SJW ruined Battlefield 5? AngryJoe in trouble for defending women

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for ivangrozny
IvanGrozny

1939

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1  Edited By IvanGrozny
Member since 2015 • 1939 Posts

There is a big controversy going around: BFV preorders are 85% behind COD: BlackOps 4.

AngyJoe, in one of his recent videos, had blamed low BF pre-orders on misogynists and had received a big backlash from his own fans, his video downvoted to hell.

After the backlash, AngryJoe had tried to back down on his previous video's statements, but still had got a huge amount of downvotes

In his third video, AngryJoe actually jumps on Anti-EA and anti-SJW hate wagon LOL

Hilarious youtube drama. Enjoy.

Avatar image for FireEmblem_Man
FireEmblem_Man

20389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#2  Edited By FireEmblem_Man
Member since 2004 • 20389 Posts

LOL Angryjoe isn't very smart. Also, he tried to smear TheQuartering over the issue.

Avatar image for texasgoldrush
texasgoldrush

15264

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#3 texasgoldrush
Member since 2003 • 15264 Posts

@FireEmblem_Man said:

LOL Angryjoe isn't very smart. Also, he tried to smear TheQuartering over the issue.

Smarter than the alt right shitbaggers who try to say that BFV is solely failing because of inclusion.

Angry Joe is exactly right on BFV's problems.

Avatar image for Jacanuk
Jacanuk

20281

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 42

User Lists: 0

#4  Edited By Jacanuk
Member since 2011 • 20281 Posts

Who the frag cares? BF5 pre-orders are down because the game is nothing new and just the more of the same old.

Not because of a few videos showed on E3 with women.

Avatar image for that_old_guy
That_Old_Guy

1233

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#5 That_Old_Guy
Member since 2018 • 1233 Posts

Cool beans

Avatar image for Archangel3371
Archangel3371

46965

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#6 Archangel3371
Member since 2004 • 46965 Posts

I think that the anti-SJW backlash with Battlefield V is just a very vocal minority. I think that the biggest problems with Battlefield V is that it has become buried in a very packed period of game releases, poor marketing, and perhaps even their numbering convention of the games.

Avatar image for BenjaminBanklin
BenjaminBanklin

11563

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7  Edited By BenjaminBanklin
Member since 2004 • 11563 Posts
@FireEmblem_Man said:

LOL Angryjoe isn't very smart. Also, he tried to smear TheQuartering over the issue.

**** TheQuartering, for real. Nothing that's a little different from the norm can survive due to internet hate trains. Fanboy Internet only has one political opinion, and it spits directly in the face of free speech.

Avatar image for zappat
Zappat

1592

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#8  Edited By Zappat
Member since 2018 • 1592 Posts
@FireEmblem_Man said:

LOL Angryjoe isn't very smart. Also, he tried to smear TheQuartering over the issue.

He isn't smart? Each of those videos have half a million views+, much more than his past videos. Lol

But anyways, gamer incels are so pathetic. Apparently their masculinity is so fragile they feel threatened by fictional female characters FFS. The faster gaming gets rid of this crowd the better it will become.

Avatar image for FireEmblem_Man
FireEmblem_Man

20389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#9 FireEmblem_Man
Member since 2004 • 20389 Posts
@texasgoldrush said:
@FireEmblem_Man said:

LOL Angryjoe isn't very smart. Also, he tried to smear TheQuartering over the issue.

Smarter than the alt right shitbaggers who try to say that BFV is solely failing because of inclusion.

Angry Joe is exactly right on BFV's problems.

Hahahahahhahahaha! Keep up with the laughs

Avatar image for FireEmblem_Man
FireEmblem_Man

20389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#10 FireEmblem_Man
Member since 2004 • 20389 Posts
@BenjaminBanklin said:
@FireEmblem_Man said:

LOL Angryjoe isn't very smart. Also, he tried to smear TheQuartering over the issue.

**** TheQuartering, for real. Nothing that's a little different from the norm can survive due to internet hate trains. Fanboy Internet only has one political opinion, and it spits directly in the face of free speech.

That's a nice way for you to make conclusions without knowing what he talks about

Avatar image for FireEmblem_Man
FireEmblem_Man

20389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#11 FireEmblem_Man
Member since 2004 • 20389 Posts
@zappat said:
@FireEmblem_Man said:

LOL Angryjoe isn't very smart. Also, he tried to smear TheQuartering over the issue.

He isn't smart? Each of those videos have half a million views+, much more than his past videos. Lol

But anyways, gamer incels are so pathetic. Apparently their masculinity is so fragile they feel threatened by fictional female characters FFS. The faster gaming gets rid of this crowd the better it will become.

After his 2 stupid videos, his viewership and subs dropped. The 3rd video is a desperate attempt to win them back, again, NOT VERY SMART OF HIM!

Also, lol, at soyboy gamers trying to impress feminist.

Avatar image for BenjaminBanklin
BenjaminBanklin

11563

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 BenjaminBanklin
Member since 2004 • 11563 Posts
@FireEmblem_Man said:
@zappat said:
@FireEmblem_Man said:

LOL Angryjoe isn't very smart. Also, he tried to smear TheQuartering over the issue.

He isn't smart? Each of those videos have half a million views+, much more than his past videos. Lol

But anyways, gamer incels are so pathetic. Apparently their masculinity is so fragile they feel threatened by fictional female characters FFS. The faster gaming gets rid of this crowd the better it will become.

After his 2 stupid videos, his viewership and subs dropped. The 3rd video is a desperate attempt to win them back, again, NOT VERY SMART OF HIM!

Also, lol, at soyboy gamers trying to impress feminist.

LOL at social reject trying to tell us what's up.

Avatar image for deactivated-5c56012aaa167
deactivated-5c56012aaa167

2538

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#13 deactivated-5c56012aaa167
Member since 2016 • 2538 Posts

I've heard that some Battlefieldmarketing guys have also insulted some of their fans which may also be one of the reasons that pre orders are low.

As for Joe, I couldn't care any less. He is just an angry annoying casual gamer.

Avatar image for zappat
Zappat

1592

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#14 Zappat
Member since 2018 • 1592 Posts
@FireEmblem_Man said:

After his 2 stupid videos, his viewership and subs dropped. The 3rd video is a desperate attempt to win them back, again, NOT VERY SMART OF HIM!

Also, lol, at soyboy gamers trying to impress feminist.

Well maybe his audience will improve.

I'm as critical of crazy feminist overreactions as I am of hysterical antifeminists. Both groups are two sides of the same coin and equally pathetic.

Avatar image for texasgoldrush
texasgoldrush

15264

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#15 texasgoldrush
Member since 2003 • 15264 Posts

@zappat said:
@FireEmblem_Man said:

After his 2 stupid videos, his viewership and subs dropped. The 3rd video is a desperate attempt to win them back, again, NOT VERY SMART OF HIM!

Also, lol, at soyboy gamers trying to impress feminist.

Well maybe his audience will improve.

I'm as critical of crazy feminist overreactions as I am of hysterical antifeminists. Both groups are two sides of the same coin and equally pathetic.

Wrong.....this is lazy bothsideism

You may not like feminist overreactions, I don't (see Mashable review on Octopath Traveler) but do not compare them to the vileness of the right wing intolerant scumbags.

Avatar image for texasgoldrush
texasgoldrush

15264

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#16 texasgoldrush
Member since 2003 • 15264 Posts

@FireEmblem_Man said:
@texasgoldrush said:
@FireEmblem_Man said:

LOL Angryjoe isn't very smart. Also, he tried to smear TheQuartering over the issue.

Smarter than the alt right shitbaggers who try to say that BFV is solely failing because of inclusion.

Angry Joe is exactly right on BFV's problems.

Hahahahahhahahaha! Keep up with the laughs

So its release date, poor marketing, not having a beta yet, and past controversy with DICE isn't a factor?

He must be not very smart....lol

Avatar image for Shewgenja
Shewgenja

21456

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#17  Edited By Shewgenja
Member since 2009 • 21456 Posts

One of World War IIs most venerated soldiers with one of the highest body counts of Nazis was a woman.

Avatar image for FireEmblem_Man
FireEmblem_Man

20389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#18 FireEmblem_Man
Member since 2004 • 20389 Posts
@texasgoldrush said:
@FireEmblem_Man said:
@texasgoldrush said:
@FireEmblem_Man said:

LOL Angryjoe isn't very smart. Also, he tried to smear TheQuartering over the issue.

Smarter than the alt right shitbaggers who try to say that BFV is solely failing because of inclusion.

Angry Joe is exactly right on BFV's problems.

Hahahahahhahahaha! Keep up with the laughs

So its release date, poor marketing, not having a beta yet, and past controversy with DICE isn't a factor?

He must be not very smart....lol

That's one of the reasons that TheQuartering pointed out, Einstein

Avatar image for BigBadBully
BigBadBully

2367

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 BigBadBully
Member since 2006 • 2367 Posts

Or maybe you just dont pre-order and buy the game at launch or few days/weeks later.

Also, isnt the Call of duty beta tied to pre-ordering? Think people are getting a bit dramatic over nothing.

EA has Origin Access and EA Access, no incentive to pre-order the game since you'll have access to play it and can buy it once your trial time is up.

Avatar image for creepywelps
Creepywelps

2964

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 Creepywelps
Member since 2015 • 2964 Posts

Just watched that the quartering guys video. He makes Joe look foolish.

Avatar image for uninspiredcup
uninspiredcup

62929

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 86

User Lists: 2

#21 uninspiredcup
Member since 2013 • 62929 Posts

Remove the female aspect, it would still be a pretty shitty trailer. The game footage shown looked more of the same. And after Battlefront 2 which reached government awareness of shadinesses, it's probably a culmination of different factors.

It's nice to see sjw's touting it cry though. Very kek.

Avatar image for Ant_17
Ant_17

13634

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#22 Ant_17
Member since 2005 • 13634 Posts

Lol, 2 videos over his video.

Avatar image for BassMan
BassMan

18752

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 233

User Lists: 0

#23 BassMan  Online
Member since 2002 • 18752 Posts

The guy is sharing his opinion on his channel. The fact that it turns into drama is pathetic. Do people seriously waste time watching all these videos with back and forth responses between Youtubers? Stop wasting time with all this Youtube and Twitch bullshit! Go play some fucking games!

Avatar image for FireEmblem_Man
FireEmblem_Man

20389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#24 FireEmblem_Man
Member since 2004 • 20389 Posts
@BassMan said:

The guy is sharing his opinion on his channel. The fact that it turns into drama is pathetic. Do people seriously waste time watching all these videos with back and forth responses between Youtubers? Stop wasting time with all this Youtube and Twitch bullshit! Go play some fucking games!

How can they? They're too busy feeding the outrage mob, to get attention.

Avatar image for davillain
DaVillain

58734

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#25 DaVillain  Moderator
Member since 2014 • 58734 Posts

I love how Joe tries to defend the low pre-orders with the release date excuse. The pre-orders are low because EA told people "if they don't like it don't buy it" why he doesn't want to accept that simple fact? Not to mention, some gamers are getting wiser to NOT pre-order at all when you should be waiting for reviews anyways. He's not wrong. The SJW thing has little nothing to do with the low sales. Amusing that hardcore Anti-SJWs actually think they did this lol.

Why would I pre-order BFV when I have EA Origin? Think about that Joe.

Avatar image for judaspete
judaspete

8135

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#26  Edited By judaspete
Member since 2005 • 8135 Posts

@BenjaminBanklin said:
@FireEmblem_Man said:
@zappat said:
@FireEmblem_Man said:

LOL Angryjoe isn't very smart. Also, he tried to smear TheQuartering over the issue.

He isn't smart? Each of those videos have half a million views+, much more than his past videos. Lol

But anyways, gamer incels are so pathetic. Apparently their masculinity is so fragile they feel threatened by fictional female characters FFS. The faster gaming gets rid of this crowd the better it will become.

After his 2 stupid videos, his viewership and subs dropped. The 3rd video is a desperate attempt to win them back, again, NOT VERY SMART OF HIM!

Also, lol, at soyboy gamers trying to impress feminist.

LOL at social reject trying to tell us what's up.

I love the idea that anyone is trying to impress females, with their opinions about video games. If you want to impress females, start by talking about any subject other than video games.

Avatar image for onesiphorus
onesiphorus

5470

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 6

#27 onesiphorus
Member since 2014 • 5470 Posts

Does this issue warrants a thread in System Wars?

Avatar image for GameboyTroy
GameboyTroy

9864

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 1

#28 GameboyTroy
Member since 2011 • 9864 Posts

Let AngryJoe defend women.

