Ratchet and Clank is better than SMG,whats so good about SMG I don't see it

Yep that's right,I think R&C is better than SMG! But really I don't see whats so good about SMG.I beat it... and so far I have been having more fun with my new R&C.I don't think SMG deserved GOTY( but awell it did) theres nothing about it that makes it look better than other games.It's like Nintendo brain washed everyone but me lol.

What I'm really saying is you guys give SMG too much credit, it is really not that good. It's just another platformer, and everyone just think it's good because that **** Mario is in it.

BTW-If you say R&C:FTODsucksor floped or whatever(unless you just wanna have a nice talk and youcan tell why you don't like it)it's clear you never played the game, so I will just ignore your comment

Super Mario Galaxy is better than Ratchet and Clank on all fields except technical graphics.

But both are still great games.

Super Mario Galaxy is better than Ratchet and Clank on all fields except technical graphics.

But both are still great games.

Willy105

whats so "better" about it?

Yep that's right,I think SMG is better than R&C But really I don't see whats so good about R&C.I beat it... and so far I have been having more fun with my new SMG.

What I'm really saying is you guys give R&C too much credit, it is really not that good. It's just another platformer, and everyone just think it's good because that **** Ratchet is in it.

BTW-If you say SMG sucksor or whatever(unless you just wanna have a nice talk and youcan tell why you don't like it)it's clear you never played the game, so I will just ignore your comment

Isn't it funny how switching a few letters and removing one line pretty much gives a really good counter argument :|

What makes Galaxy so great is the level design, wiimote use and gravity. It's not because there's Mario in it.m_machine024

But the Wiimote dosen't really do anything in the game,and dosen't the Orange box have good level design and gravity?

I guess this guy hasnt played SMG.

SMG did something new and did it well while R&C did nothing really new and "WOW" but is still a good game in its own right

[QUOTE="Willy105"]

Super Mario Galaxy is better than Ratchet and Clank on all fields except technical graphics.

But both are still great games.

Sunamaru

whats so "better" about it?

The worlds are nice and big and are not linear.

You do more jumping and exploring than shooting enemies.

A wonderful musical score.

Not distracted by a story.

It's more out-there and less conventional.

Longer time to play and larger replay value.

It always feels like this game was made by geniuses.

R&C has all of these, but only in small bites, not all over the game.

whats so good about rachet

also what do you think that mario was missing

Yep that's right,I think SMG is better than R&C But really I don't see whats so good about R&C.I beat it... and so far I have been having more fun with my new SMG.

What I'm really saying is you guys give R&C too much credit, it is really not that good. It's just another platformer, and everyone just think it's good because that **** Ratchet is in it.

BTW-If you say SMG sucksor or whatever(unless you just wanna have a nice talk and youcan tell why you don't like it)it's clear you never played the game, so I will just ignore your comment

Isn't it funny how switching a few letters and removing one line pretty much gives a really good counter argument :|

Lord_Ahti

why do you got to spam up my thread where just having a talk to try and get me tolike SMG?

[QUOTE="m_machine024"]What makes Galaxy so great is the level design, wiimote use and gravity. It's not because there's Mario in it.Sunamaru

But the Wiimote dosen't really do anything in the game,and dosen't the Orange box have good level design and gravity?

Wiimote doesn't really do anything in the game?

You have not played Super Mario Galaxy.

R&C is just better looking. the gameplay is downright boring, Uninspired and old.Always-Honest

So what it's uninspired and old?

It's fun.

theres nothing about it that makes it look better than other games.Sunamaru

False.

[QUOTE="Lord_Ahti"]

Yep that's right,I think SMG is better than R&C But really I don't see whats so good about R&C.I beat it... and so far I have been having more fun with my new SMG.

What I'm really saying is you guys give R&C too much credit, it is really not that good. It's just another platformer, and everyone just think it's good because that **** Ratchet is in it.

BTW-If you say SMG sucksor or whatever(unless you just wanna have a nice talk and youcan tell why you don't like it)it's clear you never played the game, so I will just ignore your comment

Isn't it funny how switching a few letters and removing one line pretty much gives a really good counter argument :|

Sunamaru

why do you got to spam up my thread where just having a talk to try and get me tolike SMG?

whats so good about rachet

also what do you think that mario was missing

reno7728

well everyone has there own thoughts I liked SMG till nintendo fans started bragging about it made be slowly hate it

niall I did play SMG and played pass the first Grand Star with Luigi

[QUOTE="m_machine024"]What makes Galaxy so great is the level design, wiimote use and gravity. It's not because there's Mario in it.Sunamaru

But the Wiimote dosen't really do anything in the game,and dosen't the Orange box have good level design and gravity?

[QUOTE="Sunamaru"]theres nothing about it that makes it look better than other games.Banestyrelsen

False.

Yep that's right,I think R&C is better than SMG! But really I don't see whats so good about SMG.I beat it... and so far I have been having more fun with my new R&C.I don't think SMG deserved GOTY( but awell it did) theres nothing about it that makes it look better than other games.It's like Nintendo brain washed everyone but me lol.

What I'm really saying is you guys give SMG too much credit, it is really not that good. It's just another platformer, and everyone just think it's good because that **** Mario is in it.

BTW-If you say R&C:FTODsucksor floped or whatever(unless you just wanna have a nice talk and youcan tell why you don't like it)it's clear you never played the game, so I will just ignore your comment

Sunamaru

Something for you to think about. What does you having more fun have to do with whether or not it is a better game? Just because I have a favorite sports team, doesn't automatically mean they are the best team in the league.

ok I guess I have nothing left to say I'l rent SMG off Gamefly and beat it it again and see if I'm feeling what you guys are feelingif not then I guess I just have differnt thoughts.

BTW-see how we did this so nicely it would be way better if system wars just talked like use in sted of bashing each other in stupid ways lol

[QUOTE="m_machine024"]What makes Galaxy so great is the level design, wiimote use and gravity. It's not because there's Mario in it.Sunamaru

But the Wiimote dosen't really do anything in the game,and dosen't the Orange box have good level design and gravity?

The thing... Galaxy is not great only because it great level design, wiimote use and gravity, but it mixes them nearly perfectly and it becomes one of the most polished games ever released. Great artstyle, great soundtrack and fixed camera (not perfect through) do help a lot too.

Still you need to accept that opinions differ from people to people and we can't agree on all things. I can't comvince you that Galaxy is better, I just telling why I think it's so great.

[QUOTE="Always-Honest"]R&C is just better looking. the gameplay is downright boring, Uninspired and old.Willy105

So what it's uninspired and old?

It's fun.

oh i like it, but it can't hold a candle next to Galaxy.

[QUOTE="Willy105"]

Super Mario Galaxy is better than Ratchet and Clank on all fields except technical graphics.

But both are still great games.

Sunamaru

whats so "better" about it?

What's so better about R&C?

[QUOTE="Sunamaru"]

[QUOTE="m_machine024"]What makes Galaxy so great is the level design, wiimote use and gravity. It's not because there's Mario in it.Willy105

But the Wiimote dosen't really do anything in the game,and dosen't the Orange box have good level design and gravity?

Wiimote doesn't really do anything in the game?

You have not played Super Mario Galaxy.

I have and hee is kind right,if the wii mote was taken out it would still have gotten a 9.5,maybe if its a different reviewer a 9.U use it to spin,to collect the little things by pointing at them(sorry dont know what its called)and acoupl other stuff.

Ratchet and Clank was basically a PS2 game with fancy effects. Nothing new, nothing interesting with far crappier level design and inconsistent gameplay. It was also way too easy (although 12 year old cows probably saw that as a plus). The weapons were funny but there were too many of them and only a few of them were particularly useful.

Only cows and furries think ratchet and clank is better than mario, and their opinions are pretty much worthless

Yep that's right,I think SMG is better than R&C But really I don't see whats so good about R&C.I beat it... and so far I have been having more fun with my new SMG.

What I'm really saying is you guys give R&C too much credit, it is really not that good. It's just another platformer, and everyone just think it's good because that **** Ratchet is in it.

BTW-If you say SMG sucksor or whatever(unless you just wanna have a nice talk and youcan tell why you don't like it)it's clear you never played the game, so I will just ignore your comment

Isn't it funny how switching a few letters and removing one line pretty much gives a really good counter argument :|

Lord_Ahti

Not much of a counter argument, Ratchet is not anywhere near as famous as mario. if you ask me, when GS reviewed SMG they were suffering from halo 3 syndrome and while it's a good game, it's not better than CoD4 or crysis(which alsobeat it inthe user poll).

as for this argument, i've always prefered the R&C series to the mario series, but since I've only played SMG out of the two, my opinion isn't worth much.

[QUOTE="m_machine024"]What makes Galaxy so great is the level design, wiimote use and gravity. It's not because there's Mario in it.Sunamaru

But the Wiimote dosen't really do anything in the game,and dosen't the Orange box have good level design and gravity?

It is funny,that you can tell right away when a little kid is making a post.

[QUOTE="Sunamaru"]

Yep that's right,I think R&C is better than SMG! But really I don't see whats so good about SMG.I beat it... and so far I have been having more fun with my new R&C.I don't think SMG deserved GOTY( but awell it did) theres nothing about it that makes it look better than other games.It's like Nintendo brain washed everyone but me lol.

What I'm really saying is you guys give SMG too much credit, it is really not that good. It's just another platformer, and everyone just think it's good because that **** Mario is in it.

BTW-If you say R&C:FTODsucksor floped or whatever(unless you just wanna have a nice talk and youcan tell why you don't like it)it's clear you never played the game, so I will just ignore your comment

ZIMdoom

Something for you to think about. What does you having more fun have to do with whether or not it is a better game? Just because I have a favorite sports team, doesn't automatically mean they are the best team in the league.

That is a great analogy.

Ratchet and Clank was basically a PS2 game with fancy effects. Nothing new, nothing interesting with far crappier level design and inconsistent gameplay. It was also way too easy (although 12 year old cows probably saw that as a plus). The weapons were funny but there were too many of them and only a few of them were particularly useful.

Only cows and furries think ratchet and clank is better than mario, and their opinions are pretty much worthless

the_h_bomb

Wow so this is how it is,a guy who never played a game talk about its cons,and i noticed everything ur saying can be found in the Arron Thomas:evil: Review,and if u really are basing ur info on that u have just lost all credibility,never bash a game that u never played

Everybody is intitled to their opinion. If he likes ratchet more than mario then thats fine.jack_russel

we have a winner;)

Ratchet and Clank was basically a PS2 game with fancy effects. Nothing new, nothing interesting with far crappier level design and inconsistent gameplay. It was also way too easy (although 12 year old cows probably saw that as a plus). The weapons were funny but there were too many of them and only a few of them were particularly useful.

Only cows and furries think ratchet and clank is better than mario, and their opinions are pretty much worthless

the_h_bomb

Furries! To funny.

Everybody is intitled to their opinion. If he likes ratchet more than mario then thats fine.jack_russel

This is true but if he did not want people to disagree with him he wouldn't post his opinion in SW for attention :).

I think the reason you don't see why Galaxy is better is exactly that, you are judging on the fact R&C looks so much better and not the gameplay or over all package.

Furries! To funny.

VladTheImpaler

we all have opinions on what is more fun or what we like more. it just happens that the vast majority of the public and critics like SMG more. but there's nothing wrong with you liking R&C more.

it's just like some ppl have foot fetishes while most do not.

[QUOTE="Willy105"][QUOTE="Sunamaru"]

[QUOTE="m_machine024"]What makes Galaxy so great is the level design, wiimote use and gravity. It's not because there's Mario in it.Ichigo_Ban_Kai

But the Wiimote dosen't really do anything in the game,and dosen't the Orange box have good level design and gravity?

Wiimote doesn't really do anything in the game?

You have not played Super Mario Galaxy.

I have and hee is kind right,if the wii mote was taken out it would still have gotten a 9.5,maybe if its a different reviewer a 9.U use it to spin,to collect the little things by pointing at them(sorry dont know what its called)and acoupl other stuff.

SMG is amazing. It deffinately deserved GoTY. I haven't played R&C yet, but SMG is still one amazing platformer.