This topic is locked from further discussion.
Looks about normal for next gen
dosen't look bad though, nothing too mind blowing like some people say it is
And you have to admit that the textures look pretty bad in the last pic
None of those look like gameplay.dgsag
are any of those gameplay screens. Any game can have good CGI heck the CGI cutscenes for Warcraft 3 looked good, but WAsrcraft 3 gameplay graphics arent that goodthe_hsojall of them are gameplay actually ... i'm glad they look as good as cgi tho.
Yea I admit the texture par but we are waiting for other stuff to improve so why not give MGS4 a chance?Looks about normal for next gen
dosen't look bad though, nothing too mind blowing like some people say it is
And you have to admit that the textures look pretty bad in the last pic
nintendogamer6
It looks good ..it will be on par with splinter cell graphicallyBinskiSome even look better imo and I hope it will improve.
Im a big mgs fan and even im slightly disapointment by the latest trailer in terms of graphics, im not gonna lie just because im a big fan im being honest.When you look back at the early screens from mgs2, mgs3 that were taken at a similar stage in development of the last mgs4 trailer, they look less sharpe than how the final product turned out to be, so this gives me faith. Its been a while since we have seen anything on this game, i dont think anyone can judge this game until we see the next trailer which cant be far off. I think this will give us a good idea about how the game will look when it finally ships.
If the game ships looking as good as the HD GC 2006 trailer, then in no way will i be disapointed. This is how i expect the gameplay to look when the game ships if it looks any better than its a bonus, go check it out
There is so many comments that I can make about those pics, but most of them will get me a 2 day suspension, so I will refrain...
edit - OK, I can't help myself - Is that one guy grabbing that statue's p****?
I dont think I have ever thought it was bad. I know its in early stages and using alot of the textures from MGS3. Just halo3 is using a lot of place holder textures from halo2. Its still in pre-pre-alpha. So I expect this game to look awesome. Just look how good MGS3 looks on PS2.KillfoxNot that im saying your wrong but just never got proof,can you provide a link?
None of those look like gameplay.dgsagkojima said that he recording somebody playing the game, and used a cinematic camera angle for the trailer. its like being a spectator in counterstrike.
It looks FANTASTIC. Considering there is still a year left in dev time, I cant wait to see the final product.
People play MGS for the badassary of snake not for the graphics.SKHuskieThe series's high standard in visualls have been one of it's pluses too.
People play MGS for the badassary of snake not for the graphics.SKHuskieWell maybe but if the graphics are good it's still nice.
There is so many comments that I can make about those pics, but most of them will get me a 2 day suspension, so I will refrain...
edit - OK, I can't help myself - Is that one guy grabbing that statue's p****?
REVENGEotSITH
snake is pretending to be a statue, and he is acting like the "see no evil" figure from some other work of art. This is just snake's sense of humor, that all.
[QUOTE="Driftwood111"]Looks around splintercell level. Not bad.dgsagThe first one? Yeah, that looked pretty good for 2002...
are any of those gameplay screens. Any game can have good CGI heck the CGI cutscenes for Warcraft 3 looked good, but WAsrcraft 3 gameplay graphics arent that goodthe_hsojHideo Kojima doesn't use CGI for cutscenes or other stuff. they have always run right of the game engine.
People play MGS for the badassary of snake not for the graphics.SKHuskieVery true. The good grafics is just an added bonus. I remember when MGS1 came out on the PS1, that was killer grafics then;)
These graphics look fine to me... didn't kojima say somewhere in an article or interveiw that he purposely makes the graphics average so it has a better atmosphere in the game or something like that.. the graphics look great besides. I predict this will get a AA like the last MGS... kinda pisses you off when a generic game like gears gets an AAA cause some fat man says so.. oh wellDahaka-UKyeah, well every other game reviewer will give it AAA except for GS... or maybe they don't dare to go that low, every MGS fan would leave the board in rage... making no PS3 fan left realy.
[QUOTE="Conker-Fan"]heres the question: Will it look better than SC5?tegovoltioOr will SC5 look better than MGS4? or will anyone of the MGS fan care? nope.
[QUOTE="dgsag"][QUOTE="Driftwood111"]Looks around splintercell level. Not bad.fuzzysquashThe first one? Yeah, that looked pretty good for 2002...
THOSE SCREENS ARE 100% GAMEPLAY!Sure buddy believe that all you want. Go look at previous Metal Gear trailers claiming it was mostly in game.
Kojima does NOT BS gamers! NONE of the MGS games have featured CGI in any part of them! Not even in cutscenes!
princeofshapeir
I can say the same for halo3. Which is being highly defended yet this game is being completely bashed. Hmm some how I dont think that is right. Since kojima always delivers. I too think bungie will deliver as well. They are both in pre-alpha stages at this point. Come talk to me when it a month away from release or E306 since its supposedly going to be playable.
"ZoMG teh jaggiez! n64 all over again!"JB730
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment