http://img103.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=72049_scan11280jg7lv1_122_258lo.jpg
Here it looks pretty impressive. CGI-ish graphics.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
http://img103.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=72049_scan11280jg7lv1_122_258lo.jpg
Here it looks pretty impressive. CGI-ish graphics.
I think SMG looks better....just my opinion though.Cpt_MehI think that this is the most impressive platformer game graphically. Waiting to hear from sucker punch. They have been making a game for 1 1/2 years, and is most likely going to be announced at gdc.
Banjo Kazooie is a better series imo.Banjo 2 sucked so much. I don't care what reviews gave it. It was bigger, but also the level designs, controllers, and everything else that made banjo kazzoie great was flawed in the 2nd version.
and did someone compare those to gears? cause gears looks leagues ahead of that...Rob2223
[QUOTE="Rob2223"]Banjo Kazooie is a better series imo.I agree....I like the look, but it's kinda....eh. Something about it gives me a headache.
and did someone compare those to gears? cause gears looks leagues ahead of that...Cpt_Meh
[QUOTE="Rob2223"]Banjo Kazooie is a better series imo.Banjo 2 sucked so much. I don't care what reviews gave it. It was bigger, but also the level designs, controllers, and everything else that made banjo kazzoie great was flawed in the 2nd version.
and did someone compare those to gears? cause gears looks leagues ahead of that...nextgengaming18
[QUOTE="Cpt_Meh"][QUOTE="Rob2223"]Banjo Kazooie is a better series imo.I agree....I like the look, but it's kinda....eh. Something about it gives me a headache.
and did someone compare those to gears? cause gears looks leagues ahead of that...Rob2223
I think SMG looks better....just my opinion though.Cpt_Mehyea ill agree, mostly for art style though
[QUOTE="Rob2223"]Banjo Kazooie is a better series imo.I agree....I like the look, but it's kinda....eh. Something about it gives me a headache.
and did someone compare those to gears? cause gears looks leagues ahead of that...Cpt_Meh
[QUOTE="Rob2223"]Banjo Kazooie is a better series imo.Banjo 2 sucked so much. I don't care what reviews gave it. It was bigger, but also the level designs, controllers, and everything else that made banjo kazzoie great was flawed in the 2nd version. Yep. I hated the 2nd one.
and did someone compare those to gears? cause gears looks leagues ahead of that...nextgengaming18
[QUOTE="Rob2223"]Banjo Kazooie is a better series imo.Ratchet and Banjo both sit among my favourites, and putting either one second is a great injustice.
and did someone compare those to gears? cause gears looks leagues ahead of that...lilrush
[QUOTE="GermanShepard06"]wow, best graphics i have ever seen, and its only the 2nd gen game.
Rob2223
[QUOTE="GermanShepard06"]wow, best graphics i have ever seen, and its only the 2nd gen game.
Rob2223
gears of war? rofl
[QUOTE="GermanShepard06"]wow, best graphics i have ever seen, and its only the 2nd gen game.
Rob2223
[QUOTE="Rob2223"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"]wow, best graphics i have ever seen, and its only the 2nd gen game.
nextgengaming18
[QUOTE="Rob2223"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"]wow, best graphics i have ever seen, and its only the 2nd gen game.
GermanShepard06
gears of war? rofl
[QUOTE="Rob2223"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"]wow, best graphics i have ever seen, and its only the 2nd gen game.
KeyWii
[QUOTE="GermanShepard06"][QUOTE="Rob2223"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"]wow, best graphics i have ever seen, and its only the 2nd gen game.
Rob2223
gears of war? rofl
It looks amazing, a bit disappointed that Ratchet doesnt have "Fur Shading"HappyInvader101
Yes he does, look closely at the big pic at the top and look at his left ear. You can see some but it's not too exaggerated.
It definitely looks like what I would expect from a high-quality next-gen platformer. Can't wait to see it in motion, but I probably won't be able to play it since I probably won't ever get a PS3.
[QUOTE="Rob2223"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"][QUOTE="Rob2223"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"]wow, best graphics i have ever seen, and its only the 2nd gen game.
nextgengaming18
gears of war? rofl
[QUOTE="GermanShepard06"][QUOTE="Rob2223"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"]wow, best graphics i have ever seen, and its only the 2nd gen game.
Rob2223
gears of war? rofl
More like 6.9 to me.
[QUOTE="Rob2223"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"][QUOTE="Rob2223"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"]wow, best graphics i have ever seen, and its only the 2nd gen game.
GermanShepard06
gears of war? rofl
More like 6.9 to me.
It was an AAA game.[QUOTE="Rob2223"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"][QUOTE="Rob2223"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"]wow, best graphics i have ever seen, and its only the 2nd gen game.
GermanShepard06
gears of war? rofl
i have never played Gears of War
[QUOTE="HappyInvader101"]It looks amazing, a bit disappointed that Ratchet doesnt have "Fur Shading"cheezisgoooood
Yes he does, look closely at the big pic at the top and look at his left ear. You can see some but it's not too exaggerated.
It definitely looks like what I would expect from a high-quality next-gen platformer. Can't wait to see it in motion, but I probably won't be able to play it since I probably won't ever get a PS3.
the scans are super low rez . im sure when we get real screens we will be in awwww[QUOTE="GermanShepard06"][QUOTE="Rob2223"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"][QUOTE="Rob2223"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"]wow, best graphics i have ever seen, and its only the 2nd gen game.
nextgengaming18
gears of war? rofl
More like 6.9 to me.
It was an AAA game.i know that sherlock, im just saying that geow was overrated by miles. M$ does wonders with money.
[QUOTE="Rob2223"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"][QUOTE="Rob2223"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"]wow, best graphics i have ever seen, and its only the 2nd gen game.
GermanShepard06
gears of war? rofl
More like 6.9 to me.
Well, you've made it abundantly clear throughout your time here that you're a huge Sony fanboy so it's obvious that to you, no game is AAA quality unless it's on the PS3. :|
And yeah, of course MS paid everyone to give them good reviews. Gears of War couldn't possibly be good. :roll:
[QUOTE="nextgengaming18"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"][QUOTE="Rob2223"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"][QUOTE="Rob2223"]
oh thats weird! you've never seen Crysis or Gears of War?GermanShepard06
gears of war? rofl
More like 6.9 to me.
It was an AAA game.i know that sherlock, im just saying that geow was overrated by miles. M$ does wonders with money.
I don't own a 360, PS3, or a Wii, in fact I'm actually probably going to end up getting a PS3. And I agree that Gears of War was over-rated, but overrated by "miles?" There is no way you can say "overrated by miles"; the game is a technical achievement, so even if you don't like the game you can't say its 6.9, unless you are being sarcastic.Â
And yes, you are entitled to your own opinion, but you can't deny the fact that it is great looking game. It may not be your type of game, but even so, you must take into account that its one of the best in the genre.Â
[QUOTE="GermanShepard06"][QUOTE="nextgengaming18"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"][QUOTE="Rob2223"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"][QUOTE="Rob2223"]
oh thats weird! you've never seen Crysis or Gears of War?Zassimick
gears of war? rofl
More like 6.9 to me.
It was an AAA game.i know that sherlock, im just saying that geow was overrated by miles. M$ does wonders with money.
I don't own a 360, PS3, or a Wii, in fact I'm actually probably going to end up getting a PS3. And I agree that Gears of War was over-rated, but overrated by "miles?" There is no way you can say "overrated by miles"; the game is a technical achievement, so even if you don't like the game you can't say its 6.9, unless you are being sarcastic.Â
And yes, you are entitled to your own opinion, but you can't deny the fact that it is great looking game. It may not be your type of game, but even so, you must take into account that its one of the best in the genre.Â
anyone can make a good looking game like geow if they leave out about everything else there is in a game. All they did was use entire x360's power to display alot of textures and leaving out everything else in ps1 and n64 era.
[QUOTE="Zassimick"]I don't own a 360, PS3, or a Wii, in fact I'm actually probably going to end up getting a PS3. And I agree that Gears of War was over-rated, but overrated by "miles?" There is no way you can say "overrated by miles"; the game is a technical achievement, so even if you don't like the game you can't say its 6.9, unless you are being sarcastic.Â
And yes, you are entitled to your own opinion, but you can't deny the fact that it is great looking game. It may not be your type of game, but even so, you must take into account that its one of the best in the genre.Â
GermanShepard06
anyone can make a good looking game like geow if they leave out about everything else there is in a game. All they did was use entire x360's power to display alot of textures and leaving out everything else in ps1 and n64 era.
Well then I'm sorry, I must be missing something. What exactly was left out in PS1 and N64 era? Just figured I would ask, so I can become a better judge of games.Â
[QUOTE="GermanShepard06"][QUOTE="Zassimick"]I don't own a 360, PS3, or a Wii, in fact I'm actually probably going to end up getting a PS3. And I agree that Gears of War was over-rated, but overrated by "miles?" There is no way you can say "overrated by miles"; the game is a technical achievement, so even if you don't like the game you can't say its 6.9, unless you are being sarcastic.Â
And yes, you are entitled to your own opinion, but you can't deny the fact that it is great looking game. It may not be your type of game, but even so, you must take into account that its one of the best in the genre.Â
Zassimick
anyone can make a good looking game like geow if they leave out about everything else there is in a game. All they did was use entire x360's power to display alot of textures and leaving out everything else in ps1 and n64 era.
Well then I'm sorry, I must be missing something. What exactly was left out in PS1 and N64 era? Just figured I would ask, so I can become a better judge of games.Â
poor: ai, animations, sound, geometry, polygon count, aa, af.
 just few enemies on screen at once, 8player online, 8 hour game, etc.... unless u want me still to go?
Look at Resistance with 40 enemies on screen at once in certain places and 0 jaggies on this pic:
[QUOTE="Zassimick"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"][QUOTE="Zassimick"]I don't own a 360, PS3, or a Wii, in fact I'm actually probably going to end up getting a PS3. And I agree that Gears of War was over-rated, but overrated by "miles?" There is no way you can say "overrated by miles"; the game is a technical achievement, so even if you don't like the game you can't say its 6.9, unless you are being sarcastic.Â
And yes, you are entitled to your own opinion, but you can't deny the fact that it is great looking game. It may not be your type of game, but even so, you must take into account that its one of the best in the genre.Â
GermanShepard06
anyone can make a good looking game like geow if they leave out about everything else there is in a game. All they did was use entire x360's power to display alot of textures and leaving out everything else in ps1 and n64 era.
Well then I'm sorry, I must be missing something. What exactly was left out in PS1 and N64 era? Just figured I would ask, so I can become a better judge of games.Â
poor: ai, animations, sound, geometry, polygon count, aa, af.
 just few enemies on screen at once, 8player online, 8 hour game, etc.... unless u want me still to go?
Gears of War is universally praised for its mostly fluid animations, sound, excellent graphics (due to its high poly count) and AA and AF are rendered moot because it's incredibly difficult to spot jaggies when the game is in motion. A few enemies on screen doesn't matter, its 8 player online is praised as being more entertaining than Resistance's 40 player online, etc.
But even if all of that was true, it's still rated higher than the PS3's highest rated game...
And don't try to pull Gamerankings in here because Gears is rated higher there too.
But wait, MS paid every single reviewer on GameRankings to rank Gears higher right? :lol:
[QUOTE="Zassimick"][QUOTE="GermanShepard06"][QUOTE="Zassimick"]I don't own a 360, PS3, or a Wii, in fact I'm actually probably going to end up getting a PS3. And I agree that Gears of War was over-rated, but overrated by "miles?" There is no way you can say "overrated by miles"; the game is a technical achievement, so even if you don't like the game you can't say its 6.9, unless you are being sarcastic.Â
And yes, you are entitled to your own opinion, but you can't deny the fact that it is great looking game. It may not be your type of game, but even so, you must take into account that its one of the best in the genre.Â
GermanShepard06
anyone can make a good looking game like geow if they leave out about everything else there is in a game. All they did was use entire x360's power to display alot of textures and leaving out everything else in ps1 and n64 era.
Well then I'm sorry, I must be missing something. What exactly was left out in PS1 and N64 era? Just figured I would ask, so I can become a better judge of games.Â
poor: ai, animations, sound, geometry, polygon count, aa, af.
 just few enemies on screen at once, 8player online, 8 hour game, etc.... unless u want me still to go?
It is kind of odd...I found the A.I. in the game to be pretty good. That was playing on a decent difficulty setting, not easy or anything like that. Sound extremely good I thought, I mean I played with a surround sound, what type I don't know I was at a friend's playing the game in co-op, and the sound was very good.Â
Polygon count, well I'm sorry but I can't exactly say anything on that cause frankly I don't know about that. Same goes for whatever you mean by aa and af.Â
Just a few enemies on screen, well I felt that if there were anymore I wouldn't stand a chance. Maybe I am just a terrible player but like I said, I would have been swarmed I think. I haven't played online, but I'm sure too many people in a game like that would be just the same as having many characters on screen. Yes, the 8 hour game(swear it was shorter for me but probably cause I was in co-op) is very disappointing, but some people do multiple play-throughs and they play online; not everyone has the time to go through a 20 hour story either.Â
Well I have found that all your problems weren't really problems all that much, aside from the polygon count and aa and af stuff because I don't know what that all is. So yes I wouldn't mind if you kept going with reasons to get me to believe why Gears of War, while overrated, isn't the technically impressive game others say it is.Â
**Edit: And I'm not trying to compare Gears to Resistance, GermanShepard. I haven't played nor have I seen the game in action, but from what I hear it sounds great and when I get a PS3 I'll probably end up picking it up. Just wondering, what would you rate Gears overall (use the Gamespot system if you like)?
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment