Sony Joins the Offensive Against Pre-Owned Games

  • 187 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for SecretPolice
SecretPolice

45558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 SecretPolice
Member since 2007 • 45558 Posts

Wow Sony, 20 bucks just so you can play your used game on-line ? :?

I don't think this is going to go over very well with the fans.

What ya think SW ?

The Story

---

"In a move to counter sales of pre-owned games, EA recently revealed DLC perks for those who buy new copies of Mass Effect 2 and Battlefield: Bad Company 2. Now, PlayStation platform holder Sony has jumped on the bandwagonwith similar plans for the PSP's SOCOM: Fireteam Bravo 3. '[Players] will need to register their game online before they are able to access the multiplayer component of the title. UMD copies will use a redeemable code while the digital version will authenticate automatically in the background. Furthermore ... anyone buying a pre-owned copy of the game will be forced to cough up $20 to obtain a code to play online."

Avatar image for RAGINGxPONY
RAGINGxPONY

1452

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 RAGINGxPONY
Member since 2009 • 1452 Posts

I think it is more to stop piracy than it is to stop people from buying used.

Avatar image for FlamesOfGrey
FlamesOfGrey

7511

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 FlamesOfGrey
Member since 2009 • 7511 Posts
I never buy used so it doesn't affect me, however, I don't see the big deal as the big games still sale as much as ever. Companies will do what they will do whether we like it or not.
Avatar image for Shielder7
Shielder7

5191

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#4 Shielder7
Member since 2006 • 5191 Posts
Well that has fail all over it. If you buy a used game it's 20$ to start which a new copy has probably dropped to about 30-40 so it might be cheaper to just buy a new, on top of that the Multiplayer is probably old with only hardcore players which are going to simply own you. No one is going to pay 20$ for a code unless you get the game for free.
Avatar image for blue_hazy_basic
blue_hazy_basic

30854

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#5 blue_hazy_basic  Moderator
Member since 2002 • 30854 Posts
personally I think the used game market hurts the industry and lets gamestop rip off gamers. However, my issue is not with that, but it means I can't lend a game to a friend to try out?!!?!
Avatar image for Skittles_McGee
Skittles_McGee

9136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Skittles_McGee
Member since 2008 • 9136 Posts
Eh, I was getting the digital copy of this game anyhow. $20 does seem a little steep though.
Avatar image for dmaximum
dmaximum

700

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 dmaximum
Member since 2004 • 700 Posts

personally I think the used game market hurts the industry and lets gamestop rip off gamers. However, my issue is not with that, but it means I can't lend a game to a friend to try out?!!?!blue_hazy_basic
Sure you can. They just can't try the online portion.

Avatar image for JAB991
JAB991

6077

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

#8 JAB991
Member since 2007 • 6077 Posts

I definitely don't see this blowing up in their faces...
What's worse is the outrage that will follow when Sony shuts down the servers for these games.

Avatar image for HarlockJC
HarlockJC

25546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#9 HarlockJC
Member since 2006 • 25546 Posts
In my opinion used games is good for the industry it's how many people afford to buy new. Yes, there are some cases where a person waits to buy the game. Don't forget each used game was new at one time.
Avatar image for TREAL_Since
TREAL_Since

11946

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 TREAL_Since
Member since 2005 • 11946 Posts

- Well it does seem to be anti-pirate as well. But charging gamers who buy a pre-owned copy $20 is lame IMO.

-----

Here's my dilemma with EA's Mass Effect 2 "perks":

- My 360's ethernet port is literally malfunctioned. That means I can't connect to XBL! So, I put my HDD into my bro's 360 to download Zaeed and other stuff....Only to find out later, I can't access that information once I put my HDD back into my 360 (says the data is "corrupted").

- Not only that, my most recent game save is locked/ corrupted on my HDD! :| Damn, I'm glad I practice saving my games (especially RPGs) on multiple slots. Learned that with FF 7, 8, & 9 and "corrupted data" crap.

Avatar image for EG101
EG101

2091

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 EG101
Member since 2007 • 2091 Posts

Is this even legal???

That is like buying a used Corvette and then having to pay Chevy $20,000. just to be able to drive it on the street!!

These dirty tactics is what will eventually destroy this industry. You can only piss off a customer so many times before they never comeback again.

Avatar image for coasterguy65
coasterguy65

7133

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#12 coasterguy65
Member since 2005 • 7133 Posts

Do you want to reduce the sale of pre-owned games, make new ones more affordable. Also a tiered pricing plan would be good. Why does a game with 20+ hours of play time cost the same as a game with 5 hours of play time?

Why does a game like Uncharted 2 cost the same when new as Barbie's Horse Galloping Adventure?

Why after 10+ years does Twilight Princess still cost the same as when it came out? Ok 10+ years might be a bit much, but you know what I mean. :D

All these things make people turn to the used market. I would be the first one to be happy to see Gamestop's business model ruined, but there is a need for it, and they are just providing a service.

Avatar image for HuusAsking
HuusAsking

15270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 HuusAsking
Member since 2006 • 15270 Posts

Is this even legal???

That is like buying a used Corvette and then having to pay Chevy $20,000. just to be able to drive it on the street!!

These dirty tactics is what will eventually destroy this industry. You can only piss off a customer so many times before they never comeback again.

EG101
More like the Corvette can only run on specially-formulated fuel. New car buyers get gas cards enabling them to fuel up for a year or so for free while people who buy them used have to pay full price at the pump, and since it's the only fuel that works, it's pay up or don't drive.
Avatar image for Firebird-5
Firebird-5

2848

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 Firebird-5
Member since 2007 • 2848 Posts

I understand people's concerns with this. But some people I just don't. Some people claim to be morally superior to pirates when they buy used games. When paying money to support developers is involved they suddenly get cold feet. Those kinds of people shouldn't be weighing in on this - and even then, used games don't get money to the devs. Ubiquitous car analogies don't work here either: seeing as games don't lose value if you're buying second hand (you don't buy new games from gamestop with shrink wrap anyway), and you don't own the game anyway, just a licence.

Avatar image for HuusAsking
HuusAsking

15270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 HuusAsking
Member since 2006 • 15270 Posts

Do you want to reduce the sale of pre-owned games, make new ones more affordable. Also a tiered pricing plan would be good. Why does a game with 20+ hours of play time cost the same as a game with 5 hours of play time?

Why does a game like Uncharted 2 cost the same when new as Barbie's Horse Galloping Adventure?

Why after 10+ years does Twilight Princess still cost the same as when it came out? Ok 10+ years might be a bit much, but you know what I mean. :D

All these things make people turn to the used market. I would be the first one to be happy to see Gamestop's business model ruined, but there is a need for it, and they are just providing a service.

coasterguy65
Thing is reducing the price reduces revenue at a time when high development costs (brought on by increasing consumer demand for better and better) make those revenues critical; not to mention the price hasn't kept up with inflation (while dev costs have increased with inflation).
Avatar image for Espada12
Espada12

23247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#16 Espada12
Member since 2008 • 23247 Posts

Is this even legal???

That is like buying a used Corvette and then having to pay Chevy $20,000. just to be able to drive it on the street!!

These dirty tactics is what will eventually destroy this industry. You can only piss off a customer so many times before they never comeback again.

EG101

Of course it's legal. Why should you get to play their game and they make no money. What does that sound like? P I R A T I N G.

Avatar image for HuusAsking
HuusAsking

15270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 HuusAsking
Member since 2006 • 15270 Posts

I understand people's concerns with this. But some people I just don't. Some people claim to be morally superior to pirates when they buy used games. When paying money to support developers is involved they suddenly get cold feet. Those kinds of people shouldn't be weighing in on this - and even then, used games don't get money to the devs. Ubiquitous car analogies don't work here either: seeing as games don't lose value if you're buying second hand (you don't buy new games from gamestop with shrink wrap anyway), and you don't own the game anyway, just a licence.

Firebird-5
It's still ownership, though. I can just sell the license along with the copy (which should be guaranteed under the Copyright Act).
Avatar image for blue_hazy_basic
blue_hazy_basic

30854

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#18 blue_hazy_basic  Moderator
Member since 2002 • 30854 Posts
In my opinion used games is good for the industry it's how many people afford to buy new. Yes, there are some cases where a person waits to buy the game. Don't forget each used game was new at one time. HarlockJC
But when GS sell a newly released used game for $5 less it essientally is cancelling out a new game sale and giving 100% of the profit to GS.
Avatar image for HuusAsking
HuusAsking

15270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 HuusAsking
Member since 2006 • 15270 Posts

[QUOTE="EG101"]

Is this even legal???

