PSN > Live

  • 57 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for -platy-
-platy-

593

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 -platy-
Member since 2007 • 593 Posts
Soon enough atleast, but im glad because that will force MS to add more features or make it free :)
Avatar image for CajunShooter
CajunShooter

5276

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 CajunShooter
Member since 2006 • 5276 Posts

So now we get to have 100 of these threads because of those rumors :)

Avatar image for -platy-
-platy-

593

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 -platy-
Member since 2007 • 593 Posts

So now we get to have 100 of these threads because of those rumors :)

CajunShooter

Oh im sorry, i thought this was System wars

Avatar image for II-FBIsniper-II
II-FBIsniper-II

18067

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#4 II-FBIsniper-II
Member since 2005 • 18067 Posts
Thanks for your thorough explanation to why its better.
Avatar image for CajunShooter
CajunShooter

5276

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 CajunShooter
Member since 2006 • 5276 Posts
[QUOTE="CajunShooter"]

So now we get to have 100 of these threads because of those rumors :)

-platy-

Oh im sorry, i thought this was System wars

I am just saying. These are the threads we get to look forward to.

People will continually post their own instead of putting it in an existing one.

Avatar image for falconzss
falconzss

755

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 falconzss
Member since 2005 • 755 Posts

aaaah...noo...even as a ps3 owner i think that live is the most advanced online service for consoles.

there are still so many annoying things that make navigation a mess at least in the european store(s).

Avatar image for -platy-
-platy-

593

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 -platy-
Member since 2007 • 593 Posts

Thanks for your thorough explanation to why its better.II-FBIsniper-II

Lol, having the same features and possibly more while its free isnt better? Hmm ok, btw how does it feel to pay 150 MS points for gamerpics?

Avatar image for maverickx04
maverickx04

1223

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 maverickx04
Member since 2004 • 1223 Posts
Too bad developers don't agree.
Avatar image for LinKuei_warrior
LinKuei_warrior

2670

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#9 LinKuei_warrior
Member since 2006 • 2670 Posts

[QUOTE="II-FBIsniper-II"]Thanks for your thorough explanation to why its better.-platy-

Lol, having the same features and possibly more while its free isnt better? Hmm ok, btw how does it feel to pay 150 MS points for gamerpics?

how does it feel being lame enough to care what picture you have on a tacky gamerscore card?lol.

Avatar image for Nagidar
Nagidar

6231

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Nagidar
Member since 2006 • 6231 Posts

[QUOTE="II-FBIsniper-II"]Thanks for your thorough explanation to why its better.-platy-

Lol, having the same features and possibly more while its free isnt better? Hmm ok, btw how does it feel to pay 150 MS points for gamerpics?

Why not just post what parts of PSN are better than XBL? He was right to post what he did, because you posted nothing to back up your statement except your opinion.

Avatar image for ReverseCycology
ReverseCycology

9717

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 ReverseCycology
Member since 2006 • 9717 Posts

I heard a rumor that XBL will have a price cut and another rumor that when PSN is upgraded with more features you'll have to pay a fee for those features while there's a basic PSN service called PSN silver or something.

Avatar image for Ninja-Hippo
Ninja-Hippo

23434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#12 Ninja-Hippo
Member since 2008 • 23434 Posts

[QUOTE="II-FBIsniper-II"]Thanks for your thorough explanation to why its better.-platy-

Lol, having the same features and possibly more while its free isnt better? Hmm ok, btw how does it feel to pay 150 MS points for gamerpics?

Why would anybody do that though, is the real question. :| PSN is not better than xbox live. Simply because if it were, nobody would pay for Live as they'd be getting nothing for their money. Simple. And i say that as 360 and PS3 owner.

PSN is great. There's nothing wrong with it at all. It's free, which is what makes it great. But it's silly to say it's BOTH. Yes it's FREE, and on top of that it's BETTER. How does that work?

Avatar image for Ninja-Hippo
Ninja-Hippo

23434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#14 Ninja-Hippo
Member since 2008 • 23434 Posts

how does it feel being lame enough to care what picture you have on a tacky gamerscore card?lol.

LinKuei_warrior

They give out random packs for free all the time, anyhow. I got my bungie day ones for free. And my gears pictures, and my fallout 3 pictures. :?

Avatar image for lawlessx
lawlessx

48753

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#15 lawlessx
Member since 2004 • 48753 Posts
[QUOTE="LinKuei_warrior"]

how does it feel being lame enough to care what picture you have on a tacky gamerscore card?lol.

