Now that all types of fanboys have had some AAA hyped games flop (i.e. Crackdown. Zelda, and VF5), can we all now agree that Gamespot is not biased against our favorite console and that sometimes our hype creates more excitement than it's worth?
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Now that all types of fanboys have had some AAA hyped games flop (i.e. Crackdown. Zelda, and VF5), can we all now agree that Gamespot is not biased against our favorite console and that sometimes our hype creates more excitement than it's worth?
Gamespot is biased agaist the PC?Now that all types of fanboys have had some AAA hyped games flop (i.e. Crackdown. Zelda, and VF5), can we all now agree that Gamespot is not biased against our favorite console and that sometimes our hype creates more excitement than it's worth?
Nova_Mongoose
there not biased. but they are very picky. very picky. wether u think its bad or good is ur opinion. me i guess its good. i mean they dont give high scores often like gameinformer. how many 10s have they given in the last 3 years alone like 12.(i know its like 6 or 7 but u get i mean). do i always agree with what they give AAA. no personally graw, splinter cell, pdz, warioware, and god of war dont deserve it but whatever. they have there opinions i have mine.jg4xchampI agree because Game Informer IMO it seems they give really high scores to games that have Shooting in it, alot of games I like they give bad scores because those games they think are Kiddy, but if your game is a shooter or a game where you kill people they always over rate it, I might be wrong but I know that is how it was 2-3 years ago I don't know if it is the same today.
[QUOTE="jg4xchamp"]there not biased. but they are very picky. very picky. wether u think its bad or good is ur opinion. me i guess its good. i mean they dont give high scores often like gameinformer. how many 10s have they given in the last 3 years alone like 12.(i know its like 6 or 7 but u get i mean). do i always agree with what they give AAA. no personally graw, splinter cell, pdz, warioware, and god of war dont deserve it but whatever. they have there opinions i have mine.Nintendo_Ownes7I agree because Game Informer IMO it seems they give really high scores to games that have Shooting in it, alot of games I like they give bad scores because those games they think are Kiddy, but if your game is a shooter or a game where you kill people they always over rate it, I might be wrong but I know that is how it was 2-3 years ago I don't know if it is the same today. well they also gave god of war a 10 and a 9.75, way to overrated IMO, also i love Zelda but TP is not a 10, 9.5 IMO, same with wind waker. RE 4 should have got 9.75, gta and halo both should have gotten 9.75 come on way to many tens.
Gamespot is not biased. I declare that from now on, anyone who says GS is biased is stupid. People here should stop whining and/or teasing about scores on a game from ANOTHER video game console and play some damn videogames! :evil:Shad0ki11ok then i guess im stupid cause i cant see how dead rising could beat out zelda tp for action game of the year........... or how pdz(the universal flop) outscored resistance................... or why one of the only games to score higher at gs then it did at ign was Geow............ LOL, oh well its all in good fun
lol... Crackdown wasnt crazy hyped.... Zelda for the wii is one of the best games ever made. And VF5 has recieved really good reviews. So i dont know what games your talking about. But anyways, Gamespot isnt biased at all. We can agree on thatNow that all types of fanboys have had some AAA hyped games flop (i.e. Crackdown. Zelda, and VF5), can we all now agree that Gamespot is not biased against our favorite console and that sometimes our hype creates more excitement than it's worth?
Nova_Mongoose
Jeff Gerstmann is definitely biased against cooking games. He better not get assigned to the Cooking Mama: Cookoff review!!!joe_g_patton
If we are all gonna agree on one thing it should be that Jeff Gerstmann is an idiot and that his reviews are basically based on shock value and not merit. At leased he isnt biased though. He pumps out terrible reviews for all systems. Way to go Jeff!! As long as Gamespot keeps letting this stupid little boy review games, I will not take their reviews seriously. echelonNobody bats 1000. The guy is paid to present his opinion, not facts. Sometimes his opinion is out of sync with the majority but how does that make anyone an idiot?
[QUOTE="echelon"]If we are all gonna agree on one thing it should be that Jeff Gerstmann is an idiot and that his reviews are basically based on shock value and not merit. At leased he isnt biased though. He pumps out terrible reviews for all systems. Way to go Jeff!! As long as Gamespot keeps letting this stupid little boy review games, I will not take their reviews seriously. NewsboyNobody bats 1000. The guy is paid to present his opinion, not facts. Sometimes his opinion is out of sync with the majority but how does that make anyone an idiot?
[QUOTE="Newsboy"][QUOTE="echelon"]If we are all gonna agree on one thing it should be that Jeff Gerstmann is an idiot and that his reviews are basically based on shock value and not merit. At leased he isnt biased though. He pumps out terrible reviews for all systems. Way to go Jeff!! As long as Gamespot keeps letting this stupid little boy review games, I will not take their reviews seriously. echelonNobody bats 1000. The guy is paid to present his opinion, not facts. Sometimes his opinion is out of sync with the majority but how does that make anyone an idiot?
We can all agree on that the Dodgers are winning thier division right?poopinloop32Agreed, but looking at you sig, I was kind of hoping the Browns would draft JaMarcus. He's a big dude & looks like the only quarterback who could stay healthy while getting sacked 10 times a game. Maybe one day, they will actually put together an offensive line...
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment