Report says Xbox One prototypes like a beefed-up gaming PC

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for deathlordcrime
DeathLordCrime

893

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#1  Edited By DeathLordCrime
Member since 2014 • 893 Posts

Reports today have been saying MS has been testing new xbox one that can rival good gaming pc. Despite what Phil Spencer about not liking the idea of separate versions. People are already taking sources its funny how the ps4 fans are believing everything that gaming site released. More rumors and people are already convinced everything is true. The delusion has become strong now because its now okay to upgrade.

Avatar image for mjorh
mjorh

6749

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#2  Edited By mjorh
Member since 2011 • 6749 Posts

Let the fragmentation begin!

With new consoles from all the three heads, feel like the next-gen is going to get started for console gamers ...

Avatar image for Jaysonguy
Jaysonguy

39454

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#3 Jaysonguy
Member since 2006 • 39454 Posts

Oh you're using the technical term "good"? Well OK then....

Avatar image for remiks00
remiks00

4249

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 37

User Lists: 0

#4  Edited By remiks00
Member since 2006 • 4249 Posts

lol, here we go again. Rumors rumors rumors. Now it's the lems turn to become hypocrites.

Avatar image for silversix_
silversix_

26347

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 silversix_  Online
Member since 2010 • 26347 Posts

Is it SUPER CHARGED, guys? Its gonna be so powerful!!!

Avatar image for mjorh
mjorh

6749

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#6 mjorh
Member since 2011 • 6749 Posts

@remiks00 said:

lol, here we go again. Rumors rumors rumors

Who cares, sit and enjoy the view lol

Avatar image for blueeyedcasva
BlueEyedCasva

599

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7  Edited By BlueEyedCasva
Member since 2015 • 599 Posts

Hypocrisy everywhere

Avatar image for Kruiz_Bathory
Kruiz_Bathory

4765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#8 Kruiz_Bathory
Member since 2009 • 4765 Posts

So it'll be like 1k to buy but be worth 600 like those prebuilt gaming pcs.

Avatar image for deathlordcrime
DeathLordCrime

893

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#9  Edited By DeathLordCrime
Member since 2014 • 893 Posts

No way is MS going sit there and let Sony release another PS4 console. There going to have to do the same to keep with with the competition. Doesn't sound like it will be worth it when your splitting the userbase.

Avatar image for notafanboy
NotAFanboy

573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 NotAFanboy
Member since 2015 • 573 Posts

LOL... Is this like 2012 - early 2013 where Xbone was supposed to be a "monster" with a 10 TF GPU and lemmings were saying Microsoft is so smart?

Avatar image for casharmy
casharmy

9388

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 casharmy
Member since 2011 • 9388 Posts

@mjorh said:

Let the fragmentation begin!

With new consoles from all the three heads, feel like the next-gen is going to get started for console gamers ...

If MS follows Sony's route I don't see a problem with it.

And what you are saying is stupid because xbox is already pared with the windows 10 ecosystem right now which includes all PC variations and you can't get any more "fragmented" than that. So the notion that a mid range xbox console will cause fragmentation when xbox games are already shared with all variations of PC is idiotic at best.

Enough with the dumb separation/fragmentation nonsense, it's a made up condition that only exists in your mind if you choose to think that way.

PC gamers have been "fragmented" since day 1 according to your logic and it doesn't seem to bother PC gamers one bit so I think everyone else will be ok.

Avatar image for casharmy
casharmy

9388

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12  Edited By casharmy
Member since 2011 • 9388 Posts

What I envision' If I were MS' is building a xbox one upgrade that played all xbox one games....but being a windows 10 PC variant system, ALSO allowed for steam games to be played making it a true PC/console hybrid giving them a huge and instant game library of all PC games to hold over sonys system.

It would be a killer move...if MS was smart

I'd buy that system if it was made.

Avatar image for Pedro
Pedro

73969

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 72

User Lists: 0

#13 Pedro
Member since 2002 • 73969 Posts

@casharmy said:

What I envision' If I were MS' is building a xbox one upgrade that played all xbox one games....but being a windows 10 PC variant system, ALSO allowed for steam games to be played making it a true PC/console hybrid giving them a huge and instant game library over sony.

It would be a killer move...if MS was smart

MS is not that forward thinking. If you can think of a half ass version of your proposal then it would fall right in line with MS vision.

Avatar image for Shewgenja
Shewgenja

21456

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#14 Shewgenja
Member since 2009 • 21456 Posts

I think the next Xbox will have to drop the notion of ESRAM on the gpu die in order to be in a position for meaningful upgrades and modularity.

In fact, the entire concept of the APU should be revisited.

Avatar image for notafanboy
NotAFanboy

573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 NotAFanboy
Member since 2015 • 573 Posts

@Shewgenja said:

I think the next Xbox will have to drop the notion of ESRAM on the gpu die in order to be in a position for meaningful upgrades and modularity.

In fact, the entire concept of the APU should be revisited.

They can't drop the eSRAM if they want to maintain compatibility with the Xbone.

I think the Xbone 1.5 will have an upclocked CPU, GPU, and RAM but that's about it. There's no flexibility with its design.

On the other hand, SONY can upclock the CPU, GPU and RAM while also adding more CUs and having a more modern GPU architecture.

Avatar image for Bigboi500
Bigboi500

35550

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#16 Bigboi500
Member since 2007 • 35550 Posts

I barely touch the One I have now. No way I'm buying an overclocked version.

Avatar image for Phazevariance
Phazevariance

12356

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 Phazevariance
Member since 2003 • 12356 Posts

er-ma-gerd! Let's see what happens at E3 when they spill the beans.

Avatar image for mjorh
mjorh

6749

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#18 mjorh
Member since 2011 • 6749 Posts

@casharmy said:
@mjorh said:

Let the fragmentation begin!

With new consoles from all the three heads, feel like the next-gen is going to get started for console gamers ...

If MS follows Sony's route I don't see a problem with it.

And what you are saying is stupid because xbox is already pared with the windows 10 ecosystem right now which includes all PC variations and you can't get any more "fragmented" than that. So the notion that a mid range xbox console will cause fragmentation when xbox games are already shared with all variations of PC is idiotic at best.

Enough with the dumb separation/fragmentation nonsense, it's a made up condition that only exists in your mind if you choose to think that way.

PC gamers have been "fragmented" since day 1 according to your logic and it doesn't seem to bother PC gamers one bit so I think everyone else will be ok.

As i can't get it through your thick scull, here's some discussion that might help you out :

http://www.giantbomb.com/podcasts/

Check out the last podcast, forward to minute 16.

As i said thousands times, this is all speculation so it should be taken with a grain of salt.

Avatar image for cainetao11
cainetao11

38074

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 77

User Lists: 1

#19 cainetao11
Member since 2006 • 38074 Posts

@Pedro said:
@casharmy said:

What I envision' If I were MS' is building a xbox one upgrade that played all xbox one games....but being a windows 10 PC variant system, ALSO allowed for steam games to be played making it a true PC/console hybrid giving them a huge and instant game library over sony.

It would be a killer move...if MS was smart

MS is not that forward thinking. If you can think of a half ass version of your proposal then it would fall right in line with MS vision.

You're ready for an executive position there.

Avatar image for lamprey263
lamprey263

45470

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#20 lamprey263
Member since 2006 • 45470 Posts

Don't buy it, at least not as far as being their XB1.5 slim. Though, don't doubt they're working on next console, and I'm guessing shooting for upgradable design... and if not them, some is gonna have to eventually.

Avatar image for casharmy
casharmy

9388

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 casharmy
Member since 2011 • 9388 Posts

@Pedro said:
@casharmy said:

What I envision' If I were MS' is building a xbox one upgrade that played all xbox one games....but being a windows 10 PC variant system, ALSO allowed for steam games to be played making it a true PC/console hybrid giving them a huge and instant game library over sony.

It would be a killer move...if MS was smart

MS is not that forward thinking. If you can think of a half ass version of your proposal then it would fall right in line with MS vision.

I'm thinking they have to come up with something other than the base library of xbox one games that they've already made.

Simply being more powerful isn't going to help MS at this point when they are so far behind in games. Furthermore, MS doesn't like to invest in games as it is...honestly if MS is serious about putting out a more powerful mid-gen console they really have to do something like I am suggesting if they want to compete.

The thing is, if they do what I suggest, they can actually catch up and possibly get a lead on sony making the PC market more mainstream using the xbox brand and it will truly fit the "xbox" vision that it should have mirrored in the first place.

Avatar image for Pedro
Pedro

73969

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 72

User Lists: 0

#22 Pedro
Member since 2002 • 73969 Posts

@Shewgenja said:

I think the next Xbox will have to drop the notion of ESRAM on the gpu die in order to be in a position for meaningful upgrades and modularity.

