Your arguement against RE4 would have been much more relevant when I was here Back when RE4 first came out on GC...and even when RE4 was released months later on PS2.
Now?
Capcom has had time to release it's Sequel some 4 years later, RE5. You are about 4 years late.
Your arguement against RE4 would have been much more relevant when I was here Back when RE4 first came out on GC...and even when RE4 was released months later on PS2.
Now?
Capcom has had time to release it's Sequel some 4 years later, RE5. You are about 4 years late.
I think Resident Evil 5 should have had that, and the inventory system from Resident Evil 4, and didn't make co-op a core component of the game. But hey, my opinion is irrelevant.
I always thought that was a bit stupid really. You've got nutters running about infesting and killing everyone and this dude is happily skipping all over the place without a worry.
It's like the dude in MGS4 with the monkey but at least they tried to explain how he got about, even if it was lame.
[QUOTE="eccoisgood"]I Repeat....RE4 had a Merchant. Shouldn't even count it as a Resident Evilzarshack
what are ya buying?... what are ya sellin? for the win! on topic. who cares? both 4 and 5 are very entertaining. people around here take things far too seriously.
It's still one of the best games I've played! Can't wait for RE5, it should arrive today or tomorrow :D I don't really care about the older Resident Evil games though, they're _OK_ I guess.
um... if you don't argue opinion.. then what do you argue? You argue opinion, but you back it up with actual facts and (gasp!) logic. Yeah, I guess that was more or less what I was trying to say :P
Log in to comment