Ninja-Hippo

They give out random packs for free all the time, anyhow. I got my bungie day ones for free. And my gears pictures, and my fallout 3 pictures. :?

really does help us figure who really has an 360 doesn't it?

Avatar image for footballstar07
footballstar07

698

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#16 footballstar07
Member since 2007 • 698 Posts
i hate to admit it but PSn isn't better than live right now. If PSN completely takes all the features Live has and remains free than we will see
Avatar image for velocity99
velocity99

480

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#17 velocity99
Member since 2005 • 480 Posts

Too bad developers don't agree.maverickx04

Enjoy not having mods for UT3, then tell me how amazing live is.

Avatar image for WilliamRLBaker
WilliamRLBaker

28915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 WilliamRLBaker
Member since 2006 • 28915 Posts
on a cold day in hell.

Xbox live has more users, more features...ect its better in every way.

the update 2.4 is rumored and thats it its not a fact its a rumor.
Avatar image for Relys
Relys

4426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#19 Relys
Member since 2005 • 4426 Posts
So they're going to give everyone with a PS3 a free headset? Why haven't I heard of this yet?
Avatar image for Nagidar
Nagidar

6231

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 Nagidar
Member since 2006 • 6231 Posts

So they're going to give everyone with a PS3 a free headset? Why haven't I heard of this yet?Relys

Same, I've never heard of this. BTW, love your sig:

Currently playing:Wii-Boom Blox, Brawl. 360-Halo 3. PS3-Waiting for MGS4. PC-CS:S, BF2, COD2. DS-Nothing currently. PSP-Final Fantasy:CC, GoW:CoO.

Sorry, the underlined caught my eye and I lol'd.

Avatar image for GazzaB
GazzaB

27139

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 25

User Lists: 0

#21 GazzaB
Member since 2004 • 27139 Posts

Why is it everytime Sony announce a new firmware update with an added feature or two, threads pop up everywhere with playstation fanboys claiming its better than XBL, or that the gap is closing fast?

Seriously, its getting tiresome. As an owner and user of both services, i can say that PSN is nowhere near XBL. Sure, it gets the job done in that you can play online lag free mostly. But in comparison with XBL, it falls so short. Im sorry, but in-game XMB does NOT make it equal or better than XBL. There are so manyfeatures thatPSN is lacks in comparison.

Avatar image for velocity99
velocity99

480

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#22 velocity99
Member since 2005 • 480 Posts

You live users are so far up your own asses, you won't even listen to facts or reason. You do realize what you are paying for is essentially acheivements and a really neat store to spend more money in? Microsoft doesn't even have to host servers. All the servers, save for few games like frontlines, are hosted by players. That means you pay to host with your internet subscription which you already pay for. The servers which simply cannot be hosted by players, are usually privately owned or clan servers, again, not hosted by microsoft.

Not only that, but you are paying for features that have been or have become standards for PC gamers, and while you pay enough to own one less game every year(more if you pay monthly), we can buy an additional game every year. Everything points to live being a fat scam, and while the service they provide (however little that is) is quality, it is up to you to decide whether or not you want to throw money at it. Me? Let's just say it's a cold day in hell when i pay for live again, after my Gears PC experience.

If you people will take a minute of your time to look at something deserving of praise? Try steam. They host demos, content, updates, promote mods and a community feeling in general. In fact, steam community blows away any other friend system to date. They also added achievments recently. Want to know something else? It's free, and so, so sweet.

Avatar image for dotWithShoes
dotWithShoes

5596

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#23 dotWithShoes
Member since 2006 • 5596 Posts

You live users are so far up your own asses, you won't even listen to facts or reason. You do realize what you are paying for is essentially acheivements and a really neat store to spend more money in? Microsoft doesn't even have to host servers. All the servers, save for few games like frontlines, are hosted by players. That means you pay to host with your internet subscription which you already pay for. The servers which simply cannot be hosted by players, are usually privately owned or clan servers, again, not hosted by microsoft.

Not only that, but you are paying for features that have been or have become standards for PC gamers, and while you pay enough to own one less game every year(more if you pay monthly), we can buy an additional game every year. Everything points to live being a fat scam, and while the service they provide (however little that is) is quality, it is up to you to decide whether or not you want to throw money at it. Me? Let's just say it's a cold day in hell when i pay for live again, after my Gears PC experience.

If you people will take a minute of your time to look at something deserving of praise? Try steam. They host demos, content, updates, promote mods and a community feeling in general. In fact, steam community blows away any other friend system to date. They also added achievments recently. Want to know something else? It's free, and so, so sweet.

velocity99

Basicly the bolded part is all I am gonna read... simply cuz I want an answer to this, if I don't pay for live, say I only have a Silver account, which IS free... I cannot get achievements and cannot download stuff from the marketplace?

Avatar image for -platy-
-platy-

593

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 -platy-
Member since 2007 • 593 Posts

Lol someone please show me where i said psn is better RIGHT NOW...nowhere did i say that, Sony is making the right moves and adding features that contends with live all the while being free.

and btw i have both systems, so hop off.

Avatar image for ReverseCycology
ReverseCycology

9717

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 ReverseCycology
Member since 2006 • 9717 Posts

You live users are so far up your own asses, you won't even listen to facts or reason. You do realize what you are paying for is essentially acheivements and a really neat store to spend more money in? Microsoft doesn't even have to host servers. All the servers, save for few games like frontlines, are hosted by players. That means you pay to host with your internet subscription which you already pay for. The servers which simply cannot be hosted by players, are usually privately owned or clan servers, again, not hosted by microsoft.

Not only that, but you are paying for features that have been or have become standards for PC gamers, and while you pay enough to own one less game every year(more if you pay monthly), we can buy an additional game every year. Everything points to live being a fat scam, and while the service they provide (however little that is) is quality, it is up to you to decide whether or not you want to throw money at it. Me? Let's just say it's a cold day in hell when i pay for live again, after my Gears PC experience.

If you people will take a minute of your time to look at something deserving of praise? Try steam. They host demos, content, updates, promote mods and a community feeling in general. In fact, steam community blows away any other friend system to date. They also added achievments recently. Want to know something else? It's free, and so, so sweet.

velocity99

I stopped reading after that. Lol.

XBL is the best CONSOLE online gaming service period.

Avatar image for xXHackettXx
xXHackettXx

3560

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#26 xXHackettXx
Member since 2006 • 3560 Posts

So now we get to have 100 of these threads because of those rumors :)

CajunShooter
whats the rumor?
Avatar image for velocity99
velocity99

480

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#27 velocity99
Member since 2005 • 480 Posts
[QUOTE="velocity99"]

You live users are so far up your own asses, you won't even listen to facts or reason. You do realize what you are paying for is essentially acheivements and a really neat store to spend more money in? Microsoft doesn't even have to host servers. All the servers, save for few games like frontlines, are hosted by players. That means you pay to host with your internet subscription which you already pay for. The servers which simply cannot be hosted by players, are usually privately owned or clan servers, again, not hosted by microsoft.

Not only that, but you are paying for features that have been or have become standards for PC gamers, and while you pay enough to own one less game every year(more if you pay monthly), we can buy an additional game every year. Everything points to live being a fat scam, and while the service they provide (however little that is) is quality, it is up to you to decide whether or not you want to throw money at it. Me? Let's just say it's a cold day in hell when i pay for live again, after my Gears PC experience.

If you people will take a minute of your time to look at something deserving of praise? Try steam. They host demos, content, updates, promote mods and a community feeling in general. In fact, steam community blows away any other friend system to date. They also added achievments recently. Want to know something else? It's free, and so, so sweet.

dotWithShoes

Basicly the bolded part is all I am gonna read... simply cuz I want an answer to this, if I don't pay for live, say I only have a Silver account, which IS free... I cannot get achievements and cannot download stuff from the marketplace?

I think it's download all you want, but pay to play.

Avatar image for velocity99
velocity99

480

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#28 velocity99
Member since 2005 • 480 Posts
[QUOTE="velocity99"]

You live users are so far up your own asses, you won't even listen to facts or reason. You do realize what you are paying for is essentially acheivements and a really neat store to spend more money in? Microsoft doesn't even have to host servers. All the servers, save for few games like frontlines, are hosted by players. That means you pay to host with your internet subscription which you already pay for. The servers which simply cannot be hosted by players, are usually privately owned or clan servers, again, not hosted by microsoft.

Not only that, but you are paying for features that have been or have become standards for PC gamers, and while you pay enough to own one less game every year(more if you pay monthly), we can buy an additional game every year. Everything points to live being a fat scam, and while the service they provide (however little that is) is quality, it is up to you to decide whether or not you want to throw money at it. Me? Let's just say it's a cold day in hell when i pay for live again, after my Gears PC experience.

If you people will take a minute of your time to look at something deserving of praise? Try steam. They host demos, content, updates, promote mods and a community feeling in general. In fact, steam community blows away any other friend system to date. They also added achievments recently. Want to know something else? It's free, and so, so sweet.

ReverseCycology

I stopped reading after that. Lol.

Oh i assure you it's a good read, you might learn something.

Avatar image for Jacboy71
Jacboy71

1421

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 Jacboy71
Member since 2007 • 1421 Posts
I love my ps3 way more than my 360 but there is no way in gods green earth psn is better than live to agree with that statement you have to be a fanboy or never used the live service.
Avatar image for ReverseCycology
ReverseCycology

9717

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 ReverseCycology
Member since 2006 • 9717 Posts
[QUOTE="ReverseCycology"][QUOTE="velocity99"]

You live users are so far up your own asses, you won't even listen to facts or reason. You do realize what you are paying for is essentially acheivements and a really neat store to spend more money in? Microsoft doesn't even have to host servers. All the servers, save for few games like frontlines, are hosted by players. That means you pay to host with your internet subscription which you already pay for. The servers which simply cannot be hosted by players, are usually privately owned or clan servers, again, not hosted by microsoft.

Not only that, but you are paying for features that have been or have become standards for PC gamers, and while you pay enough to own one less game every year(more if you pay monthly), we can buy an additional game every year. Everything points to live being a fat scam, and while the service they provide (however little that is) is quality, it is up to you to decide whether or not you want to throw money at it. Me? Let's just say it's a cold day in hell when i pay for live again, after my Gears PC experience.

If you people will take a minute of your time to look at something deserving of praise? Try steam. They host demos, content, updates, promote mods and a community feeling in general. In fact, steam community blows away any other friend system to date. They also added achievments recently. Want to know something else? It's free, and so, so sweet.

velocity99

I stopped reading after that. Lol.

XBL is the best CONSOLE online gaming service period.

Oh i assure you it's a good read, you might learn something.

This is a PSN vs XBL, console vs console thread, not a PC vs Console thread. And the bottomline is that XBL is really is the best console online gaming service out now.

And why do you care so much on what people want to spend their money on. Im pretty sure you spent a pretty penny upgrading your PC rig.

Avatar image for GazzaB
GazzaB

27139

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 25

User Lists: 0

#31 GazzaB
Member since 2004 • 27139 Posts

You live users are so far up your own asses, you won't even listen to facts or reason. You do realize what you are paying for is essentially acheivements and a really neat store to spend more money in? Microsoft doesn't even have to host servers. All the servers, save for few games like frontlines, are hosted by players. That means you pay to host with your internet subscription which you already pay for. The servers which simply cannot be hosted by players, are usually privately owned or clan servers, again, not hosted by microsoft.

Not only that, but you are paying for features that have been or have become standards for PC gamers, and while you pay enough to own one less game every year(more if you pay monthly), we can buy an additional game every year. Everything points to live being a fat scam, and while the service they provide (however little that is) is quality, it is up to you to decide whether or not you want to throw money at it. Me? Let's just say it's a cold day in hell when i pay for live again, after my Gears PC experience.

If you people will take a minute of your time to look at something deserving of praise? Try steam. They host demos, content, updates, promote mods and a community feeling in general. In fact, steam community blows away any other friend system to date. They also added achievments recently. Want to know something else? It's free, and so, so sweet.

velocity99

No. Obviously you havent played XBL, or you'd know that no-one is essentially just paying for achievements and market place. You'd also know that achievements and the maketplace is available to silver users, who last time i checked, dont pay a thing. Also, M$ do host servers, you think all that data like gamer profiles etc. just magically stores itself? Yes, most games are P2P, but the live service itself is still run and maintained by M$. Im not agreeing with the pricing at all, but i dont have a problem with it either, and you fail to realise that xbox owners unfortunately have no choice. Its either pay, or no online. Wandering away from the point though, this thread is about the services themselves. The fact you pay for XBL does not make PSN any better.

Oh, and this thread has absolutely nothing to do with PC and its services. Its to do with PSN and XBL, sure Steam is better, its free. Who cares, get over it. I dont think anyone is arguing.

Avatar image for Gta3-fan334
Gta3-fan334

1499

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#32 Gta3-fan334
Member since 2004 • 1499 Posts

You live users are so far up your own asses, you won't even listen to facts or reason. You do realize what you are paying for is essentially acheivements and a really neat store to spend more money in? Microsoft doesn't even have to host servers. All the servers, save for few games like frontlines, are hosted by players. That means you pay to host with your internet subscription which you already pay for. The servers which simply cannot be hosted by players, are usually privately owned or clan servers, again, not hosted by microsoft.

Not only that, but you are paying for features that have been or have become standards for PC gamers, and while you pay enough to own one less game every year(more if you pay monthly), we can buy an additional game every year. Everything points to live being a fat scam, and while the service they provide (however little that is) is quality, it is up to you to decide whether or not you want to throw money at it. Me? Let's just say it's a cold day in hell when i pay for live again, after my Gears PC experience.

If you people will take a minute of your time to look at something deserving of praise? Try steam. They host demos, content, updates, promote mods and a community feeling in general. In fact, steam community blows away any other friend system to date. They also added achievments recently. Want to know something else? It's free, and so, so sweet.

velocity99
No, I'm sorry Live> Steam. Steam's tech support is worse then annoying MS could come up with, if you contact steam it takes days or weeks to get a reply verses 24 hrs with MS. Hell, EA Store> Steam.
Avatar image for Nagidar
Nagidar

6231

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 Nagidar
Member since 2006 • 6231 Posts
[QUOTE="velocity99"]

You live users are so far up your own asses, you won't even listen to facts or reason. You do realize what you are paying for is essentially acheivements and a really neat store to spend more money in? Microsoft doesn't even have to host servers. All the servers, save for few games like frontlines, are hosted by players. That means you pay to host with your internet subscription which you already pay for. The servers which simply cannot be hosted by players, are usually privately owned or clan servers, again, not hosted by microsoft.

Not only that, but you are paying for features that have been or have become standards for PC gamers, and while you pay enough to own one less game every year(more if you pay monthly), we can buy an additional game every year. Everything points to live being a fat scam, and while the service they provide (however little that is) is quality, it is up to you to decide whether or not you want to throw money at it. Me? Let's just say it's a cold day in hell when i pay for live again, after my Gears PC experience.

If you people will take a minute of your time to look at something deserving of praise? Try steam. They host demos, content, updates, promote mods and a community feeling in general. In fact, steam community blows away any other friend system to date. They also added achievments recently. Want to know something else? It's free, and so, so sweet.

dotWithShoes

Basicly the bolded part is all I am gonna read... simply cuz I want an answer to this, if I don't pay for live, say I only have a Silver account, which IS free... I cannot get achievements and cannot download stuff from the marketplace?

No, hes full of ****, the ONLY thing you have to pay for is to play online, nothing else, you can use the Marketplace and get achievements without paying.

Avatar image for Couth_
Couth_

10369

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 Couth_
Member since 2008 • 10369 Posts
You don't pay for acheivments or to use the store. All you pay for is to play online. It's a rip IMO.
Avatar image for SHuN_G0Ku
SHuN_G0Ku

480

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#35 SHuN_G0Ku
Member since 2008 • 480 Posts
[QUOTE="CajunShooter"]

So now we get to have 100 of these threads because of those rumors :)

-platy-

Oh im sorry, i thought this was System wars

i thought you were a lemming bashing the PS3..

but that could be someone else with the same avatar

Avatar image for velocity99
velocity99

480

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#36 velocity99
Member since 2005 • 480 Posts
[QUOTE="velocity99"]

You live users are so far up your own asses, you won't even listen to facts or reason. You do realize what you are paying for is essentially acheivements and a really neat store to spend more money in? Microsoft doesn't even have to host servers. All the servers, save for few games like frontlines, are hosted by players. That means you pay to host with your internet subscription which you already pay for. The servers which simply cannot be hosted by players, are usually privately owned or clan servers, again, not hosted by microsoft.

Not only that, but you are paying for features that have been or have become standards for PC gamers, and while you pay enough to own one less game every year(more if you pay monthly), we can buy an additional game every year. Everything points to live being a fat scam, and while the service they provide (however little that is) is quality, it is up to you to decide whether or not you want to throw money at it. Me? Let's just say it's a cold day in hell when i pay for live again, after my Gears PC experience.

If you people will take a minute of your time to look at something deserving of praise? Try steam. They host demos, content, updates, promote mods and a community feeling in general. In fact, steam community blows away any other friend system to date. They also added achievments recently. Want to know something else? It's free, and so, so sweet.

Gta3-fan334

No, I'm sorry Live> Steam. Steam's tech support is worse then annoying MS could come up with, if you contact steam it takes days or weeks to get a reply verses 24 hrs with MS.

I'd like to point out that good tech support usually means that things are supposed to go wrong. My half life CD key was screwed up, and so i sent them a few pictures of it and i got a new one later that day. From that point on i was able to play Half-life, team fortress, counter-strike, deathmatch classic, and a crapload of free and by that time amazing mods. This is when steam became my platform of choice

But i digress, i am not ashamed to admit that i wandered off the topic of PSN vs Live. It is universally accepted that live is better than PSN. What i was trying to say is that steam demonstartes a better service than live for free, and that i disgusts me that so many people put up with live and the cost when such a magnificent alternative is around.

To answer another question i saw somewhere, upgrading my pc that cost me 700$ 2 years ago, took all of around 500$, that included replacing motherboard, getting a new hard-drive, video card, RAM, and processor. Needless to say i won't be eating dog food, as some of us have jobs.

Avatar image for -platy-
-platy-

593

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 -platy-
Member since 2007 • 593 Posts
I think people got the wrong idea when reading the OP, what im basically saying is PSN is making the right moves and slowly catching up to Live, and soon it will catch up and MS will either have to add more distinctive features that benefit us or get rid of the fee (which i dont think will happen). Thats all ladies.
Avatar image for GazzaB
GazzaB

27139

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 25

User Lists: 0

#38 GazzaB
Member since 2004 • 27139 Posts

I'd like to point out that good tech support usually means that things are supposed to go wrong. My half life CD key was screwed up, and so i sent them a few pictures of it and i got a new one later that day. From that point on i was able to play Half-life, team fortress, counter-strike, deathmatch ****c, and a crapload of free and by that time amazing mods. This is when steam became my platform of choice

But i digress, i am not ashamed to admit that i wandered off the topic of PSN vs Live. It is unicersally accepted that live is better than PSN. What i was trying to say is that steam demonstartes a better service than live for free, and that i disgusts me that so many people put up with live and the cost when such a magnificent alternative is around.

To answer another question i saw somewhere, upgrading my pc that cost me 700$ 2 years ago, took all of around 500$, that included replacing motherboard, getting a new hard-drive, video card, RAM, and processor. Needless to say i won't be eating dog food, as some of us have jobs.

velocity99

How is Steam an alternative though? Its not available on the Xbox, and im sure as hell not going to migrate to PC gaming due to a £40 a year fee im forced to pay. Also, what exactly can we do about it? M$ charge for the service, and thats that. Sure, we can maybe make a petition, get a few signitures. In the end though, youre paying very little each year for XBL, you have to think is it really worth the effort. And i agree, some of us do have jobs, so arguing over £40 a year is nothing. I probably loose that much in loose change anyway.

I think people got the wrong idea when reading the OP, what im basically saying is PSN is making the right moves and slowly catching up to Live, and soon it will catch up and MS will either have to add more distinctive features that benefit us or get rid of the fee (which i dont think will happen). Thats all ladies.-platy-

Yes, PSN is improving, but why do people assume Sony will continue to update PSN while M$ will sit on their behinds and do nothing? I honestly dont think M$ are going to let Sony catch up. M$ have a lot of new features scheduled for this autumn update, somehow i think Sony will forever be playing the catch-up game.

Avatar image for -platy-
-platy-

593

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 -platy-
Member since 2007 • 593 Posts

Gamer Pictures:

Title: GUNDAM OPERATION TROY

Price: 180 Microsoft Points

Price increase much?

Avatar image for E M I N 3 M
E M I N 3 M

2615

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 E M I N 3 M
Member since 2002 • 2615 Posts
What a joke thread. The look, feel & infrostructure of LIVE is light years beyond PSN. So go MooOOooooOOoo yourself to sleep & dream of that other flop called "HOME". :lol:
Avatar image for readingfc_1
readingfc_1

2548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#41 readingfc_1
Member since 2004 • 2548 Posts

[QUOTE="II-FBIsniper-II"]Thanks for your thorough explanation to why its better.-platy-

Lol, having the same features and possibly more while its free isnt better? Hmm ok, btw how does it feel to pay 150 MS points for gamerpics?

How does it feel to not have a choice?

Avatar image for Khansoul
Khansoul

4639

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 Khansoul
Member since 2004 • 4639 Posts

Soon enough atleast, but im glad because that will force MS to add more features or make it free :)-platy-

PSN is not even worthy to lick the boot of XBOX Live. I have both and PSN is barley a service in its current state.

no friend requests in game!

/thread

Avatar image for -platy-
-platy-

593

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 -platy-
Member since 2007 • 593 Posts
[QUOTE="-platy-"]

[QUOTE="II-FBIsniper-II"]Thanks for your thorough explanation to why its better.readingfc_1

Lol, having the same features and possibly more while its free isnt better? Hmm ok, btw how does it feel to pay 150 MS points for gamerpics?

How does it feel to not have a choice?

Im not sure, seeing as i have both services

Avatar image for velocity99
velocity99

480

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#44 velocity99
Member since 2005 • 480 Posts

[QUOTE="velocity99"]

I'd like to point out that good tech support usually means that things are supposed to go wrong. My half life CD key was screwed up, and so i sent them a few pictures of it and i got a new one later that day. From that point on i was able to play Half-life, team fortress, counter-strike, deathmatch ****c, and a crapload of free and by that time amazing mods. This is when steam became my platform of choice

But i digress, i am not ashamed to admit that i wandered off the topic of PSN vs Live. It is unicersally accepted that live is better than PSN. What i was trying to say is that steam demonstartes a better service than live for free, and that i disgusts me that so many people put up with live and the cost when such a magnificent alternative is around.

To answer another question i saw somewhere, upgrading my pc that cost me 700$ 2 years ago, took all of around 500$, that included replacing motherboard, getting a new hard-drive, video card, RAM, and processor. Needless to say i won't be eating dog food, as some of us have jobs.

GazzaB

How is Steam an alternative though? Its not available on the Xbox, and im sure as hell not going to migrate to PC gaming due to a £40 a year fee im forced to pay. Also, what exactly can we do about it? M$ charge for the service, and thats that. Sure, we can maybe make a petition, get a few signitures. In the end though, youre paying very little each year for XBL, you have to think is it really worth the effort. And i agree, some of us do have jobs, so arguing over £40 a year is nothing. I probably loose that much in loose change anyway.

This is exaclty where freedom falls, "What can we do about it, we cannot defy Microsoft, our masters.". If you will excuse me, i have to go weep for all gamers, and then cry myself to sleep.

Avatar image for whackedjob213
whackedjob213

2103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#46 whackedjob213
Member since 2006 • 2103 Posts
I own a PS3 and I know that is crap. Live will always be better than PSN there is no doubt about that. They have everything so well integrated and it is clearly worth the 50 bucks a year. Not Home, not trophies and not in gmae XMB will make PSN better than Live. I'm sorry that is just a fact.
Avatar image for SHuN_G0Ku
SHuN_G0Ku

480

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#47 SHuN_G0Ku
Member since 2008 • 480 Posts

Live charges you for downloading themes where in PSN you can get those for free.

also PS3 has an internet browser 8)

both services has their own advantage and disadvantages

...i just dont know how it'll be expressed once firmware 2.40 goes live..

Avatar image for DisPimpin
DisPimpin

2513

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 DisPimpin
Member since 2006 • 2513 Posts
Is this a joke thread? :|
Avatar image for GazzaB
GazzaB

27139

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 25

User Lists: 0

#49 GazzaB
Member since 2004 • 27139 Posts

Live charges you for downloading themes where in PSN you can get those for free.

also PS3 has an internet browser 8)

both services has their own advantage and disadvantages

...i just dont know how it'll be expressed once firmware 2.40 goes live..

SHuN_G0Ku

But Live has so many more themes available than PSN. Plus if you dont want to pay, you can just upload you're own. Nothing big.

Although yeah, the Internet browser is one of the only things PSN has over XBL.

Avatar image for -platy-
-platy-

593

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 -platy-
Member since 2007 • 593 Posts
[QUOTE="SHuN_G0Ku"]

Live charges you for downloading themes where in PSN you can get those for free.

also PS3 has an internet browser 8)

both services has their own advantage and disadvantages

...i just dont know how it'll be expressed once firmware 2.40 goes live..

GazzaB

But Live has so many more themes available than PSN. Plus if you dont want to pay, you can just upload you're own. Nothing big.

Although yeah, the Internet browser is one of the only things PSN has over XBL.

what? PS3 has tons more themes...