In fact, the entire concept of the APU should be revisited.

They most likely will. I would not be surprise if they simply emulate ESRAM with GDDR5.

Avatar image for Guy_Brohski
Guy_Brohski

2221

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#23 Guy_Brohski
Member since 2013 • 2221 Posts

Interesting times ahead for console gamers.

Avatar image for casharmy
casharmy

9388

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24  Edited By casharmy
Member since 2011 • 9388 Posts

Do you guys think MS will make the new xbox games down compatible to xbox one like Sony is going to do with PS4 neo or leave fans who invested in xbone high and dry as they move on to greener pastures with the new xbox?

Avatar image for notafanboy
NotAFanboy

573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25  Edited By NotAFanboy
Member since 2015 • 573 Posts

@casharmy said:

Do you guys think MS will keep the new xbox games down compatible on xbox one like Sony is going to do for PS4 neo or leave fans who invested in xbone high and dry as the move on to greener pastures with xbox 2?

2nd option.

MS can't commit to anything if it's not an instant success. That's one of the biggest differences between SONY and MS.

I bet the Xbone 1.5 is actually a new console and not a revision.

Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#26 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

@notafanboy said:
@casharmy said:

Do you guys think MS will keep the new xbox games down compatible on xbox one like Sony is going to do for PS4 neo or leave fans who invested in xbone high and dry as the move on to greener pastures with xbox 2?

2nd option.

MS can't commit to anything if it's not an instant success. That's one of the biggest differences between SONY and MS.

I bet the Xbone 1.5 is actually a new console and not a revision.

oh phew, then that means it probably wont happen

Avatar image for casharmy
casharmy

9388

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27  Edited By casharmy
Member since 2011 • 9388 Posts

@notafanboy said:
@casharmy said:

Do you guys think MS will keep the new xbox games down compatible on xbox one like Sony is going to do for PS4 neo or leave fans who invested in xbone high and dry as the move on to greener pastures with xbox 2?

2nd option.

MS can't commit to anything if it's not an instant success. That's one of the biggest differences between SONY and MS.

I bet the Xbone 1.5 is actually a new console and not a revision.

If that happens that will be a lot worse then what people ranting and raving about PS4 k was suspected to do.

It's up in the air, but MS did they they didn't wan't to do any middle revisions but a full blown upgrade.

It sounds as if they're making a console that xbone will have no chance of sharing games with and that will truly be "screwing" customers who bought xbones this gen, not like what people were trying to suggest with PS4k.

Avatar image for notafanboy
NotAFanboy

573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28  Edited By NotAFanboy
Member since 2015 • 573 Posts

Seeing some of the predictions by lemmings is so hilarious.

Here's 1 gem from a lemming from Neogaf:

-14nm 4.0tf+ Gpu

- 2.2ghz+ jaguar eight core processor.

- 8GB DDR4 2400mhz with 64MB esram

LMFAO... They're going to DOUBLE the eSRAM??? That would make the Xbone 1.5 nearly as large as my tower PC. It would also draw heat like a jet engine. Also, an SoC of that size would have disastrous yields on a low-distance node fabs.

The Xbone 1.5 will only have slight upclocks. Don't expect anything else. I predict 1.5-1.7 TF performance in total.

The PS4.5 will have larger upclocks, double the CUs, and the polaris architecture. I expect 4.2-4.5 TF performance. The gap will be enormous.

Edit: Prominent Neogaf insider and developer Matt said this in response to another user's question about the Xbone 1.5 bring stronger than the PS4.5: "Nah, I don't."

Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#29  Edited By ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts

@notafanboy said:

LOL... Is this like 2012 - early 2013 where Xbone was supposed to be a "monster" with a 10 TF GPU and lemmings were saying Microsoft is so smart?

Xbox One has a larger SoC with about half of it spent on 32 MB ESRAM. If Xbox One followed PS4's model, it would have a GCN solution with 28 CU.

@notafanboy said:

Seeing some of the predictions by lemmings is so hilarious.

Here's 1 gem from a lemming from Neogaf:

-14nm 4.0tf+ Gpu

- 2.2ghz+ jaguar eight core processor.

- 8GB DDR4 2400mhz with 64MB esram

LMFAO... They're going to DOUBLE the eSRAM??? That would make the Xbone 1.5 nearly as large as my tower PC. It would also draw heat like a jet engine. Also, an SoC of that size would have disastrous yields on a low-distance node fabs.

