Sonic Unleashed a Wii exclusive?

Reviewers are simply out of touch.BioShockOwnz

[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]Reviewers are simply out of touch.AlexSays

No, because they like a technically inferior product. It's not opinion when talking about the "technical" parts of the game. And somehow reviewers are blindly reviewing games, or they don't know a sirloin from a filet mignon.

A game is only an exclusive when it's EXCLUSIVE!

[QUOTE="AlexSays"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]Reviewers are simply out of touch.BioShockOwnz

No, because they like a technically inferior product. It's not opinion when talking about the "technical" parts of the game. And somehow reviewers are blindly reviewing games, or they don't know a sirloin from a filet mignon.

[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]

[QUOTE="AlexSays"] Because they disagree with your opinion? Okay, noted.EuroMafia

No, because they like a technically inferior product. It's not opinion when talking about the "technical" parts of the game. And somehow reviewers are blindly reviewing games, or they don't know a sirloin from a filet mignon.

Tell that to the sheep, this is the biggest victory they have had for over six months. kinda sad really...thegoldenpoo

Tell that to the sheep, this is the biggest victory they have had for over six months. kinda sad really...thegoldenpoo

Er, what's scoring got to do with what an exclusive is? If it was only on Wii, it'd be exclusive, but it's not, so it's definitely not one.ithilgore2006

My perspective when I made the thread is this; since the other versions of the game are so much worse, should they even be considered the same game? It's like if LBP came to the PSP. Sure, LittlebigPlanet is on both PSP and PS3, but the PS3 version is so significantly better it's still considered an exclusive.

Btw I'm only going by GS scores here, don't flame me for saying the 360/Ps3 versions suck Bioshockownz :P

[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]

[QUOTE="AlexSays"] Because they disagree with your opinion? Okay, noted.EuroMafia

No, because they like a technically inferior product. It's not opinion when talking about the "technical" parts of the game. And somehow reviewers are blindly reviewing games, or they don't know a sirloin from a filet mignon.

Thanks for your opinion, but I prefer people who can make their own opinion from actually playing it. But anyways...:roll:

[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]Reviewers are simply out of touch.AlexSays

How about..no? The Wii is having such a terrible holiday line-up, sheep are actually trying to complain a Sonic game as exclusive? :lol:GinoNYC

I'm a sheep? Awesome.

And reviewers have never been wrong?JLF1

depends if the ps2 ver scores the same

if it scores under 7 then it would count as an AE, so long as ghost recon is still an AAAE for 360

[QUOTE="AlexSays"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]Reviewers are simply out of touch.JLF1

3.5 is far too harsh. But I'm playing the game, not the score.GeoffZak

[QUOTE="JLF1"]And reviewers have never been wrong?AlexSays

[QUOTE="AlexSays"][QUOTE="JLF1"]And reviewers have never been wrong?JLF1

Yes reviewers have been wrong.

Thought my answer was implied through my rhetorical question.

We could almost take from all of us... that nobody is ALWAYS right! (except me of course)

Unfortunately for Bioshock and the bunches of Sega fans that he says agree with him, someone looking at this right now will take a reviewer's opinion over theirs.

People on this site have wacky tastes, and there's people that blindly hate on good games. Just like there are people who blindly defend terrible games. After seeing much of that, it's hard for anyone to believe one member over one of this site's reviewers.

[QUOTE="JLF1"][QUOTE="AlexSays"] And people on this site haven't? (Lists every game ever made)AlexSays

Yes reviewers have been wrong.

Thought my answer was implied through my rhetorical question.

We could almost take from all of us... that nobody is ALWAYS right! (except me of course)

Unfortunately for Bioshock and the bunches of Sega fans that he says agree with him, someone looking at this right now will take a reviewer's opinion over theirs.

People on this site have wacky tastes, and there's people that blindly hate on good games. Just like there are people who blindly defend terrible games. After seeing much of that, it's hard for anyone to believe one member over one of this site's reviewers.

