Some points:
1) If ithe ps3 sells exactly the same way the 360 has previously, it will always be behind.
2) It is the relative market share currently which counts because this determines exclusive releases and pricing (aligning launches is actually pretty daft).
3) Aligning releases does not accound for the 400% more HD tvs that were in households when the PS3 was released.
4) Given that previous sony owners outnumber xbox owners 10:1 the market saturation curves are completely different, the progress of the PS3 is worrying in this regard and actually reflects the reality that many previous sony fans have moved to an xbox or are yet to make up their mind
5) The xbox was supply limited driving a more linear increase in sales - the ps3 is plateauing already despite good supply.
6) The sales of the PS3 are perhaps more impressive since it has been released into a market already dominated by a major competitor.
The point I'm trying to make is that the comparison is entirely confounded by a range of temporal factors and is actually pretty pointless. You are much better off looking at the current market share graphs. Trying to spin this in some kind of a fanboy way is worthless. I'm very sure that next months NPD figures will be highly informative for this generation 'war'.
Log in to comment