Sometimes i dont a damn about the SP of a game, (COD4, Resistance 2) and only want to play the MP we all know we buy COD for MP, same with bad company, the storys sucked and i had no care for them. They should give us the option to buy mp for cheaper, say 20 for bad tacked on ones and 40 for the sp (bioshock 2) or 40 for good mp and 20 for the SP or co-op portion (COD). It also allows us that want the rich graphcial experience of out high end pc to enjoy the SP there and leave the MP for another system. if a game is MP centric I always get it for my ps3, so thank god Crysis 2's MP sucked lol, even tho im waiting for the DX11 patch.
Only if they focus and actually try to give us a Campaign since it is being sold seperately I don't care about Multiplayer so if it makes them flesh out the campaign to be a lot longer then yes it is a good idea.
If it is just the same campaign seperate from Multiplayer then no because those games only focus on Multiplayer and the single player is an afterthought.
Bad for developers because production costs are too high for this to happen. If we go back to the old days, sure why not? But, I still doubt they would allow this to happen because they want as much money as possible. So, $60 is where it's at no matter what.
I could go for that as long as they don't start charging 60 for Multiplayer and 60 for Single Player (if anything that's what they are most likely to do)
Who's stopping them? I don't know if that would work though. If the final price is somewhere around 50-60 €/$ it wouldn't make any sense to sell them separately. They would probably put some ridiculous price for at least one of them and that would be just sad.
They are allowed to right now. The reason publishers don't is because it doesn't make sense to split your price between two halves of your game for consumers to choose from, since if they want one half they would likely buy the full-priced whole game anyway.
Log in to comment