I don't own a PS3, nor have i ever played one of these games ever. I assume its like Mario 64 and so on since. Most sites i see have given it over a 9.0 and all so i fig it must be one of those must have for PS3 fans and whatnot. I know gamespot is trying to go that hardcore way lately and rate games well below everyone else. I got the 360 and Wii, does this mean for us Wii owners Mario Galaxy is gonna score below an 8.0 ?
And man Gamespot if you read this, where were all any of you who had the BALLS a few weeks ago to rate Halo 3 what it really was. Just a piece of crap game with a horrid storyline thats been done to death more and more. I love how you gave it a 9.5.
Man Halo has not been decent since Halo 1. Anyone with a brain knowsw Half Life 2 smokes Halo out of the water and beyond. How much did Micro pay you guys off. I bet your gonna complain about Contra 4 being hard on the DS also just cause you P***ys can't play games with a challenge anymore. Newbies i tell you.
I still feel PS3 is a joke this gen with price and this blu ray crap. But maybe you should implement in reviews for each 360 game how long the life span will be due to red rings of death.
Mentioning how sucky Halo 3 is should at least get 1000 posts back of idiots claiming its actually better then StarCraft.
Log in to comment