"Modern Warfare 2 and all shooters are really meant for 360" Biggest B

  • 85 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Kennysolidsnake
Kennysolidsnake

1068

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Kennysolidsnake
Member since 2009 • 1068 Posts

Ok i have heard time and time again the argument "Modern warfare 2 is really a superior game on xbox consoles along with other shooters" Since when? Can someone give me one just one reason why the Call of duty games and shooters in general are always better on the xbox? no no, just because MS markets COD to death on the 360 more than Sony doesn't make it better on the 360.. Now that the 360 has party chat you will hardly hear anyone with mics anyway and even when people talked its not like anyone ever used to team work to begin with.

And the lame argument "but the 360 will have more online players" ok yea maybe more people will have the game on 360 but how does that add to the experience? I mean im willing to bet the PS3 verrsion will so just as many copies on the PS3 as the 360, modern warfare only sold 1 million copies more on the 360 than the PS3 and that was when the PS3 was still $500.00 and didnt have near the many owners as it does now..

Ok is it just me or does the PS3 have more shooter exclusives.. Resistance, Socom,Killzone and MAG.. the exclusive shooters on the 360... Gears and Halo.. So anyway my point is this, this whole idea that Modern Warfare 2 "was built for the 360" is utter crap.. they both perform equally, look equally and play equally on both consoles.. FACT..

Avatar image for tagyhag
tagyhag

15874

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 tagyhag
Member since 2007 • 15874 Posts
Pardon my elitism, but shooters were really meant for the PC. Excluding Modern Warfare 2 though. :x
Avatar image for Dead-Memories
Dead-Memories

6587

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 190

User Lists: 0

#3 Dead-Memories
Member since 2008 • 6587 Posts

It usually just boils down to controller, which often, is the selling point for FPS on the 360 in my opinion.

Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#4 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

Pardon my elitism, but shooters were really meant for the PC. Excluding Modern Warfare 2 though. :xtagyhag
It's basically a console game on PC, which is funny since COD started on PC!:lol:

Avatar image for Kennysolidsnake
Kennysolidsnake

1068

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Kennysolidsnake
Member since 2009 • 1068 Posts

It usually just boils down to controller, which often, is the selling point for FPS on the 360 in my opinion.

Dead-Memories
a myth.. I have modern warfare for both the PS3 and 360 and both play exactly the same.. Both feel equally good for both versions, i could see if the 360 had a exclusive good gun controller then yes it would be ideal for shooters, yea the trigger buttons feel more like "triggers" but not to the point where you can tell a great difference when playing shooters on the PS3 or 360
Avatar image for dethroned3
dethroned3

1104

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 dethroned3
Member since 2007 • 1104 Posts

it's kinda sad that microsoft barely have any good exclusives this year, and have no choice but to turn to a multiplat like MW2 for help.

Avatar image for tbolt76
tbolt76

987

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#7 tbolt76
Member since 2008 • 987 Posts

Ok i have heard time and time again the argument "Modern warfare 2 is really a superior game on xbox consoles along with other shooters" Since when? Can someone give me one just one reason why the Call of duty games and shooters in general are always better on the xbox? no no, just because MS markets COD to death on the 360 more than Sony doesn't make it better on the 360.. Now that the 360 has party chat you will hardly hear anyone with mics anyway and even when people talked its not like anyone ever used to team work to begin with.

And the lame argument "but the 360 will have more online players" ok yea maybe more people will have the game on 360 but how does that add to the experience? I mean im willing to bet the PS3 verrsion will so just as many copies on the PS3 as the 360, modern warfare only sold 1 million copies more on the 360 than the PS3 and that was when the PS3 was still $500.00 and didnt have near the many owners as it does now..

Ok is it just me or does the PS3 have more shooter exclusives.. Resistance, Socom,Killzone and MAG.. the exclusive shooters on the 360... Gears and Halo.. So anyway my point is this, this whole idea that Modern Warfare 2 "was built for the 360" is utter crap.. they both perform equally, look equally and play equally on both consoles.. FACT..Kennysolidsnake

The argument is very meaningful when you look at more players equaling more quality matches. I own MW for both the 360 and the PS3 and the online experience makes them seem like two totally different games. From very few people with mics to the uneven matchmaking, the online experience is just not the same. Is it superior, well that is your opinion, but, when I pick up MW to play (unless I am invited, outside of PSN, by a friend), I am playing on 360. That goes for all of my multiplayer multiplats.

Avatar image for RTUUMM
RTUUMM

4859

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 RTUUMM
Member since 2008 • 4859 Posts

It usually just boils down to controller, which often, is the selling point for FPS on the 360 in my opinion.

Dead-Memories
the 360 having a better controller for shooters is BS
Avatar image for Parasomniac
Parasomniac

2723

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Parasomniac
Member since 2007 • 2723 Posts
The triggers are definitely better on 360. The dualshock 3 ones aren't up to par.
Avatar image for Kokuro_Kun
Kokuro_Kun

2339

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Kokuro_Kun
Member since 2009 • 2339 Posts
I think every game boils down to controller preference. When i look at games and the PS3 version has an install with faster load times than 360, i usually just look at the game and decide what it plays like. Shooters feel better on Xbox, while fighting and Adventure games feel much better on Ps3. MW is simply a shooter and if your okay with MW2's new servers and m/kb thats just well and fine.
Avatar image for PS_Joe
PS_Joe

66

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 PS_Joe
Member since 2009 • 66 Posts
[QUOTE="tagyhag"]Pardon my elitism, but shooters were really meant for the PC. Excluding Modern Warfare 2 though. :x

Avatar image for SF_KiLLaMaN
SF_KiLLaMaN

6446

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#12 SF_KiLLaMaN
Member since 2007 • 6446 Posts
The triggers are definitely better on 360. The dualshock 3 ones aren't up to par.Parasomniac
you don;t shoot with the triggers on the PS3, therefore your point is invalid.
Avatar image for nmaharg
nmaharg

3285

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 nmaharg
Member since 2004 • 3285 Posts

I can only speak for myslef, but the FPS community on the PS3 is weak. I get most of my FPS on PC, but if I do get them on a console its going to be 360, simply for better comp. Also why I get all fighters on PS3.

Avatar image for nmaharg
nmaharg

3285

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 nmaharg
Member since 2004 • 3285 Posts
The triggers are definitely better on 360. The dualshock 3 ones aren't up to par.Parasomniac
Yeah my fingers always slip off them. I hate the dual shock 3.
Avatar image for PSdual_wielder
PSdual_wielder

10646

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#15 PSdual_wielder
Member since 2003 • 10646 Posts

Who on earth said that? :?

Especially the 2nd half...

Avatar image for tagyhag
tagyhag

15874

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 tagyhag
Member since 2007 • 15874 Posts

[QUOTE="tagyhag"]Pardon my elitism, but shooters were really meant for the PC. Excluding Modern Warfare 2 though. :xmitu123

It's basically a console game on PC, which is funny since COD started on PC!:lol:

It really is a shame, I just want to know what the hell happened.
Avatar image for SLIisaownsystem
SLIisaownsystem

964

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 SLIisaownsystem
Member since 2009 • 964 Posts

The whole CoD series started on PC, MW was a complete other game on PC. With Mouse and Keyboard, Mods, dedicated Servers and 50+ player it destroys the console version.

Avatar image for finalfantasy94
finalfantasy94

27442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#18 finalfantasy94
Member since 2004 • 27442 Posts

[QUOTE="Kennysolidsnake"]

Ok i have heard time and time again the argument "Modern warfare 2 is really a superior game on xbox consoles along with other shooters" Since when? Can someone give me one just one reason why the Call of duty games and shooters in general are always better on the xbox? no no, just because MS markets COD to death on the 360 more than Sony doesn't make it better on the 360.. Now that the 360 has party chat you will hardly hear anyone with mics anyway and even when people talked its not like anyone ever used to team work to begin with.

And the lame argument "but the 360 will have more online players" ok yea maybe more people will have the game on 360 but how does that add to the experience? I mean im willing to bet the PS3 verrsion will so just as many copies on the PS3 as the 360, modern warfare only sold 1 million copies more on the 360 than the PS3 and that was when the PS3 was still $500.00 and didnt have near the many owners as it does now..

Ok is it just me or does the PS3 have more shooter exclusives.. Resistance, Socom,Killzone and MAG.. the exclusive shooters on the 360... Gears and Halo.. So anyway my point is this, this whole idea that Modern Warfare 2 "was built for the 360" is utter crap.. they both perform equally, look equally and play equally on both consoles.. FACT..tbolt76

The argument is very meaningful when you look at more players equaling more quality matches. I own MW for both the 360 and the PS3 and the online experience makes them seem like two totally different games. From very few people with mics to the uneven matchmaking, the online experience is just not the same. Is it superior, well that is your opinion, but, when I pick up MW to play (unless I am invited, outside of PSN, by a friend), I am playing on 360. That goes for all of my multiplayer multiplats.

Sorry I just cant agree with that. I have played it also for both systems and I get the same experiance. Just less mic talk.

Avatar image for shakmaster13
shakmaster13

7138

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#19 shakmaster13
Member since 2007 • 7138 Posts

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

[QUOTE="tagyhag"]Pardon my elitism, but shooters were really meant for the PC. Excluding Modern Warfare 2 though. :xtagyhag

It's basically a console game on PC, which is funny since COD started on PC!:lol:

It really is a shame, I just want to know what the hell happened.

Activision got bigger than anything we could have imagined, that's what happened.

Avatar image for nmaharg
nmaharg

3285

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 nmaharg
Member since 2004 • 3285 Posts

The whole CoD series started on PC, MW was a complete other game on PC. With Mouse and Keyboard, Mods, dedicated Servers and 50+ player destroys the console version.

SLIisaownsystem
Now it's $10 more and they removed dedicated servers. What the hell are they thinking. I'll wait for a steam sale to get it. In fact I may just download it, eff IW.
Avatar image for kunal1092000
kunal1092000

920

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 kunal1092000
Member since 2003 • 920 Posts

Call of Duty on the PC was amazing back in the day. Some parts of the campaign are still ingrained in my head.

Avatar image for Jfisch93
Jfisch93

3557

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#22 Jfisch93
Member since 2008 • 3557 Posts

Ps3 is better for shooters because you don't have so many kids yelling into the mics when they lose! :P

Avatar image for box0rocks
box0rocks

1006

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 box0rocks
Member since 2008 • 1006 Posts

Ps3 is better for shooters because you don't have so many kids yelling into the mics when they lose! :P

Jfisch93

LOL haha so true

Avatar image for nmaharg
nmaharg

3285

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 nmaharg
Member since 2004 • 3285 Posts

[QUOTE="Jfisch93"]

Ps3 is better for shooters because you don't have so many kids yelling into the mics when they lose! :P

box0rocks

LOL haha so true

The down side is that it seems everyone on PS3 who does have a mic has a pretty crappy one. Making for all times of unwanted noices pouring through my headset. Box in a headset sony, cheap sob.

Avatar image for Cow_tipping
Cow_tipping

602

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 Cow_tipping
Member since 2009 • 602 Posts

Pardon my elitism, but shooters were really meant for the PC. Excluding Modern Warfare 2 though. :xtagyhag

halo changed that

Avatar image for PSdual_wielder
PSdual_wielder

10646

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#26 PSdual_wielder
Member since 2003 • 10646 Posts

[QUOTE="tagyhag"]Pardon my elitism, but shooters were really meant for the PC. Excluding Modern Warfare 2 though. :xCow_tipping

halo changed that

halo changed the way xbox fanboys think. I still agree with tagyhag.

Avatar image for clyde46
clyde46

49061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#27 clyde46
Member since 2005 • 49061 Posts

I cant get my fingers round the tiggers on the DS3. Playing Killzone 2 on a friends PS3 was made even more annoying by having to fight the controller. I dont think it helped playing it on the hardest difficulty leve :P

Avatar image for Who_Dat_Ninja
Who_Dat_Ninja

236

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 Who_Dat_Ninja
Member since 2009 • 236 Posts

Shooters are better on the PC, here's why:

Avatar image for ozzdog123
ozzdog123

1527

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#29 ozzdog123
Member since 2003 • 1527 Posts
The triggers are definitely better on 360. The dualshock 3 ones aren't up to par.Parasomniac
pretty much fact
Avatar image for 12345678ew
12345678ew

2353

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#30 12345678ew
Member since 2008 • 2353 Posts

1-26-2010 i'm reviving this thread and you'll all eat your words.... it'll be a bigger knockout than the mgs4 ratings.

Avatar image for treedoor
treedoor

7648

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 treedoor
Member since 2004 • 7648 Posts

Online

Controls

Both of which are superior on the 360, and both of which are very important to making a successful shooter.

Why do you think the PC has the most superior of all shooters? Because the controls are even better than the 360's, and the online community is the best to be had.

Avatar image for Flame-Eternal
Flame-Eternal

234

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 Flame-Eternal
Member since 2009 • 234 Posts
FPS games feel better on the 360 controller. more fact than opinion. for FPS PC > 360 > PS3/PS2 it is what it is.
Avatar image for Revolution316
Revolution316

2877

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 Revolution316
Member since 2009 • 2877 Posts

The triggers are definitely better on 360. The dualshock 3 ones aren't up to par.Parasomniac
L1, R1 is how you shoot, not triggers. its been like that since the beginning of time with no complaints so why complain now?

Avatar image for finalfantasy94
finalfantasy94

27442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#34 finalfantasy94
Member since 2004 • 27442 Posts

Online

Controls

Both of which are superior on the 360, and both of which are very important to making a successful shooter.

Why do you think the PC has the most superior of all shooters? Because the controls are even better than the 360's, and the online community is the best to be had.

treedoor

Controls being superior on 360 is opinion. Nothing more nothing less.

Avatar image for Hihatrider87
Hihatrider87

1042

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#35 Hihatrider87
Member since 2007 • 1042 Posts

[QUOTE="Dead-Memories"]

It usually just boils down to controller, which often, is the selling point for FPS on the 360 in my opinion.

Kennysolidsnake

a myth.. I have modern warfare for both the PS3 and 360 and both play exactly the same.. Both feel equally good for both versions, i could see if the 360 had a exclusive good gun controller then yes it would be ideal for shooters, yea the trigger buttons feel more like "triggers" but not to the point where you can tell a great difference when playing shooters on the PS3 or 360

when you say you have both copies, you just mean access to both for comparison. you didn't actually buy two copies right?

anyways, i guess its just preference, but i hated playing cod4 on a borrowed ps3.

for starters, why is the fire gun button on the r1 button instead of the r2 trigger? i changed it and saw that the triggers on the ps3 aren't very snappy (more muddy). i could never really decide which one was better (between firing with r1 or r2). besides that, after getting used to xbox controllers, i haven't ever enjoyed moving back to the dualshock because its not as contoured to fit your hands. i notice that especially around the right analog and it tends to slow my aiming down a good bit.

so like i said, i guess its just preference.

Avatar image for suntaice
suntaice

786

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#36 suntaice
Member since 2006 • 786 Posts

I wanted to punch the two guys on the nosefrom Infinity Ward during Gamespot's E3 interview. Those guys are turning a renowned PC shooter series into this POS console crap. Instead of being ported from PC to consoles, its console to PC which is so screwed up.

Honestly, I rather play my shooters on a keyboard and mouse rather than a fat sweaty controller. Controllers are for people with stiff fingers whereas KB/M are for people with dextrous fingers.

Avatar image for Hihatrider87
Hihatrider87

1042

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#37 Hihatrider87
Member since 2007 • 1042 Posts

[QUOTE="treedoor"]

Online

Controls

Both of which are superior on the 360, and both of which are very important to making a successful shooter.

Why do you think the PC has the most superior of all shooters? Because the controls are even better than the 360's, and the online community is the best to be had.

finalfantasy94

Controls being superior on 360 is opinion. Nothing more nothing less.

well, the TC is asking why people always claim that shooters are better on xbox. the answer to this question almost has to be an opinion. most people prefer FPSs on xbox as opposed to the ps3 because they hold the opinion that the controls are tighter on xbox. it really kills the experience in an fps when your aiming "just doesn't feel right".

Avatar image for magnax1
magnax1

4605

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#38 magnax1
Member since 2007 • 4605 Posts

I have both a PS3 and 360, and the controller is just better for shooters (and everything else) on the 360. Unless you have hands the size of an average midget, the PS3 controller is to small.

Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#39 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

[QUOTE="tagyhag"][QUOTE="mitu123"] It's basically a console game on PC, which is funny since COD started on PC!:lol:

shakmaster13

It really is a shame, I just want to know what the hell happened.

Activision got bigger than anything we could have imagined, that's what happened.

Yeah, pretty much this, and greed!

Avatar image for SilverChimera
SilverChimera

9256

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#40 SilverChimera
Member since 2009 • 9256 Posts
[QUOTE="Parasomniac"]The triggers are definitely better on 360. The dualshock 3 ones aren't up to par.nmaharg
Yeah my fingers always slip off them. I hate the dual shock 3.

see, that would be more valid or valid at all if you actually used the triggers to shoot on PS3. But you don't. It's L1 and R1. So point = invalid.
Avatar image for Gxgear
Gxgear

10425

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 Gxgear
Member since 2003 • 10425 Posts

Kb/M, enough said.

Personally I made the shift from favouring Kb/M to console controllers, it's just too easy on PC (SP or online).

Avatar image for jg4xchamp
jg4xchamp

64054

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#42 jg4xchamp
Member since 2006 • 64054 Posts
FPS=PC to be quite honest. Sure some of them are built with console pads in mind like Halo or TimeSplitters, but even those would work perfectly fine on a PC and could only get better. Also it really is preference for console pads. Personally the 360 gamepad is just way better than the PS3 dualshock 3 all the way around, but that's me.
Avatar image for devious742
devious742

3924

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 devious742
Member since 2003 • 3924 Posts

It usually just boils down to controller, which often, is the selling point for FPS on the 360 in my opinion.

Dead-Memories

that shouldnt matter anymore since i heard that IW made a custom controller for the game..

Avatar image for rolo107
rolo107

5469

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#44 rolo107
Member since 2007 • 5469 Posts
[QUOTE="SLIisaownsystem"]

The whole CoD series started on PC, MW was a complete other game on PC. With Mouse and Keyboard, Mods, dedicated Servers and 50+ player destroys the console version.

nmaharg
Now it's $10 more and they removed dedicated servers. What the hell are they thinking. I'll wait for a steam sale to get it. In fact I may just download it, eff IW.

Download it? Haha, that's pitiful. And it's still cheaper than games were ten years ago. Inflation buddy. Maybe if all games on PC cost $60, and still sold well, maybe a bit better, developers would actually dedicate more resources to the platform...
Avatar image for ProjectPat187
ProjectPat187

2178

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#45 ProjectPat187
Member since 2005 • 2178 Posts
I swear if you console noobs ever played a COD game of multiplayer on PC you will never touch your consoles again, the multiplayer experience on PC is like no other, awesome custom maps of all types with 48-64 players, the mods man I can go on, I never understand how peeps play games like COD on consoles in mutliplayer with only a max of 16 players, console multiplay feels like a ghost town and has limited options and is boring compared to PC, this all ended with MW2 ofcourse ( screw you IW I hate you )
Avatar image for Communistsheep
Communistsheep

1516

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#46 Communistsheep
Member since 2009 • 1516 Posts
[QUOTE="Dead-Memories"]

It usually just boils down to controller, which often, is the selling point for FPS on the 360 in my opinion.

RTUUMM
the 360 having a better controller for shooters is BS

Because, i prefer controller to KB+M, are you going to say i'm wrong?
Avatar image for heretrix
heretrix

37881

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#47 heretrix
Member since 2004 • 37881 Posts

And the lame argument "but the 360 will have more online players" ok yea maybe more people will have the game on 360...

Kennysolidsnake

Considering that the games multiplayer is it's selling point, I'd say that isn't lame at all.

Avatar image for heretrix
heretrix

37881

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#48 heretrix
Member since 2004 • 37881 Posts

[QUOTE="SLIisaownsystem"]

The whole CoD series started on PC, MW was a complete other game on PC. With Mouse and Keyboard, Mods, dedicated Servers and 50+ player destroys the console version.

nmaharg

In fact I may just download it, eff IW.

But you feel the need to play their game? Why not avoid it all together. It's an extremely silly stance to have.

"I hate what IW is doing to this game, but I'm going to download it because I absolutely have to play it.":|

Avatar image for deactivated-5f19d4c9d7318
deactivated-5f19d4c9d7318

4166

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 deactivated-5f19d4c9d7318
Member since 2008 • 4166 Posts
[QUOTE="heretrix"]

[QUOTE="Kennysolidsnake"]

And the lame argument "but the 360 will have more online players" ok yea maybe more people will have the game on 360...

Considering that the games multiplayer is it's selling point, I'd say that isn't lame at all.

How is it an advantage though, it's not like you'll play every person on PSN who has the game anyway, so the number of players on the game doesn't matter.
Avatar image for heretrix
heretrix

37881

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#50 heretrix
Member since 2004 • 37881 Posts

[QUOTE="heretrix"]

[QUOTE="Kennysolidsnake"]

And the lame argument "but the 360 will have more online players" ok yea maybe more people will have the game on 360...

hoosier7

Considering that the games multiplayer is it's selling point, I'd say that isn't lame at all.

How is it an advantage though, it's not like you'll play every person on PSN who has the game anyway, so the number of players on the game doesn't matter.

If the major selling point of the game is multiplayer then having more people to play against would be an advantage. How is that not obvious?