topic
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Well since Resistance: Fall of Man didn't suck and sold over 2 million copies, I would have to say that it should be the FPS being hyped and not Killzone 2.
But I seriously doubt it'll be out this year, atleast after reading up on all the details for the game.
Resistance 2 > Killzone 2. Make the right choice cows.
:roll:
How can anyone care about it?
What makes Killzone 2 stand out among the FPS genre that'll make it more enjoyable compared to it's counterparts.
What have Guerrilla Games contributed to the FPS genre?
How can you not like this game...
redandblack23
ahh all i see is pretty graphics if you want to call them that, no decent NEW gameplay or any sort. fail.
[QUOTE="redandblack23"]How can you not like this game...
game_fanatic
ahh all i see is pretty graphics if you want to call them that, no decent NEW gameplay or any sort. fail.
ohh you mean like the NEW gameplay in the 9.5 scoring halo 3?Sony is going to need both to compete with the upcoming PDZ 2 in the FPS genre. Red Steel 2 is coming out as well.
Nike_Air
If PDZ2 turns out to be like the first one they won't need both.
Even Haze would suffice.
[QUOTE="game_fanatic"][QUOTE="redandblack23"]
How can you not like this game...
Jenai1
ahh all i see is pretty graphics if you want to call them that, no decent NEW gameplay or any sort. fail.
You've played the game have you? I didnt realise it was out?
yes of course i've forgotten that the last killzone made some briliant additions to shooters and that we should expect the same from this one :roll:
Sony is going to need both to compete with the upcoming PDZ 2 in the FPS genre. Red Steel 2 is coming out as well.
:lol:
Nike_Air
Sony is going to need both to compete with the upcoming PDZ 2 in the FPS genre. Red Steel 2 is coming out as well.
Nike_Air
I smell sarcasm all over this post. lol
But then again 1st Killzone had potential but AI and such made it suck, just like how PDZ, and Red steel 1 suck. So it makes sense.
[QUOTE="Jenai1"][QUOTE="game_fanatic"][QUOTE="redandblack23"]How can you not like this game...
game_fanatic
ahh all i see is pretty graphics if you want to call them that, no decent NEW gameplay or any sort. fail.
You've played the game have you? I didnt realise it was out?
yes of course i've forgotten that the last killzone made some briliant additions to shooters and that we should expect the same from this one :roll:
So far everone who has played it says its very fun. Still we know nothing of this game besides it having amazing graphics. Any company can make a bad game then come back to make a stellar title.
KZ was originally a PC game, then ported to the PS2 with a low budget and time restraints. KZ2 faces none of these challenges.
No. Sony needs as many games possible to help them. Sony and the cows could hype these games as the Big Ones but these games just really need to proves themselves. What Sony needs to focus on is lowering the price of a PS3 and bring back backward compatibility, and they need to focus more on PSN.
[QUOTE="game_fanatic"][QUOTE="Jenai1"][QUOTE="game_fanatic"][QUOTE="redandblack23"]How can you not like this game...
TREAL_Since
ahh all i see is pretty graphics if you want to call them that, no decent NEW gameplay or any sort. fail.
You've played the game have you? I didnt realise it was out?
yes of course i've forgotten that the last killzone made some briliant additions to shooters and that we should expect the same from this one :roll:
So far everone who has played it says its very fun. Still we know nothing of this game besides it having amazing graphics. Any company can make a bad game then come back to make a stellar title.
KZ was originally a PC game, then ported to the PS2 with a low budget and time restraints. KZ2 faces none of these challenges.
The first halo was to be made on the MAc then the PC then the PS2 then the Xbox whats ur Point?
i know lemmings make is sounds as if every game on the 360 is better than it when in truth its the other way around
How can you not like this game...
redandblack23
Killzone 1 sucked (70 rating @ metacritic). Resistance 1 is AA (86 average @ metacritic) title. Not only that, its not like Killzone outsold resistance so you can't use popularity to explain the hype. Yet the Sony fanbase hypes the sequel to a crap game more than the sequel to a good game.
You'll need a Doctorate in Bovine Sciences to understand that one.
I just want some more killzone 2 info! Come on killzone has been announce in 2005 and we have next to no info about the game. resistance 2 we have only known about it for a a week and we know alot moreabout it that killzone 2.
As for killzone getting AAA statues on gamespot i wouldn't hold my breath. lol. Just because the game has a budget of 20 million that doesn't mean its going be AAA. Just look at Uncharted. Uncharted had a budget at around 20 million(i heard this from a interview with evan wells long time ago) but still it barely made AA on gamespot. I personally own uncharted and i would give it AAA in a heart beat. Its so good!
The first halo was to be made on the MAc then the PC then the PS2 then the Xbox whats ur Point?
Ajam666
And then Halo published up by MS and given a reasonable budget and time frame for completion. KZ has a great premise and great weapons and now that Sony is actually backing Guerilla Games as far as time and money issues are concerned it has potential to be an amazing game.
Take Bungie for example. They created a game called Oni. It scored 7.1 and 6.9 here at GS. Around the same score as the orginal KZ2. Any company can bounce back from a mediocre title.
[QUOTE="game_fanatic"][QUOTE="redandblack23"]How can you not like this game...
redandblack23
ahh all i see is pretty graphics if you want to call them that, no decent NEW gameplay or any sort. fail.
ohh you mean like the NEW gameplay in the 9.5 scoring halo 3?Halo 3 didn't need new gameplay when its predeccesors had a proven system.Killzone 2on the other hand needs abig revamp in the gameplay if they plan on using the same formula of the first one.
[QUOTE="redandblack23"][QUOTE="game_fanatic"][QUOTE="redandblack23"]How can you not like this game...
II-FBIsniper-II
ahh all i see is pretty graphics if you want to call them that, no decent NEW gameplay or any sort. fail.
ohh you mean like the NEW gameplay in the 9.5 scoring halo 3?Halo 3 didn't need new gameplay when its predeccesors had a proven system.Killzone 2on the other hand needs abig revamp in the gameplay if they plan on using the same formula of the first one.
The reason Jeff scored Halo 3 a 9.5:
- Saved Films
- Community d/ls
- The Forge
IF Bungie hadn't done that it could have gotten an 8.5-9. But luckily they did include those great features so it deserved it's score. I'm pretty sure it wasn't the same old gameplay though.
Take Bungie for example. They created a game called Oni. It scored 7.1 and 6.9 here at GS. Around the same score as the orginal KZ2. Any company can bounce back from a mediocre title.TREAL_Since
Difference is that there is ZERO HYPE FOR ONI 2. Nobody is like, "Oni 1 sucked, can't wait for Oni 2."
The reason Jeff scored Halo 3 a 9.5:- Saved Films
- Community d/ls
- The ForgeIF Bungie hadn't done that it could have gotten an 8.5-9. But luckily they did include those great features so it deserved it's score. I'm pretty sure it wasn't the same old gameplay though.
TREAL_Since
I agree. If Halo 3 was missing alot of major features that it has, it wouldn't be as good of a game. I can forgive this logic. Fresh out of school with a Bachelor's in Bovine Science, its expected that people are alittle green under the the thumb. But I think in a year or two you'll catch on and be just as good as any other graduate.
Killzone 1 had great graphics and was hyped to the max - It also sucked
Killzone 2 has great graphics and is hyped to the max (well not halo standards but still) - it will suck
Resistance has decent Graphics and wasnt hyped nearly as much as killzone - It was suprisngly decent
Resistance 2 has great graphics and is getting hyped so much - ???
[QUOTE="TREAL_Since"][QUOTE="Ajam666"]The first halo was to be made on the MAc then the PC then the PS2 then the Xbox whats ur Point?
Senor_Kami
And then Halo published up by MS and given a reasonable budget and time frame for completion. KZ has a great premise and great weapons and now that Sony is actually backing Guerilla Games as far as time and money issues are concerned it has potential to be an amazing game.
Take Bungie for example. They created a game called Oni. It scored 7.1 and 6.9 here at GS. Around the same score as the orginal KZ2. Any company can bounce back from a mediocre title.
Difference is that there is ZERO HYPE FOR ONI 2. Nobody is like, "Oni 1 sucked, can't wait for Oni 2."
So... In no way can hype for a game hinder what the developers have planned for that game. The game will be either good or bad regardless.
Let cows hype the game. It's just hype and that is what SW is about. I'm excited to see if GG will overcome the challenges they faced with the first Killzone and make the best game they can.
Plus, I've only seen cows hype the graphics so far saying that it owns Halo 3's graphics. I'm not sure if KZ2 is hyped AAA though.
No. Sony needs as many games possible to help them. Sony and the cows could hype these games as the Big Ones but these games just really need to proves themselves. What Sony needs to focus on is lowering the price of a PS3 and bring back backward compatibility, and they need to focus more on PSN.
ReverseCycology
Sony already has more than enough games that have already proven themselves
[QUOTE="ReverseCycology"]No. Sony needs as many games possible to help them. Sony and the cows could hype these games as the Big Ones but these games just really need to proves themselves. What Sony needs to focus on is lowering the price of a PS3 and bring back backward compatibility, and they need to focus more on PSN.
Blinblingthing
Sony already has more than enough games that have already proven themselves
Sorry no. Where's the exclusive AAA games?
[QUOTE="Senor_Kami"][QUOTE="TREAL_Since"][QUOTE="Ajam666"]The first halo was to be made on the MAc then the PC then the PS2 then the Xbox whats ur Point?
TREAL_Since
And then Halo published up by MS and given a reasonable budget and time frame for completion. KZ has a great premise and great weapons and now that Sony is actually backing Guerilla Games as far as time and money issues are concerned it has potential to be an amazing game.
Take Bungie for example. They created a game called Oni. It scored 7.1 and 6.9 here at GS. Around the same score as the orginal KZ2. Any company can bounce back from a mediocre title.
Difference is that there is ZERO HYPE FOR ONI 2. Nobody is like, "Oni 1 sucked, can't wait for Oni 2."
So... In no way can hype for a game hinder what the developers have planned for that game. The game will be either good or bad regardless.
Let cows hype the game. It's just hype and that is what SW is about. I'm excited to see if GG will overcome the challenges they faced with the first Killzone and make the best game they can.
Plus, I've only seen cows hype the graphics so far saying that it owns Halo 3's graphics. I'm not sure if KZ2 is hyped AAA though.
So many other games already look better than Halo 3, so it isn't to far off to believe that it will be better. Just to name a few, Alan Wake, CoD4, Mass Effect, ect. If anything, I would say Halo 3 is on par with GeoW and Uncharted.
[QUOTE="Blinblingthing"][QUOTE="ReverseCycology"]No. Sony needs as many games possible to help them. Sony and the cows could hype these games as the Big Ones but these games just really need to proves themselves. What Sony needs to focus on is lowering the price of a PS3 and bring back backward compatibility, and they need to focus more on PSN.
ReverseCycology
Sony already has more than enough games that have already proven themselves
Sorry no. Where's the exclusive AAA games?
Multiplats, 'nuff said. On another note, since when were AAA games the only enjoyable games?
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment