[QUOTE="NorthlandMan"]i hope they make a DS versionGoten_king
I know! i can't beleive the maker sees FE as a console game, and not a handheld game, after how well it did on the GBA. O well, it will come eventually, but still, why must they wait so long.
In Japan, Fire Emblem 1-5 were on consoles, and therefore is a console series. There have only been three on the GBA, 6-8. Nine is also on a console, and ten will be as well. The Japanese bought the console versions more than the portable ones, so that's why they brought it back to consoles. Yes, personally I liked FE7 (the first one in America) the best, and it was portable, but it's still mainly a console series. Oh, and to your earlier post, FE: GoD is supposed to be a really long game (the longest so far), so that's why it would be worth more money. I still wish it was a DS game, though, so that it would be $15 cheaper. :x
Obviously Fire Emblem is my favorite, so I voted for that over Blue Dragon. Oh, and there would be more strategy if Intelligent Systems made the A.I. more difficult (adjust to the way you are playing). I think that was actually a feature in one of the Japanese FE's, but enemies still acted poorly some of the time. Fire Emblem is actually pretty hard on hard mode, anyway. What FE also needs are user-created maps that could be shared over the internet. Intelligent systems already included a map maker with Advance Wars, so I think they should be able to do the same for Fire Emblem.
Whoever said it is terrible needs to play it first or look beyond the fact that it's a strategy game. It's like how people can not like RE4 but see that it's a quality game (like me :P).
Log in to comment