Series X has more 120 FPS so far. Is PS5 gonna try to follow this 120 FPS tactic?

What type of TV are most people that will own an XSX going to have?

...

Unless it's a VR game... 120fps isn't required. Thus, I hope they don't bother trying to achieve 120fps with their non-VR games.

PS5 8k240fps

Ps5 can’t it is too weak.

Expect massive downgrades in frame rate and fidelity on any multi plat game

@phbz: PS5 pro 8k240fps

I wouldn't think so, though they are releasing their "Ready for PS5" TV's with 4K/120 and 8K/120, but definitely don't expect games to be aiming for that, unless a developer wishes to tie their game features/graphics around those frames. I'm not even sure if we could see 1440p checkerboard at 120.

Forgot about this. So technically, 120FPS was already a thing with PS4 through PSVR?

My card struggles with that, PS5 has no chance. Although you mentioned checkerboard, perhaps.

This is way outside of my area of expertise, and i'd be shocked if it happened. TBH, personally i'm not worried about that true 4K, as i'd happily do 1440/120 on my PC if I struggle to maintain that locked 60. Still, with DLSS2, we get the best of both worlds.

Here's another fakefan who thinks that the SeX advantage is going to allow it's multiplats to have "massive" differences over the ps5 multiplats.

LMAO at the tears above

The only game I see having a 120fps mode from PlayStation would be Gran Turismo.

I'm sure some 3rd party devs will choose to have 120fps modes but, I don't see a reason to do it unless it's some sort of esports / multiplayer game.

Sackboy game doesn't really look that impressive. I'm also guessing a game like Astrobot/Playroom might support it eventually.

PR BS

All I want is 60 fps and decent Res

I dun mind more but 60 @ 4k is ideal

@rzxv04: I doubt it for most their games. I still get motion sick. I'm saying it needs to happen for VR games to help.

Dirt 5 is both 120fps on PS5 and Xbox Series X. Though I don't think Sony dev particularly cares about 120fps mode as they usually aims to make the most beautiful game on this planet.

So now console gamers suddenly care about frame rates over graphical fidelity?

Surely 60fps with better graphics would be the direction to go?

I expect many PS5 games at a buttery smooth 30 fps. lmao.

They flip flop constantly when it suits them.

I remember a VERY long time ago when this forum was nearly new, they did this with online gaming and FPS games for the most part lmao. Both were "PC trash". Not joking.

@Random_Matt: No offense but the Radeon VII is not a very good card and very niche, PS5 and Seriex X are faster. Back on topic 120fps is a waste right now. How many people own 120hz displays? I don't, I have 4K HDR10 and don't plan on upgrading anytime soon. So for the 5% who can take advantage of this good I guess. BTW where the **** are the next gen fighting games at?

A) It is a very good card for the present, it is like calling a 2070 shit, mine is better. Undervolting and overclocking is great.

B) I'll be upgrading, no shit next gen are better, was unaware they released.

Aiming for 120 FPS is a waste since most casuals wouldn't have high-refresh rate displays anyway. 60 FPS would be more than enough, and downscaling from 4k to 1080p displays would be better just to hit that 60 FPS.

@Random_Matt: maybe I went in too hard. Radeon VII is a very good card and comparable to RTX 2070S/2080 in many games, wasn't trying to diss your card. Really unless you game at 4K or have an interest in RT there is no need to upgrade that beastly PC. But RDNA2 should bring IPC gaines, RT, VRS and hopefully a DLSS-like solution.

Nah man, it is not strong enough. I'm hoping the new cards can provide a consistent 144+ FPS at 1440P, on AAA I cannot reach that. If not then I guess I won't bother upgrading, we will see what they are like.

It's crazy how console marketing misses the optimal experience by so much.

Obviously a console is just a mid-spec computer. The sweet spot is all about balance. 4K and 120Hz is a waste of resources. You need to target 60Hz at ~1440p and upscale it. You'll get lots of graphical details and smooth performance.

Somebody gotta check these fools.

@Random_Matt: current rumors point to an 80 CU Navi21 with performance in excess of 30% of RTX 2080 Ti, and 3090/3080 TI about 10% ahead of that. Extrapolate the lower models from that as you will. But remember always chasing the 144hz dream always pushes up against ever more demanding games.

Bu...bu...but sales

HaH

Sony go more for visuals so 30/60 performance mode will be prominent on ps5

What do sales have to do with this thread kingtito?

Knowing that 30 fps is all what people seek and need...on consoles.

NO is probably the shortest answer.

@saltslasher: Why are you obvious trolls so lazy, you don't even try anymore.

I guess you have already forgotten that the OG Xbone was running games at 720p to start the gen.

And no TV is 240hz lol. Good job exposing yourself as being completely clueless about them.

@Telekill: I agree. Personally 120fps (for a non VR game) is as much of a waste of resources as native 4k. Bring me everything at something like 1600p60 with other visual improvements, and i'll be happy.

omg lol last gen games confirmed to be 120fps.

were are the next gen games being 120fps?

this is what you get when xbox shows you guys last gen games on the series x.

were are game like ratchet and clank, hzd 2 on the series x?

were are those next gen only games?

YOU THINK FABLE WILL BE 120FPS OR AVOWED?

yup to weak to play last gen games at 120fps lmao. every single one is on a xbox one.

were are the next gen title that have raytracing etc. that will be 120fps?

so only the rich parents that can afford a 4k for there kids are cool?

look every only poor kids are not cool. just the rich are?

your not cool just for saying this.