sony and microsoft should join xbox and playstation

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Alacoque72
Alacoque72

1238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Alacoque72
Member since 2008 • 1238 Posts

they would make more money because everyone with a ps3 and xbox would get it and then they would sell more from advertising it

Avatar image for RTUUMM
RTUUMM

4859

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 RTUUMM
Member since 2008 • 4859 Posts
That is the stupidest idea ever. >_>
Avatar image for shakmaster13
shakmaster13

7138

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#3 shakmaster13
Member since 2007 • 7138 Posts

But we the consumers would suffer due to lack of competition. I don't want that to happen. Think about things before you post.

Avatar image for cainetao11
cainetao11

38063

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 77

User Lists: 1

#4 cainetao11
Member since 2006 • 38063 Posts
Yeah I agree there are some positives to joining up and marketing together. But in big business there are a lot of egos. And that's by nature fragile. I'm not sure either side could see it as anything but defeat, at this point.
Avatar image for Dr_Snood
Dr_Snood

2547

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#5 Dr_Snood
Member since 2008 • 2547 Posts
What? Kind of stupid..
Avatar image for thinicer
thinicer

3704

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 thinicer
Member since 2006 • 3704 Posts

If this happened, this would all but guarantee another company entering the video game market to take away market share.

Avatar image for -M117-
-M117-

349

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 -M117-
Member since 2009 • 349 Posts

they would make more money because everyone with a ps3 and xbox would get it and then they would sell more from advertising it

Alacoque72

Or............MS can buy out Sonys gaming division and liquidate the assets?

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62013

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#8 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62013 Posts

Ok, we need to put a permanent moratorium on threads saying "X company should hook up with Y company". There are so many things wrong with it.

Avatar image for Nero_Paladin
Nero_Paladin

1099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Nero_Paladin
Member since 2007 • 1099 Posts

[QUOTE="Alacoque72"]

they would make more money because everyone with a ps3 and xbox would get it and then they would sell more from advertising it

-M117-

Or............MS can buy out Sonys gaming division and liquidate the assets?

I hope your joking

Avatar image for Bruceisright
Bruceisright

267

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#10 Bruceisright
Member since 2005 • 267 Posts

they would make more money because everyone with a ps3 and xbox would get it and then they would sell more from advertising it

Alacoque72
.............. did you think before you typed that? never going to happen they would make less money that way since they would have to split the money unless they charge twice as much for everything.
Avatar image for porky_ownsu
porky_ownsu

1287

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 porky_ownsu
Member since 2008 • 1287 Posts

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outline_of_economics

basic economics.. this is a good read.

Avatar image for -M117-
-M117-

349

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 -M117-
Member since 2009 • 349 Posts

[QUOTE="-M117-"]

[QUOTE="Alacoque72"]

they would make more money because everyone with a ps3 and xbox would get it and then they would sell more from advertising it

Nero_Paladin

Or............MS can buy out Sonys gaming division and liquidate the assets?

I hope your joking

why? it sounds jolly good fun. And the lulz it would cause on the internet......priceless :P

Avatar image for Nero_Paladin
Nero_Paladin

1099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 Nero_Paladin
Member since 2007 • 1099 Posts

[QUOTE="Nero_Paladin"]

[QUOTE="-M117-"]

Or............MS can buy out Sonys gaming division and liquidate the assets?

-M117-

I hope your joking

why? it sounds jolly good fun. And the lulz it would cause on the internet......priceless :P

Then what will happen to devs like Team Ico? :cry:

Avatar image for _LiquidFlame_
_LiquidFlame_

13736

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#15 _LiquidFlame_
Member since 2007 • 13736 Posts

That would be a pretty neat console thing. :P

Avatar image for -M117-
-M117-

349

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 -M117-
Member since 2009 • 349 Posts

[QUOTE="-M117-"]

[QUOTE="Nero_Paladin"]

I hope your joking

Nero_Paladin

why? it sounds jolly good fun. And the lulz it would cause on the internet......priceless :P

Then what will happen to devs like Team Ico? :cry:

they get liquidated offcourse :)

Avatar image for shahchip
shahchip

1282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 28

User Lists: 0

#17 shahchip
Member since 2007 • 1282 Posts
...if that happens ill buy the EA console
Avatar image for Bruceisright
Bruceisright

267

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#18 Bruceisright
Member since 2005 • 267 Posts

Dont worry people this will never happen since Nintendo will make enough money to buy both Sony and Microsft out right and will rule the world!!!

