sales=potential for better 3rd party

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for darth-pyschosis
darth-pyschosis

9322

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 darth-pyschosis
Member since 2006 • 9322 Posts
it does. every console that sells well gets the best support, but ppl have been saying for a while that the Wii wont be the same case, devs much rather make a cheap buck, no hardcore games am i right? then why is monster hunter 3 (popular online RPG), dragon quest 10 (need i say more RPG fans?), fatal frame IV (rated high in JP waiting for translation), tales of smyphonia dawn of the new world, tales of ten, arc rise fantasia, madworld, de blob, valhalla knights: elder saga, tenchu, zack & wiki, final fantasy fables, final fantasy my life as a king, final fantasy crystal bearers, little kings story, tatsunko vs capcom (may not make it stateside but its origin alone is awesome), fragile, cursed mountain, mushroom men, deadley creatures, conduit, why are these on Wii if the sales havent forced 3rd parties to make a more compelling product? theyre bringing alot of new IPs, in varying genres (adventure, RTS, RPGs, action) i cant imagine you're like OMG i must have Wii now but why on earth would after its sales, and big IPs like MH, FF, DQ10 jumped to Wii, why would it stop there? and how do u feel knowing that also, due to studio closures these games were canned, but at one point THQ was making an original red faction for Wii, saints row, even FR was designing a wii TS4, (remember thq had to close those studios and we know FR) so these Wii games just appeared for no reason? devs flipped a coin? or was it sales that helped give devs that extra push to make the jump? discuss
Avatar image for Skittles_McGee
Skittles_McGee

9136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Skittles_McGee
Member since 2008 • 9136 Posts
You don't need fanboy goggles to look at the Wii's library and be disappointed.
Avatar image for SeanDiff
SeanDiff

933

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#3 SeanDiff
Member since 2007 • 933 Posts

http://www.gamespot.com/pages/forums/show_msgs.php?topic_id=26767819&tag=topics;title

I'd link but Gamespot won't let me post when I do.

Avatar image for 110million
110million

14910

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#4 110million
Member since 2008 • 14910 Posts
The one thing in common between Monster Hunter and Dragon Quest is that both seem to come to the current highest selling platform, you can argue the DS and whatnot, but whatever. Also, don't list off every single game you can think of, several of those are not good.
Avatar image for yoshi_64
yoshi_64

25261

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#5 yoshi_64
Member since 2003 • 25261 Posts
More support is nice, but it seems that many upon many publishers don't see hardcore games a part of the Wii market. It's been told numerous times already from some devs who are having hard to get their games like the game Winter from N-space which won't be released yet because publishers don't see it as a good thing for the market cause there's no hardcore market, Conduit struggled with this. Something tells me there were many other games too..
Avatar image for Vitro-Vivo
Vitro-Vivo

133

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Vitro-Vivo
Member since 2009 • 133 Posts
"Just wait."
Avatar image for darth-pyschosis
darth-pyschosis

9322

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 darth-pyschosis
Member since 2006 • 9322 Posts
You don't need fanboy goggles to look at the Wii's library and be disappointed.Skittles_McGee
really? i'm a fanboy? sorry you get that impression. but if you'd like to ignore the post, whether sales helped wii get better 3rd party support and where it will end up, then plz keep dissing the platform in your post? i suppose my topic is asking for it, but i'd like to have a discussion
Avatar image for darth-pyschosis
darth-pyschosis

9322

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 darth-pyschosis
Member since 2006 • 9322 Posts
[QUOTE="110million"]The one thing in common between Monster Hunter and Dragon Quest is that both seem to come to the current highest selling platform, you can argue the DS and whatnot, but whatever. Also, don't list off every single game you can think of, several of those are not good.

well alot arent out, some are from proven franchises, and the others like de blob are decently rated (if you dont play 7's and 8's games im sorry for you) i was listing to prove a point, that big IPs are going to Wii in numbers, and some devs are taking risks with existing IPs or new ones. (like square) so, unless all those games have a average score of 5, or you've beaten the unreleased ones, then dont say they arent very good coz you dont know (im sure tales yeah that got some 6's OHHH! thats bad! that will kill me!)
Avatar image for heretrix
heretrix

37881

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#9 heretrix
Member since 2004 • 37881 Posts
The Wii isn't an interesting platform at all. It focuses on the mundane and often fails to have any titiles with any real substance. Some games are fun but most lack any kind of depth.
Avatar image for shadowcat2576
shadowcat2576

908

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#10 shadowcat2576
Member since 2006 • 908 Posts

I think the potential is always there, and there have certainly been some great announcements and support so far.

