PSN to offer "Premium Level" Subscription Fee in 2010.

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for mythrol
mythrol

5237

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#1 mythrol
Member since 2005 • 5237 Posts

Taken straight from our beloved Gamespot.

"One the biggest selling points of the PlayStation 3 is that gamers can use the console to play online at no additional charge. However, evidence has surfaced that the company is planning a two-tiered subscription model for the PlayStation Network similar to--but also fundamentally different from--Xbox Live.

Slides accompanying a Thursday presentation by Sony show that the company is planning a "new revenue stream from subscription" on PSN in 2010. [UPDATE] During the presentation, which emphasized Sony's plans to make its game business profitable in the next fiscal year, Sony Computer Entertainment CEO Kaz Hirai confirmed the plans. "We will be building upon our current free [PSN] service offering with premium content and services to start the subscription model," he told attendees."

Follow the link to see the whole article.

I personally can understand Sony needing to go this route. I have a feeling we'll be seeing something Similiar from Microsoft too.

Thoughts?

Avatar image for Kahuna_1
Kahuna_1

7948

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Kahuna_1
Member since 2006 • 7948 Posts

All I have ever needed is free online play, so this is all irrelevant to me.

Avatar image for Optusnet
Optusnet

11065

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#3 Optusnet
Member since 2003 • 11065 Posts

As long as they don't get rid of the ability to play online for lower-tier uses, I'll live.

Avatar image for washd123
washd123

3418

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 washd123
Member since 2003 • 3418 Posts

which is how it should be done. playing games should be free charging for 'premium' crap is ok since you dont have to opt in just to play games.

Avatar image for Stevo_the_gamer
Stevo_the_gamer

50149

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

#5 Stevo_the_gamer  Moderator
Member since 2004 • 50149 Posts
I'm surprised Sony decided to do this so late in the game, actually.
Avatar image for MondeEdlu
MondeEdlu

181

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 MondeEdlu
Member since 2005 • 181 Posts

similar to but fundamentally different? gee thx guys that really cleared it up

Avatar image for SolidTy
SolidTy

49991

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#7 SolidTy
Member since 2005 • 49991 Posts

I'm sure it was hard for SONY to ignore the millions upon millions the competition was raking in from their service in rough economic waters.

Avatar image for Zaibach
Zaibach

13466

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#8 Zaibach
Member since 2007 • 13466 Posts

isnt this about the qore service?

Avatar image for shutdown_202
shutdown_202

5649

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 shutdown_202
Member since 2005 • 5649 Posts

Wont be long till they start taking away free stuff and adding it to the premium (ala MS).

Avatar image for G-O-M-J
G-O-M-J

1520

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 G-O-M-J
Member since 2009 • 1520 Posts
I can see new psn features being exclusive to the premium service from now on. The free service will just get minor upgrades. Thats what i think anyway.
Avatar image for Salt_The_Fries
Salt_The_Fries

12480

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#11 Salt_The_Fries
Member since 2008 • 12480 Posts

I'm sure it was hard for SONY to ignore the millions upon millions the competition was raking in from their service in rough economic waters.

SolidTy
They will still be treated like Messiahs even if they'd ditch free-of-charge playing on PSN and made it from premium accounts only.
Avatar image for Ragnarok1051
Ragnarok1051

20238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 Ragnarok1051
Member since 2007 • 20238 Posts
[QUOTE="SolidTy"]

I'm sure it was hard for SONY to ignore the millions upon millions the competition was raking in from their service in rough economic waters.

Salt_The_Fries
They will still be treated like Messiahs even if they'd ditch free-of-charge playing on PSN and made it from premium accounts only.

All fanboys treat their favorite company like Messiahs.
Avatar image for vaderhater
vaderhater

3972

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 vaderhater
Member since 2003 • 3972 Posts

[QUOTE="Salt_The_Fries"][QUOTE="SolidTy"]

I'm sure it was hard for SONY to ignore the millions upon millions the competition was raking in from their service in rough economic waters.

Ragnarok1051

They will still be treated like Messiahs even if they'd ditch free-of-charge playing on PSN and made it from premium accounts only.

All fanboys treat their favorite company like Messiahs.

But the difference is that one group will and have put its foot in its own mouth quite far by then.

Avatar image for mccoyca112
mccoyca112

5434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#14 mccoyca112
Member since 2007 • 5434 Posts

Not paying any higher than $20 bucks.

Avatar image for RJay123
RJay123

911

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 RJay123
Member since 2009 • 911 Posts

Sony fans pwned

Avatar image for vaderhater
vaderhater

3972

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 vaderhater
Member since 2003 • 3972 Posts

I am concerned. The idea doesn't sit well with me because it's a slippery slope. It wouldn't be hard to imagine that PSN could soon end up like Live in that you need to pay in some way in order to play effectively or efficiently online. Maybe not a monthly fee but you may have to pay for this or that.

And then there is the concern that content will be held back and I assure you it will be. Content will be created specifically for this advanced subscription or held back for it otherwise there wouldn't be any incentive for people to join it. You can bet your buttox that Sony wants people to sign up and throw them money and there's really only one way to do that if not the paying to play; it's content. "exclusive content" that probably should've been in the real game in the first place.


Or maybe not. Only time will tell. All we know right now is that they probably will implement something and that they are thinking about it. Sony is still a business and PSN perhaps does make money but perhaps not nearly enough. And, come on, Sony isn't dumb. They've seen Live Prosper and its success; they, like anyone else, would like a piece of that pie.

AncientDozer

The thing is that Sony seems to be releasing a little news at a time so as to ease people into the idea. Less shock that way.

Avatar image for shutdown_202
shutdown_202

5649

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 shutdown_202
Member since 2005 • 5649 Posts

As long as they don't get rid of the ability to play online for lower-tier uses, I'll live.

Optusnet

:lol:

Dude, where have you been? I've missed your sig. Gave me alot of good lulz way back.

Avatar image for SolidTy
SolidTy

49991

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#19 SolidTy
Member since 2005 • 49991 Posts

[QUOTE="Ragnarok1051"][QUOTE="Salt_The_Fries"] They will still be treated like Messiahs even if they'd ditch free-of-charge playing on PSN and made it from premium accounts only.vaderhater

All fanboys treat their favorite company like Messiahs.

But the difference is that one group will and have put its foot in its own mouth quite far by then.

They both do that, over the course of all these many years.

Here's the thing, Consumers are saying, "Charge us Please", and if folks keep paying, then that's that. We can't blame Xbox or Playstation for the users giving up their money freely, we ultimately need to look to ourselves.We asked for this.

Avatar image for Zaibach
Zaibach

13466

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#20 Zaibach
Member since 2007 • 13466 Posts

Sony fans pwned

RJay123

actually gamers everywhere pwned!!! thank you MS.

Avatar image for Panther501
Panther501

1990

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 Panther501
Member since 2007 • 1990 Posts
I bet its going to allow subscribers free access to betas, maybe discounts on downloadable games, and qore service. Doesn't really affect anyone as long as they don't take away features.
Avatar image for hyperboy152000
hyperboy152000

4815

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#22 hyperboy152000
Member since 2003 • 4815 Posts

I'm surprised Sony decided to do this so late in the game, actually.Stevo_the_gamer

yea considering how successful LIVE has been, even on the original xbox, thats what made the xbox and the 360 so popular

Avatar image for littlestreakier
littlestreakier

2950

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 littlestreakier
Member since 2004 • 2950 Posts

-sigh- i just know sony's going to gradually put more and more things on the premium side. who knows maybe even the ability to play games online :shock: with both sony and ms charging for online gaming would consumers really have a choice if they want to play games online? yes, and we canchoose not tobut in reality i'm sure the majority of people would be willing to pay sony to be able to play games online.

Avatar image for TerrorIncognito
TerrorIncognito

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 TerrorIncognito
Member since 2009 • 25 Posts

similar to but fundamentally different? gee thx guys that really cleared it up

MondeEdlu
LMAO, I second that motion!
Avatar image for TerrorIncognito
TerrorIncognito

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 TerrorIncognito
Member since 2009 • 25 Posts
Yes, Sony could charge, and people would pay, but still! Its one of the main selling points for the PS3 is FREE online gaming. Thats the original reason I switched to the PS3 from the 360. I cant go back now of course, lol, but still. I thunk itd be okay if they left the online gaming, PSHome, ect just how it is (free), and added some cool features such as Free Beta access, Qore subscription, Discounted games, ect ( such as stated by another forum member), add all that to a subscription package. But keep it affordable. Like, a year for 50 bucks or something. Monthly more expensive of course! (like, 7.99 or so per month).
Avatar image for Tjeremiah1988
Tjeremiah1988

16665

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 Tjeremiah1988
Member since 2003 • 16665 Posts

Wont be long till they start taking away free stuff and adding it to the premium (ala MS).

shutdown_202
as long as gamers can play online with others n with friends for free, i dont think they will care .
Avatar image for deactivated-5b19214ec908b
deactivated-5b19214ec908b

25072

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#27 deactivated-5b19214ec908b
Member since 2007 • 25072 Posts

Its just going to be Qore and netfix membership or something. its got nothing to do with online play

Avatar image for z4twenny
z4twenny

4898

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#28 z4twenny
Member since 2006 • 4898 Posts

as long as they don't take away any current functionality (ie psn store, online playing, messaging etc) then im fine with it. i won't be getting it, but i don't have a problem with them making a subscription service (like qore) that adds more stuff. if they can make it worth my while then i might actually get it, but they'd have to add a lot of awesome stuff (it'd have to blow live out of the water as i don't feel that service is worth what is charged)

Avatar image for Fumpa
Fumpa

3307

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 Fumpa
Member since 2003 • 3307 Posts
I'm surprised Sony decided to do this so late in the game, actually.Stevo_the_gamer
They probably weren't in a position to do this any sooner. If they had tried this sooner then some people may have chosen to buy a 360 instead of a PS3. It's safer now to introduce the fees because they have a stronger list of great titles, and because of the price drop.
Avatar image for river_rat3117
river_rat3117

3474

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 river_rat3117
Member since 2003 • 3474 Posts
as being a yearly subsciber to qore i wonder if you can get a discount. i really dont care. if they keep core online play free they are still good in my book
Avatar image for darktx2005
darktx2005

396

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 darktx2005
Member since 2009 • 396 Posts
I'd almost put money on the fact that sony will eventually charge for playing online. Maybe not this gen, but it will happen. If that does happen, PSN is over for me. XBL is superior in every way but cost, and I'm not about to pay to play on Sony's inferior network.