Mostly because graphically the Wii can't accomplish what they wish RE5 to be like, they would have to tune it down so much I expect. It's not like the last generation when the GCN wasn't THAT far behind the Xbox and PS2. But the Wii is way behind the other two in terms of power.
I think its cuz Capcom and Nintendo got in a catfight over that exclusive deal that blew up in each other's face. Remember that awesome looking dragon game that was supposed to come out for GC?
[QUOTE="Mikazukinoyaiba"]Mostly because graphically the Wii can't accomplish what they wish RE5 to be like, they would have to tune it down so much I expect. It's not like the last generation when the GCN wasn't THAT far behind the Xbox and PS2. But the Wii is way behind the other two in terms of power. You make it sound like the PS2 was more powerful than the GCN, which is wasn't. On topic: They are making RE: Umbrella Chronicles for the Wii, so put away your tissue box.
Mostly because graphically the Wii can't accomplish what they wish RE5 to be like, they would have to tune it down so much I expect. It's not like the last generation when the GCN wasn't THAT far behind the Xbox and PS2. But the Wii is way behind the other two in terms of power.Mikazukinoyaiba
I find statements like this really funny. Resident Evil 4 was one of, if not the best looking game of last year and it was a Gamecube title, it looked awful on the PS2 cause the graphics were watered down. RE4 looked amazing and way ahead of 95% of all the games last gen in terms of graphics. The Wii gets Umbrella Chronicles which is part of the regular Resident Evil storyline and not a spin off like Nemesis was.
[QUOTE="Mikazukinoyaiba"]Mostly because graphically the Wii can't accomplish what they wish RE5 to be like, they would have to tune it down so much I expect. It's not like the last generation when the GCN wasn't THAT far behind the Xbox and PS2. But the Wii is way behind the other two in terms of power.
uhh, ps2 had the worst graphics last gen buddy. and gc was very close to x box. seriously, learn things before you post.
[QUOTE="Mikazukinoyaiba"]Mostly because graphically the Wii can't accomplish what they wish RE5 to be like, they would have to tune it down so much I expect. It's not like the last generation when the GCN wasn't THAT far behind the Xbox and PS2. But the Wii is way behind the other two in terms of power.DSgamer64
I find statements like this really funny. Resident Evil 4 was one of, if not the best looking game of last year and it was a Gamecube title, it looked awful on the PS2 cause the graphics were watered down. RE4 looked amazing and way ahead of 95% of all the games last gen in terms of graphics. The Wii gets Umbrella Chronicles which is part of the regular Resident Evil storyline and not a spin off like Nemesis was.
While it did look better on GC, it looked far from "awful" on the PS2. It was easily one of the best looking games on either console, and the 'watered down' graphics were not as noticeable as people make them out to be.
[QUOTE="Mikazukinoyaiba"]Mostly because graphically the Wii can't accomplish what they wish RE5 to be like, they would have to tune it down so much I expect. It's not like the last generation when the GCN wasn't THAT far behind the Xbox and PS2. But the Wii is way behind the other two in terms of power.DSgamer64
I find statements like this really funny. Resident Evil 4 was one of, if not the best looking game of last year and it was a Gamecube title, it looked awful on the PS2 cause the graphics were watered down. .
Your point? We're talking about the Wii in comparision to the 360 and PS3. The difference in power is WAY beyond that of the last generation consoles.
uhh, ps2 had the worst graphics last gen buddy. and gc was very close to x box. seriously, learn things before you post.
It was an typo on my part, I was already aware the GCN had more powerful graphics then the PS2. What you sheep fail to realize though is that the Wii is MUCH further behind the PS3 and 360 unlike last generation when the consoles were closer to each other in power. Now do you have an actual reply to make or more damage control?
[QUOTE="Mikazukinoyaiba"]Mostly because graphically the Wii can't accomplish what they wish RE5 to be like, they would have to tune it down so much I expect. It's not like the last generation when the GCN wasn't THAT far behind the Xbox and PS2. But the Wii is way behind the other two in terms of power.Mikazukinoyaiba
I find statements like this really funny. Resident Evil 4 was one of, if not the best looking game of last year and it was a Gamecube title, it looked awful on the PS2 cause the graphics were watered down. .
