Sony refuses to use the Banhammer

  • 185 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for akira2465
akira2465

1194

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 akira2465
Member since 2004 • 1194 Posts

http://kotaku.com/5418607/javelin-cheats-sony-dont-give-a-hoot

While Microsoft will take swift, stern action against anyone caught using the javelin "exploit" in Modern Warfare 2, Sony apparently couldn't care less. A Sony rep has told CVG "I don't believe we are banning people for using the glitch". If they're not banning people outright, makes you wonder what they are doing. Simply watching? Placing marks next to people's names? Tutting endlessly? Sony NOT banning for MW2 Javelin glitch [CVG]

So what do you guys think? Is Sony or IW responsible to regulate MW2?

Avatar image for deactivated-63f6895020e66
deactivated-63f6895020e66

21177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 deactivated-63f6895020e66
Member since 2004 • 21177 Posts
IW should fix it.
Avatar image for xXDrPainXx
xXDrPainXx

4001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 xXDrPainXx
Member since 2008 • 4001 Posts
Shouldn't it be up to the devs to actually fix this? I mean what does this have to do with Sony or Microsoft? Yes it uses their services to bring the game to the consoles but still it should be up to IW for correcting this not have people being permabanned. Least that is what I think.
Avatar image for reiv
reiv

1038

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 reiv
Member since 2008 • 1038 Posts
I don't think it is right to ban people for taking advantage of lax programming. How could the testers not have found this? Don't get me wrong, anyone using the glitch is being a complete jerk but IW are at fault here.
Avatar image for sikanderahmed
sikanderahmed

5444

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 sikanderahmed
Member since 2007 • 5444 Posts

that glitch is IWs fault so why should sony ban people? also MS has standards and a superior service and they care about the gamers who want to play the game for fun without any cheap ass glitcher ruining it and thats the reason MS took action so why would sony care when PSN is mediocre free service.

Avatar image for finalstar2007
finalstar2007

27952

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#6 finalstar2007
Member since 2008 • 27952 Posts

The glitch is Iw's fault so why would sony just go and ban people? i never knew about the glitches till yesterday and i think its not right to use them

Avatar image for akira2465
akira2465

1194

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 akira2465
Member since 2004 • 1194 Posts

Yeah because of the articles from the gaming press, you'd think more people would be doing it, now that's it's being brought to their attention. Has anyone noticed the increase? I wish I could check but I'm in the process of moving and don't have a current connection

Avatar image for Ninten007
Ninten007

3129

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Ninten007
Member since 2005 • 3129 Posts

Not their job to do so.

Sony has provided great online service for games like UC2, KZ 2, Warhawk, etc. It is really hard to exploit cheap tactics in those games. Especially SOCOM Confrontion, Sony took the liberty of fixing the game's early problems because its their own IP.

Besides Sony is not gonna prevent a patch that IW should come up with to prevent javelin exploiters.

Another example is Fight Night 4, last night EA patched the online so there is no more people exploiting something in the game to win matches.

Also MW 2 is not the only game with cheaters on 360, so why does MS not ban people who cheat in other games?

Avatar image for xX-Incubus-Xx
xX-Incubus-Xx

1120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 xX-Incubus-Xx
Member since 2009 • 1120 Posts

I've run into many javelin glitchers with my team of people and we own them every time. So much so that they end up just switching classes.

Anyways, this gltch isn't nearly as bad as the infinite air drops or the glitch to get in a rock on Afgan, THESE are game breaking glitches. The javelin exploi is just funny.

Avatar image for akira2465
akira2465

1194

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 akira2465
Member since 2004 • 1194 Posts

Not their job to do so.

Sony has provided great online service for games like UC2, KZ 2, Warhawk, etc. It is really hard to exploit cheap tactics in those games. Especially SOCOM Confrontion, Sony took the liberty of fixing the game's early problems because its their own IP.

Besides Sony is not gonna prevent a patch that IW should come up with to prevent javelin exploiters.

Another example is Fight Night 4, last night EA patched the online so there is no more people exploiting something in the game to win matches.

Also MW 2 is not the only game with cheaters on 360, so why does MS not ban people who cheat in other games?

Ninten007

MS probably is targetting this game because it's the most popular and does not want to lose activity on mw2.

Avatar image for Messiahbolical-
Messiahbolical-

5670

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 Messiahbolical-
Member since 2009 • 5670 Posts
lol @ Banning because of a glitch A glitch is a developer's problem, it's in the game. Why the **** would someone get banned for doing something that's IN THE GAME? Besides, the javelin glitch isn't even helpful or anything. You have to GET KILLED to GET KILLS. So what's the point? The guys I see doing the javelin glitch usually end up with more deaths than kills. So that just proves how stupid it is. I'd rather not use the glitch and get 30 or more kills and 10 or less deaths like I usually do than than run around trying to get close to people for them to kill me and risk getting 18 kills and 25 deaths or something like that. Also... whenever I see someone trying to do it to me, I just run away with my lightweight and marathon until they're far enough so the explosion wont kill me then I just shoot them. Who cares about the glitch. It's stupid and people shouldn't get banned for it. If anyone should be penalized, it's IW for not fixing it. Why should anyone EVER get penalized for something that's part of the game? I don't remember reading any rules that said you can't do it or you'll get banned.
Avatar image for Legendaryscmt
Legendaryscmt

12532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 Legendaryscmt
Member since 2005 • 12532 Posts

There's a huge difference between banning and a suspension. A ban for this goes way too far, but a suspension is fine for cheaters.

Avatar image for akira2465
akira2465

1194

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 akira2465
Member since 2004 • 1194 Posts

I've run into many javelin glitchers with my team of people and we own them every time. So much so that they end up just switching classes.

Anyways, this gltch isn't nearly as bad as the infinite air drops or the glitch to get in a rock on Afgan, THESE are game breaking glitches. The javelin exploi is just funny.

xX-Incubus-Xx

Can't you just shoot them from a safe distance?

Avatar image for SpruceCaboose
SpruceCaboose

24589

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#14 SpruceCaboose
Member since 2005 • 24589 Posts
They cannot really ban you to well, since you can just create a new free PSN account. That is one benefit to the XBL fee. One of the only benefits.
Avatar image for finalstar2007
finalstar2007

27952

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#15 finalstar2007
Member since 2008 • 27952 Posts

lol @ Banning because of a glitch A glitch is a developer's problem, it's in the game. Why the **** would someone get banned for doing something that's IN THE GAME? Besides, the javelin glitch isn't even helpful or anything. You have to GET KILLED to GET KILLS. So what's the point? The guys I see doing the javelin glitch usually end up with more deaths than kills. So that just proves how stupid it is. I'd rather not use the glitch and get 30 or more kills and 10 or less deaths like I usually do than than run around trying to get close to people for them to kill me and risk getting 18 kills and 25 deaths or something like that. Also... whenever I see someone trying to do it to me, I just run away with my lightweight and marathon until they're far enough so the explosion wont kill me then I just shoot them. Who cares about the glitch. It's stupid and people shouldn't get banned for it. If anyone should be penalized, it's IW for not fixing it. Why should anyone EVER get penalized for something that's part of the game? I don't remember reading any rules that said you can't do it or you'll get banned. Messiahbolical-

Its funny that MS make you pay for online and then ban you if you use a glitch that happened because of the game developers while sony give you everything for free and dosent. thats why i dont believe anyone who says paying online is better ;)

Avatar image for SpruceCaboose
SpruceCaboose

24589

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#16 SpruceCaboose
Member since 2005 • 24589 Posts

[QUOTE="Messiahbolical-"]lol @ Banning because of a glitch A glitch is a developer's problem, it's in the game. Why the **** would someone get banned for doing something that's IN THE GAME? Besides, the javelin glitch isn't even helpful or anything. You have to GET KILLED to GET KILLS. So what's the point? The guys I see doing the javelin glitch usually end up with more deaths than kills. So that just proves how stupid it is. I'd rather not use the glitch and get 30 or more kills and 10 or less deaths like I usually do than than run around trying to get close to people for them to kill me and risk getting 18 kills and 25 deaths or something like that. Also... whenever I see someone trying to do it to me, I just run away with my lightweight and marathon until they're far enough so the explosion wont kill me then I just shoot them. Who cares about the glitch. It's stupid and people shouldn't get banned for it. If anyone should be penalized, it's IW for not fixing it. Why should anyone EVER get penalized for something that's part of the game? I don't remember reading any rules that said you can't do it or you'll get banned. finalstar2007

Its funny that MS make you pay for online and then ban you if you use a glitch that happened because of the game developers while sony give you everything for free and dosent. thats why i dont believe anyone who says paying online is better ;)

I prefer not playing with cheaters.
Avatar image for Sollet
Sollet

8288

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#17 Sollet
Member since 2003 • 8288 Posts
IW should fix it.IronBass
This. This is NOT Sony's problem, it's IWs.
Avatar image for Messiahbolical-
Messiahbolical-

5670

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 Messiahbolical-
Member since 2009 • 5670 Posts
They cannot really ban you to well, since you can just create a new free PSN account. That is one benefit to the XBL fee. One of the only benefits.SpruceCaboose
You know what, this is pretty ironic. I'm starting to think that the real reason M$ is so ban happy compared to Sony is because all those people payed for XBL accounts already and M$ already has their money, when they get banned they don't get a refund on that account. So when M$ bans all of these people, all these people need to spend money AGAIN on a new account to make that account gold. It's just extra money in M$ pocket no matter what. I thought it was kind of strange that Microsoft seemed like they were going out of their way, trying to find all these reasons to ban people. Now it's clear. It's simply an extremely easy way for them to earn extra money. Earning extra cash by basically doing nothing. It's genius TBH.
Avatar image for deactivated-63f6895020e66
deactivated-63f6895020e66

21177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 deactivated-63f6895020e66
Member since 2004 • 21177 Posts
[QUOTE="SpruceCaboose"]They cannot really ban you to well, since you can just create a new free PSN account. That is one benefit to the XBL fee. One of the only benefits.Messiahbolical-
You know what, this is pretty ironic. I'm starting to think that the real reason M$ is so ban happy compared to Sony is because all those people payed for XBL accounts already and M$ already has their money, when they get banned they don't get a refund on that account. So when M$ bans all of these people, all these people need to spend money AGAIN on a new account to make that account gold. It's just extra money in M$ pocket no matter what. I thought it was kind of strange that Microsoft seemed like they were going out of their way, trying to find all these reasons to ban people. Now it's clear. It's simply an extremely easy way for them to earn extra money. Earning extra cash by basically doing nothing. It's genius TBH.

The banning for abusing the glitch are not permanent. Two weeks, I heard.
Avatar image for spinecaton
spinecaton

8986

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#20 spinecaton
Member since 2003 • 8986 Posts

[QUOTE="SpruceCaboose"]They cannot really ban you to well, since you can just create a new free PSN account. That is one benefit to the XBL fee. One of the only benefits.Messiahbolical-
You know what, this is pretty ironic. I'm starting to think that the real reason M$ is so ban happy compared to Sony is because all those people payed for XBL accounts already and M$ already has their money, when they get banned they don't get a refund on that account. So when M$ bans all of these people, all these people need to spend money AGAIN on a new account to make that account gold. It's just extra money in M$ pocket no matter what. I thought it was kind of strange that Microsoft seemed like they were going out of their way, trying to find all these reasons to ban people. Now it's clear. It's simply an extremely easy way for them to earn extra money. Earning extra cash by basically doing nothing. It's genius TBH.

You honestly believe what you just wrote?

Avatar image for Messiahbolical-
Messiahbolical-

5670

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 Messiahbolical-
Member since 2009 • 5670 Posts
[QUOTE="finalstar2007"]

[QUOTE="Messiahbolical-"]lol @ Banning because of a glitch A glitch is a developer's problem, it's in the game. Why the **** would someone get banned for doing something that's IN THE GAME? Besides, the javelin glitch isn't even helpful or anything. You have to GET KILLED to GET KILLS. So what's the point? The guys I see doing the javelin glitch usually end up with more deaths than kills. So that just proves how stupid it is. I'd rather not use the glitch and get 30 or more kills and 10 or less deaths like I usually do than than run around trying to get close to people for them to kill me and risk getting 18 kills and 25 deaths or something like that. Also... whenever I see someone trying to do it to me, I just run away with my lightweight and marathon until they're far enough so the explosion wont kill me then I just shoot them. Who cares about the glitch. It's stupid and people shouldn't get banned for it. If anyone should be penalized, it's IW for not fixing it. Why should anyone EVER get penalized for something that's part of the game? I don't remember reading any rules that said you can't do it or you'll get banned. SpruceCaboose

Its funny that MS make you pay for online and then ban you if you use a glitch that happened because of the game developers while sony give you everything for free and dosent. thats why i dont believe anyone who says paying online is better ;)

I prefer not playing with cheaters.

How is it cheating if it's IN THE GAME. And hypothetically let's say it WASN'T in the game(even though it is), how is it cheating if there's no rules that tell you before hand you're not allowed to do it. Also, how does Microsoft have the right to ban someone's account that they pay yearly for for doing something that there's no rules that say you're not allowed to do. They'll probably get a nice lawsuit out of this.
Avatar image for SpruceCaboose
SpruceCaboose

24589

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#22 SpruceCaboose
Member since 2005 • 24589 Posts
[QUOTE="SpruceCaboose"]They cannot really ban you to well, since you can just create a new free PSN account. That is one benefit to the XBL fee. One of the only benefits.Messiahbolical-
You know what, this is pretty ironic. I'm starting to think that the real reason M$ is so ban happy compared to Sony is because all those people payed for XBL accounts already and M$ already has their money, when they get banned they don't get a refund on that account. So when M$ bans all of these people, all these people need to spend money AGAIN on a new account to make that account gold. It's just extra money in M$ pocket no matter what. I thought it was kind of strange that Microsoft seemed like they were going out of their way, trying to find all these reasons to ban people. Now it's clear. It's simply an extremely easy way for them to earn extra money. Earning extra cash by basically doing nothing. It's genius TBH.

