. Can we compare a 2005 $400 dollar pc to the 360? I really don't have a clue about pc costs.

Well with 6 yrs of xbox live & 6 years of more expensive games (at say 1 game a month) I reckon thats about $1000 right there - not including the original hardware or the HDTV you need to play it on to get the most out of it .... Oh look thats $200 more that I paid for my brand new gaming rig and monitor! :o

That is easily one of the most ridiculous things I have read. I am just going to assume your being COMPLETELY sarcastic ;)
Avatar image for alfredooo
alfredooo

2664

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 alfredooo
Member since 2007 • 2664 Posts

[QUOTE="Vadamee"][QUOTE="blue_hazy_basic"] Well with 6 yrs of xbox live & 6 years of more expensive games (at say 1 game a month) I reckon thats about $1000 right there - not including the original hardware or the HDTV you need to play it on to get the most out of it .... Oh look thats $200 more that I paid for my brand new gaming rig and monitor! :oblue_hazy_basic

Except we're talking about hardware and not accessories which have nothing to do with its ability to play games. Also, you can hook your console up to monitors just as you can hook your PC up to TVs so the point is moot.

Um ok, everything I said still stands ... except the saving would be about $150 for the PC as I don't need to include the monitor price ... :?

is it even a real point? the HDTV nonsense aside.... you are assuming you will be buying 12 games a year and have xbox live active every single day for six years. with those assumptions you are not saying pc is "cheaper", all you are saying is it WOULD be cheaper if you gamed under certain conditions.

since we are up to this, should i include $15 a month fee for six years to the pc's price for a WoW subscription?

Avatar image for CajunShooter
CajunShooter

5276

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 CajunShooter
Member since 2006 • 5276 Posts
Haven't these threads been beaten to death yet?
Avatar image for dramaybaz
dramaybaz

6020

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 dramaybaz
Member since 2005 • 6020 Posts

So what is better; powerful 6 year old PC or PS3/Xbox?

charlesdarwin55
What about factoeing in the cost of buying a PC. Unless you are referring to a $600 back then, in which case consoles win.
Avatar image for menes777
menes777

2643

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 menes777
Member since 2003 • 2643 Posts

PC all the way.

- If I want more RAM I can always get it

- If I want a better Video card I can get it

- If I want to mod my games I can do it

- If a part breaks on my PC I can fix it

With consoles if you want better looking games or you want to upgrade you are SOL, you have to buy a new console. If your console breaks you are also SOL.

Avatar image for rawr89
rawr89

1746

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 rawr89
Member since 2010 • 1746 Posts

what about comparing a $600 2005 PC vs a $600 PS3. and bby $600 2005 PC that does not count the monitor.

Avatar image for Inconsistancy
Inconsistancy

8094

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 Inconsistancy
Member since 2004 • 8094 Posts
360 > a single gpu '05 pc, but sucks as a pc and has no ram. The PS3 was out in '06, so it not being vastly more powerful than the 360 puts it behind the pc's of the time.
Avatar image for VanDammFan
VanDammFan

4783

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#38 VanDammFan
Member since 2009 • 4783 Posts

what about comparing a $600 2005 PC vs a $600 PS3. and bby $600 2005 PC that does not count the monitor.

rawr89

I dont want to get into this argument again..I mean...debate...BUT I dont care what anyone says...YOU HAVE TO FIGURE THE PRICE OF A MONITOR INTO A PC..JUST LIKE if you build your own, you have to add the price of an OS at some point. EVERYONE I know has some kind of a tv and that tv may or may not have a way to use a pc on it..SO a monitor is ALWAYS 100% of the time figured into STARTING out with a PC..NOW if you upgrade your pc later on, you already have the monitor so no need in adding it again..You have it already..

THIS is just the way it works...People have tvs...NOT everyone has a monitor OR a tv that can "with ease" be used as a pc monitor.

Avatar image for glez13
glez13

10314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 glez13
Member since 2006 • 10314 Posts

Realistically no one would have a 6 year old PC that could take on a console right now. First even an super 3l33t PC from that time would only be owned by a few, and second that PC was probably already in a graveyard like a little more than 5 years ago, replaced by another super 3l33t PC. Second even those 7900GTX on SLI can't do much with their level of optimization nowadays and also the whole thing would almost flop by looking at the price of a console and the price of the PC.

Third the amount of people that have a six year old console is also as laughable as the 360 with the whole RROD thing. If we go for something more realistic like the age of a PS3, which a launch unit is highly more likely to still function compared to a 360. The High end Geforce 8 series still gives as good if not better than consoles performance up to this point.

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#40 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62001 Posts

I dont want to get into this argument again..I mean...debate...BUT I dont care what anyone says...YOU HAVE TO FIGURE THE PRICE OF A MONITOR INTO A PC..JUST LIKE if you build your own, you have to add the price of an OS at some point. EVERYONE I know has some kind of a tv and that tv may or may not have a way to use a pc on it..SO a monitor is ALWAYS 100% of the time figured into STARTING out with a PC..NOW if you upgrade your pc later on, you already have the monitor so no need in adding it again..You have it already..

THIS is just the way it works...People have tvs...NOT everyone has a monitor OR a tv that can "with ease" be used as a pc monitor.

VanDammFan

http://www.laikeet.com/catalog/images/1to4.jpg

Done and done. You can hook up your PC to an SDTV (God knows why you would want to), just like you can hook up a console to a SDTV. Hence, we don't include the cost of either.

Avatar image for blue_hazy_basic
blue_hazy_basic

30854

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#41 blue_hazy_basic  Moderator
Member since 2002 • 30854 Posts

[QUOTE="blue_hazy_basic"]

[QUOTE="Vadamee"] Except we're talking about hardware and not accessories which have nothing to do with its ability to play games. Also, you can hook your console up to monitors just as you can hook your PC up to TVs so the point is moot.alfredooo

Um ok, everything I said still stands ... except the saving would be about $150 for the PC as I don't need to include the monitor price ... :?

is it even a real point? the HDTV nonsense aside.... you are assuming you will be buying 12 games a year and have xbox live active every single day for six years. with those assumptions you are not saying pc is "cheaper", all you are saying is it WOULD be cheaper if you gamed under certain conditions.

since we are up to this, should i include $15 a month fee for six years to the pc's price for a WoW subscription?

Include the person I quoted: "Thats what I was thinking.. Can we compare a 2005 $400 dollar pc to the 360? I really don't have a clue about pc costs."

I said NOT including the costs of the xbox or the tv (see again NOT and remember this is 2005 when most people didn't have HDTV's) I was comparing the cost of owning a PC vs a 360 for those 6 years. So while the initial cost is higher, the long term benefits balance that out. As for the assumptions, I would say MOST (see I said MOST) gamers on here that own a 360 have Live, and that MOST people would buy at least 1 game every 30 or days or so.

So for the person quoted I compared a reasonable cost of the 360 vs a PC.

EDIT glitchspot buried my post

Avatar image for 2Chalupas
2Chalupas

7286

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#42 2Chalupas
Member since 2009 • 7286 Posts

Console > 6 year old PC, unless that PC cost about $2500 6 years ago - or of course if you've upgraded it - but that means you've poured more money into hardware just to keep up with games. If it's the same PC you spent $500 for 6 years ago then you probably can't do jack @#%^ on it right now as far as games are concerned. For old games you can keep up with consoles just fine, but new games might not even be supported on older PC hardware - whereas they are more and more being optimized for consoles. Especially since most computers then and now get sold with integrated graphics not everyone has the max GPU of the time, not everyone has a dedicated GPU at all.

Obviously in the last couple years the bang for the buck has shifted more in the PC's favor, each year that goes on now without a new console the PC market looks better and better. Even a cheapass like me sees value in spending $500-700 on a PC that will do 1080P games across the board. In the past I just played whatever games my PC could (but I played original Half like and original Counter-Strike just fine 10 years ago).But this year I'll be building a PC specifically for Battlefield 3 to make sure I play it at 1080P or more and with DX11.

When the next gen of consoles comes out it is highly like that the "value proposition" will be temporarily shifted back in the consoles favor, that is assuming Sony/MS learn their lesson and release at better price point. Remember that they usually sell the hardware as a "loss leader".

Avatar image for demonic_85
demonic_85

1395

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#43 demonic_85
Member since 2009 • 1395 Posts

Price per performance, consoles would have probably been the better choice back in 2005. Now even cheap $500-$600 computers can smoke any console and not by just a little but a LOOOOOONG shot.

Avatar image for streetridaz
streetridaz

3276

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#44 streetridaz
Member since 2003 • 3276 Posts

You can SLI a 7800 GTX for increased performance so PC.:D

mitu123
I think the question is a little to open for a real answer. I'm taking the question as "can a high end gaming pc from 2005 compete with todays xbox 360 and ps3?" yes it can and yes it would still out perform the consoles.
Avatar image for killzoneded
killzoneded

486

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 killzoneded
Member since 2011 • 486 Posts

So what is better; powerful 6 year old PC or PS3/Xbox?

charlesdarwin55

My 2 years old laptop does not even start Crysis 2 and my 1 year old PC (700$)runs it in 5-25fps

So, xbox 360 beats anything less than a super PC today

As for a 6 yo PC, i doubt it can even install Crysis 2, as for running it ....

Avatar image for GTSaiyanjin2
GTSaiyanjin2

6018

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#46 GTSaiyanjin2
Member since 2005 • 6018 Posts

[QUOTE="VanDammFan"]

[QUOTE="hiiijack"]

How much did that cost back then?

markinthedark

The OS alone cost at least 100$..The video card probably 200$-250$...RAM I would say 100$..So far we're up there pretty good..still have case,ROM,motherboard,PSU,processor,ect ect..

8800GTX for 200-300 bucks? i wish, the card came out at the tail end of 2006 and i bought one too... it cost $600.

Unless he got a used one a really good deal from someone did 8800GTX did not cost him 250-300... That card kept its $500-600 price tag for a very long time going all the way till 2008 you could still sell them for about $250-300 used. And that CPU is a $600 CPU if im correct.

Avatar image for deactivated-58b6232955e4a
deactivated-58b6232955e4a

15594

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 deactivated-58b6232955e4a
Member since 2006 • 15594 Posts

[QUOTE="charlesdarwin55"]

So what is better; powerful 6 year old PC or PS3/Xbox?

killzoneded

My 2 years old laptop does not even start Crysis 2 and my 1 year old PC (700$)runs it in 5-25fps

So, xbox 360 beats anything less than a super PC today

As for a 6 yo PC, i doubt it can even install Crysis 2, as for running it ....

A $500 PC can run Crysis 2 at 1920x1080...
Avatar image for Inconsistancy
Inconsistancy

8094

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 Inconsistancy
Member since 2004 • 8094 Posts

[QUOTE="charlesdarwin55"]

So what is better; powerful 6 year old PC or PS3/Xbox?

killzoneded

My 2 years old laptop does not even start Crysis 2 and my 1 year old PC (700$)runs it in 5-25fps

So, xbox 360 beats anything less than a super PC today

As for a 6 yo PC, i doubt it can even install Crysis 2, as for running it ....

Your 1 year old pc is obviously complete garbage, and or is running an integrated/extremely low end gpu. You probably got ripped off, or skimped on the most important part for games, the gpu.

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#49 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62001 Posts

My 2 years old laptop does not even start Crysis 2 and my 1 year old PC (700$)runs it in 5-25fps

So, xbox 360 beats anything less than a super PC today

As for a 6 yo PC, i doubt it can even install Crysis 2, as for running it ....

killzoneded

What are the specs of your 1 year old PC? I fully expect you not to answer.

Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#50 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

[QUOTE="charlesdarwin55"]

So what is better; powerful 6 year old PC or PS3/Xbox?

killzoneded

My 2 years old laptop does not even start Crysis 2 and my 1 year old PC (700$)runs it in 5-25fps

So, xbox 360 beats anything less than a super PC today

As for a 6 yo PC, i doubt it can even install Crysis 2, as for running it ....

That's an obvious pre-built, my custom PC runs it above 30FPS in 1920x1080 and is far from top of the line.

And who honestly uses laptops for gaming?