Rockstar isnt a lazy dev. PS3 will never run an open world game like 360.

The 360 is balanced with more memory and a better graphics card period. The embedded 10meg of edram on the board is why 360 can run 2xAA in games like red dead redemption. As far as shadows and particle effects go...thats the graphics card, if you think RSX is better then have fun doing so. And lastly memory allocation is far superior on the 360, not partitioned like the PS3 is. I had to post this cuz i was so sick of hearing lazy developers. The PS3 is a nightmare people. And yes you can achieve great graphics in a small environment game on an exclusive 100 million dollar budget type of game...god of war 3 isnt like Fallout people...and yes New Vegas will crush on the 360 too, and that is next gen...Red Dead, Fallout type games which are not for PS3...sorry.

Why do people still post like its 2006?

So you're a developer?

Have first hand experience developing for PS3 and 360?

Have even a somewhat working knowledge of how each system works?

Why do people still post like its 2006?

Ragnarok1051

The 360 is balanced with more memory and a better graphics card period. The embedded 10meg of edram on the board is why 360 can run 2xAA in games like red dead redemption. As far as shadows and particle effects go...thats the graphics card, if you think RSX is better then have fun doing so. And lastly memory allocation is far superior on the 360, not partitioned like the PS3 is. I had to post this cuz i was so sick of hearing lazy developers. The PS3 is a nightmare people. And yes you can achieve great graphics in a small environment game on an exclusive 100 million dollar budget type of game...god of war 3 isnt like Fallout people...and yes New Vegas will crush on the 360 too, and that is next gen...Red Dead, Fallout type games which are not for PS3...sorry.

Shufflecuff

So you're a developer?

Have first hand experience developing for PS3 and 360?

Have even a somewhat working knowledge of how each system works?

lundy86_4

And TC: RDR cost 100m $, Uncharted 2 for example 20m $.

Infamous looked and played pretty damn good for an open world game.

Soooooo, in short: lol.

InFamous says hi.

RDR on PS3 scored the same as it did on 360. The game is great on the PS3 too, just accept it.

[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

So you're a developer?

Have first hand experience developing for PS3 and 360?

Have even a somewhat working knowledge of how each system works?

sayonara89

Me thinks so too. I was hoping TC would reply, so they could at least prove some of what they spew.

What about Infamous?

Fail thread is fail.

Sure the 360 is slightly better version of RDR, but its not a huge difference.

I would never call Rockstar lazy. We'll see what happens with the Agent.

The PS3 is a nightmare people. And yes you can achieve great graphics in a small environment game on an exclusive 100 million dollar budget type of game...Shufflecuff

What about Infamous?

Fail thread is fail.

Sure the 360 is slightly better version of RDR, but its not a huge difference.

kozzy1234

but it's noticeable...

Head to Head: I really don't see what you're talking about.

It looks like it runs fine to me.

Lens of Truth

Lol no,they're just lazy.Irishyo

[QUOTE="kozzy1234"]

What about Infamous?

Fail thread is fail.

Sure the 360 is slightly better version of RDR, but its not a huge difference.

Sev_the_gamer

but it's noticeable...

Barely noticable

[QUOTE="kozzy1234"]

What about Infamous?

Fail thread is fail.

Sure the 360 is slightly better version of RDR, but its not a huge difference.

Sev_the_gamer

but it's noticeable...

ohh god not another "EXPERT"

ohh god not another "EXPERT"

gugler990

Infamous looked and played pretty damn good for an open world game.

Soooooo, in short: lol.

Chutebox

.....i think i need another break from system wars.lawlessx

[QUOTE="Chutebox"]

Infamous looked and played pretty damn good for an open world game.

Soooooo, in short: lol.

Anjunaddict

Same engine as GTA4. So the devs have had prior practice with the PS3.

What about Infamous?

Fail thread is fail.

Sure the 360 is slightly better version of RDR, but its not a huge difference.

kozzy1234

[QUOTE="Chutebox"]

Infamous looked and played pretty damn good for an open world game.

Soooooo, in short: lol.

Anjunaddict

graphically InFamous was below average. I don't think that was due to the power of the PS3 though. Most likely due to the ps3 api's and development tools.

[QUOTE="Irishyo"]Lol no,they're just lazy.sayonara89

[QUOTE="Chutebox"]

Infamous looked and played pretty damn good for an open world game.

Soooooo, in short: lol.

Anjunaddict

[QUOTE="Anjunaddict"][QUOTE="Chutebox"]

Infamous looked and played pretty damn good for an open world game.

Soooooo, in short: lol.

Zero_epyon

[QUOTE="Anjunaddict"][QUOTE="Chutebox"]

Infamous looked and played pretty damn good for an open world game.

Soooooo, in short: lol.

Chutebox

To the TC. If I had an ignore button you would be the first to be on it. Eventually you will eat your own words. Besides if you are talking about RDR then you are mistaken my friend. They both look almost exactly the same and as for pop ins. That can be fixed with a simple patch seeing how the game was evidently rushed at the end. Besides if you want proof that the ps3 can do better graphics, run at a butter smooth frame rate, and have better textures and etc than any 360 game then play infamous. Dude it blows away any open world game in a lot of areas. So your argument is moot and sooooo 2006.

Why do people still post like its 2006?

Ragnarok1051

Because even today, PS3 harwdareshows how far behind it is from 360 one

We will never see a game like Alan Wake on PS3, or like Fable 3 or RDR (in 720p) etc

Infamous has no draw distance. And plenty o pop in...no loading ill give it that but it would have double the draw distance and less pop in on 360. Again, the PS3 will never run an open world game like 360...and of course PC is vastly superior than both for openworld.

Infamous has no draw distance. And plenty o pop in...no loading ill give it that but it would have double the draw distance and less pop in on 360. Again, the PS3 will never run an open world game like 360...and of course PC is vastly superior than both for openworld.

Shufflecuff

I wouldn't say RS is lazy, but they obviously have a bit more experience with the 360.

Infamous runs very smoothly. and i'm betting the jaggies and draw distance will be much improved in the sequel

[QUOTE="Ragnarok1051"]

Why do people still post like its 2006?

theseekar

Because even today, PS3 harwdareshows how far behind it is from 360 one

We will never see a game like Alan Wake on PS3, or like Fable 3 or RDR (in 720p) etc

[QUOTE="Ragnarok1051"]

Why do people still post like its 2006?

theseekar

Because even today, PS3 harwdareshows how far behind it is from 360 one

We will never see a game like Alan Wake on PS3, or like Fable 3 or RDR (in 720p) etc

Yea I mean thats why 360 always wins them graphic or even tencial awards.....oh wait.