Should we refer Xbox 360/ PC releases as Microsoft exclusives since Microsoft is

  • 141 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for EVOLV3
EVOLV3

12210

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 EVOLV3
Member since 2008 • 12210 Posts

[QUOTE="MortalDecay"][QUOTE="aaronmullan"]Not at all. PC is its own platform, and MS doesn't own it.aaronmullan
You're right...MS doesn't own it at all. But you bought Windows, no doubt to play games, so they're still getting your money.

Cool. Packard Bell are also getting money for my monitor, Nvida for my video card, how about the Government for the electricity? Going to throw that in there too?



Without electricity we cant play any of these games, so therefore all games are Electric Company Exclusive!

Avatar image for osan0
osan0

18268

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#52 osan0
Member since 2004 • 18268 Posts
[QUOTE="MortalDecay"][QUOTE="aaronmullan"]Not at all. PC is its own platform, and MS doesn't own it.savagetwinkie
You're right...MS doesn't own it at all. But you bought Windows, no doubt to play games, so they're still getting your money.

and licensing fee's to make games for windows...

there is no licencing fee for making games for windows. i can make a game for windows right now if i wanted and MS cant do a dam thing to stop me. i can even use direct X...i can legally download the directX sdk from MSs website, hook it up to my IDE and start writing DirectX code. if i dont like directX..i can switch over to OpenGL on windows. if i dont like that..i can go right ahead and write my own 3d api from scratch. unlike a console, where MS and the others have 100% complete control over everything, the PC is essentially an open market. MS see money from the windows licence i bought..but they didnt see a penny from when i bought drakensang...or UT3...or dawn of war and so on. the PC doesent work like a console from a business standpoint. i dont need a development kit...my PC is its own development kit. i dont need MSs permission to make windows apps...i can just go right ahead and do it. i dont have to pay MS a dime to make said apps.....if my app is very successful...MS will never see a dime of it unless i wish them to. Windows is MSs platform..but the PC isnt.
Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#53 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts
WUT? Hmm aint microsoft that doesnt release halo 3 fable 2 and gears of war 2 for pc? Yeah its microsoft that turned into x360 exclusives they even made the age of empire creators to make an x360 RTS :lol: Ohh wait we got mass effect...ehhh no if it wasn't for EA , i doubt MS will publish it on pc. Or Alan wake the fate of the pc version lies in Microsoft, hmmm..... Microsoft doesn't care for the pc (ironic isn't it?) So i guess no, its not safe to say its synonymous with the pcs
Avatar image for bobaban
bobaban

10560

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 bobaban
Member since 2005 • 10560 Posts
[QUOTE="cyprusxx"]

This Isnt Operating System Wars!!!!!!!!!, I build my PC and the are no Microsoft parts in it, so why the hell whould i say its a microsoft system, i only use some thier software. If anything maybe you could say PC's are Intel or ATI.

MortalDecay
You're still using their software to play games. They still got your money. All I am saying is that either way, MS is getting gamer's money. Whether it's through the 360, or Windows.

This is not company wars. Who cares if the computer software division of MS if getting money? What matters is the Xbox division, how they're doing. I invested in a gaming PC rather than pick up a faulty system. I have a PS3 for the fighters and its exclusives.
Avatar image for MortalDecay
MortalDecay

4298

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 MortalDecay
Member since 2005 • 4298 Posts
[QUOTE="MortalDecay"][QUOTE="aaronmullan"]Not at all. PC is its own platform, and MS doesn't own it.aaronmullan
You're right...MS doesn't own it at all. But you bought Windows, no doubt to play games, so they're still getting your money.

Cool. Packard Bell are also getting money for my monitor, Nvida for my video card, how about the Government for the electricity? Going to throw that in there too?