Nah, most Wii owners don't listen to reviews and buy poorly made Carnival Games.

Nah, most Wii owners don't listen to reviews and buy poorly made Carnival Games.BioShockOwnz

I really don't see what the porblem with the Wii Verison scoring better is. It nice to know at least one of the verisons of the game turned out well. Sonic still need to get way better though. He no where near Mario's level like he was back in the 16-bit days. Its sad to see how much poor Sonic been having problems over the years.

WEll can't wait to get the Wii Verison. I hope the Tails part is still in it. Going to be the best part of the game. Be nice to get way from Sonic even if it only 1% of the game.

[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]Nah, most Wii owners don't listen to reviews and buy poorly made Carnival Games.AlexSays

[QUOTE="AlexSays"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]Nah, most Wii owners don't listen to reviews and buy poorly made Carnival Games.fbigent34

most likely a result of lower standards for the WiiMikeE21286

[QUOTE="fbigent34"][QUOTE="AlexSays"] Most Wii owners would have more fun with a mini-game compilation than a highly detailed single-player adventure. Since I'm all for people playing what they like, that's okay with me. Heck, I've had more fun with Carnival Games than I have with Twilight Princess.AlexSays

[QUOTE="MikeE21286"]most likely a result of lower standards for the Wiinintendofreak_2

Would had been a 8 or higher on the Wii at least if they took out the Werehog entirely, when I 1st saw it, I knew the game wasn't going to bring back Sonic to his former glory days.mitu123

Well, it basically does, but they added the Werehog. The Hedgehog levels are the best Sonic's been in 3D, better than both Adventure games in that respect, even if Adventure is better overall. The Sonic speed aspect works better here.

[QUOTE="mitu123"]Would had been a 8 or higher on the Wii at least if they took out the Werehog entirely, when I 1st saw it, I knew the game wasn't going to bring back Sonic to his former glory days.BioShockOwnz

Well, it basically does, but they added the Werehog. The Hedgehog levels are the best Sonic's been in 3D, better than both Adventure games in that respect, even if Adventure is better overall. The Sonic speed aspect works better here.

[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]

[QUOTE="mitu123"]Would had been a 8 or higher on the Wii at least if they took out the Werehog entirely, when I 1st saw it, I knew the game wasn't going to bring back Sonic to his former glory days.mitu123

Well, it basically does, but they added the Werehog. The Hedgehog levels are the best Sonic's been in 3D, better than both Adventure games in that respect, even if Adventure is better overall. The Sonic speed aspect works better here.

If you want more Werehog, then go for Wii. If you want more Hedgehog, then go for 360. That's about what it comes down to, except for the hub world, graphics, etc, differences.

[QUOTE="mitu123"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]

Well, it basically does, but they added the Werehog. The Hedgehog levels are the best Sonic's been in 3D, better than both Adventure games in that respect, even if Adventure is better overall. The Sonic speed aspect works better here.

BioShockOwnz

If you want more Werehog, then go for Wii. If you want more Hedgehog, then go for 360. That's about what it comes down to, except for the hub world, graphics, etc, differences.

[QUOTE="AlexSays"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]Reviewers are simply out of touch.BioShockOwnz

No, because they like a technically inferior product. It's not opinion when talking about the "technical" parts of the game. And somehow reviewers are blindly reviewing games, or they don't know a sirloin from a filet mignon.

I hope you aren't implying that you can compare Wii games to 360/PS3 games on a technical level.... 

[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]

[QUOTE="AlexSays"] Because they disagree with your opinion? Okay, noted.rolo107

No, because they like a technically inferior product. It's not opinion when talking about the "technical" parts of the game. And somehow reviewers are blindly reviewing games, or they don't know a sirloin from a filet mignon.

I hope you aren't implying that you can compare Wii games to 360/PS3 games on a technical level....

"Technical" means more than graphics, physics, etc. It's the core functioning part of the game that's included, too.