Your point? We're talking about the Wii in comparision to the 360 and PS3. The difference in power is WAY beyond that of the last generation consoles.
uhh, ps2 had the worst graphics last gen buddy. and gc was very close to x box. seriously, learn things before you post.
It was an typo on my part, I was already aware the GCN had more powerful graphics then the PS2. What you sheep fail to realize though is that the Wii is MUCH further behind the PS3 and 360 unlike last generation when the consoles were closer to each other in power. Now do you have an actual reply to make or more damage control?
no, you definately knew what you were saying, but now that people are saying that gc was more powerful, your saying it was a typo. seriously, people have tried to pull it before, but from what you said, you definately thought the ps2 was more powerful.
plus, the wiis graphics are fine, and id rather have a fun game who graphics i dont like for 5 minutes, over staring at a pretty picture for 20 hours, with terrible gameplay.
Pretty graphics =/= bad gameplay. Weren't you just saying how RE4 looked amazing on the GC, etc? It's possible to have both; while graphics shouldn't be the deciding factor on whether a game is 'good' or not, just having good graphics doesn't mean it's inferior.
[QUOTE="Mikazukinoyaiba"]Mostly because graphically the Wii can't accomplish what they wish RE5 to be like, they would have to tune it down so much I expect. It's not like the last generation when the GCN wasn't THAT far behind the Xbox and PS2. But the Wii is way behind the other two in terms of power.HappySunnGuy
I find statements like this really funny. Resident Evil 4 was one of, if not the best looking game of last year and it was a Gamecube title, it looked awful on the PS2 cause the graphics were watered down. .
Your point? We're talking about the Wii in comparision to the 360 and PS3. The difference in power is WAY beyond that of the last generation consoles.
uhh, ps2 had the worst graphics last gen buddy. and gc was very close to x box. seriously, learn things before you post.
It was an typo on my part, I was already aware the GCN had more powerful graphics then the PS2. What you sheep fail to realize though is that the Wii is MUCH further behind the PS3 and 360 unlike last generation when the consoles were closer to each other in power. Now do you have an actual reply to make or more damage control?
no, you definately knew what you were saying, but now that people are saying that gc was more powerful, your saying it was a typo. seriously, people have tried to pull it before, but from what you said, you definately thought the ps2 was more powerful.
plus, the wiis graphics are fine, and id rather have a fun game who graphics i dont like for 5 minutes, over staring at a pretty picture for 20 hours, with terrible gameplay.
Your acting like good graphics make a game suck or something?
no, you definately knew what you were saying, but now that people are saying that gc was more powerful, your saying it was a typo. seriously, people have tried to pull it before, but from what you said, you definately thought the ps2 was more powerful
What you're a mind reader? I just love how you said in such a "matter of factly" way that I "definetelly" knew what I was doing. Listen, I'm not gonna waste my time trying to prove to you what I knew and didn't know. You may have seen other people pull it off and are use to other people being dishonest on the internet and crap, but I seriously made a mistake in my writing and suggested the PS2 was more powerful then the GCN, even though I have already known otherwise.
plus, the wiis graphics are fine, and id rather have a fun game who graphics i dont like for 5 minutes, over staring at a pretty picture for 20 hours, with terrible gameplay.
This is damage control, you completely ignored the point that the Wii apparently can't handle what the creators of RE5 want to do with the game due it's substantially weaker hardware. See, to me lying on the internet is pointless because for one, I don't know any of you and it really benefits me in no way. It isn't like by lying I will earn more money or be able to deceive anyone in order to gain something. It is a friggin web forum.
Funny how the sheep thought RE would always be on a Nintendo platform after RE 4 was announced for the GC.
I still remember the brutal ownage when Capcom announced RE 4 for PS2.
I still remember the even more brutal ownage when RE 4 ran about as good as the GC version after sheep swore it would run at 10 FPS with 30 load times on PS2.
[QUOTE="jwmakoto"]Pretty graphics =/= bad gameplay. Weren't you just saying how RE4 looked amazing on the GC, etc? It's possible to have both; while graphics shouldn't be the deciding factor on whether a game is 'good' or not, just having good graphics doesn't mean it's inferior.
ya, but several times, i go to my friends house and the game looks good, but i play the game, and it plays like crap.but theyll play it and enjoy it, and ill say, "this game sucks, why do you like it so much" and often times i hear, "because the graphics are awesome!" then i introduce them to my wii, and now every day after school they wanna come over, because though the graphics arent that great, they find it very very extremely fun. we play sonic, red steel, and wii sports, and those alone have convinced one of my friends to get one.
but often times, with gamers, on gs, people hype games because their graphics are good. theyll watch one trailer, and say, "OMG, DID YOU SEE THOSE EFFECTS??!!?! THOSE PHYSICS ARE AWESOME!" and its not just from complete noobs, i hear all sorts of people saying it, and now, people are hyping this 2d platformer to be a mario killer, when clearly, itll get 8.5 TOPS. and all they are basing it off of is co-op (which has been done) and graphics. when mario has proven himself time and time again, all these people hype thios game that comes out of no where to be a mario killer urely on 2 things. and the majority of it being on graphics instead of gameplay.
Yeah I'm not denying that people judge games based on graphics... it's often the first thing they see (no... really :D) I'm just saying not to discount something just because of the graphics. "Oh it has good graphics, so therefore it must have bad gameplay" is a faulty argument.
Funny how the sheep thought RE would always be on a Nintendo platform after RE 4 was announced for the GC.
I still remember the brutal ownage when Capcom announced RE 4 for PS2.
I still remember the even more brutal ownage when RE 4 ran about as good as the GC version after sheep swore it would run at 10 FPS with 30 load times on PS2.
:lol: sheep
mentzer
No the ps2 version looks nasty compare to the GC one ,PS2 version = no good lighting effect,shadows ect ugly textures.
no, you definately knew what you were saying, but now that people are saying that gc was more powerful, your saying it was a typo. seriously, people have tried to pull it before, but from what you said, you definately thought the ps2 was more powerfulflamingschmoes2
What you're a mind reader? I just love how you said in such a "matter of factly" way that I "definetelly" knew what I was doing. Listen, I'm not gonna waste my time trying to prove to you what I knew and didn't know. You may have seen other people pull it off and are use to other people being dishonest on the internet and crap, but I seriously made a mistake in my writing and suggested the PS2 was more powerful then the GCN, even though I have already known otherwise.
plus, the wiis graphics are fine, and id rather have a fun game who graphics i dont like for 5 minutes, over staring at a pretty picture for 20 hours, with terrible gameplay.
This is damage control, you completely ignored the point that the Wii apparently can't handle what the creators of RE5 want to do with the game due it's substantially weaker hardware. See, to me lying on the internet is pointless because for one, I don't know any of you and it really benefits me in no way. It isn't like by lying I will earn more money or be able to deceive anyone in order to gain something. It is a friggin web forum.
Yeah even I knew what you meant. The point is, Xbox 1, PS2, and GCn were faily within reach of each others power. Thats why there were so many games that were made for all three. But this time, as you said, the Wii is so far behind the race in hardware tht now the games are only going to Xbox 360/PS3 and not Wii. That is the difference and that hurts Wii a lot. Um, Xbox1 was in a differnt league to ps2 as far as power is concerned.
Funny how the sheep thought RE would always be on a Nintendo platform after RE 4 was announced for the GC.
I still remember the brutal ownage when Capcom announced RE 4 for PS2.
I still remember the even more brutal ownage when RE 4 ran about as good as the GC version after sheep swore it would run at 10 FPS with 30 load times on PS2.
:lol: sheep
venture00
No the ps2 version looks nasty compare to the GC one ,PS2 version = no good lighting effect,shadows ect ugly textures. Unless you're playing them side by side, you're not really going to notice or care, they're both fun. And if you are playing them side by side just for that, then I think you've got more problems than debating GC vs PS2 graphics ;)
you know i normally defend the wii. and i mean i defend it alot. but sheeps calm down. its a given the wii is graphically behind the other 2. by miles. sheesh calm down. the wii will be fine there resident evil umbrella chronicles. i understand it might be a spinoff but code veronica was really good. and technically resident evil 0 was a spinoff as well. also good game. relax. the wii is weak from a technical standpoint compare to the other 2. yes its stronger than the last gen systems. but the wii is behind. just because the other 2 dont have the motion sensing doesnt mean there games cant be fun. it just means wii games are fun in a whole different way. i mean whats with the damage control. relax.