The Xbone 1.5 will only have slight upclocks. Don't expect anything else. I predict 1.5-1.7 TF performance in total.

The PS4.5 will have larger upclocks, double the CUs, and the polaris architecture. I expect 4.2-4.5 TF performance. The gap will be enormous.

Edit: Prominent Neogaf insider and developer Matt said this in response to another user's question about the Xbone 1.5 bring stronger than the PS4.5: "Nah, I don't."

For PS4K, 36 CU at 911Mhz yields 4.198 TFLOPS.

Avatar image for notafanboy
NotAFanboy

573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 NotAFanboy
Member since 2015 • 573 Posts

@ronvalencia said:
@notafanboy said:

LOL... Is this like 2012 - early 2013 where Xbone was supposed to be a "monster" with a 10 TF GPU and lemmings were saying Microsoft is so smart?

Xbox One has a larger SoC with about half of it spent on 32 MB ESRAM. If Xbox One followed PS4's model, it would have a GCN solution with 28 CU.

@notafanboy said:

Seeing some of the predictions by lemmings is so hilarious.

Here's 1 gem from a lemming from Neogaf:

-14nm 4.0tf+ Gpu

- 2.2ghz+ jaguar eight core processor.

- 8GB DDR4 2400mhz with 64MB esram

LMFAO... They're going to DOUBLE the eSRAM??? That would make the Xbone 1.5 nearly as large as my tower PC. It would also draw heat like a jet engine. Also, an SoC of that size would have disastrous yields on a low-distance node fabs.

The Xbone 1.5 will only have slight upclocks. Don't expect anything else. I predict 1.5-1.7 TF performance in total.

The PS4.5 will have larger upclocks, double the CUs, and the polaris architecture. I expect 4.2-4.5 TF performance. The gap will be enormous.

Edit: Prominent Neogaf insider and developer Matt said this in response to another user's question about the Xbone 1.5 bring stronger than the PS4.5: "Nah, I don't."

For PS4K, 36 CU at 911Mhz yields 4.198 TFLOPS.

You're forgetting the flops from the CPU.

Avatar image for Pedro
Pedro

73969

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 72

User Lists: 0

#31  Edited By Pedro
Member since 2002 • 73969 Posts

@notafanboy said:

Seeing some of the predictions by lemmings is so hilarious.

Here's 1 gem from a lemming from Neogaf:

-14nm 4.0tf+ Gpu

- 2.2ghz+ jaguar eight core processor.

- 8GB DDR4 2400mhz with 64MB esram

LMFAO... They're going to DOUBLE the eSRAM??? That would make the Xbone 1.5 nearly as large as my tower PC. It would also draw heat like a jet engine. Also, an SoC of that size would have disastrous yields on a low-distance node fabs.

The Xbone 1.5 will only have slight upclocks. Don't expect anything else. I predict 1.5-1.7 TF performance in total.

The PS4.5 will have larger upclocks, double the CUs, and the polaris architecture. I expect 4.2-4.5 TF performance. The gap will be enormous.

Edit: Prominent Neogaf insider and developer Matt said this in response to another user's question about the Xbone 1.5 bring stronger than the PS4.5: "Nah, I don't."

Or virtually allocate "ESRAM" in GDDR5 for backward compatibility.

Avatar image for notafanboy
NotAFanboy

573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32  Edited By NotAFanboy
Member since 2015 • 573 Posts

@Pedro said:
@notafanboy said:

Seeing some of the predictions by lemmings is so hilarious.

Here's 1 gem from a lemming from Neogaf:

-14nm 4.0tf+ Gpu

- 2.2ghz+ jaguar eight core processor.

- 8GB DDR4 2400mhz with 64MB esram

LMFAO... They're going to DOUBLE the eSRAM??? That would make the Xbone 1.5 nearly as large as my tower PC. It would also draw heat like a jet engine. Also, an SoC of that size would have disastrous yields on a low-distance node fabs.

The Xbone 1.5 will only have slight upclocks. Don't expect anything else. I predict 1.5-1.7 TF performance in total.

The PS4.5 will have larger upclocks, double the CUs, and the polaris architecture. I expect 4.2-4.5 TF performance. The gap will be enormous.

Edit: Prominent Neogaf insider and developer Matt said this in response to another user's question about the Xbone 1.5 bring stronger than the PS4.5: "Nah, I don't."

Or virtually allocate "ESRAM" in GDDR5 for backward compatibility.

Possible theory, but considering there are no spec leaks for the xbone 1.5, I'm assuming Microsoft is WAY behind in development.

Maybe they're having issues with compatibility.

Too bad MS doesn't have anyone like Cerny. I bet the Xbone 1.5 would be done by now and devkits sent already.

Avatar image for Pedro
Pedro

73969

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 72

User Lists: 0

#33  Edited By Pedro
Member since 2002 • 73969 Posts

@notafanboy said:
@Pedro said:

Or virtually allocate "ESRAM" in GDDR5 for backward compatibility.

Possible theory, but considering there are no spec leaks for the xbone 1.5, I'm assuming Microsoft is WAY behind in development.

Maybe they're having issues with compatibility.

Too bad MS doesn't have anyone like Cerny. I bet the Xbone 1.5 would be done by now and devkits sent already.

More like you wish they were behind in development and you wish they would not virtualize the memory because your point HEAVILY relies on it. ESRAM existed purely because of their choice to use DDR3. They most likely would not be repeating that. But then again. Besides, why would they need a new devkit for their next system? Its going to be the same platform and fully BC.

Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#34  Edited By ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts

@notafanboy said:
@Pedro said:
@notafanboy said:

Seeing some of the predictions by lemmings is so hilarious.

Here's 1 gem from a lemming from Neogaf:

-14nm 4.0tf+ Gpu

- 2.2ghz+ jaguar eight core processor.

- 8GB DDR4 2400mhz with 64MB esram

LMFAO... They're going to DOUBLE the eSRAM??? That would make the Xbone 1.5 nearly as large as my tower PC. It would also draw heat like a jet engine. Also, an SoC of that size would have disastrous yields on a low-distance node fabs.

The Xbone 1.5 will only have slight upclocks. Don't expect anything else. I predict 1.5-1.7 TF performance in total.

The PS4.5 will have larger upclocks, double the CUs, and the polaris architecture. I expect 4.2-4.5 TF performance. The gap will be enormous.

Edit: Prominent Neogaf insider and developer Matt said this in response to another user's question about the Xbone 1.5 bring stronger than the PS4.5: "Nah, I don't."

Or virtually allocate "ESRAM" in GDDR5 for backward compatibility.

Possible theory, but considering there are no spec leaks for the xbone 1.5, I'm assuming Microsoft is WAY behind in development.

Maybe they're having issues with compatibility.

Too bad MS doesn't have anyone like Cerny. I bet the Xbone 1.5 would be done by now and devkits sent already.

Note that Apple is also shifting to Polaris. http://macdailynews.com/2016/04/19/apple-to-adopt-amds-new-polaris-graphics-chips-in-next-gen-macs/

iMac = Polaris 10.

MacBook Pro = Polaris 11.

Avatar image for notafanboy
NotAFanboy

573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35  Edited By NotAFanboy
Member since 2015 • 573 Posts

@Pedro said:
@notafanboy said:
@Pedro said:

Or virtually allocate "ESRAM" in GDDR5 for backward compatibility.

Possible theory, but considering there are no spec leaks for the xbone 1.5, I'm assuming Microsoft is WAY behind in development.

Maybe they're having issues with compatibility.

Too bad MS doesn't have anyone like Cerny. I bet the Xbone 1.5 would be done by now and devkits sent already.

More like you wish they were behind in development and you wish they would not virtualize the memory because your point HEAVILY relies on it. ESRAM existed purely because of their choice to use DDR3. They most likely would not be repeating that. But then again. Besides, why would they need a new devkit for their next system? Its going to be the same platform and fully BC.

Because devkits are needed to develop for that platform.

SONY has already sent out devkits for 4.5.

Also, you can't just stuff in a completely different architecture and emulate it. Why do you think the Xbone plays 360 games like dogcrap?

Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#36  Edited By ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts

@notafanboy said:
@Pedro said:
@notafanboy said:
@Pedro said:

Or virtually allocate "ESRAM" in GDDR5 for backward compatibility.

Possible theory, but considering there are no spec leaks for the xbone 1.5, I'm assuming Microsoft is WAY behind in development.

Maybe they're having issues with compatibility.

Too bad MS doesn't have anyone like Cerny. I bet the Xbone 1.5 would be done by now and devkits sent already.

More like you wish they were behind in development and you wish they would not virtualize the memory because your point HEAVILY relies on it. ESRAM existed purely because of their choice to use DDR3. They most likely would not be repeating that. But then again. Besides, why would they need a new devkit for their next system? Its going to be the same platform and fully BC.

Because devkits are needed to develop for that platform.

SONY has already sent out devkits for 4.5.

Also, you can't just stuff in a completely different architecture and emulate it. Why do you think the Xbone plays 360 games like dogcrap?

Xbox One has a different CPU ISA than Xbox 360 i.e. it's PowerPC vs X86-64. CPU instruction translation has a large overhead.

Xbox One's ESRAM usage is abstracted by lightweight APIs i.e. the API calls can be remapped into GDDR5 or HBM locations.

@notafanboy said:

You're forgetting the flops from the CPU.

CPU's FLOPS contribution is minor and it's different from GPU's FLOPS.

Avatar image for Pedro
Pedro

73969

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 72

User Lists: 0

#37 Pedro
Member since 2002 • 73969 Posts

@notafanboy said:
@Pedro said:
@notafanboy said:
@Pedro said:

Or virtually allocate "ESRAM" in GDDR5 for backward compatibility.

Possible theory, but considering there are no spec leaks for the xbone 1.5, I'm assuming Microsoft is WAY behind in development.

Maybe they're having issues with compatibility.

Too bad MS doesn't have anyone like Cerny. I bet the Xbone 1.5 would be done by now and devkits sent already.

More like you wish they were behind in development and you wish they would not virtualize the memory because your point HEAVILY relies on it. ESRAM existed purely because of their choice to use DDR3. They most likely would not be repeating that. But then again. Besides, why would they need a new devkit for their next system? Its going to be the same platform and fully BC.

Because devkits are needed to develop for that platform.

SONY has already sent out devkits for 4.5.

Also, you can't just stuff in a completely different architecture and emulate it. Why do you think the Xbone plays 360 games like dogcrap?

Memory mapping is has little to do with architecture. I can make my DDR4 RAM pretend to be a hard-drive. Older computer relied on virtual memory in which the hard-drive served as a backup for lack of hard memory. This is not earth shattering technology. I don't see any reason why the ESRAM cannot be simply be allocated on GDDR5. Xbox One games will be oblivious to this change. All that matters is that when it calls this memory location it gets what it wants.

Avatar image for stereointegrity
stereointegrity

12151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 stereointegrity
Member since 2007 • 12151 Posts

if ms releases a new xbox its going to be a whole new one. not an incremental upgrade.

Avatar image for daniel_su123
Daniel_Su123

1103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39  Edited By Daniel_Su123
Member since 2015 • 1103 Posts

So basically it's what I was talking about in the thread about Surface and Xbox.

PC Spec Xbox = Surface Pro 4

Xbox One Slim = Surface 3

But I think it's likely that the PC spec Xbox will have a PC based Windows 10 OS on it, but not true Win 10 PC as Xbox games use multiple OSes

So at least $2000 for a Xbox Gaming PC

Avatar image for sukraj
sukraj

27859

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#40 sukraj
Member since 2008 • 27859 Posts

I'm so pumped up by all these rumors, NOT

Avatar image for ten_pints
Ten_Pints

4072

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#41 Ten_Pints
Member since 2014 • 4072 Posts

I think they should call this new console "Xbox Cloud", after all they did promise the power of the cloud.

Avatar image for l0ngshot
L0ngshot

516

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 5

#42 L0ngshot
Member since 2014 • 516 Posts

Reports today have been saying MS has been testing new xbox one that can rival good gaming pc.

No, it won't.

Avatar image for casharmy
casharmy

9388

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43  Edited By casharmy
Member since 2011 • 9388 Posts

@stereointegrity said:

if ms releases a new xbox its going to be a whole new one. not an incremental upgrade.

Meaning xbox one owners are screwed unlike with PS4k. Rejoice!

What happened to everyone caring about early adopters like they were with PS4k news? Ahh so none of those people matter now I guess, it's MS and all...

Avatar image for Shewgenja
Shewgenja

21456

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#44 Shewgenja
Member since 2009 • 21456 Posts

@notafanboy: lmfao! Oh man, I forgot about those rumors. Lemmings thought the new Xbox was going to be their Battlestar Galactica lmfao!

Avatar image for darkangel115
darkangel115

4562

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#45 darkangel115
Member since 2013 • 4562 Posts

prototypes are fine. it takes time to make consoles. as long as the next version is released around 2018-2020 I'm good with it. But if one releases this year, I'll have no interest in it