Avatar image for Cloud_imperium
Cloud_imperium

15146

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 103

User Lists: 8

#29 Cloud_imperium
Member since 2013 • 15146 Posts

Do people even play games these days or whine about women and homos/bi.

Avatar image for R4gn4r0k
R4gn4r0k

49125

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 R4gn4r0k
Member since 2004 • 49125 Posts

Can't believe Black Ops IIII is selling so well, it looks absolutely awful.

Also a lot of people were upset about the singleplayer being M.I.A. so good job of standing behind what you want people !

But then of course Black Ops seems to be a popular franchise, and Treyarch is certainly the less shitty of the three.

Avatar image for musalala
musalala

3131

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#31 musalala
Member since 2008 • 3131 Posts

I think the game is flopping for the Battlefront 2 debacle and more importantly its coming out at the same time as Red Dead Redemption which is just suicide, aint no body got time for BFV when Rockstar are releasing another masterpiece

Avatar image for KungfuKitten
KungfuKitten

27389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 42

User Lists: 0

#32  Edited By KungfuKitten
Member since 2006 • 27389 Posts

I don't like that there are actual comments that are anti-women on these video's. Keep it classy. Come on. That's not cool. We're all gamers, all people. We don't need that.

Avatar image for Gatygun
Gatygun

2709

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 Gatygun
Member since 2010 • 2709 Posts
@Cloud_imperium said:

Do people even play games these days or whine about women and homos/bi.

Wouldn't be shocked if most of them didn't even play.

Avatar image for zappat
Zappat

1592

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#34  Edited By Zappat
Member since 2018 • 1592 Posts

@texasgoldrush: Well maybe not feminist overreactions but a part of the current feminist discourse is already getting out of hand IMO. It's becoming too exclusive and even sexist which can undermine the whole movement, distract from real issues and give extreme right wing narratives a big push. Part of the current feminist discourse is disturbingly similar to conservative puritanism and tries to police morality which can turn into a witch hunt and is a precursor to fascist tendencies.

Avatar image for KungfuKitten
KungfuKitten

27389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 42

User Lists: 0

#35  Edited By KungfuKitten
Member since 2006 • 27389 Posts

@zappat said:

@texasgoldrush: Well maybe not feminist overreactions but a part of the current feminist discourse is already getting out of hand IMO. It's becoming too exclusive and even sexist which can undermine the whole movement, distract from real issues and give extreme right wing narratives a big push. Part of the current feminist discourse is disturbingly similar to conservative puritanism and tries to police morality which can turn into a witch hunt and is a precursor to fascist tendencies.

Exactly. I'm concerned about exactly that. And the polarization. Radical right and left are becoming more and more comparable and prevalent in the media as it polarizes. Maybe we're not there yet, but it's not necessarily getting better.

This is why I'm concerned about echo chambers and other ways in which discourse is denied and politically filtered. We could use more nuance, critique and self-reflection. Team-versus-team or all-or-nothing mentalities don't model the reality of the situation.

Avatar image for sonny2dap
sonny2dap

2217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 sonny2dap
Member since 2008 • 2217 Posts

@KungfuKitten said:
@zappat said:

@texasgoldrush: Well maybe not feminist overreactions but a part of the current feminist discourse is already getting out of hand IMO. It's becoming too exclusive and even sexist which can undermine the whole movement, distract from real issues and give extreme right wing narratives a big push. Part of the current feminist discourse is disturbingly similar to conservative puritanism and tries to police morality which can turn into a witch hunt and is a precursor to fascist tendencies.

Exactly. I'm concerned about exactly that. And the polarization. Radical right and left are becoming more and more comparable and prevalent in the media as it polarizes. Maybe we're not there yet, but it's not necessarily getting better.

This is why I'm concerned about echo chambers and other ways in which discourse is denied and politically filtered. We could use more nuance, critique and self-reflection. Team-versus-team or all-or-nothing mentalities don't model the reality of the situation.

The Radical right and left are the same, in this particular instance that is Identity politics authoritarians, the only difference is the boxes each of them want to put you in.

Avatar image for zappat
Zappat

1592

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#37 Zappat
Member since 2018 • 1592 Posts
@sonny2dap said:
@KungfuKitten said:
@zappat said:

@texasgoldrush: Well maybe not feminist overreactions but a part of the current feminist discourse is already getting out of hand IMO. It's becoming too exclusive and even sexist which can undermine the whole movement, distract from real issues and give extreme right wing narratives a big push. Part of the current feminist discourse is disturbingly similar to conservative puritanism and tries to police morality which can turn into a witch hunt and is a precursor to fascist tendencies.

Exactly. I'm concerned about exactly that. And the polarization. Radical right and left are becoming more and more comparable and prevalent in the media as it polarizes. Maybe we're not there yet, but it's not necessarily getting better.

This is why I'm concerned about echo chambers and other ways in which discourse is denied and politically filtered. We could use more nuance, critique and self-reflection. Team-versus-team or all-or-nothing mentalities don't model the reality of the situation.

The Radical right and left are the same, in this particular instance that is Identity politics authoritarians, the only difference is the boxes each of them want to put you in.

I'm 100% in favor of inclusion of all identities in society. People can decide to be whatever the hell they want to be freely and others should respect that. And that's where I disagree with a portion of the left that demonizes more traditional roles. If you're going to be inclusive don't try to tell others their lifestyle is worse than yours, that's the opposite of being inclusive.

I have some friends in gender studies and humanities, most of them are pretty reasonable. But within this group I have found a great deal of intolerance bordering towards hate and moralistic impositions. For example I met a girl who would only use inclusive language while we talked, a thing I have 0 problems with. It's her mouth, her decision. But then she complains and corrects others constantly. If your ideology is making you police something as language on others then you're already bordering dangerous territory. It's no different from the right pretending to proclaim how others should live their lives and micromanaging their sex practices. I was discussing with this same girl about going to a nudity friendly place here in Europe because I like people being fine with their bodies and showing them, it can be a very liberating experience. She said she liked that women can be naked without guys pervertly looking at them but that she still doesn't like it because there are too many penises there. And she said that with almost a repulsive expression on her face. So she basically has linked the part of a body of a whole group of people to her distaste towards the patriarchy. It is ok to have a distaste towards the patriarchy seeing it as an abstract ideological. cultural and economic force and fighting to change it but it is another thing to link that to the sexual organ of a particular group of people. Then you're condemning people for something they have no way to control and just because of how they were born which is awfully similar to what the religious right does with gays or transgenders.

Basically my mantra is live and let live. People can call it simplistic sometimes but it is a good jumpstart to deal with issues such as this. I have no business telling others how to dress, eat, have sex, make their video games or even buy their video games. I can suggest and let them know why I don't choose to do that or why I think their decisions are not good in my view. I'm even in favor of making fun of everything in a way as long as you're brave enough to also make fun of yourself. But to see them repulsively or try to change their decisions by force is another story. And this is how fascist tendencies start, when your world view suddenly becomes a moralist code to be imposed and by which you judge and condemn everyone.

Avatar image for Litchie
Litchie

36135

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#38 Litchie
Member since 2003 • 36135 Posts

It's so much easier for my psyche to ignore this kind of bullshit. So I will.

I'll also gladly buy a Battlefield game again if they ever go back to what made it good. If there are women or no women, I don't give a single piece of shit. I want a fun non dumbed down BF game. I've got a feeling that that's way too much to ask for from today's DICE though. They'd have to stop doing console versions. And even then, do they even have people left at the studio who knows what made the older BF games a hundred times better than the CoD-ified ones? Doubt it.

Avatar image for Litchie
Litchie

36135

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#39 Litchie
Member since 2003 • 36135 Posts
@R4gn4r0k said:

Can't believe Black Ops IIII is selling so well, it looks absolutely awful.

The name is the reason, I'm guessing. Grandmas knows what CoD is these days. There's probably more people today that have heard about CoD than Pokémon. Whenever videogames is being brought up in TV shows or whatever, it's always about CoD. It's the casual game to get coupled with FIFA.

Avatar image for deactivated-5c18005f903a1
deactivated-5c18005f903a1

4626

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 deactivated-5c18005f903a1
Member since 2016 • 4626 Posts

@Litchie said:
@R4gn4r0k said:

Can't believe Black Ops IIII is selling so well, it looks absolutely awful.

The name is the reason, I'm guessing. Grandmas knows what CoD is these days. There's probably more people today that have heard about CoD than Pokémon. Whenever videogames is being brought up in TV shows or whatever, it's always about CoD. It's the casual game to get coupled with FIFA.

