The PC is in the console war. It is a console in my views as much as the Ps3 or 360.
I myself have a gaming PC, along w/ all 3 of the next-gen consoles. I keep my PC updated, usually two updates yearly ~$500, and I don't regret it or claim PC gaming is expansive.
But in terms of the console wars, I often hear that the PC has the best version of multiplat games, and that is the case for me, and many System Warriors. But then when PS3/Wii/360 owners claim that PC gaming is expansive, we say no it isin't you can play the latest games with a two year old pc (which you may be able to play on medium settings at good framerate.).
Pc gaming does cost more if you want the BETTER game. No denying this, so fanboys don't.
SO I ask fellow Manticores and Hermits. What do we choose. Best Versions of Games but also Most expansive, or Competetivly priced and inferior multiplats (inferior compared to PS3/360, as in for example COD4 on Medium settings on PC at a steady framerate ~30FPS, vs. PS3/360 versions at 60FPS and its optimal settings...probably around high-max on the PC, more towards high settings).
So which one gamers?
Best Multiplats and Most exansive (latest games on very high-max) $1,500+
or
Inferior Multiplats and Less expansive (latest games on medium) ~$900
Log in to comment