yeah and who was that? that ghostbusters developer who fell short of funding and had to switch over to 360? yeah that game was a total graphical masterpiece for their 2nd game ever whos gonna own sucker punch?
[QUOTE="KittenWishes"][QUOTE="i_am_interested"] whos gonna own sucker punch? Besdies Rage, Red Dead Redemption is already out and it (the Xbox 360 version) looks better. rage and its pretty textures? red dead and its table tennis engine that started on 360 because they didnt have the ps3 kits yet?
[QUOTE="designer-"]Ghostbusters is your proof? mysterj
lol is it really Ghostbusters? I can't even see it. Right click and open in a new tab to see the pictures. Honestly TC you cant seriously be using Ghostbusters as proof of your point. I believe the Guriella, Naughty Dog and now Sucker Punch have all claimed this and it is quite the testament to their statements that Uncharted 2 is the best looking console game out there, that Killzone 2 looks fantastic and that Infamous 2 looks to open up the game with Uncharted graphics (as based on the gameplay video).
..
I understand that you are a fan of the 360 but as it stands right now, today, Sony has a better graphical offering. This however does not mean that the 360 is worse or needs to be defended with ludicrous examples.
[QUOTE="i_am_interested"][QUOTE="KittenWishes"][QUOTE="i_am_interested"] whos gonna own sucker punch? Besdies Rage, Red Dead Redemption is already out and it (the Xbox 360 version) looks better. rage and its pretty textures? red dead and its table tennis engine that started on 360 because they didnt have the ps3 kits yet? The engine was made for RDR. Just sayin'.
[QUOTE="KittenWishes"][QUOTE="sayonara89"][QUOTE="mysterj"] Look at teh foliage in that game! Teh powah of the... Xenos! someone with a low res mario as their avatar should not be commenting. :(
[QUOTE="sayonara89"][QUOTE="mysterj"] Look at teh foliage in that game! KittenWishes
Teh powah of the... Xenos! someone with a low res mario as their avatar should not be commenting. wait so how does this Ghostbusters game prove anything?
[QUOTE="KittenWishes"]I can see the pictures fine. The PS3 version is a disgusting mess. The xbox 360 version looks sharp, clear and attractive.KevinButlerVP
everyone else can't see them Not that it supports the TC's premise, but I saw them, and the PS3 version is vastly inferior graphics-wise.
When did ghostbusters become a standard in gaming? Sounds like you are really really trying, whose alts account are you?Diviniuz
Why does a the game used have to be a stranded in gaming? He's only trying to prove that a developer was owned, not that the 360 > PS3. Not that I support his conclusion. I just know how to properly analyze what is written.
if this post is in reply to suckerpunch and their silly declaration that Infamous 2 ( does any body even remember the first one? ) cant be done on 360, i would ignore anything that comes out of the sony camps mouth as telling the truth is a no no with them.
some of the most graphically impressive and hugest selling titles are comming out on the 360 in the next 14 months.
let the cow worshipers crow all they want.
dont risk getting moderated to answer misinformed people.
Sony....believe HALF of waht you hear, and NONE of what you see.
Log in to comment