Talk about missing the point....
Avatar image for SparkyProtocol
SparkyProtocol

7680

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 76

User Lists: 0

#56 SparkyProtocol
Member since 2009 • 7680 Posts
I think we should be able to use the term "Console Exclusive" and use Mass Effect in the 360s favor when we do a PS3 vs 360 thread or something similar.
Avatar image for Filthybastrd
Filthybastrd

7124

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 Filthybastrd
Member since 2009 • 7124 Posts

[QUOTE="savagetwinkie"][QUOTE="Animal-Mother"] ORLY? Can you link this? As well as leader or not. They don't own PC gaming regardless

Espada12

not on the mac or linux, but anything that has games for windows logo on it its M$ platform, they do make money off of it, so unless we start dividing PC's into systems, based off of hardware/os, generally PC gaming will be a M$ platform which is why you will see more games on 360/pc that aren't on ps3.

We need a sticky for this. MS doesn't make any money off of anything with the games for windows brand.

This is what the games for windows brand stands for.

Oh dear.. MS should delete that ASAP. Any pc gamer will tell you that GFWL is utter crap.

Avatar image for DontBeHatin1983
DontBeHatin1983

1044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 DontBeHatin1983
Member since 2008 • 1044 Posts

synonymous with PCs?

bphan

Sony make PC's and MS makes the software so they work together in that department.

Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#59 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts

[QUOTE="Espada12"]

[QUOTE="savagetwinkie"] not on the mac or linux, but anything that has games for windows logo on it its M$ platform, they do make money off of it, so unless we start dividing PC's into systems, based off of hardware/os, generally PC gaming will be a M$ platform which is why you will see more games on 360/pc that aren't on ps3. Filthybastrd

We need a sticky for this. MS doesn't make any money off of anything with the games for windows brand.

This is what the games for windows brand stands for.

Oh dear.. MS should delete that ASAP. Any pc gamer will tell you that GFWL is utter crap.

Its utter crap, its like they cut the xbox live and replace it with windows live.....Whats the point? Whats the point of achievements? We got steam we dont need windows live or even better why not be like cod games... no extra programs like steam and windows for live crap.
Avatar image for gamecubepad
gamecubepad

7214

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -12

User Lists: 0

#60 gamecubepad
Member since 2003 • 7214 Posts

Both Windows PCs and 360s are MS platforms. MS created the Xbox as a way of getting royalties for PC games. When a lion's share of pc gamers use linux then I will consider the possibility that they aren't MS exclusive.

Avatar image for aaronmullan
aaronmullan

33426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#61 aaronmullan
Member since 2004 • 33426 Posts
[QUOTE="aaronmullan"][QUOTE="MortalDecay"] You're right...MS doesn't own it at all. But you bought Windows, no doubt to play games, so they're still getting your money.MortalDecay
Cool. Packard Bell are also getting money for my monitor, Nvida for my video card, how about the Government for the electricity? Going to throw that in there too?

Talk about missing the point....

Nah, I got your silly point. Who cares if MS get profit for their OS? They still don't control the gaming market for PC, PERIOD.
Avatar image for DontBeHatin1983
DontBeHatin1983

1044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 DontBeHatin1983
Member since 2008 • 1044 Posts

Both Windows PCs and 360s are MS platforms. MS created the Xbox as a way of getting royalties for PC games. When a lion's share of pc gamers use linux then I will consider the possibility that they aren't MS exclusive.

gamecubepad

sony makes PC's, as far as i know MS isnt getting any royalties from PC gaming (not sure)

Avatar image for Brainkiller05
Brainkiller05

28954

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 Brainkiller05
Member since 2005 • 28954 Posts
[QUOTE="cyprusxx"]

This Isnt Operating System Wars!!!!!!!!!, I build my PC and the are no Microsoft parts in it, so why the hell whould i say its a microsoft system, i only use some thier software. If anything maybe you could say PC's are Intel or ATI.

MortalDecay
You're still using their software to play games. They still got your money. All I am saying is that either way, MS is getting gamer's money. Whether it's through the 360, or Windows.

So? Microsoft get money because you bought their OS, now back on topic: why would that somehow mean 360/pc games should be considered exclusive?
Avatar image for gamecubepad
gamecubepad

7214

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -12

User Lists: 0

#64 gamecubepad
Member since 2003 • 7214 Posts

[QUOTE="gamecubepad"]

Both Windows PCs and 360s are MS platforms. MS created the Xbox as a way of getting royalties for PC games. When a lion's share of pc gamers use linux then I will consider the possibility that they aren't MS exclusive.

