Publishers in the best/worst shape going into next gen.

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for crimsonman1245
crimsonman1245

4253

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 crimsonman1245
Member since 2011 • 4253 Posts

Publishers in the best shape:

Ubisoft

Assassins Creed, Far Cry, Watch Dogs, Rayman, The Division, tons of talent, successful advertising campaigns. However i hate Uplay, they are making alot of their games online only, and i hate the way they annually release games like Assassins Creed.

Valve

They could live off of steam easily, but their games are usually very successful as well, SteamOS and Controller are very interesting, there's no real flaw for Valve other than the fact that they wont make a certain game that everyone seems to want.

Sony

Playstation 4 doesnt have any glaring flaws like the PS3 did and its competition has made huge mistakes with their own consoles. Sonys first party is stronger than its ever been, they are priced 100 dollars cheaper than Xbox, and they have a very good reputation amongst gamers right now.

Publishers in the worst shape:

Square Enix

Square Enix is a borderline disaster right now, they have terrible leadership and things are going to get worse before it gets better. Square Enix owns powerful IPs such as Final Fantasy, Dragon Quest, Kingdom Hearts, Deus Ex, Hitman, Tomb Raider, etc etc, they have hundreds and hundreds of very talented developers and their focus is on mobile games (Which are overpriced, have microtransactions....and are generally shovelware).

If this company were run by Shuhei Yoshida they would be a juggernaut publisher, but with their current leadership they are just kind of sitting around and hoping that their mobile games will take off. Final Fantasy XV looks amazing but i fear for the future of that franchise.

EA

EA reputation is awful and for good reason. They've run several excellent franchises (And developers) into the ground, they wont greenlight a game unless it has some kind of online element, i hate the way they use DLC, Origin is a nuisance.

However they do have seem to properly fund their games and they have their engines ready for next gen.

Capcom

The EA of Japan? Their biggest franchises have no identity, Resident Evil is a horror franchise trying to be an action game, they still sell well but their metacritic scores are way down. The new Devil May Cry was highly rated but it wasnt what their fans wanted, they wont make a Megaman game, they are turning games like Breathe of Fire into Smart phone games.

I will give them credit for their new engine though, it's pretty impressive.

What do you guys think?

 

Avatar image for Jakandsigz
Jakandsigz

6341

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Jakandsigz
Member since 2013 • 6341 Posts
No TC, despite who you like or not, SE is the ONLY Publisher that is struggling. All the other Publishers that were struggling are either small dime devs that don't publish, bankrupt, or moved to IOS.
Avatar image for muffin200
muffin200

733

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 muffin200
Member since 2007 • 733 Posts

EA are not in a bad shape. Being voted the worst company in America and being disliked is irrelavent as long as they keep making good games that sell in large numbers.

 

Avatar image for LA-Nighthawk
LA-Nighthawk

335

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 LA-Nighthawk
Member since 2013 • 335 Posts
EA is in good shape. Sony is in terrible shape financially.
Avatar image for 2Chalupas
2Chalupas

7286

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#5 2Chalupas
Member since 2009 • 7286 Posts

No TC, despite who you like or not, SE is the ONLY Publisher that is struggling. All the other Publishers that were struggling are either small dime devs that don't publish, bankrupt, or moved to IOS.Jakandsigz

Sega seems to be in the worst shape. To the point it's effecting their games going forward. 

Square Enix I've read is really struggling financially, and their Japan produced games have been a disaster this gen. However they continue to be strong in their publishing of western titles. 

Capcom is a weird one. Their quality hasn't been as high as Square Enix for sure, but I haven't read as much about them being in trouble financially as the others. 

Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#6 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

in no way is EA in bad shape.  

Avatar image for 2Chalupas
2Chalupas

7286

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#7 2Chalupas
Member since 2009 • 7286 Posts

No TC, despite who you like or not, SE is the ONLY Publisher that is struggling. All the other Publishers that were struggling are either small dime devs that don't publish, bankrupt, or moved to IOS.Jakandsigz

Sega seems to be in the worst shape. To the point it's effecting their games going forward. 

Square Enix I've read is really struggling financially, and their Japan produced games have been a disaster this gen. However they continue to be strong in their publishing of western titles. 

Capcom is a weird one. Their quality hasn't been as high as Square Enix for sure, but I haven't read as much about them being in trouble financially as the others. 

Avatar image for 1PMrFister
1PMrFister

3134

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#8 1PMrFister
Member since 2010 • 3134 Posts

[QUOTE="Jakandsigz"]No TC, despite who you like or not, SE is the ONLY Publisher that is struggling. All the other Publishers that were struggling are either small dime devs that don't publish, bankrupt, or moved to IOS.2Chalupas

Sega seems to be in the worst shape. To the point it's effecting their games going forward. 

Square Enix I've read is really struggling financially, and their Japan produced games have been a disaster this gen. However they continue to be strong in their publishing of western titles. 

Capcom is a weird one. Their quality hasn't been as high as Square Enix for sure, but I haven't read as much about them being in trouble financially as the others. 

Capcom only has about $152 million in the bank. They're not doing so hot, either.

Avatar image for Sushiglutton
Sushiglutton

10477

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#9 Sushiglutton
Member since 2009 • 10477 Posts
EA is in a great position with EA- sports (FIFA in particular obv), Battlefield and Mass Effect. Sure they had some problems with MoH, Dragon Age and Dead Space, but overall I think they are doing fine. Moving their games to just a couple of engines is clever. Square Enix is the one most lost in space atm imo. They invested huge in a few titles and then sold them off for 75% discounts a couple of months after release. Seemed very desperate. I liked Sleeping Dogs and new Tomb Raider though, but business wise it's suicide what they are doing. Also they have managed to hurt the FF brand a lot lately. Capcom also seems pretty lost atm. Ubisoft knows what they are doing, even though many of their games are real hollow with pretty exteriors. Ubi games are typically stuffed with tons of junk content and fillers. But they are selling well.
Avatar image for Nintendo_Ownes7
Nintendo_Ownes7

30973

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#10 Nintendo_Ownes7
Member since 2005 • 30973 Posts

[QUOTE="Jakandsigz"]No TC, despite who you like or not, SE is the ONLY Publisher that is struggling. All the other Publishers that were struggling are either small dime devs that don't publish, bankrupt, or moved to IOS.2Chalupas

Sega seems to be in the worst shape. To the point it's effecting their games going forward. 

Square Enix I've read is really struggling financially, and their Japan produced games have been a disaster this gen. However they continue to be strong in their publishing of western titles. 

Capcom is a weird one. Their quality hasn't been as high as Square Enix for sure, but I haven't read as much about them being in trouble financially as the others. 

Capcom is doing bad they only have 152 Million in the bank.

Avatar image for SonofK
SonofK

1088

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 SonofK
Member since 2013 • 1088 Posts
IMO Ubisoft is probably the top publisher right now Splinter Cell, Ghost Recon, Division, Rainbow Six Patriots, Rayman, Assassins Creed, Far Cry, Watch Dogs No one else has a line up like that
Avatar image for Micropixel
Micropixel

1383

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#12 Micropixel
Member since 2005 • 1383 Posts

Sony is no where NEAR being in good shape financially. Four months ago, The New York Times reported on a harsh assesment of Sony's Electronics Business by investment banking firm Jefferies who said:

"Electronics is its Achilles' heel and, in our view, it is worth zero." They also went on to say: "In our view, it needs to exit most electronics markets."

There are more details throughout the article if anyone is interested. There have been revisions and what-not since it's posting date.

Avatar image for 2Chalupas
2Chalupas

7286

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#13 2Chalupas
Member since 2009 • 7286 Posts

Sony is no where NEAR being in good shape financially. Four months ago, The New York Times reported on a harsh assesment of Sony's Electronics Business by investment banking firm Jefferies who said:

"Electronics is its Achilles' heel and, in our view, it is worth zero." They also went on to say: "In our view, it needs to exit most electronics markets."

There are more details throughout the article if anyone is interested. There have been revisions and what-not since it's posting date.

Micropixel

 

EA $3.7 Billion Annual Revenues

Sony $72 Billion Annual Revenues. (and this is well below what it used to be). 

Sony's Operating Cash Flow = $5.2 Billion. Despite all their struggles, Sony's positive cash flow is higher than EA's entire revenue!

Everyone knows that Sony has divisions that have been hemoragging for years. The reason they report financial losses, is usually due to disposition or writing off legacy eletronics businesses or re-organizations. However they are still a massive company, and their actual cash flows are positive. And if they chose to do so they could easily spin off their "entertainment" business - and as a standalone entertainment business Sony would be one of the strongest in gaming (nevermind the movie and music businesses) 

Avatar image for crimsonman1245
crimsonman1245

4253

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 crimsonman1245
Member since 2011 • 4253 Posts

I didnt do a very good job explaining what i meant, i wasnt strictly talking about the companies financial situation.

For instance, Microsoft is much more profitable than Sony, but Playstation 4 is in a much better position right now than Xbox One. Its 100 dollars cheaper, much more powerful, has a better first party, has better value with PS+, and has a much better reputation among gamers.

Avatar image for 2Chalupas
2Chalupas

7286

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#15 2Chalupas
Member since 2009 • 7286 Posts

Sony is no where NEAR being in good shape financially. Four months ago, The New York Times reported on a harsh assesment of Sony's Electronics Business by investment banking firm Jefferies who said:

"Electronics is its Achilles' heel and, in our view, it is worth zero." They also went on to say: "In our view, it needs to exit most electronics markets."

There are more details throughout the article if anyone is interested. There have been revisions and what-not since it's posting date.

Micropixel

 

EA $3.7 Billion Annual Revenues

Sony $72 Billion Annual Revenues. (and this is well below what it used to be). 

Sony's Operating Cash Flow = $5.2 Billion. Despite all their struggles, Sony's positive cash flow is higher than EA's entire revenue!

Everyone knows that Sony has divisions that have been hemoragging for years. The reason they report financial losses, is usually due to disposition or writing off legacy eletronics businesses or re-organizations. However they are still a massive company, and their actual cash flows are positive. And if they chose to do so they could easily spin off their "entertainment" business - and as a standalone entertainment business Sony would be one of the strongest in gaming (nevermind the movie and music businesses) 

Avatar image for Magescrew
Magescrew

541

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#16 Magescrew
Member since 2008 • 541 Posts

Bioware: sadly, in bad shape. They have a lot to prove with DA3 after the blunder that was DA2. ME4 has to make up for the tricolor ending of ME3. And beyond that people are going to get sick of Bioware if they don't create any new IPs. I'm a huge Bioware fan and I'm hoping they return to the glory days that lasted up until about the release of ME2.

Avatar image for Magescrew
Magescrew

541

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#17 Magescrew
Member since 2008 • 541 Posts

Bioware: sadly, in bad shape. They have a lot to prove with DA3 after the blunder that was DA2. ME4 has to make up for the tricolor ending of ME3. And beyond that people are going to get sick of Bioware if they don't create any new IPs. I'm a huge Bioware fan and I'm hoping they return to the glory days that lasted up until about the release of ME2.

Avatar image for deactivated-5d6bb9cb2ee20
deactivated-5d6bb9cb2ee20

82724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 56

User Lists: 0

#18 deactivated-5d6bb9cb2ee20
Member since 2006 • 82724 Posts
Nintendo's in great shape, I can't believe you didn't list them.
Avatar image for nintendoboy16
nintendoboy16

42238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 44

User Lists: 14

#19 nintendoboy16
Member since 2007 • 42238 Posts

Nintendo's in great shape, I can't believe you didn't list them.charizard1605
Good luck convincing that to other posters here. :P

Avatar image for 2Chalupas
2Chalupas

7286

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#20 2Chalupas
Member since 2009 • 7286 Posts

Bioware: sadly, in bad shape. They have a lot to prove with DA3 after the blunder that was DA2. ME4 has to make up for the tricolor ending of ME3. And beyond that people are going to get sick of Bioware if they don't create any new IPs. I'm a huge Bioware fan and I'm hoping they return to the glory days that lasted up until about the release of ME2.

Magescrew

This thread is about publishers. Bioware = EA. 

Mass Effect 2 was probably the last game they did that didn't have EA influence.

Avatar image for 2Chalupas
2Chalupas

7286

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#21 2Chalupas
Member since 2009 • 7286 Posts

Bioware: sadly, in bad shape. They have a lot to prove with DA3 after the blunder that was DA2. ME4 has to make up for the tricolor ending of ME3. And beyond that people are going to get sick of Bioware if they don't create any new IPs. I'm a huge Bioware fan and I'm hoping they return to the glory days that lasted up until about the release of ME2.

Magescrew

This thread is about publishers. Bioware = EA. 

Mass Effect 2 was probably the last game they did that didn't have EA influence.

Avatar image for sweeten16
sweeten16

2872

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#22 sweeten16
Member since 2005 • 2872 Posts
EA are the the best shape of all the companies easily.
Avatar image for HarlockJC
HarlockJC

25546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#23 HarlockJC
Member since 2006 • 25546 Posts
I don't understand how Capcom let themselves get to this place. They have SF and MH both of which are still selling really well. Then they have RE, sure they suck but they sell.
Avatar image for GD1551
GD1551

9645

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 GD1551
Member since 2011 • 9645 Posts

Why even list EA for the worst? They have a pretty large number of the best selling games... and they have what looks to be the hottest new IP for next gen..

Avatar image for cain006
cain006

8625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 38

User Lists: 0

#25 cain006
Member since 2008 • 8625 Posts

If you'd asked this a year ago I would've said THQ - they went bankrupt. Doesn't get much worse than that :P

Avatar image for teuf_
Teuf_

30805

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 Teuf_
Member since 2004 • 30805 Posts

Capcom is in pretty rough shape, both in terms of money and in terms of the quality of their games. I think Monster Hunter is the only thing keeping them afloat at this point.

Avatar image for dercoo
dercoo

12555

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 dercoo
Member since 2006 • 12555 Posts

Publishers in the best shape:

Ubisoft

Assassins Creed, Far Cry, Watch Dogs, Rayman, The Division, tons of talent, successful advertising campaigns. However i hate Uplay, they are making alot of their games online only, and i hate the way they annually release games like Assassins Creed.

Valve

They could live off of steam easily, but their games are usually very successful as well, SteamOS and Controller are very interesting, there's no real flaw for Valve other than the fact that they wont make a certain game that everyone seems to want.

Sony

Playstation 4 doesnt have any glaring flaws like the PS3 did and its competition has made huge mistakes with their own consoles. Sonys first party is stronger than its ever been, they are priced 100 dollars cheaper than Xbox, and they have a very good reputation amongst gamers right now.

Publishers in the worst shape:

Square Enix

Square Enix is a borderline disaster right now, they have terrible leadership and things are going to get worse before it gets better. Square Enix owns powerful IPs such as Final Fantasy, Dragon Quest, Kingdom Hearts, Deus Ex, Hitman, Tomb Raider, etc etc, they have hundreds and hundreds of very talented developers and their focus is on mobile games (Which are overpriced, have microtransactions....and are generally shovelware).

If this company were run by Shuhei Yoshida they would be a juggernaut publisher, but with their current leadership they are just kind of sitting around and hoping that their mobile games will take off. Final Fantasy XV looks amazing but i fear for the future of that franchise.

EA

EA reputation is awful and for good reason. They've run several excellent franchises (And developers) into the ground, they wont greenlight a game unless it has some kind of online element, i hate the way they use DLC, Origin is a nuisance.

However they do have seem to properly fund their games and they have their engines ready for next gen.

Capcom

The EA of Japan? Their biggest franchises have no identity, Resident Evil is a horror franchise trying to be an action game, they still sell well but their metacritic scores are way down. The new Devil May Cry was highly rated but it wasnt what their fans wanted, they wont make a Megaman game, they are turning games like Breathe of Fire into Smart phone games.

I will give them credit for their new engine though, it's pretty impressive.

What do you guys think?

 

crimsonman1245

Overall, seems accurate, but I would move EA to mid tier.

Financially they are doing great, but sales & especially acclaim/good PR are hitting a platto.

EA's buisness practices are starting to backfire, and pull down their devs.

They could easily still turn it around, but they are currently on the same track as Cpcom or SE about 4-5 years ago.

Avatar image for dercoo
dercoo

12555

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 dercoo
Member since 2006 • 12555 Posts

Publishers in the best shape:

Ubisoft

Assassins Creed, Far Cry, Watch Dogs, Rayman, The Division, tons of talent, successful advertising campaigns. However i hate Uplay, they are making alot of their games online only, and i hate the way they annually release games like Assassins Creed.

Valve

They could live off of steam easily, but their games are usually very successful as well, SteamOS and Controller are very interesting, there's no real flaw for Valve other than the fact that they wont make a certain game that everyone seems to want.

Sony

Playstation 4 doesnt have any glaring flaws like the PS3 did and its competition has made huge mistakes with their own consoles. Sonys first party is stronger than its ever been, they are priced 100 dollars cheaper than Xbox, and they have a very good reputation amongst gamers right now.

Publishers in the worst shape:

Square Enix

Square Enix is a borderline disaster right now, they have terrible leadership and things are going to get worse before it gets better. Square Enix owns powerful IPs such as Final Fantasy, Dragon Quest, Kingdom Hearts, Deus Ex, Hitman, Tomb Raider, etc etc, they have hundreds and hundreds of very talented developers and their focus is on mobile games (Which are overpriced, have microtransactions....and are generally shovelware).

If this company were run by Shuhei Yoshida they would be a juggernaut publisher, but with their current leadership they are just kind of sitting around and hoping that their mobile games will take off. Final Fantasy XV looks amazing but i fear for the future of that franchise.

EA

EA reputation is awful and for good reason. They've run several excellent franchises (And developers) into the ground, they wont greenlight a game unless it has some kind of online element, i hate the way they use DLC, Origin is a nuisance.

However they do have seem to properly fund their games and they have their engines ready for next gen.

Capcom

The EA of Japan? Their biggest franchises have no identity, Resident Evil is a horror franchise trying to be an action game, they still sell well but their metacritic scores are way down. The new Devil May Cry was highly rated but it wasnt what their fans wanted, they wont make a Megaman game, they are turning games like Breathe of Fire into Smart phone games.

I will give them credit for their new engine though, it's pretty impressive.

What do you guys think?

 

crimsonman1245

Overall, seems accurate, but I would move EA to mid tier.

Financially they are doing great, but sales & especially acclaim/good PR are hitting a platto.

EA's buisness practices are starting to backfire, and pull down their devs.

They could easily still turn it around, but they are currently on the same track as Cpcom or SE about 4-5 years ago.

Avatar image for dercoo
dercoo

12555

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 dercoo
Member since 2006 • 12555 Posts

Publishers in the best shape:

Ubisoft

Assassins Creed, Far Cry, Watch Dogs, Rayman, The Division, tons of talent, successful advertising campaigns. However i hate Uplay, they are making alot of their games online only, and i hate the way they annually release games like Assassins Creed.

Valve

They could live off of steam easily, but their games are usually very successful as well, SteamOS and Controller are very interesting, there's no real flaw for Valve other than the fact that they wont make a certain game that everyone seems to want.

Sony

Playstation 4 doesnt have any glaring flaws like the PS3 did and its competition has made huge mistakes with their own consoles. Sonys first party is stronger than its ever been, they are priced 100 dollars cheaper than Xbox, and they have a very good reputation amongst gamers right now.

Publishers in the worst shape:

Square Enix

Square Enix is a borderline disaster right now, they have terrible leadership and things are going to get worse before it gets better. Square Enix owns powerful IPs such as Final Fantasy, Dragon Quest, Kingdom Hearts, Deus Ex, Hitman, Tomb Raider, etc etc, they have hundreds and hundreds of very talented developers and their focus is on mobile games (Which are overpriced, have microtransactions....and are generally shovelware).

If this company were run by Shuhei Yoshida they would be a juggernaut publisher, but with their current leadership they are just kind of sitting around and hoping that their mobile games will take off. Final Fantasy XV looks amazing but i fear for the future of that franchise.

EA

EA reputation is awful and for good reason. They've run several excellent franchises (And developers) into the ground, they wont greenlight a game unless it has some kind of online element, i hate the way they use DLC, Origin is a nuisance.

However they do have seem to properly fund their games and they have their engines ready for next gen.

Capcom

The EA of Japan? Their biggest franchises have no identity, Resident Evil is a horror franchise trying to be an action game, they still sell well but their metacritic scores are way down. The new Devil May Cry was highly rated but it wasnt what their fans wanted, they wont make a Megaman game, they are turning games like Breathe of Fire into Smart phone games.

I will give them credit for their new engine though, it's pretty impressive.

What do you guys think?

 

crimsonman1245

Overall, seems accurate, but I would move EA to mid tier.

Financially they are doing great, but sales & especially acclaim/good PR are hitting a platto.

EA's buisness practices are starting to backfire, and pull down their devs.

They could easily still turn it around, but they are currently on the same track as Cpcom or SE about 4-5 years ago.

Avatar image for Newhopes
Newhopes

4775

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#30 Newhopes
Member since 2009 • 4775 Posts

Sony is in no way in a good shape.....

Avatar image for Ilovegames1992
Ilovegames1992

14221

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#31 Ilovegames1992
Member since 2010 • 14221 Posts

EA arent in bad shape. 

Capcom might be heading there but they still are going strong, they are just retarded. 

I hope 505 games get a big push in the future and work on a big title. I like the games they've published. Even Naughty Bear has a disgusting charm.

Avatar image for Doom_HellKnight
Doom_HellKnight

12217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#32 Doom_HellKnight
Member since 2005 • 12217 Posts
In no way is EA in bad shape, regardless of what you think of them...
Avatar image for GhoX
GhoX

6267

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#33 GhoX
Member since 2006 • 6267 Posts
I think the TC is confusing the financial status of the publishers with how beneficial/reputable those publishers are to gamers. Overpriced mobile shovelware with micro-transactions cost little and make a ton of money. Bad for consumers, but great for investors. DLC spam and online only are also bad for consumers, but great for investors.
Avatar image for uninspiredcup
uninspiredcup

62950

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 86

User Lists: 2

#34 uninspiredcup
Member since 2013 • 62950 Posts

It's very sad to see the once great Bioware sink to the bottom of a sea of a shit. On the more positive side of things, it's always interesting to follow Valve and specifically Gabe Newell. It seems pretty clear both as a publisher and developer these fellows are well, well above the competition.

Avatar image for GhoX
GhoX

6267

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#35 GhoX
Member since 2006 • 6267 Posts
I think the TC is confusing the financial status of the publishers with how beneficial/reputable those publishers are to gamers. Overpriced mobile shovelware with micro-transactions cost little and make a ton of money. Bad for consumers, but great for investors. DLC spam and online only are also bad for consumers, but great for investors.

[QUOTE="Micropixel"]

Sony is no where NEAR being in good shape financially. Four months ago, The New York Times reported on a harsh assesment of Sony's Electronics Business by investment banking firm Jefferies who said:

"Electronics is its Achilles' heel and, in our view, it is worth zero." They also went on to say: "In our view, it needs to exit most electronics markets."

There are more details throughout the article if anyone is interested. There have been revisions and what-not since it's posting date.

2Chalupas

 

EA $3.7 Billion Annual Revenues

Sony $72 Billion Annual Revenues. (and this is well below what it used to be). 

Sony's Operating Cash Flow = $5.2 Billion. Despite all their struggles, Sony's positive cash flow is higher than EA's entire revenue!

Everyone knows that Sony has divisions that have been hemoragging for years. The reason they report financial losses, is usually due to disposition or writing off legacy eletronics businesses or re-organizations. However they are still a massive company, and their actual cash flows are positive. And if they chose to do so they could easily spin off their "entertainment" business - and as a standalone entertainment business Sony would be one of the strongest in gaming (nevermind the movie and music businesses) 

Yet Sony is so diverse. The overall performance of the company is almost irrelevant for the purpose of comparison against other companies. Just for gaming-related divisions they have, of course, the hardware divisions, first party titles, and also SOE, which develops and publishes some MMOs. EA on the other hand solely focuses on developing and publishing games. The companies are far from comparable.
Avatar image for GiantAssPanda
GiantAssPanda

1885

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 GiantAssPanda
Member since 2011 • 1885 Posts
Mass Effect 2 was probably the last game they did that didn't have EA influence.2Chalupas
Nope. That was Dragon Age Origins. After that the old Bioware was finished.
Avatar image for crimsonman1245
crimsonman1245

4253

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 crimsonman1245
Member since 2011 • 4253 Posts

Sony is in no way in a good shape.....

Newhopes

You couldnt have written a better script for Playstation this year.

Wii U is a disaster, it will not take hardly any marketshare away from them.

Microsoft made a 500 dollar box that is significantly weaker than PS4, had always online, didnt allow used games, was region locked, didnt allow self publishing, and had some of the worst PR we've ever seen. They were forced to take alot of that stuff out but the damage was done, PS4 is dominating pre-orders and Microsoft has no answer for Sonys first party or PS+.

I wasnt talking about Sonys stock prices, i was talking about who is in the best position to do well going into next gen, and out of the three hardware makers that is easily Playstation right now.

Avatar image for NathanDrakeSwag
NathanDrakeSwag

17392

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 NathanDrakeSwag
Member since 2013 • 17392 Posts

Capcom is in the worst shape. They have nothing going for them heading into next gen. Square can atleast depend on Final Fantasy, Kingdom Hearts, Deus Ex and Tomb Raider.

Avatar image for Alpha_S_
Alpha_S_

395

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 Alpha_S_
Member since 2007 • 395 Posts

Capcom is in pretty bad shape, I'm starting to put them on death watch if they don't pick it up soon.  They're almost out of cash.

Valve is doing great and has moved beyond being another publisher. 

Avatar image for dercoo
dercoo

12555

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 dercoo
Member since 2006 • 12555 Posts

Publishers in the best shape:

Ubisoft

Assassins Creed, Far Cry, Watch Dogs, Rayman, The Division, tons of talent, successful advertising campaigns. However i hate Uplay, they are making alot of their games online only, and i hate the way they annually release games like Assassins Creed.

Valve

They could live off of steam easily, but their games are usually very successful as well, SteamOS and Controller are very interesting, there's no real flaw for Valve other than the fact that they wont make a certain game that everyone seems to want.

Sony

Playstation 4 doesnt have any glaring flaws like the PS3 did and its competition has made huge mistakes with their own consoles. Sonys first party is stronger than its ever been, they are priced 100 dollars cheaper than Xbox, and they have a very good reputation amongst gamers right now.

Publishers in the worst shape:

Square Enix

Square Enix is a borderline disaster right now, they have terrible leadership and things are going to get worse before it gets better. Square Enix owns powerful IPs such as Final Fantasy, Dragon Quest, Kingdom Hearts, Deus Ex, Hitman, Tomb Raider, etc etc, they have hundreds and hundreds of very talented developers and their focus is on mobile games (Which are overpriced, have microtransactions....and are generally shovelware).

If this company were run by Shuhei Yoshida they would be a juggernaut publisher, but with their current leadership they are just kind of sitting around and hoping that their mobile games will take off. Final Fantasy XV looks amazing but i fear for the future of that franchise.

EA

EA reputation is awful and for good reason. They've run several excellent franchises (And developers) into the ground, they wont greenlight a game unless it has some kind of online element, i hate the way they use DLC, Origin is a nuisance.

However they do have seem to properly fund their games and they have their engines ready for next gen.

Capcom

The EA of Japan? Their biggest franchises have no identity, Resident Evil is a horror franchise trying to be an action game, they still sell well but their metacritic scores are way down. The new Devil May Cry was highly rated but it wasnt what their fans wanted, they wont make a Megaman game, they are turning games like Breathe of Fire into Smart phone games.

I will give them credit for their new engine though, it's pretty impressive.

What do you guys think?

 

crimsonman1245

Overall, seems accurate, but I would move EA to mid tier.

Financially they are doing great, but sales & especially acclaim/good PR are hitting a platto.

EA's buisness practices are starting to backfire, and pull down their devs.

They could easily still turn it around, but they are currently on the same track as Cpcom or SE about 4-5 years ago.

Avatar image for vashkey
vashkey

33781

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 135

User Lists: 25

#41 vashkey
Member since 2005 • 33781 Posts
SEGA is the next THQ
Avatar image for dercoo
dercoo

12555

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 dercoo
Member since 2006 • 12555 Posts

Publishers in the best shape:

Ubisoft

Assassins Creed, Far Cry, Watch Dogs, Rayman, The Division, tons of talent, successful advertising campaigns. However i hate Uplay, they are making alot of their games online only, and i hate the way they annually release games like Assassins Creed.

Valve

They could live off of steam easily, but their games are usually very successful as well, SteamOS and Controller are very interesting, there's no real flaw for Valve other than the fact that they wont make a certain game that everyone seems to want.

Sony

Playstation 4 doesnt have any glaring flaws like the PS3 did and its competition has made huge mistakes with their own consoles. Sonys first party is stronger than its ever been, they are priced 100 dollars cheaper than Xbox, and they have a very good reputation amongst gamers right now.

Publishers in the worst shape:

Square Enix

Square Enix is a borderline disaster right now, they have terrible leadership and things are going to get worse before it gets better. Square Enix owns powerful IPs such as Final Fantasy, Dragon Quest, Kingdom Hearts, Deus Ex, Hitman, Tomb Raider, etc etc, they have hundreds and hundreds of very talented developers and their focus is on mobile games (Which are overpriced, have microtransactions....and are generally shovelware).

If this company were run by Shuhei Yoshida they would be a juggernaut publisher, but with their current leadership they are just kind of sitting around and hoping that their mobile games will take off. Final Fantasy XV looks amazing but i fear for the future of that franchise.

EA

EA reputation is awful and for good reason. They've run several excellent franchises (And developers) into the ground, they wont greenlight a game unless it has some kind of online element, i hate the way they use DLC, Origin is a nuisance.

However they do have seem to properly fund their games and they have their engines ready for next gen.

Capcom

The EA of Japan? Their biggest franchises have no identity, Resident Evil is a horror franchise trying to be an action game, they still sell well but their metacritic scores are way down. The new Devil May Cry was highly rated but it wasnt what their fans wanted, they wont make a Megaman game, they are turning games like Breathe of Fire into Smart phone games.

I will give them credit for their new engine though, it's pretty impressive.

What do you guys think?

 

crimsonman1245

Overall, seems accurate, but I would move EA to mid tier.

Financially they are doing great, but sales & especially acclaim/good PR are hitting a platto.

EA's buisness practices are starting to backfire, and pull down their devs.

They could easily still turn it around, but they are currently on the same track as Cpcom or SE about 4-5 years ago.