[QUOTE="lucas_kelly"][QUOTE="falconclan"][QUOTE="Stumpt25"][QUOTE="blues3531"] That review for mgs4 was probably the most well written and dead on reviews the site has posted in the last 3 years. It is reminiscent of greg k's great writing style. Seriously awesome review, great score as well.
Anyone else think the review was just great?
falconclan
TBH, if there was anything that lost the credibility of the score that GS gave, it was that Kevin rated it.
This is the same guy that rated AC = 9.0, NMH = 9.0, ME = 8.5 etc....
The guy only writes the review, the scores are all of them, they collaborate :| Way to know the rating system :DI don't think it completely works like that. He would still have more input in the final score than anyone else because he is the one reviewing it.
No, they all have equal say, and what they come up with is what he puts. Its always been like this. They would never just let 1 guy rate a game, because there are too many different tastes. Thats why I'm surprised MGS4 got a 10, its one of those love hate games. You either love it or hate it, apparently all the gamespot writers love it. Thats a bad way of doing it. Gamespot just lost even more credibility for me. You cant properly score a game unless you have spent a decent amount of time on it. I'm sure not all the GS editors spend the same amount of time playing the game as the editor reviewing the game does.
Log in to comment