[QUOTE="Mikazukinoyaiba"]Mostly because graphically the Wii can't accomplish what they wish RE5 to be like, they would have to tune it down so much I expect. It's not like the last generation when the GCN wasn't THAT far behind the Xbox and PS2. But the Wii is way behind the other two in terms of power.
...
The GCN was just behind the XBOX, which were both WAY ahead of what the PS2 could do.Â
you know i normally defend the wii. and i mean i defend it alot. but sheeps calm down. its a given the wii is graphically behind the other 2. by miles. sheesh calm down. the wii will be fine there resident evil umbrella chronicles. i understand it might be a spinoff but code veronica was really good. and technically resident evil 0 was a spinoff as well. also good game. relax. the wii is weak from a technical standpoint compare to the other 2. yes its stronger than the last gen systems. but the wii is behind. just because the other 2 dont have the motion sensing doesnt mean there games cant be fun. it just means wii games are fun in a whole different way. i mean whats with the damage control. relax.jg4xchamp
You Sir, are one of the few sensible people to post in this thread.
[QUOTE="Mikazukinoyaiba"]Mostly because graphically the Wii can't accomplish what they wish RE5 to be like, they would have to tune it down so much I expect. It's not like the last generation when the GCN wasn't THAT far behind the Xbox and PS2. But the Wii is way behind the other two in terms of power.jeffwulf
...
The GCN was just behind the XBOX, which were both WAY ahead of what the PS2 could do.Â
[QUOTE="machitocaliente"][QUOTE="Ben3128947"]graphics = atmosphere , better graphics = more engadging experience,...the wii just can't handle it unfortunately.flamingschmoes2
lamao. what about last gen? i really hate hypocrites.... wii is more that capable, not like 360/ ps3, but its capable Not capable of what Capcom wanted as seen in this pic. So not capable Immersive? Sort of. but Xbox 360 and PS3 do it better better 4 you maybe. but IMAO
HONESTLY. I DONT CARE ABOUT YOUR DEFINITION OF BRAND NEW... BRAND NEW... YOU MEAND BRAND NEW GRAPHICS?... WHAT ABOUT BRAND NEW GAMEPLAY / CONTROLER? YOU GO AND PLAY WITH YOUR OLD SAME OLD GAMECUBE CONTROLLER + HUBER GRAPHZ ILL GO PLAY WITH MY WIIMOTE + RE4 GRAFICS. IN THE END YOU ARE THE ONE PLAYING THE SAME OLD GAME.
HONESTLY. I DONT CARE ABOUT YOUR DEFINITION OF BRAND NEW... BRAND NEW... YOU MEAND BRAND NEW GRAPHICS?... WHAT ABOUT BRAND NEW GAMEPLAY / CONTROLER? YOU GO AND PLAY WITH YOUR OLD SAME OLD GAMECUBE CONTROLLER + HUBER GRAPHZ ILL GO PLAY WITH MY WIIMOTE + RE4 GRAFICS. IN THE END YOU ARE THE ONE PLAYING THE SAME OLD GAME.
machitocaliente
come on, new story, new weapons, new character, new gamplay mechanic, new physicl+AI. That's not enough to make a new game?
[QUOTE="Mikazukinoyaiba"]Mostly because graphically the Wii can't accomplish what they wish RE5 to be like, they would have to tune it down so much I expect. It's not like the last generation when the GCN wasn't THAT far behind the Xbox and PS2. But the Wii is way behind the other two in terms of power. GCN was ahead of PS2
Mostly because graphically the Wii can't accomplish what they wish RE5 to be like, they would have to tune it down so much I expect. It's not like the last generation when the GCN wasn't THAT far behind the Xbox and PS2. But the Wii is way behind the other two in terms of power.Mikazukinoyaiba
Um...the GC was superior to the PS2 in graphical quality.Â
Log in to comment