R6V 2 vs CoD 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for ndrewn
ndrewn

605

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#1 ndrewn
Member since 2006 • 605 Posts
Ive only played CoD 4 but I just like to read your thoughts and comments about them.
Avatar image for Albanian_Killa
Albanian_Killa

1685

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Albanian_Killa
Member since 2007 • 1685 Posts

RSV vs COD 4 I think COD4 would definetialy win.

RSV is fun, but the second one doesn't bring much to the table except more guns, etc. which makes it feel like an expansion pack. Graphics are also the same. RSV2 seems to also be having issues. I think IW has their **** together compared to UbiSoft. Also, to whoever says "COD4 is arcadeish that doesn't require tactics!" I say go play some Search and Destroy or Hardcore Search and Destroy. This game is more realistic than RSV. In RSV, you could literally be in a 5mx5m room with another guy, spray with an LMG, and the guy will not die. There's something messed up with the gunplay in RSV, but for long range, it has some of the best. COD4 though does a good job with it's guns, and it is realistic. RSV makes shooting a gun harder than it needs to be. I also love war settings a lot more, so I would say COD4 is better. RSV is by no means a bad game though. It has a great cover system too.

Avatar image for ModernTimes
ModernTimes

1029

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 ModernTimes
Member since 2007 • 1029 Posts
RSV2 was better for SP. CoD4 has better MP.
Avatar image for FF6fan
FF6fan

1637

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#4 FF6fan
Member since 2007 • 1637 Posts
I'd say COD4 yet i haven't played R6V.... Just wondering, can you hit enemys through walls on R6V?
Avatar image for leejohnson7
leejohnson7

2909

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 leejohnson7
Member since 2007 • 2909 Posts

RSV vs COD 4 I think COD4 would definetialy win.

RSV is fun, but the second one doesn't bring much to the table except more guns, etc. which makes it feel like an expansion pack. Graphics are also the same. RSV2 seems to also be having issues. I think IW has their **** together compared to UbiSoft. Also, to whoever says "COD4 is arcadeish that doesn't require tactics!" I say go play some Search and Destroy or Hardcore Search and Destroy. This game is more realistic than RSV. In RSV, you could literally be in a 5mx5m room with another guy, spray with an LMG, and the guy will not die. There's something messed up with the gunplay in RSV, but for long range, it has some of the best. COD4 though does a good job with it's guns, and it is realistic. RSV makes shooting a gun harder than it needs to be. I also love war settings a lot more, so I would say COD4 is better. RSV is by no means a bad game though. It has a great cover system too.

Albanian_Killa

I say, that doesn't sound like much of an improvement. And people call GTP a demo...

Personally, I thought R6V was poor when it came to online play.

Avatar image for TheWiikestLink
TheWiikestLink

1730

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 TheWiikestLink
Member since 2006 • 1730 Posts
r6 aint much of a improvement over teh 1st one,CoD is and continue to be the number 1 FPS,no...multiplayer game right now. THE only thing id add to cod4 is the ability to customize ur own character in any shape or form.
Avatar image for white_sox
white_sox

17442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -1

User Lists: 0

#7 white_sox
Member since 2006 • 17442 Posts
CoD4 wins by far on single player. Multiplayer wise, I'm not sure, but I do know the first Vegas is still better than both of them.