Unfortunately, it looks like we're in the "Gen of the Multiplat" right now which isn't doing the Wii a lot of favors. Personally, as an old-time gamer, I remember the glory days of the NES, SMS, SNES and Genesis where consoles lived and died by their exclusives. You really needed to own all the systems to get the best of all the game back then.

Avatar image for Keep-the-Faith
Keep-the-Faith

841

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 Keep-the-Faith
Member since 2009 • 841 Posts

That means nothing to a fanboy.

To a fanboy sales = bragging rights, saying mine is better then yours in the real world.

Every fanboy cares about sales, even those who downplay them.

Avatar image for stvee101
stvee101

2953

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 stvee101
Member since 2006 • 2953 Posts

Now the Wii is the "just wait" system.

2009 does look more promising for the Wii,but we're well over two years into it's life-cycle and many people would struggle to name more than a handful of high-quality 3rd party titles for the system.That's despite it selling at record levels ever since release.

Avatar image for wulfshelmut
wulfshelmut

77

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 wulfshelmut
Member since 2009 • 77 Posts

The Wii is accused of having shovelware but so did the ps2 have tons of shovel ware. Especially JRPGs. Theres tons of those horrible things on the ps2. I see the shovelware argument mostly used my sony and MS fanboys. I dont own a wii nor am I a nintendo fanboy but I do recognize the wiis success. Its outsold both "next gen" systems. Thats saying alot.

Avatar image for Ragnarok1051
Ragnarok1051

20238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 Ragnarok1051
Member since 2007 • 20238 Posts
Are you serious Valhalla Knights? Man you are really scraping the bottom of the barrel if you hype those games.
Avatar image for Ragnarok1051
Ragnarok1051

20238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 Ragnarok1051
Member since 2007 • 20238 Posts

The Wii is accused of having shovelware but so did the ps2 have tons of shovel ware. Especially JRPGs. Theres tons of those horrible things on the ps2. I see the shovelware argument mostly used my sony and MS fanboys. I dont own a wii nor am I a nintendo fanboy but I do recognize the wiis success. Its outsold both "next gen" systems. Thats saying alot.

wulfshelmut
The PS2 had a fantastic lineup to counter the crap.
Avatar image for wulfshelmut
wulfshelmut

77

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 wulfshelmut
Member since 2009 • 77 Posts
The ps2 did have alot of good games. But its expected that any system that sells very well will get its own share of stinker titles. But the wii has only been around for a little less then 3 yrs now. maybe better games will come later on.
Avatar image for Lemmywinks_360
Lemmywinks_360

1996

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 Lemmywinks_360
Member since 2007 • 1996 Posts

:lol: potential. How long have sheep been playing the "just wait" card? 2 years now? When are these games coming, looking at the 09 lineup it doesnt look

much better than the paltry 08 lineup. Only second rate devs are making second rate games for the wii.

  • rainbow studios- deadly creatures
  • high voltage studios- the conduit
  • deep silver- cursed mountan
These are terrible devs but now they are going to make great games for the wii. Right:roll:
Avatar image for InfinityMugen
InfinityMugen

3905

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#18 InfinityMugen
Member since 2007 • 3905 Posts
TC dont use logic here! Lets just pretend that we will always be stuck in 2008 and delude overselves to believing that the Wii's install base will never matter in the long run. With that being said, wouldnt you rather make a grafix king thread instead?
Avatar image for death919
death919

4724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 92

User Lists: 0

#19 death919
Member since 2004 • 4724 Posts
Tales of 10 will be amazing.
Avatar image for hakanakumono
hakanakumono

27455

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 hakanakumono
Member since 2008 • 27455 Posts
Sales mean more games produced for the system, they do not mean higher quality games or even IP. The wii has proved that develoeprs don't need to make any effort in making wii games for them to sell well (Carnival games has sold over a million copies after all).
Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#21 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
And yet the Wii gets the shaft anytime a company like Capcom wants to release their next big multiplatform title like RE5 and gets a shoddy port of a three-year old game instead.
Avatar image for Locke562
Locke562

7673

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 Locke562
Member since 2004 • 7673 Posts
But aren't Third Party SALES better on the PS3 and 360?
Avatar image for goblaa
goblaa

19304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#23 goblaa
Member since 2006 • 19304 Posts

More support is nice, but it seems that many upon many publishers don't see hardcore games a part of the Wii market. It's been told numerous times already from some devs who are having hard to get their games like the game Winter from N-space which won't be released yet because publishers don't see it as a good thing for the market cause there's no hardcore market, Conduit struggled with this. Something tells me there were many other games too..yoshi_64

That is the dead elephant in the room everyone is ignoring. The sole problem here is publishers. Publishers won't release traditional games for the wii because they feel there is no market for traditional games because no publishers are releasing traditional games for the wii.

The people who decide what games get made, and what games don't are PR departments, marketing departments, and bean counters. None of these people know anything about games.

Avatar image for Heydanbud92
Heydanbud92

4464

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#24 Heydanbud92
Member since 2007 • 4464 Posts

[QUOTE="yoshi_64"]More support is nice, but it seems that many upon many publishers don't see hardcore games a part of the Wii market. It's been told numerous times already from some devs who are having hard to get their games like the game Winter from N-space which won't be released yet because publishers don't see it as a good thing for the market cause there's no hardcore market, Conduit struggled with this. Something tells me there were many other games too..goblaa

That is the dead elephant in the room everyone is ignoring. The sole problem here is publishers. Publishers won't release traditional games for the wii because they feel there is no market for traditional games because no publishers are releasing traditional games for the wii.

The people who decide what games get made, and what games don't are PR departments, marketing departments, and bean counters. None of these people know anything about games.

Yes that's true, and it sucks. It's an unfortunate fact. I agree that that is part of the problem with Wii's library.

BUT Nintendo could be creating more development studios to bring us those kinds of games themselves, with all the mountains of money that they are making since they basically are the only ones doing really big numbers on their two platforms.

It seems they would rather put their money into marketing the few casual games that they have been making.

If they want to please us they should make more games like zelda and super mario etc. with all that money.

Avatar image for ActicEdge
ActicEdge

24492

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 ActicEdge
Member since 2008 • 24492 Posts
Unrealized potential is just a waste for everyone, that's all that is important.
Avatar image for Grinning_Demon
Grinning_Demon

1809

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#26 Grinning_Demon
Member since 2009 • 1809 Posts
And yet the Wii gets the shaft anytime a company like Capcom wants to release their next big multiplatform title like RE5 and gets a shoddy port of a three-year old game instead.foxhound_fox
Capcom already came out and said that Resident Evil 5 was being developed and funded before the Wii came out. They also said in a RE5 interview that they will bring RE again to the system when they have the resources to do it (when they finish RE5). They are doing MH3, SFIV and RE5 at the same time, Capcom isnt as big as people think, in fact they have to outsource most of their "smaller" projects to keep their internal team focused on those bigger ones.
Avatar image for goblaa
goblaa

19304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#27 goblaa
Member since 2006 • 19304 Posts

And yet the Wii gets the shaft anytime a company like Capcom wants to release their next big multiplatform title like RE5 and gets a shoddy port of a three-year old game instead.foxhound_fox

RE5 started development WAYYYYY before the wii was even known about...let alone its success.

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#28 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
RE5 started development WAYYYYY before the wii was even known about...let alone its success. goblaa

Given the size of the install base and potential sales, you would have thought they would have devoted resources to porting the game over the two years since the Wii came out and was a smash success.
Avatar image for Grinning_Demon
Grinning_Demon

1809

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#29 Grinning_Demon
Member since 2009 • 1809 Posts

[QUOTE="goblaa"]RE5 started development WAYYYYY before the wii was even known about...let alone its success. foxhound_fox

Given the size of the install base and potential sales, you would have thought they would have devoted resources to porting the game over the two years since the Wii came out and was a smash success.

What resources? The resident evil team (and alot of others) are all being used on RE5

Capcom wont outsource a main entry of their flagship franchise just like that

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#30 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
What resources? The resident evil team (and alot of others) are all being used on RE5

Capcom wont outsource a main entry of their flagship franchise just like that

Grinning_Demon

Given Chop Till You Drop, I would have thought capitalizing on the Wii's install base would have been top priority for such an important and mass-appeal game in the series. Here I thought game companies were about making money regardless of the quality they deliver.

The 360 and PS3 get Lost Planet, Dead Rising, Devil May Cry 4, Resident Evil 5, Street Fighter IV and Bionic Commando while the Wii gets ports of Okami, RE4, RE0 and a ****ty version of Dead Rising.
Avatar image for Heydanbud92
Heydanbud92

4464

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#31 Heydanbud92
Member since 2007 • 4464 Posts

[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"]And yet the Wii gets the shaft anytime a company like Capcom wants to release their next big multiplatform title like RE5 and gets a shoddy port of a three-year old game instead.goblaa

RE5 started development WAYYYYY before the wii was even known about...let alone its success.

Well if ps2 could get re4 then wii should get a, horribly gimped, version of re5 right?

Really, they've had plenty of time to react to Wiis success and hire some cheap dev. to do a sloppy port for Wii at least.

Avatar image for Heydanbud92
Heydanbud92

4464

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#32 Heydanbud92
Member since 2007 • 4464 Posts

[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"][QUOTE="goblaa"]RE5 started development WAYYYYY before the wii was even known about...let alone its success. Grinning_Demon


Given the size of the install base and potential sales, you would have thought they would have devoted resources to porting the game over the two years since the Wii came out and was a smash success.

What resources? The resident evil team (and alot of others) are all being used on RE5

Capcom wont outsource a main entry of their flagship franchise just like that

The resources that the Wii version would make if it were developed. That's how things work.

You know at least half a million are going to buy it even if it were a half-assed super-downgraded port.

I wouldn't be surprised if capcom actually did this after chop 'till the one zombie is dead.

Avatar image for Grinning_Demon
Grinning_Demon

1809

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#33 Grinning_Demon
Member since 2009 • 1809 Posts


Given Chop Till You Drop, I would have thought capitalizing on the Wii's install base would have been top priority for such an important and mass-appeal game in the series. foxhound_fox

RE5 had 300 people on it once so it could be finished in time, and as far as i know CtyD wasnt outsourced, the lack of available resources resulted in a safer project with a smaller team. The thing is, DR actually works in my favour, that game is a filler, something they made as soon as possible to capitalize on RE4Wii's success, and since the RE5/SFIV/MH trains where already at full steam this is what they ended up with. Companies dont say no to money, if there isnt a RE5 on the Wii its because they currently dont have the manpower to pull it off (and i'm not just pulling this out of my a**, i'm a member of Capcom Unity, i make Sven's life miserable for DR)

Here I thought game companies were about making money regardless of the quality they deliver.

The 360 and PS3 get Lost Planet, Dead Rising, Devil May Cry 4, Resident Evil 5, Street Fighter IV and Bionic Commando while the Wii gets ports of Okami, RE4, RE0 and a ****ty version of Dead Rising.foxhound_fox

And Monster Hunter 3, that you so conviniently forgot.

Like i said, all those trains left the station before the Wii came along, and you cant stop a train once its starts rolling (well MH3 on PS3 did lol)

Avatar image for Grinning_Demon
Grinning_Demon

1809

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#34 Grinning_Demon
Member since 2009 • 1809 Posts
You know at least half a million are going to buy it even if it were a half-assed super-downgraded port.

I wouldn't be surprised if capcom actually did this after chop 'till the one zombie is dead.

Heydanbud92

The resources i speak are manpower, not money. Capcom cant make RE5Wiis out of thin air, if they knew the Wii would be such a success and RE4Wii would end up selling more then 1.6 million games they would rethink their strategy, you can bet on that.

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#35 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
Like i said, all those trains left the station before the Wii came along, and you cant stop a train once its starts rolling (well MH3 on PS3 did lol)Grinning_Demon

The train will always "have left the station" until the Wii is replaced it seems. There is absolutely NOTHING stopping these developers from changing direction of what platforms they are produced on mid-development. That is a terrible excuse for the Wii not getting all the third-party titles the PS3 and 360 get.

I forgot Monster Hunter 3 because I have hardly heard anyone but Wii fanatics hype it.
Avatar image for PSdual_wielder
PSdual_wielder

10646

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#36 PSdual_wielder
Member since 2003 • 10646 Posts
Sales of a console does have a correlation to its 3rd party support. However the support doesn't neccessarily result in quality games. The devs will just see a business opportunity and make a quantity of games for it. Everyone knows the wii isn't giving us any quality games, not lately at least.
Avatar image for Heydanbud92
Heydanbud92

4464

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#37 Heydanbud92
Member since 2007 • 4464 Posts

[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"]
Given Chop Till You Drop, I would have thought capitalizing on the Wii's install base would have been top priority for such an important and mass-appeal game in the series. Grinning_Demon

RE5 had 300 people on it once so it could be finished in time, and as far as i know CtyD wasnt outsourced, the lack of available resources resulted in a safer project with a smaller team. The thing is, DR actually works in my favour, that game is a filler, something they made as soon as possible to capitalize on RE4Wii's success, and since the RE5/SFIV/MH trains where already at full steam this is what they ended up with. Companies dont say no to money, if there isnt a RE5 on the Wii its because they currently dont have the manpower to pull it off (and i'm not just pulling this out of my a**, i'm a member of Capcom Unity, i make Sven's life miserable for DR)

Here I thought game companies were about making money regardless of the quality they deliver.

The 360 and PS3 get Lost Planet, Dead Rising, Devil May Cry 4, Resident Evil 5, Street Fighter IV and Bionic Commando while the Wii gets ports of Okami, RE4, RE0 and a ****ty version of Dead Rising.foxhound_fox

And Monster Hunter 3, that you so conviniently forgot.

Like i said, all those trains left the station before the Wii came along, and you cant stop a train once its starts rolling (well MH3 on PS3 did lol)

if re5 has 300 people working on it....don't you think capcom could hire 20 more people to do a downgraded port for Wii? Especially as it would make a profit, like you said they won't say no to money.

and the MH series is popular yeah, but they are not great games i'm sorry it's not something to be that proud of IMO, unless you just want games that sell well and don't care if they are considered mediocre or not. and if you don't care about scores then that's good for you (it really is) but this is SW.

Avatar image for Heydanbud92
Heydanbud92

4464

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#38 Heydanbud92
Member since 2007 • 4464 Posts
[QUOTE="Heydanbud92"]You know at least half a million are going to buy it even if it were a half-assed super-downgraded port.

I wouldn't be surprised if capcom actually did this after chop 'till the one zombie is dead.

Grinning_Demon

The resources i speak are manpower, not money. Capcom cant make RE5Wiis out of thin air, if they knew the Wii would be such a success and RE4Wii would end up selling more then 1.6 million games they would rethink their strategy, you can bet on that.

it's the same thing as far as capcoms descision makers are concerned. You hire poeple WITH MONEY to make your games.

Avatar image for Heydanbud92
Heydanbud92

4464

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#39 Heydanbud92
Member since 2007 • 4464 Posts

Sales of a console does have a correlation to its 3rd party support. However the support doesn't neccessarily result in quality games. The devs will just see a business opportunity and make a quantity of games for it. Everyone knows the wii isn't giving us any quality games, not lately at least.PSdual_wielder

Exactly, and maybe 3rd party devs. will make ports of ps360 games for Wii. But ithought that's not what sheep wanted? Maybe they do? Ah who knows.

Avatar image for Grinning_Demon
Grinning_Demon

1809

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#40 Grinning_Demon
Member since 2009 • 1809 Posts
The train will always "have left the station" until the Wii is replaced it seems. There is absolutely NOTHING stopping these developers from changing direction of what platforms they are produced on mid-development. foxhound_fox


Wut? ok you dont know what you're talking about.
What part of my post is an excuse? the fact that most of those games were greenlit before the Wii came out? Looke it up, its a FACT.


That is a terrible excuse for the Wii not getting all the third-party titles the PS3 and 360 get.foxhound_fox


We are talking about Capcom here, a Japanese company from Japan (you know, the country were the Wii leads by far). We are not talking about the western market that has a few developers who manage to make it big without developing for the lead system. Dont shift the disscussion to better suit your arguments.

I forgot Monster Hunter 3 because I have hardly heard anyone but Wii fanatics hype it.foxhound_fox


I dont care if you like or loath those games (I personaly dont give a crap about DMC, BC or LP but i didnt mention it), that franchise is a giant and a flagship title of the highest priority for Capcom and thats a fact.
Lets not throw objectivity out of the window and start dismissing big franchises just because we dont like them, they are big, require alot of manpower and are expensive to produce.
Avatar image for Grinning_Demon
Grinning_Demon

1809

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#41 Grinning_Demon
Member since 2009 • 1809 Posts

if re5 has 300 people working on it....don't you think capcom could hire 20 more people to do a downgraded port for Wii? Heydanbud92

I want to live in your world where a team of 20 can pull of a port of a main entry of a big franshise without making it look worse than RE4.

and the MH series is popular yeah, but they are not great games i'm sorry it's not something to be that proud of IMO, unless you just want games that sell well and don't care if they are considered mediocre or not. and if you don't care about scores then that's good for you (it really is) but this is SW. Heydanbud92

And heeere come the personal opinions. I think Bionic Comando is crap, Lost Planet is an average POS TPS and DMC is laughable atempt to capture the American JpPop-obcessed teen crowd with stupid characters...now tell me how this adds anything to a discussion about big projects and the reason how they are distributed the way they are?

Avatar image for Heydanbud92
Heydanbud92

4464

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#42 Heydanbud92
Member since 2007 • 4464 Posts


[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"] The train will always "have left the station" until the Wii is replaced it seems. There is absolutely NOTHING stopping these developers from changing direction of what platforms they are produced on mid-development. Grinning_Demon


Wut? ok you dont know what you're talking about.

What part of my post is an excuse? the fact that most of those games were greenlit before the Wii came out? Looke it up, its a FACT

Wow. Did you read his post??? He suggested that Re5 as it is now could have been CANCELLED (ya know) and then moved to wii. or at least ported what they have done already on Re5 to Wii.


That is a terrible excuse for the Wii not getting all the third-party titles the PS3 and 360 get.foxhound_fox


We are talking about Capcom here, a Japanese company from Japan (you know, the country were the Wii leads by far). We are not talking about the western market that has a few developers who manage to make it big without developing for the lead system. Dont shift the disscussion to better suit your arguments.

I don't ever understand your point on this part???

I forgot Monster Hunter 3 because I have hardly heard anyone but Wii fanatics hype it.foxhound_fox


I dont care if you like or loath those games (I personaly dont give a crap about DMC, BC or LP but i didnt mention it), that franchise is a giant and a flagship title of the highest priority for Capcom and thats a fact.
Lets not throw objectivity out of the window and start dismissing big franchises just because we dont like them, they are big, require alot of manpower and are expensive to produce.

This thread is about "better 3rd party support". We as gamers care if a game is, in our opinion, good or worthy. Or we should. Apparently you only care if it's "big, require alot of manpower and are expensive to produce" That's sad. I guess fanboys will take whatever they can get when they get desperate.



Avatar image for Heydanbud92
Heydanbud92

4464

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#43 Heydanbud92
Member since 2007 • 4464 Posts

[QUOTE="Heydanbud92"]if re5 has 300 people working on it....don't you think capcom could hire 20 more people to do a downgraded port for Wii? Grinning_Demon

I want to live in your world where a team of 20 can pull of a port of a main entry of a big franshise without making it look worse than RE4.

and the MH series is popular yeah, but they are not great games i'm sorry it's not something to be that proud of IMO, unless you just want games that sell well and don't care if they are considered mediocre or not. and if you don't care about scores then that's good for you (it really is) but this is SW. Heydanbud92

And heeere come the personal opinions. I think Bionic Comando is crap, Lost Planet is an average POS TPS and DMC is laughable atempt to capture the American JpPop-obcessed teen crowd with stupid characters...now tell me how this adds anything to a discussion about big projects and the reason how they are distributed the way they are?

20 people is PLENTY for a port, are you kidding? Even if it were 100 people they would still make profit.

What it adds is that you are the odd one out. And the new bionic commando is not out yet. I've tried the MH games and I formulated my opinion based on that. Lost planet is average, yeah so what who talks about that game? I bet you would if it came to Wii. It's a "big, expensive"game after all. And DMC is considered one of the best action franchises....and it's also "big and expensive" so IDK why you wouldn't want it on Wii. Oh, right because you are a hypocrite.

Avatar image for Grinning_Demon
Grinning_Demon

1809

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#44 Grinning_Demon
Member since 2009 • 1809 Posts

This thread is about "better 3rd party support". We as gamers care if a game is, in our opinion, good or worthy. Or we should. Apparently you only care if it's "big, require alot of manpower and are expensive to produce" That's sad. I guess fanboys will take whatever they can get when they get desperate.
Heydanbud92

If you wanted to join the discussion you could'v at least take the time to see where it started and whats it about cuz you are clearly lost. Your picking up stuff i posted and replying to it out of context.

I don't ever understand your point on this part??? foxhound_fox

I would be amazed if you did. See the above answer why.


1 Wow. Did you read his post??? He suggested that Re5 as it is now could have been CANCELLED (ya know) and then moved to wii.

2 or at least ported what they have done already on Re5 to Wii.Heydanbud92

1- Cancel a project that was already at full speed when RE4Wii hit the market, a multiplatform project where millions of dollars where already spent and deals with two major companies where already signed? Yeah seems reasonable.

2- I am clearly wrong. The most obvious reason is that Capcom wont do RE5 for the Wii for teh lulz: Seems more likely than saying they cant do such a big project with so little people half way through RE5 HD development without making it look worse than its predecessor, thats crazy talk

Avatar image for Grinning_Demon
Grinning_Demon

1809

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#45 Grinning_Demon
Member since 2009 • 1809 Posts

Lost planet is average, yeah so what who talks about that game? I bet you would if it came to Wii. It's a "big, expensive"game after all. And DMC is considered one of the best action franchises....and it's also "big and expensive" so IDK why you wouldn't want it on Wii. Oh, right because you are a hypocrite.

Heydanbud92


If you want to know, i actually like the first DMC(one is enough), never played BC (dont care about it) and LP is average (meh). I also dont particularly care for Megaman.

Seems like i failed to give the idea that my "opinions" towards those games werent really my opinion. It was a sarcastic remark to show how pointless it is to undermine a big franchise in a disscussion about why Capcom's resources are distributed the way they are (here i am repeating myself ugh). I thought the way i wrote it was obvious, aparently it wasnt. My bad

Thank you for implying that i'm a fanboy and hypocrite though. I'm clearly a troll too
Avatar image for nitekids2004
nitekids2004

2981

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 nitekids2004
Member since 2005 • 2981 Posts
Then how come 3rd party games (released or announced) on the PS3/360 are better than the ones on the Wii?
Avatar image for GinoNYC
GinoNYC

470

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#48 GinoNYC
Member since 2008 • 470 Posts
Heh, you call a bunch of boring "niche" games third-party support? Let me know when Wii ever gets a game as big as:

Mass Effect
Bio-shock
Fallout 3
Oblivion
Final Fantasy XIII
Resident Evil 5
Dead Space
GRID
Pure
And many, many more

Now THAT is true third-party support, because we all know the real thrid-party blockbusters are on PS3, 360, and PC, not the Wii. More Wii sales = more third-party SHOVELWARE support, and that's about it.