DontBeHatin1983

sony makes PC's, as far as i know MS isnt getting any royalties from PC gaming (not sure)

That's hardware. Find me some PC games that don't have Windows XP/Vista as a requirement. Microsoft is the proprietor of DirectX, another requirement for most PC games.

Face it, MS is the dominating force in PC gaming. They set the standards.

Avatar image for savagetwinkie
savagetwinkie

7981

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 savagetwinkie
Member since 2008 • 7981 Posts
[QUOTE="osan0"][QUOTE="savagetwinkie"][QUOTE="MortalDecay"] You're right...MS doesn't own it at all. But you bought Windows, no doubt to play games, so they're still getting your money.

and licensing fee's to make games for windows...

there is no licencing fee for making games for windows. i can make a game for windows right now if i wanted and MS cant do a dam thing to stop me. i can even use direct X...i can legally download the directX sdk from MSs website, hook it up to my IDE and start writing DirectX code. if i dont like directX..i can switch over to OpenGL on windows. if i dont like that..i can go right ahead and write my own 3d api from scratch. unlike a console, where MS and the others have 100% complete control over everything, the PC is essentially an open market. MS see money from the windows licence i bought..but they didnt see a penny from when i bought drakensang...or UT3...or dawn of war and so on. the PC doesent work like a console from a business standpoint. i dont need a development kit...my PC is its own development kit. i dont need MSs permission to make windows apps...i can just go right ahead and do it. i dont have to pay MS a dime to make said apps.....if my app is very successful...MS will never see a dime of it unless i wish them to. Windows is MSs platform..but the PC isnt.

Except there is, you can't just freely develope for windows, all the tools and to even be able to get the games for windows logo has have certain M$ requirements. If you use M$ tools for free and try to sell anythign expect lawsuits from M$ and your mom to be sodomized by bill gates.
Avatar image for halo_wars86
halo_wars86

1505

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#66 halo_wars86
Member since 2009 • 1505 Posts

I don't think Sony fans would like it because it just helps Microsoft and makes them look better which is true

bphan

they are not exclusives but any game that comes on 360 whether it is exclusive or pc360 excklusive and CANT be played at ps3 is considered a win for the ps3 since u will either need a 360 or pc to play it so where fan admit it or not it still is a game they cant play unless they have a 1500$ + rig

Avatar image for djsifer01
djsifer01

7238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#67 djsifer01
Member since 2005 • 7238 Posts
MS's only involvement with the PC is the operating system so NO. They dont make make PC's or make any on the internal parts for them. If anything they should count for Sony since they make PC's lol. j/k.
Avatar image for savagetwinkie
savagetwinkie

7981

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 savagetwinkie
Member since 2008 • 7981 Posts
MS's only involvement with the PC is the operating system so NO. They dont make make PC's or make any on the internal parts for them.djsifer01
they don't make the hardware but any game developer making games for the pc the only thing they see is windows since they are making the game to work on windows, use windows hardware api's, in fact you don't have to have pc hardware to make a PC games. The only reason they have to consider hardware is that its not standardized and they have to make their game scalable.
Avatar image for lowe0
lowe0

13692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 lowe0
Member since 2004 • 13692 Posts

I swear, it's like "context" is a dirty word around here. Is it so difficult to imagine thata gamemight be both exclusive and non-exclusive, depending on the set of systems being discussed?

Avatar image for deactivated-58b6232955e4a
deactivated-58b6232955e4a

15594

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 deactivated-58b6232955e4a
Member since 2006 • 15594 Posts
No, Microsoft makes no money off of pc games :|
Avatar image for teuf_
Teuf_

30805

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 Teuf_
Member since 2004 • 30805 Posts

Except there is, you can't just freely develope for windows, all the tools and to even be able to get the games for windows logo has have certain M$ requirements. If you use M$ tools for free and try to sell anythign expect lawsuits from M$ and your mom to be sodomized by bill gates.savagetwinkie


Developing for Windows in general is completely free. You can give away or sell all the windows apps you want, and there are even free tools available from Microsoft that you can use to make them.

Getting the "Games For Windows" logo has certain requirements (listed here and here), but none of them require paying Microsoft money or purchasing tools for them (all of the tools you'd need are free).

Avatar image for ActicEdge
ActicEdge

24492

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 ActicEdge
Member since 2008 • 24492 Posts

Nope. System wars, not company wars.

Avatar image for waynehead895
waynehead895

18660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#73 waynehead895
Member since 2005 • 18660 Posts
Doesn't matter what you call it imo. MS having more or less exclusives doesn't have any impact on my gaming habits.
Avatar image for mythrol
mythrol

5237

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#74 mythrol
Member since 2005 • 5237 Posts
[QUOTE="bphan"]

synonymous with PCs?

MortalDecay
It'll never work. Every time a 360/PC release comes along, cows say it's not exclusive, because they can play it on the PC, even though most of them can't. They demand to know why lems are ignoring the PC. Then the phrase "console exclusive" came around, and cows said it's silly, and doesn't count. On the other hand, cows came up with the phrase, "console graphics king". Completely ignoring the PC, and Crysis. They want to have it their way, or no way at all. To me, 360/PC releases still gives the 360 the edge over the PS3, because there aren't many people that own a gaming PC powerful enough to runs those kind of games. To the majority, that's what consoles are for. The lack in PC games sales prove this.

You speak the truth. the term console exclusive has been around SW since last gen (or even before that) and it was NEVER argued over last gen. Everyone used the term all the time. It was an accepted part of system wars. Suddenly this gen comes around and cows see that a lot of the 360's games also release on the PC and so argue against exclusivity and / or using the term console exclusive. The irony of it all, and why I think SW's is so stupid for trying to ban the term console exclusive is that I can this very moment make a thread saying "Compare the Xbox 360's game Library VS. the Playstation 3's game library." and suddenly I'm able to use all those PC/360 games because I'm only talking about the PS3 vs 360 in that thread. Effectively, making ALL those PC/360 games. . .*gasp* CONSOLE EXCLUSIVE. But somehow the actual term "console exclusive" is like some bad word that can't be mentioned in system wars. Tons of people here say "PC is a system too. It should be counted." But let's be honest, when you walk into your local gamestop and you look at the people in there, How many are purchasing PC games? How much of the store is actually devoted to PC games? How come at E3 does the "PC" not a press conference? And let's say PC did have a press conference, who would host it? (Microsoft) Answer: PC is not considered competition. It's on a different level. It's viewed differently. Even though there's a niche market that does use PC's for gaming =/= anywhere near as mainstream or as popular as SW's would like you to believe. That's why there's 1 shelf at Gamestop. As much as Cows want to say "this isn't brand wars", That's EXACTLY what it is. If it's not then why do they always spell Microsoft "M$". IF this isn't about the "brands" then why do so many fanboys HATE the other brands. The sooner SW's acknowledges this, the sooner we can realize the truth and have actual relevant discussions instead of arguing over the verb I use to describe the games that I play.
Avatar image for Phazevariance
Phazevariance

12356

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 Phazevariance
Member since 2003 • 12356 Posts
[QUOTE="Animal-Mother"][QUOTE="bphan"]

I don't Sony fans would like it because it just helps Microsoft and makes them look better which is true

No the PC is a separate platform in itself. MS doesn't own PC gaming

They do if the games don't work on linux and Mac...
Avatar image for savagetwinkie
savagetwinkie

7981

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 savagetwinkie
Member since 2008 • 7981 Posts

[QUOTE="savagetwinkie"]Except there is, you can't just freely develope for windows, all the tools and to even be able to get the games for windows logo has have certain M$ requirements. If you use M$ tools for free and try to sell anythign expect lawsuits from M$ and your mom to be sodomized by bill gates.Teufelhuhn



Developing for Windows in general is completely free. You can give away or sell all the windows apps you want, and there are even free tools available from Microsoft that you can use to make them.

Getting the "Games For Windows" logo has certain requirements (listed here and here), but none of them require paying Microsoft money or purchasing tools for them (all of the tools you'd need are free).

You can't sell anything with those free tools... not under the license aggrement, if you want to sell stuff you have to pay for them.

Avatar image for Rob-Belmont
Rob-Belmont

1350

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#77 Rob-Belmont
Member since 2009 • 1350 Posts

Lemmings sure are getting desperate.

Avatar image for teuf_
Teuf_

30805

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 Teuf_
Member since 2004 • 30805 Posts

[QUOTE="Teufelhuhn"]

[QUOTE="savagetwinkie"]Except there is, you can't just freely develope for windows, all the tools and to even be able to get the games for windows logo has have certain M$ requirements. If you use M$ tools for free and try to sell anythign expect lawsuits from M$ and your mom to be sodomized by bill gates.savagetwinkie



Developing for Windows in general is completely free. You can give away or sell all the windows apps you want, and there are even free tools available from Microsoft that you can use to make them.

Getting the "Games For Windows" logo has certain requirements (listed here and here), but none of them require paying Microsoft money or purchasing tools for them (all of the tools you'd need are free).

You can't sell anything with those free tools... not under the license aggrement, if you want to sell stuff you have to pay for them.



Of course you can. Feel free to read the licenses yourself.

Avatar image for savagetwinkie
savagetwinkie

7981

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 savagetwinkie
Member since 2008 • 7981 Posts

Lemmings sure are getting desperate.

Rob-Belmont
Actually i think M$ has a fairly large investment in windows and since PC gaming is almost exclusive to their platform, they are fairly invested in games for windows, so gathering games exclusively for their 2 platforms isn't exactly failed logic or anything.
Avatar image for savagetwinkie
savagetwinkie

7981

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#80 savagetwinkie
Member since 2008 • 7981 Posts

[QUOTE="savagetwinkie"]

[QUOTE="Teufelhuhn"]

Developing for Windows in general is completely free. You can give away or sell all the windows apps you want, and there are even free tools available from Microsoft that you can use to make them.

Getting the "Games For Windows" logo has certain requirements (listed here and here), but none of them require paying Microsoft money or purchasing tools for them (all of the tools you'd need are free).

Teufelhuhn

You can't sell anything with those free tools... not under the license aggrement, if you want to sell stuff you have to pay for them.



Of course you can. Feel free to read the licenses yourself.

yah if you notice teh last distro, visual studio pro, it even says, eventually you may want to sell something you create or make a business.... the express editions are just to create programs, but not licensed to sell them, they are giving away tools for free so people will learn how to use them instead of going to linux and mac. But the express and free versions are not licensed to make software with the the intent to sell, same with the msdn licenses i believe.

A section from the Terms of Use for Visual Studio Express 2008 is shown below:

PERSONAL AND NON-COMMERCIAL USE LIMITATION.

Unless otherwise specified, the Services are for your personal and non-commercial use. You may not modify, copy, distribute, transmit, display, perform, reproduce, publish, license, create derivative works from, transfer, or sell any information, software, products or services obtained from the Services.

Avatar image for coola426
coola426

405

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#81 coola426
Member since 2009 • 405 Posts
Not at all. Because some games are EXCLUSIVE to the PC platform such as Aion, World at Warcraft, Spore etc. And PC fanboys support the PC so to say that games like Gears of War is a X360 exclusive PC fanboys who don't like the 360 would dissagree and say "well I can play that on my PC".
Avatar image for deactivated-619c4c1a1a382
deactivated-619c4c1a1a382

4956

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#82 deactivated-619c4c1a1a382
Member since 2005 • 4956 Posts

synonymous with PCs?

bphan
What if it runs on a mac?
Avatar image for Microdevine
Microdevine

1126

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#83 Microdevine
Member since 2008 • 1126 Posts

i really dont care.who its from.the reason i bought the 360 over the ps3 is(in my opinion)*grabs flamesheild* the 360 has a better library.over what the ps3 has to offer.i dont care if they're "true" exclusives or not. i dont feel like spending tons of money on a gaming pc so i can play mass effect, gears 1, l4d, ect., when theyre exactly the same, with slightly improved graphics.and usually a smaller community.(ill take the better community).

Avatar image for cyprusxx
cyprusxx

817

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#84 cyprusxx
Member since 2005 • 817 Posts

[QUOTE="aaronmullan"][QUOTE="MortalDecay"] You're right...MS doesn't own it at all. But you bought Windows, no doubt to play games, so they're still getting your money.EVOLV3

Cool. Packard Bell are also getting money for my monitor, Nvida for my video card, how about the Government for the electricity? Going to throw that in there too?



Without electricity we cant play any of these games, so therefore all games are Electric Company Exclusive!

hahah you just owned him

Avatar image for savagetwinkie
savagetwinkie

7981

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#85 savagetwinkie
Member since 2008 • 7981 Posts

[QUOTE="Teufelhuhn"]

[QUOTE="savagetwinkie"] You can't sell anything with those free tools... not under the license aggrement, if you want to sell stuff you have to pay for them.

savagetwinkie



Of course you can. Feel free to read the licenses yourself.

yah if you notice teh last distro, visual studio pro, it even says, eventually you may want to sell something you create or make a business.... the express editions are just to create programs, but not licensed to sell them, they are giving away tools for free so people will learn how to use them instead of going to linux and mac. But the express and free versions are not licensed to make software with the the intent to sell, same with the msdn licenses i believe.

A section from the Terms of Use for Visual Studio Express 2008 is shown below:

PERSONAL AND NON-COMMERCIAL USE LIMITATION.

Unless otherwise specified, the Services are for your personal and non-commercial use. You may not modify, copy, distribute, transmit, display, perform, reproduce, publish, license, create derivative works from, transfer, or sell any information, software, products or services obtained from the Services.

looked more into this and what that actaully ment, but basicly if i try to sell an app using an express edition, i'm actually selling the app and not a license to use it, so they can do anything they want with it, ie: copy it and give it to people. Express is all opensource where if i want a closed source I have to pay M$ for it to dev on windows and be able to enforce a eula.

Avatar image for chapnzaba
chapnzaba

2302

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 55

User Lists: 0

#86 chapnzaba
Member since 2005 • 2302 Posts
No because then we'd call PS2/PSP/PS3 games Sony Exclusives.
Avatar image for teuf_
Teuf_

30805

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#87 Teuf_
Member since 2004 • 30805 Posts

[QUOTE="Teufelhuhn"]

[QUOTE="savagetwinkie"] You can't sell anything with those free tools... not under the license aggrement, if you want to sell stuff you have to pay for them.

savagetwinkie



Of course you can. Feel free to read the licenses yourself.

yah if you notice teh last distro, visual studio pro, it even says, eventually you may want to sell something you create or make a business.... the express editions are just to create programs, but not licensed to sell them, they are giving away tools for free so people will learn how to use them instead of going to linux and mac. But the express and free versions are not licensed to make software with the the intent to sell, same with the msdn licenses i believe.

A section from the Terms of Use for Visual Studio Express 2008 is shown below:

PERSONAL AND NON-COMMERCIAL USE LIMITATION.

Unless otherwise specified, the Services are for your personal and non-commercial use. You may not modify, copy, distribute, transmit, display, perform, reproduce, publish, license, create derivative works from, transfer, or sell any information, software, products or services obtained from the Services.



http://www.microsoft.com/express/support/faq/

Can I use Express Editions for commercial use?

Yes, there are no licensing restrictions for applications built using Visual Studio Express Editions.

Avatar image for teuf_
Teuf_

30805

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#88 Teuf_
Member since 2004 • 30805 Posts

looked more into this and what that actaully ment, but basicly if i try to sell an app using an express edition, i'm actually selling the app and not a license to use it, so they can do anything they want with it, ie: copy it and give it to people. Express is all opensource where if i want a closed source I have to pay M$ for it to dev on windows and be able to enforce a eula.

savagetwinkie



Nowhere does it say anything of the sort. Using the express editions does not bind your code to any sort of open-source licensing agreement, or any licensing agreement for that matter. The bit you quoted simply says that you can't modify, distribute, or sell the actual Visual Studio Express software or anything that comes with it. It has nothing to do with the software you create with it.

Avatar image for savagetwinkie
savagetwinkie

7981

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#89 savagetwinkie
Member since 2008 • 7981 Posts

[QUOTE="savagetwinkie"]

looked more into this and what that actaully ment, but basicly if i try to sell an app using an express edition, i'm actually selling the app and not a license to use it, so they can do anything they want with it, ie: copy it and give it to people. Express is all opensource where if i want a closed source I have to pay M$ for it to dev on windows and be able to enforce a eula.

Teufelhuhn



Nowhere does it say anything of the sort. Using the express editions does not bind your code to any sort of open-source licensing agreement, or any licensing agreement for that matter. The bit you quoted simply says that you can't modify, distribute, or sell the actual Visual Studio Express software or anything that comes with it. It has nothing to do with the software you create with it.

This if from people i talked to and what it used to be but so you win with the licensing, but either way the express edition lose alot of tools especialy for large dev companies, i highly doubt they are getting the express editions to dev games... and either way, windows is the dev platform for 99% of games on the "pc" because 360 is a pc, ps3 is a pc, a smartphone is a pc, mac is a pc, linux is a pc... ect... so game companies are supporting M$ platforms with 360/pc exclusives. Even mac refers to windows as pc though, by getting companies to support winodws m$ can sell more copies more peopel will stick with it and the more money they make, theres even one cross game live-pc game that pc gamers can play against live players.

Avatar image for HAZE-Unit
HAZE-Unit

10564

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#90 HAZE-Unit
Member since 2007 • 10564 Posts

With BC on the PS3 ( old models and new models also have PS1 BC ), 360 fans would be in big trouble with PS exclusives, the library would consist of PS1, PS2 and PS3 exclusive games.

And console fans would be in big trouble with the PC, the PC would dominate with exclusives from the 80s to this day.

There is no such thing as 360 console exclusive, if you could play it on another platform then its not exclusive.

It just increase the library of 360 when compared to the PS3, again, PS3 owners play PS2 and PS1 games on their PS3 so that is something 360 owners have to deal with too.

Avatar image for DontBeHatin1983
DontBeHatin1983

1044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#91 DontBeHatin1983
Member since 2008 • 1044 Posts

[QUOTE="DontBeHatin1983"]

[QUOTE="gamecubepad"]

Both Windows PCs and 360s are MS platforms. MS created the Xbox as a way of getting royalties for PC games. When a lion's share of pc gamers use linux then I will consider the possibility that they aren't MS exclusive.

gamecubepad

sony makes PC's, as far as i know MS isnt getting any royalties from PC gaming (not sure)

That's hardware. Find me some PC games that don't have Windows XP/Vista as a requirement. Microsoft is the proprietor of DirectX, another requirement for most PC games.

Face it, MS is the dominating force in PC gaming. They set the standards.

there is also Mac but dosent support all the games.

Avatar image for MortalDecay
MortalDecay

4298

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#92 MortalDecay
Member since 2005 • 4298 Posts
[QUOTE="MortalDecay"][QUOTE="aaronmullan"] Cool. Packard Bell are also getting money for my monitor, Nvida for my video card, how about the Government for the electricity? Going to throw that in there too? aaronmullan
Talk about missing the point....

Nah, I got your silly point. Who cares if MS get profit for their OS? They still don't control the gaming market for PC, PERIOD.

Then fanboys need to stop with all of this crap about how MS has nothing to do with PC gaming, when they have a lot to do with it. Silly, or not, it's a fact.
Avatar image for lowe0
lowe0

13692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#93 lowe0
Member since 2004 • 13692 Posts
This if from people i talked to and what it used to be but so you win with the licensing, but either way the express edition lose alot of tools especialy for large dev companiessavagetwinkie
Why would a large dev be using VS Express? I can get Visual Studio Pro with MSDN for 800 a seat, and it's good for 3 years worth of upgrades through SA. That's about 1-2% of a good coder's salary.
Avatar image for deactivated-58b6232955e4a
deactivated-58b6232955e4a

15594

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#94 deactivated-58b6232955e4a
Member since 2006 • 15594 Posts
[QUOTE="aaronmullan"][QUOTE="MortalDecay"] Talk about missing the point....MortalDecay
Nah, I got your silly point. Who cares if MS get profit for their OS? They still don't control the gaming market for PC, PERIOD.

Then fanboys need to stop with all of this crap about how MS has nothing to do with PC gaming, when they have a lot to do with it. Silly, or not, it's a fact.

:| no they really don't have much to do with it.
Avatar image for savagetwinkie
savagetwinkie

7981

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#95 savagetwinkie
Member since 2008 • 7981 Posts
[QUOTE="savagetwinkie"] This if from people i talked to and what it used to be but so you win with the licensing, but either way the express edition lose alot of tools especialy for large dev companieslowe0
Why would a large dev be using VS Express? I can get Visual Studio Pro with MSDN for 800 a seat, and it's good for 3 years worth of upgrades through SA. That's about 1-2% of a good coder's salary.

i was just pointing out that M$ does see money off of game developement on windows, not for each game sold but at least in the tools to dev fo on windows, then some guy said they'd could do it for free using express...
Avatar image for savagetwinkie
savagetwinkie

7981

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#96 savagetwinkie
Member since 2008 • 7981 Posts
[QUOTE="MortalDecay"][QUOTE="aaronmullan"] Nah, I got your silly point. Who cares if MS get profit for their OS? They still don't control the gaming market for PC, PERIOD.SAGE_OF_FIRE
Then fanboys need to stop with all of this crap about how MS has nothing to do with PC gaming, when they have a lot to do with it. Silly, or not, it's a fact.

:| no they really don't have much to do with it.

actually so long as people support directx they pretty much own pc gaming, most games use that, so in order to play games you need windows..
Avatar image for cainetao11
cainetao11

38077

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 77

User Lists: 1

#97 cainetao11
Member since 2006 • 38077 Posts

[QUOTE="Animal-Mother"][QUOTE="bphan"]

I don't Sony fans would like it because it just helps Microsoft and makes them look better which is true

bphan

No the PC is a separate platform in itself. MS doesn't own PC gaming

But Microsof is the leader of the PC gaming alliance.

Who makes those "I'm a PC" commercials?
Avatar image for savagetwinkie
savagetwinkie

7981

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#98 savagetwinkie
Member since 2008 • 7981 Posts
[QUOTE="bphan"]

[QUOTE="Animal-Mother"] No the PC is a separate platform in itself. MS doesn't own PC gamingcainetao11

But Microsof is the leader of the PC gaming alliance.

Who makes those "I'm a PC" commercials?

mac and windows, i've never seen a linux commercial, granted i did see a new one i wanted to try.
Avatar image for StealthKnife
StealthKnife

2104

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#99 StealthKnife
Member since 2008 • 2104 Posts

synonymous with PCs?

bphan
i dont think so... MS makes the most popular OS used for computers... but with out Hardware... a PC is nothing either way.. PC + PS3 = :)
Avatar image for lowe0
lowe0

13692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#100 lowe0
Member since 2004 • 13692 Posts

[QUOTE="lowe0"][QUOTE="savagetwinkie"] This if from people i talked to and what it used to be but so you win with the licensing, but either way the express edition lose alot of tools especialy for large dev companiessavagetwinkie
Why would a large dev be using VS Express? I can get Visual Studio Pro with MSDN for 800 a seat, and it's good for 3 years worth of upgrades through SA. That's about 1-2% of a good coder's salary.

i was just pointing out that M$ does see money off of game developement on windows, not for each game sold but at least in the tools to dev fo on windows, then some guy said they'd could do it for free using express...

Yeah, but Express is actually pretty important to the business model. The real limitation of the Express IDEs isn't what you can use it for - they're pretty permissive about that, and you can indeed release commercial apps written with it - but that you can't plug anything into it, for example source control. MS knows they don't have to put limits on what you can or can't release with VSE, because Visual Studio is one of the few apps MS writes that is so damn good it pays for itself in time saved.

That said, you don't even need VSE to program on Windows. There are plenty of other C++ IDEs, if you don't plan on using XNA, or if you really hate yourself, you could always fire up a text editor and gcc :cry:.