Avatar image for Nirron
Nirron

359

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#19 Nirron
Member since 2008 • 359 Posts

[QUOTE="Nero_Paladin"]

[QUOTE="-M117-"]

why? it sounds jolly good fun. And the lulz it would cause on the internet......priceless :P

-M117-

Then what will happen to devs like Team Ico? :cry:

they get liquidated offcourse :)

For simplicity's sake, why not just do MS? Sony would involve liquidating something like 15 studios/devs, while we could streamline the liquation of Rare/Lionhead/Turn 10. The speed would be hilarity. Then again, losing 15+ studios would be interesting to see on the interwebs.

(Please nobody take me serious :( . I do wish MS had more internal studios, but I don't really know why Sony has so freakin' many)

Avatar image for -M117-
-M117-

349

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 -M117-
Member since 2009 • 349 Posts

[QUOTE="-M117-"]

[QUOTE="Nero_Paladin"]

Then what will happen to devs like Team Ico? :cry:

Nirron

they get liquidated offcourse :)

For simplicity's sake, why not just do MS? Sony would involve liquidating something like 15 studios/devs, while we could streamline the liquation of Rare/Lionhead/Turn 10. The speed would be hilarity. Then again, losing 15+ studios would be interesting to see on the interwebs.

(Please nobody take me serious :( . I do wish MS had more internal studios, but I don't really know why Sony has so freakin' many)

MS is smart to downsize studious. In the long run with games looking better and requiring more money, MS wont eat up as much money with studios making games. Sony however, must pay and maintain every studio they own, which can be very costly. And with every PS3 game they make costing ridiculous amounts of money and will only go up with PS4.........Sony will realize that too many studious can be a curse.

Avatar image for Nirron
Nirron

359

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#21 Nirron
Member since 2008 • 359 Posts

[QUOTE="Nirron"]

[QUOTE="-M117-"]

they get liquidated offcourse :)

-M117-

For simplicity's sake, why not just do MS? Sony would involve liquidating something like 15 studios/devs, while we could streamline the liquation of Rare/Lionhead/Turn 10. The speed would be hilarity. Then again, losing 15+ studios would be interesting to see on the interwebs.

(Please nobody take me serious :( . I do wish MS had more internal studios, but I don't really know why Sony has so freakin' many)

MS is smart to downsize studious. In the long run with games looking better and requiring more money, MS wont eat up as much money with studios making games. Sony however, must pay and maintain every studio they own, which can be very costly. And with every PS3 game they make costing ridiculous amounts of money and will only go up with PS4.........Sony will realize that too many studious can be a curse.

Indeed they will not have to pay as much (not really going to debate your semi-joking points) and I actually somewhat agree with Sony having to pay way too many people, though I guess it's admirable they want to make so many games. However, unless they are practically slave drivers to their remaining studios and are saving money, and with games requiring more money as you say, how do they secure exclusives while saving money? Surely developers (well, most developers other than perhaps Kojima/Nomura/Itagaki) aren't going to keep a game exclusive out of the kindness of their hearts.

Oh, and I don't think I got to welcome you back yet Ghost. Hope you make account number 7 (or 8 maybe?) a good one.

Avatar image for -Melix-
-Melix-

494

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 -Melix-
Member since 2009 • 494 Posts

[QUOTE="Nirron"]

[QUOTE="-M117-"]

they get liquidated offcourse :)

-M117-

For simplicity's sake, why not just do MS? Sony would involve liquidating something like 15 studios/devs, while we could streamline the liquation of Rare/Lionhead/Turn 10. The speed would be hilarity. Then again, losing 15+ studios would be interesting to see on the interwebs.

