Yeah the graphics are terrific, better thing is that the game library is consistently growing.
Not really
Bloodborne looks like **** on my 4k tv ,perhaps if I was a 1080p pleb games wouldn't look as bad.....
@delta3074: Does a slight boost in AA make it unrecognizable? Really? And he keeps blabbering about all the shit photo mode does. Infamous SS adds nothing to the assets and he claimed the same for it to. Same with the Order. And yes he is a dumb troll but that's ok so are you.
Yes I agree that the PlayStation 4 does have pretty good graphics. As the 8th Generation progress the games on PS4 will continue to get better.
@nyadc: Yes DC does look like that unless you are saying adding a slight boost of AA makes it unrecognizable.
Also I guess you can't read. I said one month after Dying Light was released, perhaps do research. You preceded to post a picture of the game before the patch.
@ripsaw1994: pc has always looked better than console. People who tried to justify x360 last gen by saying it looked better and was more powerful than pc were full of shit, and weren't pc gamers to begin with. While those fools were playing cod2 and gun at 720p or less I was playing them in twice the rest maxed using a 7900 Nvidia and then a 8800gtx. Does that mean consoles last gen were bad looking at the time? No they just never matched pc.
This gen it's the same thing, but different. For most people 1080p is the norm, 4k cost a lot with a special monitor. Entry point for that is staggering. For 1080p most ps4 games that are multiplat are equivalent to pc counterparts minus more aa. Xbone is less resolution. My ATI 7870 is about equal to my ps4.
People who bad mouth consoles this gen as "weak" are full of shit. They are vastly superior to consoles last gen. Double the res (for ps4) more shaders, rops and 8x the memory.
Comparing to pc is stupid and people doing so sound like they need to justify their system. I have been a pc gamer since inception in the 80's on 4 color cga displays and apple iic... things have come a long way, but they also have come along way for consoles.
You can have appreciation for both. I avoid almost all controller based games on pc, as one I don't like the x360 controller, and want to play those games on my massive tv. While I wouldn't play a grand strategy game like eu4 or civ5 on console, those style games belong on pc.
Bottom line, u can love both. And people that berate consoles are the same fools who would be hating on a $599 price point if they were more powerful.... so there is no winning to them... they are just negative trolls who are just full of hate or snobbery.
Both platforms have their place and u should experience them both... just avoid that xbone, no reaon to buy that crap :p
@delta3074: Does a slight boost in AA make it unrecognizable? Really? And he keeps blabbering about all the shit photo mode does. Infamous SS adds nothing to the assets and he claimed the same for it to. Same with the Order. And yes he is a dumb troll but that's ok so are you.
i'm dumb? at least i know what the word 'Exactly' actually means dude, if they added AA it's not 'Exactly' the same is it?
Exactly
in an exact manner; precisely; accurately.in every respect
You like to call everyone else dumb but you seriously need to look in the mirror, you will see dumb looking back at you
'Does a slight boost in AA make it unrecognizable?'
where did i say it made it unrecognizable, oh yeah, i didn't, i said AA makes a difference, which it does.
i was just pointing out the fact that you are so clever you managed to contradict yourself in one sentence.
You said it was Exactly the same, if they added AA it isn't, basic logic, objective fact.
Try to understand the English language properly before using it mate
@SolidGame_basic:
If you really care so much about graphics then you should get a PC and stop being a living, breathing advertisement.
Yet to be impressed with consoles this gen. The biggest surprise this gen was how weak the hardware was.
They can only really perform at 30fps.
For me, this gen kind of marks the end of consoles. Less exclusives and low end hardware out of the gate.
looks fine for a casual...
a more savvy gamer will go to PC.
Meanwhile Wii U's graphics...
L O L
bloodborne is a really bad example. it looks like a bad PS3 game or a an MMO running on a low end PC. Infamous and driveclub and the order all look good. Not sure about MK or project cars though.
Yeah Bloodborne is a fantastic game, but it is straight up ugly and I've noticed alot of framerate drops. Technically it could be great or whatever, but there are some Wii U games that are much more pleasing to look at.
I am satisfied with it, but if we are just talking graphics from the best games on each system then xbone and wii U have pretty good graphics as well so.....?
They're exactly the same, I see no difference at all, it's just a little bit a AA that's been added.
Besides you're cherry picking the images to fit your agenda.
Sorry I went down with consoletrollitis there, I'm feeling better now.
In comparison to what, the PS3, sure, the X1, pretty close each other, PC, nah, not really.
Did you use a movie trailer from R&C?
@delta3074: He said it looked NOTHING like that. So perhaps you need to look up the definition of the word nothing before you ride his cock some more. You obviously took his side and called me out yet completely ignored the fact that he said it looks NOTHING like the photo mode. And yes you are a raving anti PS4 troll who somehow thought his argument was more logical then mine.
Don't get why you show Bloodborne, it doesn't have great graphics compared to ISS, UC4, Project Cars, etc
I was thinking that too Bloodborne looks really bland to me. Generally as a second games machine (PC is main) I'm more than happy with my PS4,
Well graphics is cool and all but I care way more about gameplay. I wish Sony could go back to ps2 or ps1 days when they cared about gameplay.
I noticed how you listed multiplats too (that look identical everywhere else).
"bu, bu DF said there is a stick missing on level 3"
If we stay out of comparisons and the graphics criteria is a simple Y or N, then the PS4 passes. I would be satisfied.
@gamecubepad: Infamous SS looks great but the LOD Distance is its weak point. Feels you're in a dead city if you're far on top of a building.
@anthonyautumns:
I've noticed that. Also, I've seen strategy games with higher lod on the trees than some of the stuff I've seen in Infamous.
Ownage approved. Poor Janko!
Now he's going to log on his alt.
Melonfarmers, and jesusrobot or something like that.
Explain to me how those shots M3boarder/giovela/m3dude/gpuking/carlosvela (all the same person) posted look anything like the photomode shots....
Photomode exists for a reason, they look different. There is no reason to go on an alt to show this fact.
even the screens show an insane amount of motion blur, it looks blurred on movement, and we are talking about a corridor racing game here, it is the same as second son, they had to give up a lot of shadows and distance of view to achieve decent graphics, point is, ps4 is not a magic box, its hardware is pathetic and any modern gaming pc absolutely destroys it, we are talking about pcs that are 3-4 times stringer, or even more, that fact won't change no matter screens you post.
@ripsaw1994: pc has always looked better than console. People who tried to justify x360 last gen by saying it looked better and was more powerful than pc were full of shit, and weren't pc gamers to begin with. While those fools were playing cod2 and gun at 720p or less I was playing them in twice the rest maxed using a 7900 Nvidia and then a 8800gtx. Does that mean consoles last gen were bad looking at the time? No they just never matched pc.
This gen it's the same thing, but different. For most people 1080p is the norm, 4k cost a lot with a special monitor. Entry point for that is staggering. For 1080p most ps4 games that are multiplat are equivalent to pc counterparts minus more aa. Xbone is less resolution. My ATI 7870 is about equal to my ps4.
People who bad mouth consoles this gen as "weak" are full of shit. They are vastly superior to consoles last gen. Double the res (for ps4) more shaders, rops and 8x the memory.
Comparing to pc is stupid and people doing so sound like they need to justify their system. I have been a pc gamer since inception in the 80's on 4 color cga displays and apple iic... things have come a long way, but they also have come along way for consoles.
You can have appreciation for both. I avoid almost all controller based games on pc, as one I don't like the x360 controller, and want to play those games on my massive tv. While I wouldn't play a grand strategy game like eu4 or civ5 on console, those style games belong on pc.
Bottom line, u can love both. And people that berate consoles are the same fools who would be hating on a $599 price point if they were more powerful.... so there is no winning to them... they are just negative trolls who are just full of hate or snobbery.
Both platforms have their place and u should experience them both... just avoid that xbone, no reaon to buy that crap :p
Oblivion benchmarks circa March 2006 tell a different story...
Dont judge the 360 on 2008 basis...Judge it on 2005-early 2006....
The Xbone and the PS4 are gen 7.5....both cost LESS to build than the selling price...
I want my $715 console sold at $400...
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment