rainbow six downgraded on ps3 LOL

http://ps3.ign.com/articles/797/797927p1.html

One area that Rainbow Six: Vegas on the PlayStation 3 does fall a little short on when compared to the other versions is with regards to visuals. It's a nice looking game to be sure, but the whole thing doesn't look quite as sharp as it could. Colors are a little duller and there isn't as much use of certain effects, like bloom lighting and such. Some folks may appreciate that aspect to a certain degree, but beyond that it still doesn't look quite as nice as what we've seen previously. Some texture work isn't quite as sharp, and the characters aren't as detailed as what's found in the 360 release, especially in the faces. Weapons that have been dropped pop in and out of view as you approach and walk away when they're but a mere 50 feet or so away.

OWNED

So? It's still AAA.nyoroism

Some texture work isn't quite as sharp, and the characters aren't as detailed as what's found in the 360 release, especially in the faces. Weapons that have been dropped pop in and out of view as you approach and walk away when they're but a mere 50 feet or so away.

graphics>>>extra content.

Ubisoft port? Your surprised?Eddie-Vedder

No, i read in interview BEFORE THIS GAME WAS RELEASED PS3 IS LESS POWERFUL THAN XBOX360.

ubisoft said xbox360 is more powerful, and ps3 has less ram so texture resolutions have to be downgraded to save memory.

It seems fine to me. I bought it the other day and it looks great. :|Not-A-Stalker

Look better on xbox360 lol.

[QUOTE="Not-A-Stalker"]It seems fine to me. I bought it the other day and it looks great. :|ps3rulezzggdff

Look better on xbox360 lol.

Why should I care?

[QUOTE="ps3rulezzggdff"]

[QUOTE="Not-A-Stalker"]It seems fine to me. I bought it the other day and it looks great. :|Not-A-Stalker

Look better on xbox360 lol.

Why should I care?

[QUOTE="ps3rulezzggdff"]

[QUOTE="Not-A-Stalker"]It seems fine to me. I bought it the other day and it looks great. :|Not-A-Stalker

Look better on xbox360 lol.

Why should I care?

Exactly. There is no difference really. Since the content on the 360 version is free on july 6th and anyone who bought the black pack will get they'er MS points refunded and tye fact the 360 versions £17.99....

[QUOTE="ps3rulezzggdff"]

[QUOTE="Not-A-Stalker"]It seems fine to me. I bought it the other day and it looks great. :|Not-A-Stalker

Look better on xbox360 lol.

Why should I care?

You obviously cared enough to enter this thread.

Thats not the hardwares fault. Its the devs fault that they are not used to its hardware as much as they are with the 360 hardware.Killfox

NO, it's clearly PS3'S SPLIT 256+256 memory's fault. hardware fault UBISOFT SAID IT.

i think a developer working with ps3 hardware would know more than a ps3 fanboy daydreaming on a forum wishing this wasnt true lol.

Ubisoft port? Your surprised?Eddie-Vedder

[QUOTE="Not-A-Stalker"][QUOTE="ps3rulezzggdff"]

[QUOTE="Not-A-Stalker"]It seems fine to me. I bought it the other day and it looks great. :|Templar1991

Look better on xbox360 lol.

Why should I care?

You obviously cared enough to enter this thread.

I entered this thread because it obviously posted by a troll. I like messing with trolls. It's fun feeding trolls. :|

everything looks better on x360 this gen is going to microsoft hahahaha ps3 fanboys get ownedCaUs3

Wow. The only reason games look better on 360 right now because the 360 architexture it fairly similiar to PC. Where as the PS3 is different because the CPU and GPU are almost as one. Where they work together. RSX and cell were made to work with each other. Soon PC will be like this were the CPU and GPU are one piece of hardware.

[QUOTE="Killfox"]Thats not the hardwares fault. Its the devs fault that they are not used to its hardware as much as they are with the 360 hardware.ps3rulezzggdff

NO, it's clearly PS3'S SPLIT 256+256 memory's fault. hardware fault UBISOFT SAID IT.

i think a developer working with ps3 hardware would know more than a ps3 fanboy daydreaming on a forum wishing this wasnt true lol.

Haha. Owned

[QUOTE="Templar1991"][QUOTE="Not-A-Stalker"][QUOTE="ps3rulezzggdff"]

[QUOTE="Not-A-Stalker"]It seems fine to me. I bought it the other day and it looks great. :|Not-A-Stalker

Look better on xbox360 lol.

Why should I care?

You obviously cared enough to enter this thread.

I entered this thread because it obviously posted by a troll. I like messing with trolls. It's fun feeding trolls. :|

I guess you got me there :P

[QUOTE="ps3rulezzggdff"]

[QUOTE="Killfox"]Thats not the hardwares fault. Its the devs fault that they are not used to its hardware as much as they are with the 360 hardware.USSJAndrew

NO, it's clearly PS3'S SPLIT 256+256 memory's fault. hardware fault UBISOFT SAID IT.

i think a developer working with ps3 hardware would know more than a ps3 fanboy daydreaming on a forum wishing this wasnt true lol.

Haha. Owned

HAH. I like how you called me a PS3fanboy. That just cracks me up. I dont even a PS3. I own a xbox360. Why would I want a system that has like no games out right now. And there is no way im paying$600 for a console. The most I would pay is $400. Which is what I payedfor mypremium 360.Icant believe you think im a PS3 fanboy. Did you even bother to look at my sig??? That should have given itaway.

it was made for 360, im not surpised its better on it, most multi plats areKevanio

Umm, that's not saying much that's saying ps3 is really bad, because pc is the most powerful, unreal tournament 3 is a computer port to ps3/xbox360, if ps3 cant even handle a xbox360 port how the hell is it gonna handle a graphical masterpiece like ut3?

xbox360 will handle unreal tournament 3 much better, will have higher resolution texture's because of more memory avalible and that=graphics lol.

[QUOTE="Kevanio"]it was made for 360, im not surpised its better on it, most multi plats areps3rulezzggdff

Umm, that's not saying much that's saying ps3 is really bad, because pc is the most powerful, unreal tournament 3 is a computer port to ps3/xbox360, if ps3 cant even handle a xbox360 port how the hell is it gonna handle a graphical masterpiece like ut3?

xbox360 will handle unreal tournament 3 much better, will have higher resolution texture's because of more memory avalible and that=graphics lol.

UT3 isn't being ported. :|

example of devs focusing on the 360 version, and then porting it to the PS3

cows will never get a better version of a multiplat this way

http://www.gamespot.com/ps3/action/rainbowsixvegas/review.html?om_act=convert&om_clk=gssummary&tag=summary;review

Gamespot seems to think its just as good as the 360 version, and doesn't GS have a rep for being more biased towards 360?

Oh well idc, the game has its flaws on both systems but its still a great game.

http://ps3.ign.com/articles/797/797927p1.html

One area that Rainbow Six: Vegas on the PlayStation 3 does fall a little short on when compared to the other versions is with regards to visuals. It's a nice looking game to be sure, but the whole thing doesn't look quite as sharp as it could. Colors are a little duller and there isn't as much use of certain effects, like bloom lighting and such. Some folks may appreciate that aspect to a certain degree, but beyond that it still doesn't look quite as nice as what we've seen previously. Some texture work isn't quite as sharp, and the characters aren't as detailed as what's found in the 360 release, especially in the faces. Weapons that have been dropped pop in and out of view as you approach and walk away when they're but a mere 50 feet or so away.

OWNED

ps3rulezzggdff

[QUOTE="ps3rulezzggdff"]

[QUOTE="Kevanio"]it was made for 360, im not surpised its better on it, most multi plats areNot-A-Stalker

Umm, that's not saying much that's saying ps3 is really bad, because pc is the most powerful, unreal tournament 3 is a computer port to ps3/xbox360, if ps3 cant even handle a xbox360 port how the hell is it gonna handle a graphical masterpiece like ut3?

xbox360 will handle unreal tournament 3 much better, will have higher resolution texture's because of more memory avalible and that=graphics lol.

UT3 isn't being ported. :|

Actually yes it is buddy, it's a pc game originally coded in direct x 9 api, then ported to ps3 dev kits open gl es when sony started handing out their stuff, same with xbox360.

it's pc game by heart will look best on pc, second best on xbox360 and look like a turd on ps3 with washed out lower detailed textures.

[QUOTE="ps3rulezzggdff"]

http://ps3.ign.com/articles/797/797927p1.html

One area that Rainbow Six: Vegas on the PlayStation 3 does fall a little short on when compared to the other versions is with regards to visuals. It's a nice looking game to be sure, but the whole thing doesn't look quite as sharp as it could. Colors are a little duller and there isn't as much use of certain effects, like bloom lighting and such. Some folks may appreciate that aspect to a certain degree, but beyond that it still doesn't look quite as nice as what we've seen previously. Some texture work isn't quite as sharp, and the characters aren't as detailed as what's found in the 360 release, especially in the faces. Weapons that have been dropped pop in and out of view as you approach and walk away when they're but a mere 50 feet or so away.

OWNED

_AsasN_

So, if ps3 cannot handle a port from another system this means it's weaker than the other system.

funny how dreamcast came out before ps2 and unreal tournament was ported to ps2/dc and ps2 version ran/looked best because it had more ram.

The same deal is happening with ps3/xbox360, even though xbox360 came out before, sony put out a less powerful system a year later.

Even ps3 developers admitted xbox360 is more powerful.

They said it's easier for xbox360 to handle ps3 game without downgrades, than ps3 handling a xbox360 game without downgrades.

This automatically tells you ps3 hardware cant compete.

good god thread #134805348908 about this. Yes, it looks slightly better on 360. It's still AAA here, it doesn't matter lol. We need E3 to come and in a hurry, the same threads pop up here everday.

well I am dissapointed, but at the same time, not surprised by Ubisofts half-arsed approach. When are developers going to learn that systems these days cant be ported like they were previously. They need to look for ways to exploit system power.

DUDE, SO MANY PEOPLE ARE IN DAMAGE CONTROL, NO MATTER WHo PROGRAMMED PORTED THIS, IT WOULD BE DOWNGRADED IN GRAPHICS BECAUSE THE TEXTURE'S MADE ARE SO LARGE IN RESOLUTION PS3 DOESNT HAVE ENOUGH RAM TO KEEP THEM AT SAME RESOLUTION AND FIT WHOLE GAME INTO VIDEO MEMORY/system.

The texture's would have to be totally remade and then would look different and still wouldnt be as high in detail because it cannot hold the same texture resolution.

LIMITED SYSTEM MEMORY=HARDWARE FLAW NOT SLOPPY PORTING.

Wow a port that looks just a good unless viewed side by side. Who cares.

Pure ownage. Ownage for people who spend thier time carring which version of a port is better. I could care less if the PS3 version of oblivion looks better than the 360 version. I don't play them side by side so who cares. Some people need to get a life. Seriously.

http://ps3.ign.com/articles/797/797927p1.html

One area that Rainbow Six: Vegas on the PlayStation 3 does fall a little short on when compared to the other versions is with regards to visuals. It's a nice looking game to be sure, but the whole thing doesn't look quite as sharp as it could. Colors are a little duller and there isn't as much use of certain effects, like bloom lighting and such. Some folks may appreciate that aspect to a certain degree, but beyond that it still doesn't look quite as nice as what we've seen previously. Some texture work isn't quite as sharp, and the characters aren't as detailed as what's found in the 360 release, especially in the faces. Weapons that have been dropped pop in and out of view as you approach and walk away when they're but a mere 50 feet or so away.

OWNED

ps3rulezzggdff

DUDE, SO MANY PEOPLE ARE IN DAMAGE CONTROL, NO MATTER WHo PROGRAMMED PORTED THIS, IT WOULD BE DOWNGRADED IN GRAPHICS BECAUSE THE TEXTURE'S MADE ARE SO LARGE IN RESOLUTION PS3 DOESNT HAVE ENOUGH RAM TO KEEP THEM AT SAME RESOLUTION AND FIT WHOLE GAME INTO VIDEO MEMORY/system.

The texture's would have to be totally remade and then would look different and still wouldnt be as high in detail because it cannot hold the same texture resolution.

LIMITED SYSTEM MEMORY=HARDWARE FLAW NOT SLOPPY PORTING.

ps3rulezzggdff

thats why its a sloppy port.

DUDE, SO MANY PEOPLE ARE IN DAMAGE CONTROL, NO MATTER WHo PROGRAMMED PORTED THIS, IT WOULD BE DOWNGRADED IN GRAPHICS BECAUSE THE TEXTURE'S MADE ARE SO LARGE IN RESOLUTION PS3 DOESNT HAVE ENOUGH RAM TO KEEP THEM AT SAME RESOLUTION AND FIT WHOLE GAME INTO VIDEO MEMORY/system.

The texture's would have to be totally remade and then would look different and still wouldnt be as high in detail because it cannot hold the same texture resolution.

LIMITED SYSTEM MEMORY=HARDWARE FLAW NOT SLOPPY PORTING.

ps3rulezzggdff

[QUOTE="_AsasN_"][QUOTE="ps3rulezzggdff"]

http://ps3.ign.com/articles/797/797927p1.html

One area that Rainbow Six: Vegas on the PlayStation 3 does fall a little short on when compared to the other versions is with regards to visuals. It's a nice looking game to be sure, but the whole thing doesn't look quite as sharp as it could. Colors are a little duller and there isn't as much use of certain effects, like bloom lighting and such. Some folks may appreciate that aspect to a certain degree, but beyond that it still doesn't look quite as nice as what we've seen previously. Some texture work isn't quite as sharp, and the characters aren't as detailed as what's found in the 360 release, especially in the faces. Weapons that have been dropped pop in and out of view as you approach and walk away when they're but a mere 50 feet or so away.

OWNED

ps3rulezzggdff

So, if ps3 cannot handle a port from another system this means it's weaker than the other system.

funny how dreamcast came out before ps2 and unreal tournament was ported to ps2/dc and ps2 version ran/looked best because it had more ram.

The same deal is happening with ps3/xbox360, even though xbox360 came out before, sony put out a less powerful system a year later.

The PS3 has the same amount of ram. Only the PS3 OS CURRENTLY takes more than the 360's does. In time the difference wont be that much once the PS3 OS is finalized with HOME/ETC.

One thing that won't ever change is that the 360s GPU is the memory controller and there isn't a lot of bandwidth for both CPU and GPU with the shared memory architecture.

Ubisoft port? Your surprised?Eddie-Vedder

And the damage control begins....

[QUOTE="ps3rulezzggdff"][QUOTE="_AsasN_"][QUOTE="ps3rulezzggdff"]

http://ps3.ign.com/articles/797/797927p1.html

One area that Rainbow Six: Vegas on the PlayStation 3 does fall a little short on when compared to the other versions is with regards to visuals. It's a nice looking game to be sure, but the whole thing doesn't look quite as sharp as it could. Colors are a little duller and there isn't as much use of certain effects, like bloom lighting and such. Some folks may appreciate that aspect to a certain degree, but beyond that it still doesn't look quite as nice as what we've seen previously. Some texture work isn't quite as sharp, and the characters aren't as detailed as what's found in the 360 release, especially in the faces. Weapons that have been dropped pop in and out of view as you approach and walk away when they're but a mere 50 feet or so away.

OWNED

iwo4life

So, if ps3 cannot handle a port from another system this means it's weaker than the other system.

funny how dreamcast came out before ps2 and unreal tournament was ported to ps2/dc and ps2 version ran/looked best because it had more ram.

The same deal is happening with ps3/xbox360, even though xbox360 came out before, sony put out a less powerful system a year later.

The PS3 has the same amount of ram. Only the PS3 OS CURRENTLY takes more than the 360's does. In time the difference wont be that much once the PS3 OS is finalized with HOME/ETC.

One thing that won't ever change is that the 360s GPU is the memory controller and there isn't a lot of bandwidth for both CPU and GPU with the shared memory architecture.

no 256+256 is not the same as 512 mb of ram unified.

xbox360 has plenty of bandwidth, 256 gb on the 10 mb edram for framebuffer which is the biggest bandwidth hog.

plus 22.4 gb shared between cpu/gpu.

ps3 has like 20.8 gb for video ram and 25.6 on main memory.

ps3's video memory will take a very large hit doing framebuffer use almost all of 20.8 gb and maybe some of xdr bandwidth so it all evens out.

xbox360 simply has more ram and this is the whole reason xbox360 is better well and more powerful gpu.

[QUOTE="ps3rulezzggdff"]

DUDE, SO MANY PEOPLE ARE IN DAMAGE CONTROL, NO MATTER WHo PROGRAMMED PORTED THIS, IT WOULD BE DOWNGRADED IN GRAPHICS BECAUSE THE TEXTURE'S MADE ARE SO LARGE IN RESOLUTION PS3 DOESNT HAVE ENOUGH RAM TO KEEP THEM AT SAME RESOLUTION AND FIT WHOLE GAME INTO VIDEO MEMORY/system.

The texture's would have to be totally remade and then would look different and still wouldnt be as high in detail because it cannot hold the same texture resolution.

LIMITED SYSTEM MEMORY=HARDWARE FLAW NOT SLOPPY PORTING.

leejohnson7

thats why its a sloppy port.

even if they were totally remade, they still couldnt handle the same resolution size as like 1024x1024, the ps3 textures would have to be like 512x512.

TC go inform yourself on how PS3 works. Better yet go look and see how PC work before you spray BS all over my face. Also do some research on how ports are made. Or what a port even is for that matter. Your are one of the most ill informed lemmings i have seen in a long time. You know what I tell people like you "Keep telling yourself that."Killfox

I have known how ps3 works since 2005, ive known from the start PS3 IS LESS POWERFUL.

LAIR DEVELOPERS AND RESISTANCE FALL OF MAN BOTH SAID 360 IS MORE POWERFUL.

why cant people accept this and move on with their life? goddamn i feel like smacking them.

TC go inform yourself on how PS3 works. Better yet go look and see how PC work before you spray BS all over my face. Also do some research on how ports are made. Or what a port even is for that matter. Your are one of the most ill informed lemmings i have seen in a long time. You know what I tell people like you "Keep telling yourself that."Killfox

Dude, you are misinformed, just accept ps3 sucks and love on.

[QUOTE="Killfox"]TC go inform yourself on how PS3 works. Better yet go look and see how PC work before you spray BS all over my face. Also do some research on how ports are made. Or what a port even is for that matter. Your are one of the most ill informed lemmings i have seen in a long time. You know what I tell people like you "Keep telling yourself that."ps3rulezzggdff

I have known how ps3 works since 2005, ive known from the start PS3 IS LESS POWERFUL.

LAIR DEVELOPERS AND RESISTANCE FALL OF MAN BOTH SAID 360 IS MORE POWERFUL.

why cant people accept this and move on with their life? goddamn i feel like smacking them.

Man keep telling yourself that. If that makes you sleep at night. So be it. Keep it to yourself. I also want links of were the devs have said this. Links????????

[QUOTE="ps3rulezzggdff"]

[QUOTE="Killfox"]TC go inform yourself on how PS3 works. Better yet go look and see how PC work before you spray BS all over my face. Also do some research on how ports are made. Or what a port even is for that matter. Your are one of the most ill informed lemmings i have seen in a long time. You know what I tell people like you "Keep telling yourself that."Killfox

I have known how ps3 works since 2005, ive known from the start PS3 IS LESS POWERFUL.

LAIR DEVELOPERS AND RESISTANCE FALL OF MAN BOTH SAID 360 IS MORE POWERFUL.

why cant people accept this and move on with their life? goddamn i feel like smacking them.

Man keep telling yourself that. If that makes you sleep at night. So be it. Keep it to yourself. I also want links of were the devs have said this. Links????????

ISNT IS KIND OF FUNNY HOW MAJORITY OF GAMES ARE DOWNGRADED ON PS3 VS 360?

someones in denial.

I feel bad for ps3 fans it truly is a piece of crap console and i know this for a fact just casual gamers that dont know crap about hardware think otherwise.

[QUOTE="ps3rulezzggdff"]

[QUOTE="Killfox"]TC go inform yourself on how PS3 works. Better yet go look and see how PC work before you spray BS all over my face. Also do some research on how ports are made. Or what a port even is for that matter. Your are one of the most ill informed lemmings i have seen in a long time. You know what I tell people like you "Keep telling yourself that."Killfox

I have known how ps3 works since 2005, ive known from the start PS3 IS LESS POWERFUL.

LAIR DEVELOPERS AND RESISTANCE FALL OF MAN BOTH SAID 360 IS MORE POWERFUL.

why cant people accept this and move on with their life? goddamn i feel like smacking them.

Man keep telling yourself that. If that makes you sleep at night. So be it. Keep it to yourself. I also want links of were the devs have said this. Links????????

Why cant you believe me? google it man i read it months ago im not gonna waste my time for someone in denial i dont make crap up.