And it's beyond meaningless considering that 1 game is the best looking out of all of them. Plus there are plenty of equals. And hell can you even name a single major multiplat that wasn't a port. Imo considering the massive architechture differences it's amazing PS3 got equal games this early. It's just a matter of time until they're all equal.... but I do doubt they'll ever be much better considering PS3's primary advantages can't be really used in a multiplat. Exclusives are what really matter for visuals and PS3 is definitely looking pretty good in that area.
This is true. The only game that's better on the PS3 is Oblivion. It's not a matter of opinion...name any multiplat on the 360 and PS3 and I can name why it's best on 360.
Don't we get a bonus or something since out of all those multiplats, Oblivion was the best? But oh well to me they're all pretty much the same. Even the only one that is really different is Oblivion because loading randomly in the game along with generally long loading times matters a lot to me.
I guess no one has heard about the news on Dirt. http://www.n4g.com/ps3/News-51433.aspx
And as far as some games, it's all opinion. Example: Fight Night Round 3: PS3 version has slighty weaker backgrounds, but the character models and lighting is better.
Overall, the 360's multiplats are better. But that is because developers, especially third party, are not familiar with the complex and unfamiliar architecture of Cell and RSX. The 360's hardware is very similar to that of a PC so the power has been much easier to harness. My opinion is that multiplats are going to look better on the PS3 as time goes on.
Sony should have done more to improve the quality of the PS3 version of multiplat games as it has hurt the console sales and game sales.Sony are trying to sell the PS3 as the more advanced consoleover the 360 but people can't believe that if they see multiplat games side by side and then see the 360 version are better most of the time.
Oh yea, shame on sony for letting the devs to get more comfortable with the 360 hardware a year early.ginglejangle
No one ever used this excuse last gen why use it now? The PS3 was suppose to blow the 360 out of the water from launch, not lag behind it and make excuses for performance issues with multiplats.
I guess no one has heard about the news on Dirt. http://www.n4g.com/ps3/News-51433.aspx
And as far as some games, it's all opinion. Example: Fight Night Round 3: PS3 version has slighty weaker backgrounds, but the character models and lighting is better.
But yes, overall the 360's multplats are better.
CR00K
didn't fight night for the PS3 have frame rate problems? I'm asking! not passing along as fact.
Aren't current games that are coming out now getting the same score on both consoles? Such as The Darkness.
And thank goodness the porting of 360 games will end because frankly they were doing a poor job with most of the games. Of course Rainbow Six Vegas and Oblivion being the exceptions.
This is true. The only game that's better on the PS3 is Oblivion. It's not a matter of opinion...name any multiplat on the 360 and PS3 and I can name why it's best on 360.dracula_16
I guess no one has heard about the news on Dirt. http://www.n4g.com/ps3/News-51433.aspx
And as far as some games, it's all opinion. Example: Fight Night Round 3: PS3 version has slighty weaker backgrounds, but the character models and lighting is better.
But yes, overall the 360's multplats are better.
CR00K
the lighting is better on the 360 version along with backgrounds and fps..the only area ps3 is better is the extra skins on the boxers.
what you need to ask your self is..do i look at the actual fighters more than the backgrounds.but still the 360 version is better in those areas.
[QUOTE="dracula_16"]This is true. The only game that's better on the PS3 is Oblivion. It's not a matter of opinion...name any multiplat on the 360 and PS3 and I can name why it's best on 360.white_sox
the darkness...surely your kidding??
the ps3 version is a jaggy mess with lower res textures and the rendering is not as good..ive played both.
Every multiplathas beenoptimized for the 360 then ported to the PS3, when this is not the case and games are optimized for the PS3 and ported to the 360 people will see the difference, its just that this early in the consoles life crappy ports are all we see because its all developers have had enough time to make.Oblivion was notlike this asBethesda actually took time to optimize itand it was better on the PS3. Another game which may bring light into the multiplatform war is GRAW 2, isn't it also be optimized for the PS3 although it is Ubisoft and they seem content to release low quality ports. i'dhappily wait a few months if it means a better game in the end. So just save judgement untill 360 starts getting PS3 ports.
[QUOTE="white_sox"][QUOTE="dracula_16"]This is true. The only game that's better on the PS3 is Oblivion. It's not a matter of opinion...name any multiplat on the 360 and PS3 and I can name why it's best on 360.daveg1
the darkness...surely your kidding??
the ps3 version is a jaggy mess with lower res textures and the rendering is not as good..ive played both.
I haven't, I thought the online was unplayable in the 360 version and the ps3 version is supposed to have better colors.
[QUOTE="white_sox"][QUOTE="dracula_16"]This is true. The only game that's better on the PS3 is Oblivion. It's not a matter of opinion...name any multiplat on the 360 and PS3 and I can name why it's best on 360.white_sox
the darkness...surely your kidding??
the ps3 version is a jaggy mess with lower res textures and the rendering is not as good..ive played both.
I haven't, I thought the online was unplayable in the 360 version and the ps3 version is supposed to have better colors.dont know about the online...you will be hard pushed to even notice any differences in the colour.i played it on a plasma hdtv with great colours and they were the same or unnoticable at all..thebigdifferences are the ones i stated...the ps3 version does'nt even look as if its using AA at all...
dont know about the online...you will be hard pushed to even notice any differences in the colour.i played it on a plasma hdtv with great colours and they were the same or unnoticable at all..thebigdifferences are the ones i stated...the ps3 version does'nt even look as if its using AA at all...daveg1
Oh, I misread I thought you said laggy mess so I naturally assumed the online.
Log in to comment