That is like buying a used Corvette and then having to pay Chevy $20,000. just to be able to drive it on the street!!

These dirty tactics is what will eventually destroy this industry. You can only piss off a customer so many times before they never comeback again.

Espada12

Of course it's legal. Why should you get to play their game and they make no money. What does that sound like? P I R A T I N G.

But as a disincentive to buy used, this seems rather cutthroat. This definitely falls into that gray area where First Sale Doctrine could kick in (but hasn't because no one's taken Sony, Valve, or whatever to court over the matter of digital license resales).
Avatar image for HuusAsking
HuusAsking

15270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 HuusAsking
Member since 2006 • 15270 Posts
[QUOTE="HarlockJC"]In my opinion used games is good for the industry it's how many people afford to buy new. Yes, there are some cases where a person waits to buy the game. Don't forget each used game was new at one time. blue_hazy_basic
But when GS sell a newly released used game for $5 less it essientally is cancelling out a new game sale and giving 100% of the profit to GS.

But at just a $5 savings, more people would be inclined to go the extra inch and just get a new copy, unless new copies are unavailable. I'm pretty sure a good chunk of used sales don't occur until they slash the price to around half.
Avatar image for Espada12
Espada12

23247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#21 Espada12
Member since 2008 • 23247 Posts

[QUOTE="Espada12"]

[QUOTE="EG101"]

Is this even legal???

That is like buying a used Corvette and then having to pay Chevy $20,000. just to be able to drive it on the street!!

These dirty tactics is what will eventually destroy this industry. You can only piss off a customer so many times before they never comeback again.

HuusAsking

Of course it's legal. Why should you get to play their game and they make no money. What does that sound like? P I R A T I N G.

But as a disincentive to buy used, this seems rather cutthroat. This definitely falls into that gray area where First Sale Doctrine could kick in (but hasn't because no one's taken Sony, Valve, or whatever to court over the matter of digital license resales).

Their methods maybe extreme but the situation calls for them, I see it as console's DRM.

Avatar image for Firebird-5
Firebird-5

2848

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 Firebird-5
Member since 2007 • 2848 Posts

[QUOTE="blue_hazy_basic"][QUOTE="HarlockJC"]In my opinion used games is good for the industry it's how many people afford to buy new. Yes, there are some cases where a person waits to buy the game. Don't forget each used game was new at one time. HuusAsking
But when GS sell a newly released used game for $5 less it essientally is cancelling out a new game sale and giving 100% of the profit to GS.

But at just a $5 savings, more people would be inclined to go the extra inch and just get a new copy, unless new copies are unavailable. I'm pretty sure a good chunk of used sales don't occur until they slash the price to around half.

I certainly wouldn't. If I saw the exact same game priced $5 cheaper I'd buy that edition. Unfortunately I don't get that because I am a PC gamer. The average customer isn't educated on things like this.

Avatar image for osan0
osan0

18245

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#23 osan0
Member since 2004 • 18245 Posts
*shudder* i just had a nasty thought. anyone remember that sony patent that essentially ties a disc to a particular device. I.E if i buy U2 for the PS3 and play it on my PS3...my copy will only work on the PS3 i used it on. if i try to play it on another PS3 then it wont work. obhiously this is just a patent and was never applied....but what if console manufacturers decide to just put the foot down? im probably just completly overreacting though....at least i hope i am :). as for pre-owned games...perfectly legit. publishers inability to get in on that action is their own failure. i buy a licence to a game...i should be perfectly entitled to transfer it. the inability to transfer DD games is one of the things a hate about DD (overall i think its great...but thats one bugbear).
Avatar image for Pixel-Pirate
Pixel-Pirate

10771

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#24 Pixel-Pirate
Member since 2009 • 10771 Posts

[QUOTE="blue_hazy_basic"][QUOTE="HarlockJC"]In my opinion used games is good for the industry it's how many people afford to buy new. Yes, there are some cases where a person waits to buy the game. Don't forget each used game was new at one time. HuusAsking
But when GS sell a newly released used game for $5 less it essientally is cancelling out a new game sale and giving 100% of the profit to GS.

But at just a $5 savings, more people would be inclined to go the extra inch and just get a new copy, unless new copies are unavailable. I'm pretty sure a good chunk of used sales don't occur until they slash the price to around half.

Sometimes the savings are 20 dollars. Also gamestop has an interesting policy that allows you to take the used game back for a refund within 7 days. Main reason I buy used.

Personally I feel this is epic BS and I hope it blows up in Sonys face. I also don't think used game sellers like Gamestop are going to take it lying down. Theres also the case with older games where new copies are hard to find. Basically any game made prior to 2008 that wasn't a mega hit.

Honestly this is just going to piss gamers like me off. If they want to stop a legitimate buisness of reselling property you own, they should move to Digital distribution.

Avatar image for skrat_01
skrat_01

33767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 skrat_01
Member since 2007 • 33767 Posts
Works perfectly with PC games. Stops piracy on the platform to a degree. Hardly a bad thing considering how terrible it is on the PSP. And of course you have incentives like what EA is doing on multiple platforms. So expect entering keys into games to become all the more common console gamers.
Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#26 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts
It was bound to happen.. People say piracy is a big deal on the PC.. But the used game and rental services are even worse, every one uses them and its cheap and legal.
Avatar image for daveg1
daveg1

20405

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#27 daveg1
Member since 2005 • 20405 Posts
i will happily download games for free and screw them...they deserve to be ripped off considering they ripped off the people who buy the games who get told they have to pay more and more!
Avatar image for Pixel-Pirate
Pixel-Pirate

10771

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#28 Pixel-Pirate
Member since 2009 • 10771 Posts

Works perfectly with PC games. Stops piracy on the platform to a degree. Hardly a bad thing considering how terrible it is on the PSP. And of course you have incentives like what EA is doing on multiple platforms. So expect entering keys into games to become all the more common console gamers.skrat_01

To be honest I'd probably just quit buying games and just go back to playing snes and nes.

Avatar image for skrat_01
skrat_01

33767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 skrat_01
Member since 2007 • 33767 Posts

Theres also the case with older games where new copies are hard to find. Basically any game made prior to 2008 that wasn't a mega hit.

Pixel-Pirate

Guess its worth pointing towards the PC platform again in respect to older titles. Considering the surge in digital games that aren't re printed could get re released. Otherwise there isn't much that GameStop can do. Considering how much the retailer has taken advantage of the pre owned policy for years, its not surprising that publishers would react to it by now. But hey GameStop didn't have the amazing foresight of DD and emerging trends like what EA are just more punches to the gut while.

To be honest I'd probably just quit buying games and just go back to playing snes and nes.

Pixel-Pirate

You could but ultimately when people want to play X game they conform.

Avatar image for Mograine
Mograine

3666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 Mograine
Member since 2006 • 3666 Posts

I'm surprised they're doing this so late.

By the way, does anyone else smell something here?

When piracy countermeasures are applied everything is perfectly fine, but when second-hand sales countermeasures are applied instead everyone's screaming. *sniffs* The smell of hypocrisy is so strong you can almost taste it.

I fully expect the new generation of consoles to have cdkey activations.

Avatar image for HuusAsking
HuusAsking

15270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 HuusAsking
Member since 2006 • 15270 Posts

[QUOTE="HuusAsking"][QUOTE="blue_hazy_basic"] But when GS sell a newly released used game for $5 less it essientally is cancelling out a new game sale and giving 100% of the profit to GS.Pixel-Pirate

But at just a $5 savings, more people would be inclined to go the extra inch and just get a new copy, unless new copies are unavailable. I'm pretty sure a good chunk of used sales don't occur until they slash the price to around half.

Sometimes the savings are 20 dollars. Also gamestop has an interesting policy that allows you to take the used game back for a refund within 7 days. Main reason I buy used.

Personally I feel this is epic BS and I hope it blows up in Sonys face. I also don't think used game sellers like Gamestop are going to take it lying down. Theres also the case with older games where new copies are hard to find. Basically any game made prior to 2008 that wasn't a mega hit.

