RFOM Is Very Impressive For A Next Gen Game.....................................

http://www.gametrailers.com/player.php?id=18112&type=mov&pl=game

In this interview, they talk to one of insomniac devs and he tells them that RFOM was the first project they ever made for the ps3 that uses shaders and stuff like a pc and xbox 360 does, and for a team that has never worked on a pc game or xbox 360 related to pc developing, for a small team like insomniac to make a great game like they have with RFOM, and rush it a little just to make the launch, u have to be impressed.

Example to John Carmack and a few other devs saying it is too hard to dev ps3 games, is no excuse, because if this small company can do it with there first time ever working with this type of hardware, where as most of the devs already have expirience with this type of hardware, and still complain, shows me that alot of them must do half ass work and is why alot of there games are not hits like games coming out of insomniac which is not even a big company at all, but very hard working and no half ass work coming from this team. Look for the next RFOM to be a big hit, and I already know Ratchet and Clank is gonna be a smash hit for the PS3. Till den enjoy and game on and tell me what your thoughts on this interview is. :)

Gears of War is the first time Epic has worked on the 360 :|

I felt RFOM is still a graphically inferior game to the other blockbuster next-gen heavyweights like Gears of War and the likes of GRAW, but the sheer inventiveness of Resistance (which is unusual, seeing as its content just slams sci-fi and WW2 shooters into one) is what sets it apart.  It's not that Insomniac works harder than other developers, but they managed to find the right blend of ideas and the right mix of gameplay elements to make the game a first-rate FPS.

If their work is so half-assed, why dont you show them how to do it? Do you know what it takes to make a game engine? Do you even know how to read a single line of code?XaosII

No I dont but if devs are gonna sit there and argue how hard it is that are suppose to be pro's in this field, and see noobs like insomniac come with a hit like RFOM, it has to just make u feel like wow, I am a known dev, and I am here arguing how hard it is to make a game for the ps3 and here comes some devs who never ever worked on a pc before or xbox 360 which is supposingly easyer to dev for, and make a stellar game on a hardware that is suppose to be hard to make games, just shows how lack these third party devs are.

"and rush it a little just to make the launch". Sorry but ps3 was delayed many many months, no game slated for launch had to rush anything.CPM_basic

Oh so you think RFoM was ready for march 2006? Well no. They finished the game not too long before launch.

i think what most people don't understand (for those who haven't played it) is that RFOM is just as good if not better then the Halo series. It was scored lower because Halo came first. For a next-gen game, it is nothing new, but if this came out last year on ps2, it would have killed.

on and please, COD2 is the new medal of honor for 10 year olds. That series is done (good on PC tho) 

Gears of War is the first time Epic has worked on the 360 :|

 

thirstychainsaw

Yeah but the xbox 360 is said to be a mirror of a pc, and unreal has made games for pc's for how long, and is easy to make games for the xbox 360 since its hardware is made like a pc, so it is just like making a pc game for them, only thing is the xbox 360 is limited to things the pc can be enhanced.

Well I can believe it, Resistance wasn't very impressive graphically.

[QUOTE="XaosII"]If their work is so half-assed, why dont you show them how to do it? Do you know what it takes to make a game engine? Do you even know how to read a single line of code?squallff8_fan

No I dont but if devs are gonna sit there and argue how hard it is that are suppose to be pro's in this field, and see noobs like insomniac come with a hit like RFOM, it has to just make u feel like wow, I am a known dev, and I am here arguing how hard it is to make a game for the ps3 and here comes some devs who never ever worked on a pc before or xbox 360 which is supposingly easyer to dev for, and make a stellar game on a hardware that is suppose to be hard to make games, just shows how lack these third party devs are.

And the devs that have argued about it, including John Carmack, are all developing games for the PS3. Its not a crime for a developer to give his honest opinion about the system hes developing - especially if they have the devkits for the system in question.

If you really want to shut me up, i'd love to see a quote from a game programmer that is happy about the PS3. 

Poor little Insomniac, the little engine that could...:?

[QUOTE="squallff8_fan"]

[QUOTE="XaosII"]If their work is so half-assed, why dont you show them how to do it? Do you know what it takes to make a game engine? Do you even know how to read a single line of code?XaosII

No I dont but if devs are gonna sit there and argue how hard it is that are suppose to be pro's in this field, and see noobs like insomniac come with a hit like RFOM, it has to just make u feel like wow, I am a known dev, and I am here arguing how hard it is to make a game for the ps3 and here comes some devs who never ever worked on a pc before or xbox 360 which is supposingly easyer to dev for, and make a stellar game on a hardware that is suppose to be hard to make games, just shows how lack these third party devs are.

And the devs that have argued about it, including John Carmack, are all developing games for the PS3. Its not a crime for a developer to give his honest opinion about the system hes developing - especially if they have the devkits for the system in question.

If you really want to shut me up, i'd love to see a quote from a game programmer that is happy about the PS3. 

Insomniac and Team Ninja and Ninja Theory, are a few that think its an amazing hardware, and warhawk creator. :)

it's a good game, but not great in the graphics departementdanneswegman

Im not talking just about the graphics, im talking about the all around game and fun replay, which is a blast online if u own the game, u will see soo many people online playing this game.

which is a blast online if u own the game, u will see soo many people online playing this game.squallff8_fan

 Looks like it's the first online game for cows

Man only fanboys will say this game is not good, but anyone who actually owns a ps3 and RFOM will tell u, that this game is one hell of a game, and coming from Insomniac that are not known for games like this, is very impressive. squallff8_fan

exactly. 

Gears of War is the first time Epic has worked on the 360 :|

 

thirstychainsaw

http://www.gametrailers.com/player.php?id=18112&type=mov&pl=game

In this interview, they talk to one of insomniac devs and he tells them that RFOM was the first project they ever made for the ps3 that uses shaders and stuff like a pc and xbox 360 does, and for a team that has never worked on a pc game or xbox 360 related to pc developing, for a small team like insomniac to make a great game like they have with RFOM, and rush it a little just to make the launch, u have to be impressed.

Example to John Carmack and a few other devs saying it is too hard to dev ps3 games, is no excuse, because if this small company can do it with there first time ever working with this type of hardware, where as most of the devs already have expirience with this type of hardware, and still complain, shows me that alot of them must do half ass work and is why alot of there games are not hits like games coming out of insomniac which is not even a big company at all, but very hard working and no half ass work coming from this team. Look for the next RFOM to be a big hit, and I already know Ratchet and Clank is gonna be a smash hit for the PS3. Till den enjoy and game on and tell me what your thoughts on this interview is. :)

squallff8_fan

These are impressive, in my opinion, not Gears but impressive nonetheless

[QUOTE="danneswegman"]it's a good game, but not great in the graphics departementsquallff8_fan

Im not talking just about the graphics, im talking about the all around game and fun replay, which is a blast online if u own the game, u will see soo many people online playing this game.

not really.. didn't even look as good as CoD2Huxley_00

Gears of War is the first time Epic has worked on the 360 :|

 

thirstychainsaw

Indeed !!!

i think what most people don't understand (for those who haven't played it) is that RFOM is just as good if not better then the Halo series. It was scored lower because Halo came first. For a next-gen game, it is nothing new, but if this came out last year on ps2, it would have killed.

on and please, COD2 is the new medal of honor for 10 year olds. That series is done (good on PC tho)

Koalakommander

Umm...no. Just no. Halo is one of the best games eer made and RFOM is one of the worst shotoers ever made. The only reason is scored as hig has it did is cause its sony first oparty. The same game on xbox woulda gotten 6.5 or lower.  

[QUOTE="XaosII"]If their work is so half-assed, why dont you show them how to do it? Do you know what it takes to make a game engine? Do you even know how to read a single line of code?squallff8_fan

No I dont but if devs are gonna sit there and argue how hard it is that are suppose to be pro's in this field, and see noobs like insomniac come with a hit like RFOM, it has to just make u feel like wow, I am a known dev, and I am here arguing how hard it is to make a game for the ps3 and here comes some devs who never ever worked on a pc before or xbox 360 which is supposingly easyer to dev for, and make a stellar game on a hardware that is suppose to be hard to make games, just shows how lack these third party devs are.

If anything, RFOM should have stuck to the Unreal engine.-Antisocial-

[QUOTE="XaosII"][QUOTE="squallff8_fan"]

[QUOTE="XaosII"]If their work is so half-assed, why dont you show them how to do it? Do you know what it takes to make a game engine? Do you even know how to read a single line of code?squallff8_fan

No I dont but if devs are gonna sit there and argue how hard it is that are suppose to be pro's in this field, and see noobs like insomniac come with a hit like RFOM, it has to just make u feel like wow, I am a known dev, and I am here arguing how hard it is to make a game for the ps3 and here comes some devs who never ever worked on a pc before or xbox 360 which is supposingly easyer to dev for, and make a stellar game on a hardware that is suppose to be hard to make games, just shows how lack these third party devs are.

And the devs that have argued about it, including John Carmack, are all developing games for the PS3. Its not a crime for a developer to give his honest opinion about the system hes developing - especially if they have the devkits for the system in question.

If you really want to shut me up, i'd love to see a quote from a game programmer that is happy about the PS3.

Insomniac and Team Ninja and Ninja Theory, are a few that think its an amazing hardware, and warhawk creator. :)

[QUOTE="squallff8_fan"]

[QUOTE="XaosII"]If their work is so half-assed, why dont you show them how to do it? Do you know what it takes to make a game engine? Do you even know how to read a single line of code?coreygames

No I dont but if devs are gonna sit there and argue how hard it is that are suppose to be pro's in this field, and see noobs like insomniac come with a hit like RFOM, it has to just make u feel like wow, I am a known dev, and I am here arguing how hard it is to make a game for the ps3 and here comes some devs who never ever worked on a pc before or xbox 360 which is supposingly easyer to dev for, and make a stellar game on a hardware that is suppose to be hard to make games, just shows how lack these third party devs are.

"and rush it a little just to make the launch". Sorry but ps3 was delayed many many months, no game slated for launch had to rush anything.CPM_basic

Thank you, Thank you, Thank you once again....! Finally someone with common sense without Sony fanboy goggles touches on the subject Ive been saying to cows since the PS3 launch. There is no excuse for the PS3 to have a lackluster lineup because the system was due to launch Spring 06, not Nov 06. Sony along with all third party devs should have had a stellar lineup ready for  the PS3 launch because they had plenty of time to work out the bugs and even add a lil polish to their games.....but of course we all know that didnt happen!

Game On... 

[QUOTE="CPM_basic"]"and rush it a little just to make the launch". Sorry but ps3 was delayed many many months, no game slated for launch had to rush anything.FatalDomain

Thank you, Thank you, Thank you once again....! Finally someone with common sense without Sony fanboy goggles touches on the subject Ive been saying to cows since the PS3 launch. There is no excuse for the PS3 to have a lackluster lineup because the system was due to launch Spring 06, not Nov 06. Sony along with all third party devs should have had a stellar lineup ready for the PS3 launch because they had plenty of time to work out the bugs and even add a lil polish to their games.....but of course we all know that didnt happen!

Game On...

[QUOTE="FatalDomain"]

[QUOTE="CPM_basic"]"and rush it a little just to make the launch". Sorry but ps3 was delayed many many months, no game slated for launch had to rush anything.ChopperDave1

Thank you, Thank you, Thank you once again....! Finally someone with common sense without Sony fanboy goggles touches on the subject Ive been saying to cows since the PS3 launch. There is no excuse for the PS3 to have a lackluster lineup because the system was due to launch Spring 06, not Nov 06. Sony along with all third party devs should have had a stellar lineup ready for the PS3 launch because they had plenty of time to work out the bugs and even add a lil polish to their games.....but of course we all know that didnt happen!

Game On...

Well that was 100% Sony's fault for not getting dev kits out in a timely manner. But for those devs who did receive their kits and producted a launch title, the games available were complete garbage....aside from Resistance which was good but not a system seller...

Game On....