RARE is realy deliver this GEN (not even 1 flop)

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Nisim19
Nisim19

1002

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Nisim19
Member since 2008 • 1002 Posts

RARE is not good like thay was to be but they real deliver this gen and they dont have even one flop

BANJO get 85 is realy high score in today standarts (even fable 2, L4D, FO3 on the PS3 got 85 so i imo 8.5 on gs in the new 9)

all RARE game this gen was great and not even 1 game flopd

PDZ - 9

KAMEO - 88

VP1 - 85

VP2 - 85

BANJO - 85

i love RARE and i hope thay will release more game in 09 ( pls KAMEO 2 and CONKER 2)

imo if MS let them time to do 1 game thay will make amazing games like they use to be

in the n64 thay release 1 game evrey 2 years now they releasing 2 game evrey year so i think MS puse them to hard.

while they arnt what they used to be rare is still a solid company better than most

Avatar image for lkjsdfjlk
lkjsdfjlk

116

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 lkjsdfjlk
Member since 2008 • 116 Posts

what rare is doing is releasing a "good" game every year but not releasing an amazing game every 2-3 years.

 

I wish they start doing the "amazing" game since there done w/ banjo and VP2. I just wish MS released concker 1 on marketplace bc i still gotta beat it!!

Avatar image for Nisim19
Nisim19

1002

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Nisim19
Member since 2008 • 1002 Posts

what rare is doing is releasing a "good" game every year but not releasing an amazing game every 2-3 years.

I wish they start doing the "amazing" game since there done w/ banjo and VP2. I just wish MS released concker 1 on marketplace bc i still gotta beat it!!

lkjsdfjlk
you right if MS let them 2-3 years to make a game they will make amazing games but MS wont 2 new games evrey year
Avatar image for Sony-tha-champ0
Sony-tha-champ0

3569

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 48

User Lists: 0

#4 Sony-tha-champ0
Member since 2008 • 3569 Posts
When they where with Ninty they were much better,now.............*looks at banjo* idk,they where hell better with nintendo
Avatar image for boxofwit
boxofwit

947

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#5 boxofwit
Member since 2007 • 947 Posts

i've heavily enjoyed every RARE game this Gen, other that PDZ, which i haven't played. 

But, i can understand how some people wouldn't like VP, personally, i love it. 

Avatar image for skrat_01
skrat_01

33767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 skrat_01
Member since 2007 • 33767 Posts
Nothing outstanding either. And PDZ sucks, sorry, but its true. Its hardly the RARE of yester year. They are a good dev, but not an industry top. They fell from grace long ago.
Avatar image for Blue-Sky
Blue-Sky

10381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#7 Blue-Sky
Member since 2005 • 10381 Posts

what rare is doing is releasing a "good" game every year but not releasing an amazing game every 2-3 years.

 

I wish they start doing the "amazing" game since there done w/ banjo and VP2. I just wish MS released concker 1 on marketplace bc i still gotta beat it!!

lkjsdfjlk

It won't work because you need the old Gamespot cast to overrate all their games like the N64 days. 

Avatar image for Leejjohno
Leejjohno

13897

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#8 Leejjohno
Member since 2005 • 13897 Posts
PDZ was one of the worse FPS this generation.
Avatar image for SolidTy
SolidTy

49991

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#9 SolidTy
Member since 2005 • 49991 Posts

TC, RARE doesn't have a FLOP at Gamespot this generation...

but It has FLOPS this generation to the world. Good games, but flops.

The World knew PDZ was a flop the day it came out, like I did in 2005, but GS didn't.

There were FAR better FPS's on PS2, Xbox, and GC back in 2005. Heck there were better shooters in 2000.

For some reason, GS didn't realize that, and they overated it BIG Time.

Avatar image for dk_2007
dk_2007

680

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 dk_2007
Member since 2007 • 680 Posts

TC, RARE doesn't have a FLOP at Gamespot this generation...

but It has FLOPS this generation to the world. Good games, but flops.

The World knew PDZ was a flop the day it came out, like I did in 2005, but GS didn't.

There were FAR better FPS's on PS2, Xbox, and GC back in 2005. Heck there were better shooters in 2000.

For some reason, GS didn't realize that, and they overated it BIG Time.

SolidTy

There is this dilemma:

For PDZ: Oh GS scores dont count. In real world PDZ is a flop.

When a 360 game flops on GS and somebody says that the game is not a flop elsewhere and etc.: 100 posts saying that "Look at the address bar! you are on GS and only that counts"

 

Avatar image for Sony-tha-champ0
Sony-tha-champ0

3569

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 48

User Lists: 0

#11 Sony-tha-champ0
Member since 2008 • 3569 Posts

TC, RARE doesn't have a FLOP at Gamespot this generation...

but It has FLOPS this generation to the world. Good games, but flops.

The World knew PDZ was a flop the day it came out, like I did in 2005, but GS didn't.

There were FAR better FPS's on PS2, Xbox, and GC back in 2005. Heck there were better shooters in 2000.

For some reason, GS didn't realize that, and they overated it BIG Time.

SolidTy
Greg kasavin reviewed it,his a big time Nintendo lover and Xbot,no surprises here i mean,he rated R1 8.6,PDZ was....well bad,R1 was much better
Avatar image for SolidTy
SolidTy

49991

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#12 SolidTy
Member since 2005 • 49991 Posts
[QUOTE="SolidTy"]

TC, RARE doesn't have a FLOP at Gamespot this generation...

but It has FLOPS this generation to the world. Good games, but flops.

The World knew PDZ was a flop the day it came out, like I did in 2005, but GS didn't.

There were FAR better FPS's on PS2, Xbox, and GC back in 2005. Heck there were better shooters in 2000.

For some reason, GS didn't realize that, and they overated it BIG Time.

dk_2007

There is this dilemma:

For PDZ: Oh GS scores dont count. In real world PDZ is a flop.

When a 360 game flops on GS and somebody says that the game is not a flop elsewhere and etc.: 100 posts saying that "Look at the address bar! you are on GS and only that counts"

 

Well, we are on GS, and that's all that matters. But he's talking about an ENTIRE generation of gaming, which is a more universal and worldly topic. As long as he understands that RARE has flopped in the WORLD, but not on GS, that's fine. The TC doesn't seem astute enough to know the difference, but if he does, good for him.

That being said, we are on GS, that's the way it's played here.

Avatar image for FirstDiscovery
FirstDiscovery

5508

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 FirstDiscovery
Member since 2008 • 5508 Posts
Actually Rare is the one choosing to release so many titles, they have two studios, and considering VP2 is a rehash title, they could afford to get it out in a single year With that said, the fantastic thing about Rare is that they have a whole backlog of IPs and 360 owners can really expect to be surprised by them. Kameo? Perfect Dark? Conker? Killer Instinct? Battletoads? You name it, but a new title from all those would be great
Avatar image for dk_2007
dk_2007

680

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 dk_2007
Member since 2007 • 680 Posts
[QUOTE="dk_2007"][QUOTE="SolidTy"]

TC, RARE doesn't have a FLOP at Gamespot this generation...

but It has FLOPS this generation to the world. Good games, but flops.

The World knew PDZ was a flop the day it came out, like I did in 2005, but GS didn't.

There were FAR better FPS's on PS2, Xbox, and GC back in 2005. Heck there were better shooters in 2000.

For some reason, GS didn't realize that, and they overated it BIG Time.

SolidTy

There is this dilemma:

For PDZ: Oh GS scores dont count. In real world PDZ is a flop.

When a 360 game flops on GS and somebody says that the game is not a flop elsewhere and etc.: 100 posts saying that "Look at the address bar! you are on GS and only that counts"

 

Well, we are on GS, and that's all that matters. But he's talking about an ENTIRE generation of gaming, which is a more universal and worldly topic. As long as he understands that RARE has flopped in the WORLD, but not on GS, that's fine. The TC doesn't seem astute enough to know the difference, but if he does, good for him.

That being said, we are on GS, that's the way it's played here.

Ok, I got your point about your message to TC.

But, for me, discussing a single game is as universal as discussing an entire generation because its only discussion.

 

Avatar image for Nisim19
Nisim19

1002

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 Nisim19
Member since 2008 • 1002 Posts
[QUOTE="SolidTy"]

TC, RARE doesn't have a FLOP at Gamespot this generation...

but It has FLOPS this generation to the world. Good games, but flops.

The World knew PDZ was a flop the day it came out, like I did in 2005, but GS didn't.

There were FAR better FPS's on PS2, Xbox, and GC back in 2005. Heck there were better shooters in 2000.

For some reason, GS didn't realize that, and they overated it BIG Time.

dk_2007

There is this dilemma:

For PDZ: Oh GS scores dont count. In real world PDZ is a flop.

When a 360 game flops on GS and somebody says that the game is not a flop elsewhere and etc.: 100 posts saying that "Look at the address bar! you are on GS and only that counts"

in the real world this is the 360 year

and R2 is a flop and not even an AAA

gears 2 is GOTY

FABLE 2 is AAA

and MGS4 is not even clost to be AAAA (halo 3 have better scores)

and SMG is the best game this gen

so yes in the real world outside of GS evreyting is difrent

Avatar image for SolidTy
SolidTy

49991

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#16 SolidTy
Member since 2005 • 49991 Posts
[QUOTE="SolidTy"][QUOTE="dk_2007"]

 

There is this dilemma:

For PDZ: Oh GS scores dont count. In real world PDZ is a flop.

When a 360 game flops on GS and somebody says that the game is not a flop elsewhere and etc.: 100 posts saying that "Look at the address bar! you are on GS and only that counts"

 

dk_2007

Well, we are on GS, and that's all that matters. But he's talking about an ENTIRE generation of gaming, which is a more universal and worldly topic. As long as he understands that RARE has flopped in the WORLD, but not on GS, that's fine. The TC doesn't seem astute enough to know the difference, but if he does, good for him.

That being said, we are on GS, that's the way it's played here.

Ok, I got your point about your message to TC.

But, for me discussing a single game is as universal as discussing an entire generation because its only discussion.

 

Yeah, I wish that's how it was around here, but it's not. Ah well, that's a game too. SW the Game.

As far as the TC is concerned, he says "RARE REALLY DELIVERED THIS GEN!" which is not true.

You have to ask yourself, Did RARE really deliver, to us the RARE and/or GAMING Fans?

PDZ proves that not to be the case, and even KAMEO by many. They didn't DELIVER this gen, but they did by GS standards.

I don't know, I guess the WORD DELIVER is too powerful to describe RARE.

Avatar image for omgimba
omgimba

2645

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 omgimba
Member since 2007 • 2645 Posts

They dont flop cause nobody expects em too deliver anymore...

 

Avatar image for Amnesiacx
Amnesiacx

1329

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 Amnesiacx
Member since 2004 • 1329 Posts
Umm...... :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Avatar image for SolidTy
SolidTy

49991

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#20 SolidTy
Member since 2005 • 49991 Posts

PSZ is great, millions of sales prove it.kuu2

No, reviewers back then knew it was just a above average - good game, nothing more. Many knew that Free Radical left along time ago, and weren't duped, by GS's "9".Your opinion is that PDZ was good as evidenced by sales tabulated over the course of three years. Meanwhile, even back then HALO 2 was the NUMBER ONE ONLINE GAME Played by 360 owners until ONE YEAR LATER when GeoW hit.

So, essentiall, Many more millions of LIVE owners bought PDZ, then Proceeded to play last gen games on their system, due to their massive dissappointment. I bought TWO COPIES of PDZ, one a Collector's Edition. The game was just above average, a barely good game. Like I said before, Xbox 1 had better shooters than PDZ.

Avatar image for nintendo-4life
nintendo-4life

18281

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 nintendo-4life
Member since 2004 • 18281 Posts
yeah according to GS maybe, according to me? LOOOOOOL HELL NO!!!!!!!!!!
Avatar image for st1ka
st1ka

8179

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 st1ka
Member since 2008 • 8179 Posts

sorry to re-post guys but...

STIKA'S LIST OF RARE DOES NOT SUCK

 

Scores from ALL RARE games from the SNES to the xbox 360 (using game rankings)

 

16- bit era:

Battle toads (SNES) : 78%

Battle toads (gen) : 72%

Battletoads and double dragon: (snes) : 59%

Battletoads and double dragon (gen): 65%

Battle toads (GB) : 77.7%

Battle toads and double dragon (GB): 65%

Battletoads in ragnarock's world (GB) : 75%

Donkey kong land (GB) : 71%

Donkey Kong land 2 (gb) : 79%

Donkey kong land 3 ( 82%)

Killer instinct (GB) :25%

Killer instinct (SNES): (80%)

The amazing spider-man (73%)

Beetlejuice (GB): 55%

Fortress of fear (GB): 20%

Sneaky snakes (GB) 53%

Championship-pro-am (Gen): 80%

Donkey kong country (SNES): 92%

Donkey kong country 2 (SNES): 92%

Donkey kong countru 3 (snes): 85%

Average score: 69%


 

 

 

 

N64 era:

Perfect Dark (N 64): 95%

Perfect Dark (GBC): 66%

Donkey kong country (GBC): 90%

Conker's pocket tales (GBC): 55%

mickey's speedway USA (GBC): 81%

Mickey's speedway USA (N64): 68%

Donkey Kong 64 (N64): 88%

Banjo-Kazooeie (N64): 92%

Banjo-Tooie (N64): 90%

Blast corps (N64): 89%

Conker's bad fur day (N64): 89%

Diddy Kong Racing (N64): 89%

Golden eye 007 (N64): 95%

Jet Force Gemini (N54): 80%

Killer Instinct Gold (N64): 74%

Total average score: 82.7%


 

 

 

Gamecube-Xbox era:

Starfox Adventures (GC) : 80%

Banjo Pilot (GBA): 66%

Banjo Kazooeie: Grunty's revenge (GBA): 73%

SabreWulf (GBA): 74%

Donkey Kong Contry (GBA): 78%

It''s Mr. Pants (GBA): 76%

Donkey Kong country 2 (GBA): 81%

Donkey Kong Country 3 (GBA): 75.1%

Conker: Live and Reloaded (xbox): 79%

Grabbed by the Ghoulies (xbox) 70%

total Score: 75.2

 

Current Gen

Perfect Dark Zero (xbox 360): 81%

Viva Pinata (X360): 85%

viva Pinata 2 (X360): 83%

Viva pinata (PC): 79%

Viva Pinata (DS): 83%

Jet Pac: Refueled: (X360): 73%

Kameo (X360): 81%

Banjo 3: 78%

Average Score: 80.4%

Final Score:

1º N64 RARE: 82.7%

2º Current RARE: 80.4%

3º Last gen RARE: 75.2%

4º 16-Bit RARE: 69%

 

Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#23 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts
PDZ was one of the worse FPS this generation.Leejjohno
No, Hour of Victory is worse.
Avatar image for FirstDiscovery
FirstDiscovery

5508

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 FirstDiscovery
Member since 2008 • 5508 Posts
St1ka thats a good list, but people who refer to the N64 era only mean the N64 games, and that makes their average shoot up