Honestly this is just going to piss gamers like me off. If they want to stop a legitimate buisness of reselling property you own, they should move to Digital distribution.

Those $20 savings usually don't show up until later unless it was the result of missing materials like the manual and/or box art (I admit, I got a copy of Ape Escape 3 from them cheap soon after release, and it was missing manual and box art). This is what I'm talking about--most of the time, used sales don't make an impact until the savings become more substantial. And BTW, resale of DD property can still be guaranteed under the Copyright Act. It's just that no one's taken a DD distributor to court over the matter.
Avatar image for HuusAsking
HuusAsking

15270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 HuusAsking
Member since 2006 • 15270 Posts
[QUOTE="osan0"]*shudder* i just had a nasty thought. anyone remember that sony patent that essentially ties a disc to a particular device. I.E if i buy U2 for the PS3 and play it on my PS3...my copy will only work on the PS3 i used it on. if i try to play it on another PS3 then it wont work. obhiously this is just a patent and was never applied....but what if console manufacturers decide to just put the foot down? im probably just completly overreacting though....at least i hope i am :). as for pre-owned games...perfectly legit. publishers inability to get in on that action is their own failure. i buy a licence to a game...i should be perfectly entitled to transfer it. the inability to transfer DD games is one of the things a hate about DD (overall i think its great...but thats one bugbear).

Care to sue Valve? You might have a case over First Sale Doctrine.
Avatar image for skrat_01
skrat_01

33767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 skrat_01
Member since 2007 • 33767 Posts
i will happily download games for free and screw them...they deserve to be ripped off considering they ripped off the people who buy the games who get told they have to pay more and more!daveg1
That justifies stealing from the developers who spent months/years making it? Its all a bit more unclear tbh, personally I am not one for pirating out of spite.
Avatar image for HuusAsking
HuusAsking

15270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 HuusAsking
Member since 2006 • 15270 Posts
It was bound to happen.. People say piracy is a big deal on the PC.. But the used game and rental services are even worse, every one uses them and its cheap and legal.sSubZerOo
For a reason. Rentals still help the devs since rental copies sell for significant premiums. As for used copies, that's guaranteed under the Copyright Act, and a license is itself a salable good. If publishers want to prevent used game sales, they need to provide incentives (and preferably positive incentives) for people to retain their copies.
Avatar image for Salt_The_Fries
Salt_The_Fries

12480

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#35 Salt_The_Fries
Member since 2008 • 12480 Posts
It's a disgrace.
Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#36 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts

[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]It was bound to happen.. People say piracy is a big deal on the PC.. But the used game and rental services are even worse, every one uses them and its cheap and legal.HuusAsking
For a reason. Rentals still help the devs since rental copies sell for significant premiums. As for used copies, that's guaranteed under the Copyright Act, and a license is itself a salable good. If publishers want to prevent used game sales, they need to provide incentives (and preferably positive incentives) for people to retain their copies.

:| No they don't they just do it.. They need no incentives out side that they can make more money.. This is going to happen sooner or later, people need to realize this.. Furthermore rental is damaging to the industry because companies have already put forward the idea of making games unique to their specific system, unable to play on others.. Based on the logic of these companies use for piracy, every rental = 1 copy profit lost..

Avatar image for daveg1
daveg1

20405

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#37 daveg1
Member since 2005 • 20405 Posts
[QUOTE="daveg1"]i will happily download games for free and screw them...they deserve to be ripped off considering they ripped off the people who buy the games who get told they have to pay more and more!skrat_01
That justifies stealing from the developers who spent months/years making it? Its all a bit more unclear tbh, personally I am not one for pirating out of spite.

if these companies didnt take the **** in the first place maybe piracy wouldnt be so big as it is today..its pure greed
Avatar image for IFBB-PRO
IFBB-PRO

211

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 IFBB-PRO
Member since 2007 • 211 Posts

I dont think its legal at all!!!

To the guy who said " why should you play the game and they get no money for it" ? Sony got money from original sale and the person who bought the game can share or sell the game to any one who wishes, ITS HIS PROPERTY NOW!!!!

How is that any different from used car market, used clothes, used TV, House market. When i buy a product its mine , if company wants more money then they need to have better marketing so they can sell more products.

When I sell my car person who is buying the car only pays me he does not pay me and honda or if i decide to sell my samsung tv im the only one who gets money for it and not me and samsgung.

Only reason game companies are complaing about all this now is because used game market is a big market now and they want piece of the pie!!!!! ITS CALLED GREEED!!! As i said if game companies want more money then they need to eitehr lower price of the games or market their games better so they can have better sales.

Avatar image for Pixel-Pirate
Pixel-Pirate

10771

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#39 Pixel-Pirate
Member since 2009 • 10771 Posts

[QUOTE="daveg1"]i will happily download games for free and screw them...they deserve to be ripped off considering they ripped off the people who buy the games who get told they have to pay more and more!skrat_01
That justifies stealing from the developers who spent months/years making it? Its all a bit more unclear tbh, personally I am not one for pirating out of spite.

I can't say I'd lose any sleep over it.

This also screws over the rental industry, doesn't it? People like to you know, try the game before putting down 60-100+ dollars on it.

Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#40 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts

I dont think its legal at all!!!

To the guy who said " why should you play the game and they get no money for it" ? Sony got money from original sale and the person who bought the game can share or sell the game to any one who wishes, ITS HIS PROPERTY NOW!!!!

How is that any different from used car market, used clothes, used TV, House market. When i buy a product its mine , if company wants more money then they need to have better marketing so they can sell more products.

When I sell my car person who is buying the car only pays me he does not pay me and honda or if i decide to sell my samsung tv im the only one who gets money for it and not me and samsgung.

Only reason game companies are complaing about all this now is because used game market is a big market now and they want piece of the pie!!!!! ITS CALLED GREEED!!! As i said if game companies want more money then they need to eitehr lower price of the games or market their games better so they can have better sales.

IFBB-PRO

Its been used on the PC for years.. Furthermore you are not paying for the physical product like you are for the car, clothing etc etc.. You are paying for the rights to use the software..

Avatar image for Pixel-Pirate
Pixel-Pirate

10771

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#41 Pixel-Pirate
Member since 2009 • 10771 Posts

I dont think its legal at all!!!

To the guy who said " why should you play the game and they get no money for it" ? Sony got money from original sale and the person who bought the game can share or sell the game to any one who wishes, ITS HIS PROPERTY NOW!!!!

How is that any different from used car market, used clothes, used TV, House market. When i buy a product its mine , if company wants more money then they need to have better marketing so they can sell more products.

When I sell my car person who is buying the car only pays me he does not pay me and honda or if i decide to sell my samsung tv im the only one who gets money for it and not me and samsgung.

Only reason game companies are complaing about all this now is because used game market is a big market now and they want piece of the pie!!!!! ITS CALLED GREEED!!! As i said if game companies want more money then they need to eitehr lower price of the games or market their games better so they can have better sales.

IFBB-PRO

I agree. Once you buy a game you should be able to resell it or destroy it or do anything that doesn't break the law with it.

Avatar image for HuusAsking
HuusAsking

15270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 HuusAsking
Member since 2006 • 15270 Posts

[QUOTE="HuusAsking"][QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]It was bound to happen.. People say piracy is a big deal on the PC.. But the used game and rental services are even worse, every one uses them and its cheap and legal.sSubZerOo

For a reason. Rentals still help the devs since rental copies sell for significant premiums. As for used copies, that's guaranteed under the Copyright Act, and a license is itself a salable good. If publishers want to prevent used game sales, they need to provide incentives (and preferably positive incentives) for people to retain their copies.

:| No they don't they just do it.. They need no incentives out side that they can make more money.. This is going to happen sooner or later, people need to realize this.. Furthermore rental is damaging to the industry because companies have already put forward the idea of making games unique to their specific system, unable to play on others.. Based on the logic of these companies use for piracy, every rental = 1 copy profit lost..

And sooner or later, you're going to alienate the audience, causing them to defect. As for the "registered" game, why do you think Sony didin't go through with it? Because anyone could then sue Sony under the Copyright Act--licenses are themselves salable goods, and the First Sale Doctrine can apply to them--otherwise, any used merchandise market is illegal.
Avatar image for dmaximum
dmaximum

700

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 dmaximum
Member since 2004 • 700 Posts

It's only for the online part of a game. I don't see what the problem is.

Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#44 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts

[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]

[QUOTE="HuusAsking"]For a reason. Rentals still help the devs since rental copies sell for significant premiums. As for used copies, that's guaranteed under the Copyright Act, and a license is itself a salable good. If publishers want to prevent used game sales, they need to provide incentives (and preferably positive incentives) for people to retain their copies.HuusAsking

:| No they don't they just do it.. They need no incentives out side that they can make more money.. This is going to happen sooner or later, people need to realize this.. Furthermore rental is damaging to the industry because companies have already put forward the idea of making games unique to their specific system, unable to play on others.. Based on the logic of these companies use for piracy, every rental = 1 copy profit lost..

And sooner or later, you're going to alienate the audience, causing them to defect. As for the "registered" game, why do you think Sony didin't go through with it? Because anyone could then sue Sony under the Copyright Act--licenses are themselves salable goods, and the First Sale Doctrine can apply to them--otherwise, any used merchandise market is illegal.

Defect to where? If all systems do it, you have the choice to be a gamer or not be a gamer.. Seeing as gaming is only growing they really could care less.... If this were the case for your second part, the PC wouldn't have done this sense the mid to late 90s, and it has.. Consoles are no different.. You are paying for the license and its their right to decide what they think its legal and illegal for their intellectual property.. When you buy the game and play it, your enterting a contractual agreement to what you can do and not do, if you don't like it return it or don't buy it what so ever..

Avatar image for HuusAsking
HuusAsking

15270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 HuusAsking
Member since 2006 • 15270 Posts

[QUOTE="HuusAsking"][QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]

:| No they don't they just do it.. They need no incentives out side that they can make more money.. This is going to happen sooner or later, people need to realize this.. Furthermore rental is damaging to the industry because companies have already put forward the idea of making games unique to their specific system, unable to play on others.. Based on the logic of these companies use for piracy, every rental = 1 copy profit lost..

sSubZerOo

And sooner or later, you're going to alienate the audience, causing them to defect. As for the "registered" game, why do you think Sony didin't go through with it? Because anyone could then sue Sony under the Copyright Act--licenses are themselves salable goods, and the First Sale Doctrine can apply to them--otherwise, any used merchandise market is illegal.

Defect to where? If all systems do it, you have the choice to be a gamer or not be a gamer.. Seeing as gaming is only growing they really could care less.... If this were the case for your second part, the PC wouldn't have done this sense the mid to late 90s, and it has.. Consoles are no different.. You are paying for the license and its their right to decide what they think its legal and illegal for their intellectual property.. When you buy the game and play it, your enterting a contractual agreement to what you can do and not do, if you don't like it return it or don't buy it what so ever..

Gaming was growing until 1983, as well. Then quality took a nosedive, people believed the best days were past and found other pursuits. Plus the PC isn't as well-entranched in the idea as other platforms (yes, some use CD keys, but they can be reused within reason). And contracts cannot circumvent federal law (which guarantee the right--look up Vernor v. Autodesk, 2008--dealt with license transfer rights under the Copyright Act). Besides, I never put pen to paper for any such agreement (unlike a software lease).
Avatar image for HuusAsking
HuusAsking

15270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 HuusAsking
Member since 2006 • 15270 Posts

It's only for the online part of a game. I don't see what the problem is.

dmaximum
If online's the most important part of the game, it's like being denied access to the climax of a movie without paying extra.
Avatar image for Espada12
Espada12

23247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#47 Espada12
Member since 2008 • 23247 Posts

I dont think its legal at all!!!

To the guy who said " why should you play the game and they get no money for it" ? Sony got money from original sale and the person who bought the game can share or sell the game to any one who wishes, ITS HIS PROPERTY NOW!!!!

How is that any different from used car market, used clothes, used TV, House market. When i buy a product its mine , if company wants more money then they need to have better marketing so they can sell more products.

When I sell my car person who is buying the car only pays me he does not pay me and honda or if i decide to sell my samsung tv im the only one who gets money for it and not me and samsgung.

Only reason game companies are complaing about all this now is because used game market is a big market now and they want piece of the pie!!!!! ITS CALLED GREEED!!! As i said if game companies want more money then they need to eitehr lower price of the games or market their games better so they can have better sales.

IFBB-PRO

Sorry if a whole industry wants to ride on my product I better be getting money out of it.

Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#48 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts

[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]

[QUOTE="HuusAsking"]And sooner or later, you're going to alienate the audience, causing them to defect. As for the "registered" game, why do you think Sony didin't go through with it? Because anyone could then sue Sony under the Copyright Act--licenses are themselves salable goods, and the First Sale Doctrine can apply to them--otherwise, any used merchandise market is illegal.HuusAsking

Defect to where? If all systems do it, you have the choice to be a gamer or not be a gamer.. Seeing as gaming is only growing they really could care less.... If this were the case for your second part, the PC wouldn't have done this sense the mid to late 90s, and it has.. Consoles are no different.. You are paying for the license and its their right to decide what they think its legal and illegal for their intellectual property.. When you buy the game and play it, your enterting a contractual agreement to what you can do and not do, if you don't like it return it or don't buy it what so ever..

Gaming was growing until 1983, as well. Then quality took a nosedive, people believed the best days were past and found other pursuits. Plus the PC isn't as well-entranched in the idea as other platforms (yes, some use CD keys, but they can be reused within reason). And contracts cannot circumvent federal law (which guarantee the right--look up Vernor v. Autodesk, 2008--dealt with license transfer rights under the Copyright Act). Besides, I never put pen to paper for any such agreement (unlike a software lease).

A) That is a fail comparison.. Videogames pre 1983 were not a multi billion to trilion dollar franchise even when you account for value of money.... B) That is not relevent, its against the law to trade games like that for the PC.. Now is it enforced? Not really but most do not buy it due tot eh whole cdkey fiasco... They will once this starts having, before you can play/install the game you will have to agree to a contract with this under stipulation, which is fully in their rights of doing it.. There is nothing you can do about it.

Avatar image for DEATH775
DEATH775

4216

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#49 DEATH775
Member since 2005 • 4216 Posts

I think it is more to stop piracy than it is to stop people from buying used.

RAGINGxPONY
The PS3 doesn't have any pirated games.
Avatar image for HuusAsking
HuusAsking

15270

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 HuusAsking
Member since 2006 • 15270 Posts

[QUOTE="HuusAsking"][QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]

Defect to where? If all systems do it, you have the choice to be a gamer or not be a gamer.. Seeing as gaming is only growing they really could care less.... If this were the case for your second part, the PC wouldn't have done this sense the mid to late 90s, and it has.. Consoles are no different.. You are paying for the license and its their right to decide what they think its legal and illegal for their intellectual property.. When you buy the game and play it, your enterting a contractual agreement to what you can do and not do, if you don't like it return it or don't buy it what so ever..

sSubZerOo

Gaming was growing until 1983, as well. Then quality took a nosedive, people believed the best days were past and found other pursuits. Plus the PC isn't as well-entranched in the idea as other platforms (yes, some use CD keys, but they can be reused within reason). And contracts cannot circumvent federal law (which guarantee the right--look up Vernor v. Autodesk, 2008--dealt with license transfer rights under the Copyright Act). Besides, I never put pen to paper for any such agreement (unlike a software lease).

A) That is a fail comparison.. Videogames pre 1983 were not a multi billion to trilion dollar franchise even when you account for value of money.... B) That is not relevent, its against the law to trade games like that for the PC.. Now is it enforced? Not really but most do not buy it due tot eh whole cdkey fiasco... They will once this starts having, before you can play/install the game you will have to agree to a contract with this under stipulation, which is fully in their rights of doing it.. There is nothing you can do about it.

But it is not within their rights to do it. You cannot circumvent federal law with a contract. That's why the First Sale Doctrine is written into the Copyright Act of 1976. What you just said was exactly what Autodesk argued in their 2008 case. Guess what? They lost. Licenses are transferrable under the Copyright Act, and any contract that attempts to abridge those rights are null and void. Basically, if it looks like a sale and transacts like a sale, it's a sale...and subject to the Act. No company is legally allowed to circumvent this law as long as someone's ready to inform the US government of such a violation. It's why I'm surprised no one's taken Valve to task for not allowing resales on Steam (even though they say "Thank you for your purchase"--purchase equals sale, BTW).