There was no neither on the poll. A lot of SWers will be upset. Anyway, if there is something like Nazi zombies only better I might pick up CoD somewhere down the line when the price drops. Seeing as it's a CoD game, that means probably never. Screw you Activision.
Moh: Pros- Fresh Campaign -Frontline HD remastering with trophies Cons- MP is pretty much a clone of mw2 -Im soooo over modern warfare Black ops: pros - Theatre mode/emblem editor/customization galore -Offline bots (deal sealer for me) -typical short sweet campaign -GUNGAME! Cons- yet to see if MP will be a mess That being said... if i was currently working i'd get both but im not so im only going to be getting gt5 + blackops for rest of the year
The main appeal of Medal of Honor is Battlefield 3.
The campaign looks like it could be alright, but for whatever reason EA's not showing it. Or showing lame rail shooter segments.
The multiplayer will be pointless and redundant.
Not to mention EA has said the oh so charming VIP plan will return for this game. So expect four maps at launch with the rest unlocked after six months. This "reward" counters the reward of getting into the BF3 beta.
As for CoD BO, fish stench doesn't really appeal to me.
In the choice between that and bull****...I honestly just don't know.
Bare in mind the finished moh is nothing like the beta.
dvalo9
It's a lot like the beta. They would need at least another eight months for it to be nothing like the beta.
Probably niether. At least this year. Maybe when I can find BO used after the new year. I have StraCraft2 on the go, Halo: Reach I still have to pick up, DK, and Epic Mickey to play this year. Might squeeze AC: Brotherhood in there if I can.
I've already pre-ordered MOH because I love the franchise and this one should be sweet.
And I really enjoyed Treyarch's COD:WaW so I'll likely support them again. I'm really not a COD fan for any of the MW games, but Treyarch does too good of a job for me to say no.
I'm so glad you got to play the game after beta! So tell me, did you even read the mass amounts of changes they implemented?
bleehum
dunno about him but i havnt... care to share a link with me? Just curious :)
Here it be.
wow..thanks for that. that was a LONG READ! glad they fixed the sniper issues and hit detection! maybe i WILL pick this up ...but probably not at launch though
Bare in mind the finished moh is nothing like the beta.
dvalo9
You must be one of about three people who understand why Betas are released... not to give you a free trial of the game... to test if the structure works, not to show you the finished game... annoys me when people say "Oh the beta was crap im not getting it!".
[QUOTE="campzor"] dunno about him but i havnt... care to share a link with me? Just curious :)campzor
Here it be.
wow..thanks for that. that was a LONG READ! glad they fixed the sniper issues and hit detection! maybe i WILL pick this up ...but probably not at launch though Yeah, I was surprised with the amount of changes when I read it.
I'm so glad you got to play the game after beta! So tell me, did you even read the mass amounts of changes they implemented?
bleehum
dunno about him but i havnt... care to share a link with me? Just curious :)
Here it be.
This is why betas are done.... To improve it by demand of the audience... An intelligent deceision is to release a beta not wait for a buggy crap finished game then have to download gigs of patches which people will just moan that they took too long with the patches.
[QUOTE="McStrongfast"] It's a lot like the beta. They would need at least another eight months for it to be nothing like the beta.
bleehum
I'm so glad you got to play the game after beta! So tell me, did you even read the mass amounts of changes they implemented?
No need for the childish attitude.
After a game goes beta all a developer can do is tweak settings, optimize code and squash bugs to get the game ready for release. Which is gonna do absolute **** to change the fundamental issue with the game, which is that it feels like a stripped down BC2. DICE weren't given enough time to produce something distinct or meaningful.
Neither Reach is better than both imo and I only need one FPS for the rest of the year...the tough decision for me is whether to get Fallout: New Vegas or Assassin's Creed:Brotherhood.
Neither Reach is better than both imo and I only need one FPS for the rest of the year...the tough decision for me is whether to get Fallout: New Vegas or Assassin's Creed:Brotherhood.
TacticalDesire
I'd say BrotherHood. I read previews and Fallout New Vegas apparently isn't addresing problems from the last one. Though New Vegas is being written by ex Black Isle people it should be good in that department and the game promises a puppet state style of gameplay where you affect the city and stuff.
BrotherHood includes a wonderful campaign (we know this because AC2 was great) as well as online which should be interesting
Log in to comment