Too bad ban isn't the right word. People are *suspended* from Live for 2 weeks for glitching in MW2. You do not lose your account for this glitch, but you can lose your account (and you should) for more severe cheats, especially things like modding.
Avatar image for reiv
reiv

1038

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 reiv
Member since 2008 • 1038 Posts
I prefer not playing with cheaters. SpruceCaboose
This I agree with, but IW have invited the glitchers because they make it easy for them. These people who cheat have found an exploit that the developers and testers overlooked. I find it a bit mind boggling to be honest.
Avatar image for SpruceCaboose
SpruceCaboose

24589

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#24 SpruceCaboose
Member since 2005 • 24589 Posts
[QUOTE="Messiahbolical-"] How is it cheating if it's IN THE GAME. And hypothetically let's say it WASN'T in the game(even though it is), how is it cheating if there's no rules that tell you before hand you're not allowed to do it. Also, how does Microsoft have the right to ban someone's account that they pay yearly for for doing something that there's no rules that say you're not allowed to do. They'll probably get a nice lawsuit out of this.

You are one of the fun ones on game night that wreck the game for everyone because "there are no rules against it!". Sorry , using an exploit that creates an unfair playing field for others is not fair to me, and not playing fair is cheating to me. Super jumps in Halo, wall glitches in Call of Duty, the chainsaw glitch in Gears of War, those are cheating to me just the same as the guy who hacked his Warthog to shoot rockets.
Avatar image for SpruceCaboose
SpruceCaboose

24589

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#25 SpruceCaboose
Member since 2005 • 24589 Posts
And no, MS has all rights to terminate your account when you violate the ToU, just like here on GameSpot. Don't like being held responsible, don't use the service.
Avatar image for Messiahbolical-
Messiahbolical-

5670

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 Messiahbolical-
Member since 2009 • 5670 Posts

[QUOTE="Messiahbolical-"][QUOTE="SpruceCaboose"]They cannot really ban you to well, since you can just create a new free PSN account. That is one benefit to the XBL fee. One of the only benefits.spinecaton

You know what, this is pretty ironic. I'm starting to think that the real reason M$ is so ban happy compared to Sony is because all those people payed for XBL accounts already and M$ already has their money, when they get banned they don't get a refund on that account. So when M$ bans all of these people, all these people need to spend money AGAIN on a new account to make that account gold. It's just extra money in M$ pocket no matter what. I thought it was kind of strange that Microsoft seemed like they were going out of their way, trying to find all these reasons to ban people. Now it's clear. It's simply an extremely easy way for them to earn extra money. Earning extra cash by basically doing nothing. It's genius TBH.

You honestly believe what you just wrote?

Do you honestly think it's any stretch of the truth? Do you really believe that Microsoft doesn't like banning people? Why do you think they have so many admins and have so many ways to complain about people cheating or annoying you? Do you really believe it's because they give a crap about you? lol Banning people is probably the easiest money Microsoft ever makes. It takes practically no effort and generates an extra $50 almost every time.
Avatar image for tbolt76
tbolt76

987

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#27 tbolt76
Member since 2008 • 987 Posts

I think this speaks to a bigger issue.With PSN being free and all, do they have the resources to monitor such actions? Be it the devs fault or not, are there moderators randomly joining games and monitoring such behavior. It is highly unlikely and if there are, how limited in numbers would they be?

Avatar image for akira2465
akira2465

1194

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 akira2465
Member since 2004 • 1194 Posts

[QUOTE="Messiahbolical-"]lol @ Banning because of a glitch A glitch is a developer's problem, it's in the game. Why the **** would someone get banned for doing something that's IN THE GAME? Besides, the javelin glitch isn't even helpful or anything. You have to GET KILLED to GET KILLS. So what's the point? The guys I see doing the javelin glitch usually end up with more deaths than kills. So that just proves how stupid it is. I'd rather not use the glitch and get 30 or more kills and 10 or less deaths like I usually do than than run around trying to get close to people for them to kill me and risk getting 18 kills and 25 deaths or something like that. Also... whenever I see someone trying to do it to me, I just run away with my lightweight and marathon until they're far enough so the explosion wont kill me then I just shoot them. Who cares about the glitch. It's stupid and people shouldn't get banned for it. If anyone should be penalized, it's IW for not fixing it. Why should anyone EVER get penalized for something that's part of the game? I don't remember reading any rules that said you can't do it or you'll get banned. finalstar2007

Its funny that MS make you pay for online and then ban you if you use a glitch that happened because of the game developers while sony give you everything for free and dosent. thats why i dont believe anyone who says paying online is better ;)

I agree with your statement but if it's a violation ofthe terms of use for Live, then MS has that right. It's probably a violation of the terms of use for Sony, it's just that they have decided not to ban.

Avatar image for SpruceCaboose
SpruceCaboose

24589

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#29 SpruceCaboose
Member since 2005 • 24589 Posts
[QUOTE="SpruceCaboose"]I prefer not playing with cheaters. reiv
This I agree with, but IW have invited the glitchers because they make it easy for them. These people who cheat have found an exploit that the developers and testers overlooked. I find it a bit mind boggling to be honest.

There are millions of lines of code in a game, at least. Even the world's best programmers will make mistakes sometimes. A bug-free game is impossible to release, so post-release glitches will always happen. And testing is one of the most overlooked parts of game design because of time pressures.
Avatar image for deactivated-63f6895020e66
deactivated-63f6895020e66

21177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 deactivated-63f6895020e66
Member since 2004 • 21177 Posts
It takes practically no effort and generates an extra $50 almost every time.Messiahbolical-
Are you aware that people are not really getting banned for exploitting the glitch?
Avatar image for SpruceCaboose
SpruceCaboose

24589

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#31 SpruceCaboose
Member since 2005 • 24589 Posts
[QUOTE="Messiahbolical-"]Do you honestly think it's any stretch of the truth? Do you really believe that Microsoft doesn't like banning people? Why do you think they have so many admins and have so many ways to complain about people cheating or annoying you? Do you really believe it's because they give a crap about you? lol Banning people is probably the easiest money Microsoft ever makes. It takes practically no effort and generates an extra $50 almost every time.

They have that because CHEATING RUINS ONLINE GAMES. How do you not get that? So to keep their honest customers happy, they get rid of the cheaters, who just want to make the game unfun for others.
Avatar image for Messiahbolical-
Messiahbolical-

5670

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 Messiahbolical-
Member since 2009 • 5670 Posts
[QUOTE="SpruceCaboose"][QUOTE="Messiahbolical-"] How is it cheating if it's IN THE GAME. And hypothetically let's say it WASN'T in the game(even though it is), how is it cheating if there's no rules that tell you before hand you're not allowed to do it. Also, how does Microsoft have the right to ban someone's account that they pay yearly for for doing something that there's no rules that say you're not allowed to do. They'll probably get a nice lawsuit out of this.

You are one of the fun ones on game night that wreck the game for everyone because "there are no rules against it!". Sorry , using an exploit that creates an unfair playing field for others is not fair to me, and not playing fair is cheating to me. Super jumps in Halo, wall glitches in Call of Duty, the chainsaw glitch in Gears of War, those are cheating to me just the same as the guy who hacked his Warthog to shoot rockets.

First of all, I don't use glitches when playing. I've never needed to and I never will. That doesn't change the fact that I don't care if other people do. Second of all... why don't I care if other people do? Because it's the DEVELOPER'S FAULT and ONLY the developers fault. You can blame the person for exploiting the glitch, but that doesn't change the fact that the glitch shouldn't exist in the first place. The Javelin glitch isn't even a glitch that gives you an advantage either, the people I see doing it are better off just shooting the people they want to kill because most of the time they would've had the chance of only they had their gun out. But does it matter? No. It's the developer's liability to fix these problems. Don't fix the players, fix the game. You've gotta be pretty ignorant if you think these bans are justifiable when IW hasn't even attempted to fix the problem in the first place.
Avatar image for akira2465
akira2465

1194

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 akira2465
Member since 2004 • 1194 Posts

[QUOTE="spinecaton"]

[QUOTE="Messiahbolical-"] You know what, this is pretty ironic. I'm starting to think that the real reason M$ is so ban happy compared to Sony is because all those people payed for XBL accounts already and M$ already has their money, when they get banned they don't get a refund on that account. So when M$ bans all of these people, all these people need to spend money AGAIN on a new account to make that account gold. It's just extra money in M$ pocket no matter what. I thought it was kind of strange that Microsoft seemed like they were going out of their way, trying to find all these reasons to ban people. Now it's clear. It's simply an extremely easy way for them to earn extra money. Earning extra cash by basically doing nothing. It's genius TBH.Messiahbolical-

You honestly believe what you just wrote?

Do you honestly think it's any stretch of the truth? Do you really believe that Microsoft doesn't like banning people? Why do you think they have so many admins and have so many ways to complain about people cheating or annoying you? Do you really believe it's because they give a crap about you? lol Banning people is probably the easiest money Microsoft ever makes. It takes practically no effort and generates an extra $50 almost every time.

Correct me if i'm wrong but weren't they temporary bans? Has anyone been perma banned?

Avatar image for Ninten007
Ninten007

3129

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 Ninten007
Member since 2005 • 3129 Posts

[QUOTE="Messiahbolical-"]Do you honestly think it's any stretch of the truth? Do you really believe that Microsoft doesn't like banning people? Why do you think they have so many admins and have so many ways to complain about people cheating or annoying you? Do you really believe it's because they give a crap about you? lol Banning people is probably the easiest money Microsoft ever makes. It takes practically no effort and generates an extra $50 almost every time.SpruceCaboose
They have that because CHEATING RUINS ONLINE GAMES. How do you not get that? So to keep their honest customers happy, they get rid of the cheaters, who just want to make the game unfun for others.

There is no way to keep cheaters offline. Even if IW patches the game to get rid of Javelin suicides, there will be another bunch of people who will find something else to ruin the game with.

Besides they are not really cheating, they are just exploiting the glitch that IW/Activision is responsible for.

MS should leave this alone like Sony does and let the devs handle this.

I can bet you there are cheating in every online 360 game especially the sports genre, so why isnt MS banning those people?

Avatar image for creeping-deth87
creeping-deth87

787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#35 creeping-deth87
Member since 2008 • 787 Posts

[QUOTE="SpruceCaboose"][QUOTE="finalstar2007"]

Its funny that MS make you pay for online and then ban you if you use a glitch that happened because of the game developers while sony give you everything for free and dosent. thats why i dont believe anyone who says paying online is better ;)

Messiahbolical-

I prefer not playing with cheaters.

How is it cheating if it's IN THE GAME. And hypothetically let's say it WASN'T in the game(even though it is), how is it cheating if there's no rules that tell you before hand you're not allowed to do it. Also, how does Microsoft have the right to ban someone's account that they pay yearly for for doing something that there's no rules that say you're not allowed to do. They'll probably get a nice lawsuit out of this.

Wow. Where to begin... um, as someone has already said, there doesn't need to be a 'rule' against something for it to be considered cheating. Just because it's in the game and is available for anyone to use doesn't make it not cheating. Playing something in a way it was not meant to be played IS CHEATING. This is why you don't see professional soccer players pick up the ball with their hands and hurl it into the net. ANYONE can do it, but it's still cheating.

Avatar image for SpruceCaboose
SpruceCaboose

24589

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#36 SpruceCaboose
Member since 2005 • 24589 Posts
[QUOTE="Messiahbolical-"] First of all, I don't use glitches when playing. I've never needed to and I never will. That doesn't change the fact that I don't care if other people do. Second of all... why don't I care if other people do? Because it's the DEVELOPER'S FAULT and ONLY the developers fault. You can blame the person for exploiting the glitch, but that doesn't change the fact that the glitch shouldn't exist in the first place. The Javelin glitch isn't even a glitch that gives you an advantage either, the people I see doing it are better off just shooting the people they want to kill because most of the time they would've had the chance of only they had their gun out. But does it matter? No. It's the developer's liability to fix these problems. Don't fix the players, fix the game. You've gotta be pretty ignorant if you think these bans are justifiable when IW hasn't even attempted to fix the problem in the first place.

So you also think making a bug free game is possible? People have a utopian idea of how game development works. Glitches will happen, as programming is not perfect. Players should be able to avoid using a known exploit to gain a cheap advantage, and yet, you place the blame on the developer instead of the player who clearly makes the very conscious choice to use a glitch. Sure, you can assign all the blame to the developer, but to overlook the very real choice the cheater made is to excuse their behavior, which is something I will not do.
Avatar image for Messiahbolical-
Messiahbolical-

5670

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 Messiahbolical-
Member since 2009 • 5670 Posts
[QUOTE="Messiahbolical-"] It takes practically no effort and generates an extra $50 almost every time.IronBass
Are you aware that people are not really getting banned for exploitting the glitch?

Can you prove it? Last post I saw from you you said there's only a rumor that they're not getting banned. Now you're saying it's a fact? But even if it's true, it doesn't change the fact that people still get banned for other random garbage. Remember when Microsoft banned all those 360's recently? Supposedly because of mods, even though a lot of them weren't even modded.
Avatar image for SpruceCaboose
SpruceCaboose

24589

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#38 SpruceCaboose
Member since 2005 • 24589 Posts

[QUOTE="SpruceCaboose"][QUOTE="Messiahbolical-"]Do you honestly think it's any stretch of the truth? Do you really believe that Microsoft doesn't like banning people? Why do you think they have so many admins and have so many ways to complain about people cheating or annoying you? Do you really believe it's because they give a crap about you? lol Banning people is probably the easiest money Microsoft ever makes. It takes practically no effort and generates an extra $50 almost every time.Ninten007

They have that because CHEATING RUINS ONLINE GAMES. How do you not get that? So to keep their honest customers happy, they get rid of the cheaters, who just want to make the game unfun for others.

There is no way to keep cheaters offline. Even if IW patches the game to get rid of Javelin suicides, there will be another bunch of people who will find something else to ruin the game with.

Besides they are not really cheating, they are just exploiting the glitch that IW/Activision is responsible for.

MS should leave this alone like Sony does and let the devs handle this.

I can bet you there are cheating in every online 360 game especially the sports genre, so why isnt MS banning those people?

So MS should just let cheating go because you cannot stop every cheater? Should we let all criminals out of jail, since some get away too? There is no logic there.
Avatar image for VoodooHak
VoodooHak

15989

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#39 VoodooHak
Member since 2002 • 15989 Posts

They both share some responsibility.

IW for fixing the glitch.

Sony for acknowledging that cheating is bad and tarnishes the online experience. As a consumer, I read the article and am soured by the mere possibility of it going on. To think that Sony has no interest in punitive measures against people that abuse the system.... it just leaves a bad impression on me.

Avatar image for SpruceCaboose
SpruceCaboose

24589

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#40 SpruceCaboose
Member since 2005 • 24589 Posts
[QUOTE="IronBass"][QUOTE="Messiahbolical-"] It takes practically no effort and generates an extra $50 almost every time.Messiahbolical-
Are you aware that people are not really getting banned for exploitting the glitch?

Can you prove it? Last post I saw from you you said there's only a rumor that they're not getting banned. Now you're saying it's a fact? But even if it's true, it doesn't change the fact that people still get banned for other random garbage. Remember when Microsoft banned all those 360's recently? Supposedly because of mods, even though a lot of them weren't even modded.

I can. The quote came from MS's XBL Director.
Avatar image for SpruceCaboose
SpruceCaboose

24589

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#41 SpruceCaboose
Member since 2005 • 24589 Posts
Here is the Tweet specifying suspension. No mention of ban.
Avatar image for UnnDunn
UnnDunn

3981

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#42 UnnDunn
Member since 2002 • 3981 Posts

[QUOTE="SpruceCaboose"]They cannot really ban you to well, since you can just create a new free PSN account. That is one benefit to the XBL fee. One of the only benefits.Messiahbolical-
You know what, this is pretty ironic. I'm starting to think that the real reason M$ is so ban happy compared to Sony is because all those people payed for XBL accounts already and M$ already has their money, when they get banned they don't get a refund on that account. So when M$ bans all of these people, all these people need to spend money AGAIN on a new account to make that account gold. It's just extra money in M$ pocket no matter what. I thought it was kind of strange that Microsoft seemed like they were going out of their way, trying to find all these reasons to ban people. Now it's clear. It's simply an extremely easy way for them to earn extra money. Earning extra cash by basically doing nothing. It's genius TBH.

First of all, Microsoft has a graduated-response system for glitch-exploiters. First you get a one-day suspension. If you repeat the offense, you get a one-week suspension. Then a two-week suspension. Then several two-week suspensions.

Suspensions are temporary; you do not lose your account, and it tells you when your suspension will be lifted. All you have to do is wait it out (and avoid repeating the offending activity.)

Only in very extreme cases will Microsoft completely disable your account (such as repeated, egregious ToS or CoCviolations.) They don't even disable your account for console modding (but they will ban your console from Xbox Live.) People invest a lot of money in their Xbox Live accounts, and Microsoft is not interested in taking that away without a very good reason.

Avatar image for deactivated-63f6895020e66
deactivated-63f6895020e66

21177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 deactivated-63f6895020e66
Member since 2004 • 21177 Posts

Can you prove it?Messiahbolical-

Yes.

"While IW works on getting the MW2 glitch fixed, people we catch using it will receive suspensions from LIVE. Play fair everyone."(...) "Using a glitch in a game to get an advantage is explicitly called out in the ToU. It's not like people are doing it by accident."

Link

even though a lot of them weren't even modded.Messiahbolical-

Can you prove it?

Avatar image for Colin1192
Colin1192

6221

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#45 Colin1192
Member since 2008 • 6221 Posts

I think a 24 hour ban is fair. It sends the message that yuou should not be doing that. The glitch is so annoying and now it is in almost every game, if sony does not do something I suspect many complaints piling up where they may have to cuz who knows how long this will take to patch

Avatar image for deactivated-63f6895020e66
deactivated-63f6895020e66

21177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 deactivated-63f6895020e66
Member since 2004 • 21177 Posts
So they should patch it. :| Messiahbolical-
They are working on it.
Avatar image for spinecaton
spinecaton

8986

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#47 spinecaton
Member since 2003 • 8986 Posts

[QUOTE="spinecaton"]

[QUOTE="Messiahbolical-"] You know what, this is pretty ironic. I'm starting to think that the real reason M$ is so ban happy compared to Sony is because all those people payed for XBL accounts already and M$ already has their money, when they get banned they don't get a refund on that account. So when M$ bans all of these people, all these people need to spend money AGAIN on a new account to make that account gold. It's just extra money in M$ pocket no matter what. I thought it was kind of strange that Microsoft seemed like they were going out of their way, trying to find all these reasons to ban people. Now it's clear. It's simply an extremely easy way for them to earn extra money. Earning extra cash by basically doing nothing. It's genius TBH.Messiahbolical-

You honestly believe what you just wrote?

Do you honestly think it's any stretch of the truth? Do you really believe that Microsoft doesn't like banning people? Why do you think they have so many admins and have so many ways to complain about people cheating or annoying you? Do you really believe it's because they give a crap about you? lol Banning people is probably the easiest money Microsoft ever makes. It takes practically no effort and generates an extra $50 almost every time.

Yes I do think it is a stretch of the truth, because if you have played any paid subscription games you would know that exploiting glitches can lead to suspensions or bans. FFXI had a duplicate drop glitch, it wasn't cheating it was a glitch, and they suspended/banned people who exploited the glitch. I honestly think they are just trying to do their job since they have a report button.

Avatar image for Messiahbolical-
Messiahbolical-

5670

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 Messiahbolical-
Member since 2009 • 5670 Posts

[QUOTE="Messiahbolical-"][QUOTE="SpruceCaboose"]They cannot really ban you to well, since you can just create a new free PSN account. That is one benefit to the XBL fee. One of the only benefits.UnnDunn

You know what, this is pretty ironic. I'm starting to think that the real reason M$ is so ban happy compared to Sony is because all those people payed for XBL accounts already and M$ already has their money, when they get banned they don't get a refund on that account. So when M$ bans all of these people, all these people need to spend money AGAIN on a new account to make that account gold. It's just extra money in M$ pocket no matter what. I thought it was kind of strange that Microsoft seemed like they were going out of their way, trying to find all these reasons to ban people. Now it's clear. It's simply an extremely easy way for them to earn extra money. Earning extra cash by basically doing nothing. It's genius TBH.

First of all, Microsoft has a graduated-response system for glitch-exploiters. First you get a one-day suspension. If you repeat the offense, you get a one-week suspension. Then a two-week suspension. Then several two-week suspensions.

Suspensions are temporary; you do not lose your account, and it tells you when your suspension will be lifted. All you have to do is wait it out (and avoid repeating the offending activity.)

Only in very extreme cases will Microsoft completely disable your account (such as repeated, egregious ToS or CoCviolations.) They don't even disable your account for console modding (but they will ban your console from Xbox Live.) People invest a lot of money in their Xbox Live accounts, and Microsoft is not interested in taking that away without a very good reason.

Okay. Finally, a response that actually explains things and makes sense of things. That's more understandable. I can understand maybe a short suspension like that for people who overuse the glitches then a longer suspension if necessary. That makes more sense to me, as long as people aren't getting banned for this. Thanks for clearing that up. I still think M$ should just wait for IW to fix the problem and patch the game before suspending more people though.
Avatar image for UnnDunn
UnnDunn

3981

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#49 UnnDunn
Member since 2002 • 3981 Posts

Wow, you really are ignorant. You're right, glitches exist. But you ignore the simple fact that THEY CAN PATCH THE GAME. IW obviously must know about the glitch. So they should patch it. :| It's like you don't want to acknowledge the fact that Microsoft should be putting more effort into making IW patch the game instead of just banning people. I don't know why you're trying so hard to act like patches don't exist or to justify banning people who technically aren't cheating. There's obviously no reasoning with you. Enjoy living in your world where there's no such thing as game patches and where developers can never take the blame for something that they caused. Bye.Messiahbolical-
Infinity Ward have said they are patching the game, and the patch should hit within the week. But in the meantime, Microsoft has to find a way to keep the game fun for all players. Even though the exploit is in the game code, it clearly wasn't designed to be part of the gameplay, it breaks the game balance and lessens the fun players have in the game. That's the metric Xbox Live's enforcement team uses: not whether a glitch is in the game, but whether it is designed to be part of the gameplay.

Avatar image for SolidTy
SolidTy

49991

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#50 SolidTy
Member since 2005 • 49991 Posts

http://kotaku.com/5418607/javelin-cheats-sony-dont-give-a-hoot

While Microsoft will take swift, stern action against anyone caught using the javelin "exploit" in Modern Warfare 2, Sony apparently couldn't care less. A Sony rep has told CVG "I don't believe we are banning people for using the glitch". If they're not banning people outright, makes you wonder what they are doing. Simply watching? Placing marks next to people's names? Tutting endlessly? Sony NOT banning for MW2 Javelin glitch

So what do you guys think? Is Sony or IW responsible to regulate MW2?

akira2465

Infinity Ward SHOULD have Public Beta Tested it.

IW is responsible to regulate their game, not Sony. It's nice that Xbox wanted to get involved, but ultimately, it wasn't required. This is all on IW and ACTIVISION. EPIC's GeoW has a LOT of exploits, and those don't get fixed, so I don't see why this exploit should be treated differently.

If it's in the game, although it sucks, it's the Devs fault.

Anyways, IW is working on a patch due this week or next, so this is all pointless to talk about anyways...as it will be ancient history.

And THIS IS WHY PUBLIC BETA Testing is good folks.