(Please nobody take me serious :( . I do wish MS had more internal studios, but I don't really know why Sony has so freakin' many)

MS is smart to downsize studious. In the long run with games looking better and requiring more money, MS wont eat up as much money with studios making games. Sony however, must pay and maintain every studio they own, which can be very costly. And with every PS3 game they make costing ridiculous amounts of money and will only go up with PS4.........Sony will realize that too many studious can be a curse.

Yea but it could also be an advantage over the long run. For example ms has sold most of their studios which is a bad idea, considering that they have to rely on 3 party exclusives, which most of the time goes multi plat. And what is 360 left with? your answer is multiplats..

Avatar image for -M117-
-M117-

349

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 -M117-
Member since 2009 • 349 Posts

[QUOTE="-M117-"]

[QUOTE="Nirron"] For simplicity's sake, why not just do MS? Sony would involve liquidating something like 15 studios/devs, while we could streamline the liquation of Rare/Lionhead/Turn 10. The speed would be hilarity. Then again, losing 15+ studios would be interesting to see on the interwebs.

(Please nobody take me serious :( . I do wish MS had more internal studios, but I don't really know why Sony has so freakin' many)

-Melix-

MS is smart to downsize studious. In the long run with games looking better and requiring more money, MS wont eat up as much money with studios making games. Sony however, must pay and maintain every studio they own, which can be very costly. And with every PS3 game they make costing ridiculous amounts of money and will only go up with PS4.........Sony will realize that too many studious can be a curse.

Yea but it could also be an advantage over the long run. For example ms has sold most of their studios which is a bad idea, considering that they have to rely on 3 party exclusives, which most of the time goes multi plat. And what is 360 left with? your answer is multiplats..

nope. As logn as MS keeps releasing first and gets a head start install base wise, they can easily woe 3rd party devs for exclusives, timed exclusives, and exclusive DLC.......just like now.

Avatar image for -Melix-
-Melix-

494

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 -Melix-
Member since 2009 • 494 Posts

[QUOTE="-Melix-"]

[QUOTE="-M117-"]

MS is smart to downsize studious. In the long run with games looking better and requiring more money, MS wont eat up as much money with studios making games. Sony however, must pay and maintain every studio they own, which can be very costly. And with every PS3 game they make costing ridiculous amounts of money and will only go up with PS4.........Sony will realize that too many studious can be a curse.

-M117-

Yea but it could also be an advantage over the long run. For example ms has sold most of their studios which is a bad idea, considering that they have to rely on 3 party exclusives, which most of the time goes multi plat. And what is 360 left with? your answer is multiplats..

nope. As logn as MS keeps releasing first and gets a head start install base wise, they can easily woe 3rd party devs for exclusives, timed exclusives, and exclusive DLC.......just like now.

I dont think people buy consoles for dlc, and timed exclusives. But i do agree with you on realeasing a console first would get you a larger install base andthird party exclusives but i doubt it will happen again, considering sony will learn from their mistakes

Avatar image for efrucht
efrucht

1596

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 efrucht
Member since 2008 • 1596 Posts

and back on planet earth: That will probably never happen.

Avatar image for Mr_Nordquist
Mr_Nordquist

1777

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 Mr_Nordquist
Member since 2009 • 1777 Posts
The battle between Sony and Microsoft brings a continuous flow of lulz to forums such as these. If they were to join forces there'd be a lack of lulz, and also a lack of competition. Competition drives better games and consoles, so not sure why we'd want that.
Avatar image for zatorys
zatorys

638

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#27 zatorys
Member since 2007 • 638 Posts
ooh its not stupid idea but come on devil vs devil :) but i think they must join in the same server so xbox gamers vs ps gamesrs that will be great :)
Avatar image for ganon546
ganon546

2942

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 ganon546
Member since 2007 • 2942 Posts

I know it looks good on paper, but trust me this would be a disaster.