The only Cod my Grandma knows is served in batter with chips.

Only joking... she's been dead for years.

Avatar image for mistervulpes
MisterVulpes

797

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#41 MisterVulpes
Member since 2018 • 797 Posts

I mean, both extreme sides of this topic are wrong.

BFV isn’t failing because of inclusion, it’s failing because it looks dopey and stupid with robot arms.

BFV isn’t failing because of white misogynists, it’s failing because it looks dopey and stupid with robot arms.

I’m sure people will still play it. BF1 looked great and was fun but got old incredibly fast. The formula is just getting a bit stale for me.

Avatar image for texasgoldrush
texasgoldrush

15264

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#42 texasgoldrush
Member since 2003 • 15264 Posts

@sonny2dap said:
@KungfuKitten said:
@zappat said:

@texasgoldrush: Well maybe not feminist overreactions but a part of the current feminist discourse is already getting out of hand IMO. It's becoming too exclusive and even sexist which can undermine the whole movement, distract from real issues and give extreme right wing narratives a big push. Part of the current feminist discourse is disturbingly similar to conservative puritanism and tries to police morality which can turn into a witch hunt and is a precursor to fascist tendencies.

Exactly. I'm concerned about exactly that. And the polarization. Radical right and left are becoming more and more comparable and prevalent in the media as it polarizes. Maybe we're not there yet, but it's not necessarily getting better.

This is why I'm concerned about echo chambers and other ways in which discourse is denied and politically filtered. We could use more nuance, critique and self-reflection. Team-versus-team or all-or-nothing mentalities don't model the reality of the situation.

The Radical right and left are the same, in this particular instance that is Identity politics authoritarians, the only difference is the boxes each of them want to put you in.

No, they are not. The views of the radical right are far more morally despicable than the views of the radical left. While the actions are both are despicable, the radical right is despicable by nature.

There is no "both sides".

Avatar image for SecretPolice
SecretPolice

45713

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43  Edited By SecretPolice
Member since 2007 • 45713 Posts

SJW = Commies, whether they know it or not... Fact. :P

Avatar image for deactivated-5f3ec00254b0d
deactivated-5f3ec00254b0d

6278

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 54

User Lists: 0

#44 deactivated-5f3ec00254b0d
Member since 2009 • 6278 Posts

@SecretPolice: And anti-sjws are all Nazis. ?

Avatar image for sonny2dap
sonny2dap

2217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 sonny2dap
Member since 2008 • 2217 Posts

@texasgoldrush: Both ideologies are inherently oppressive of the individual, both advocate violence to achieve their aims. The right says (X) group are bad because (y) reason, the left says (a) group is bad because (b) reason, we can kill (x)/(a) because (y)/(b). That is the endgame for both ideologies we have seen examples of both in the 20th century it didn't end well in either case.

Avatar image for SecretPolice
SecretPolice

45713

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 SecretPolice
Member since 2007 • 45713 Posts

@phbz:

All SJW are Pansies. :D

Also, just remember... if I don't get mah rent money today, somebody's gonna get their salad tossed tonight. lol :P

Avatar image for stuff238
stuff238

3284

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#47 stuff238
Member since 2012 • 3284 Posts

EA told me the game is not for me and told me not to buy it. So I won’t.

Angry Joe told me and millions of others that we were sexist/racist, so his videos are not for me. Unsubbed.

Ghostbusters Reboot told me I was sexist/racist, so I have never seen it.

The Last Jedi was insanely SJW and because of that, Solo flopped because people like me got the message that Star Wars is Dead and not for us anymore.

Do the SJW’s understand yet that if you insult the consumers, you will lose money?

Avatar image for deactivated-5f3ec00254b0d
deactivated-5f3ec00254b0d

6278

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 54

User Lists: 0

#48 deactivated-5f3ec00254b0d
Member since 2009 • 6278 Posts

@SecretPolice:

Avatar image for SecretPolice
SecretPolice

45713

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 SecretPolice
Member since 2007 • 45713 Posts

@phbz:

Avatar image for nepu7supastar7
nepu7supastar7

6773

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 51

User Lists: 0

#50 nepu7supastar7
Member since 2007 • 6773 Posts

@ivangrozny:

1st two videos were Joe's true opinion. Sad to see so many damn anti-sjw men ruin so many franchises wanting to include women!