This topic is locked from further discussion.
Hey its true look at the sales...... Look at there games, The Dreamcast actually did better than the PS3 is doing... Karnage29
Only, y'know the PS3 is not going out of circulation.
I mean its a great system and all, a lot powerful then the 360 but its just a shame..... Feel sorry for PS3 owners and SOny they losing there exclusives to Mcirosoft and its insane how the psp is selling more than the PS3...Karnage29
Yeah, poor PS3 owners, they won't be able to play Tekken 6 or Final Fantasy XIII.....oh wait.
[QUOTE="Karnage29"]I mean its a great system and all, a lot powerful then the 360 but its just a shame..... Feel sorry for PS3 owners and SOny they losing there exclusives to Mcirosoft and its insane how the psp is selling more than the PS3...Lionheart08
Yeah, poor PS3 owners, they won't be able to play Tekken 6 or Final Fantasy XIII.....oh wait.
Seriously. Im more interested in how the new God of War 3 ingame footage will look, than whether PS3s are selling or not. I dont own SONY stock, I dont get money back if SONY sells more PS3s, so why should I care?I mean its a great system and all, a lot powerful then the 360 but its just a shame..... Feel sorry for PS3 owners and SOny they losing there exclusives to Mcirosoft and its insane how the psp is selling more than the PS3...Karnage29
What so now you are going to say that Microsoft isn't losing exclusives to the PS3? Seems like both systems are losing an equal amount of exclusives this gen, so it's all about first party in which Sony is winning by leagues.
Also to say that the PS3 is doing as bad as the Dreamcast is wrong there TC. Sorry to say but you must not know numbers to well, cause if the PS3 and the 360 were released on the same date, then the PS3 would be winning not only in games but in sales as well.
Nah i really doubt it..... I mean cause 1st party games we would have Halo 3,Gears 2 and Fable 2 and many others like Crackdown and Perfect Dark and stuff. It would be hard to figured that out though....... ALL i know is that no matter what the Wii selling a lot i still say its a garbage system. Only reason why i would get a Wii is just cause of the classics....Karnage29
The Wii is an unstoppable force that has more fame than fun. So I agree with you there, and I know what I am talking about since I have the Wii sadly. Bought it for Super Smash Brothers and haven't played it since I beat the story mode.
Halo, Gears and Fable are all franchises that sell well, some are better than others in there though. However Crackdown and Perfect Dark are not games I would be calling great hits to say the least. But the reason I say the PS3 has better first party is because even though the 360 has those three that you say, the PS3 is safe to say to have more.
I agree with the statement.
The Dreamcast was awesome and ahead of its time, much like the Playstation 3.
[QUOTE="Karnage29"]Nah i really doubt it..... I mean cause 1st party games we would have Halo 3,Gears 2 and Fable 2 and many others like Crackdown and Perfect Dark and stuff. It would be hard to figured that out though....... ALL i know is that no matter what the Wii selling a lot i still say its a garbage system. Only reason why i would get a Wii is just cause of the classics....Delsage
The Wii is an unstoppable force that has more fame than fun. So I agree with you there, and I know what I am talking about since I have the Wii sadly. Bought it for Super Smash Brothers and haven't played it since I beat the story mode.
Halo, Gears and Fable are all franchises that sell well, some are better than others in there though. However Crackdown and Perfect Dark are not games I would be calling great hits to say the least. But the reason I say the PS3 has better first party is because even though the 360 has those three that you say, the PS3 is safe to say to have more.
Yea true true i agree with u. Well Crackdown and Perfect werent amazing games but there were still good. i gues you are right bout the PS3 has more but its because they been there since 96....Hey its true look at the sales...... Look at there games, The Dreamcast actually did better than the PS3 is doing... Karnage29So you imply that PS3 will fail miserably, TC?
[QUOTE="Karnage29"] Hey its true look at the sales...... Look at there games, The Dreamcast actually did better than the PS3 is doing... Salt_The_FriesSo you imply that PS3 will fail miserably, TC?
Well im hoping not.... It would give Xbox that competition since in my opinion it would be good for business.....
[QUOTE="Karnage29"] Hey its true look at the sales...... Look at there games, The Dreamcast actually did better than the PS3 is doing... PAL360true! Dreamcast in its litlle lifetime had far more great exclusives than PS3 has now...Yeah, the Dreamcast had ton of AAA and an AAAAE. But yeah, we should really be comparing the PS3 to the Atari Jaguar. Hahaha!
Dreamcast only sold 10 million consoles. PS3 is well on its way to 20 million units by years end. Developers won't ignore 20 million consoles on the market.jakarai
1 - half of that ps3s were sold as a bluray players
2 - Dreamcast was a great system with far more A, AA and AAA exclusives than ps3 in the same amount of time.
3 - playstation name was a lot more powerfull and influent in the beggining of this gen than sega/dreamcast in 1999
[QUOTE="PAL360"][QUOTE="Karnage29"] Hey its true look at the sales...... Look at there games, The Dreamcast actually did better than the PS3 is doing... Mario2007true! Dreamcast in its litlle lifetime had far more great exclusives than PS3 has now...Yeah, the Dreamcast had ton of AAA and an AAAAE. But yeah, we should really be comparing the PS3 to the Atari Jaguar. Hahaha!
true :P
the only thing that makes PS3 better than Jaguar, CDi, CD32, 3DO, etc is the fact that there are legions of sony fans that will buy it at any cost :?
Nah we are just saying its almost gonna be the same...... I mean u gotta admit the Dreamcast was great and had a great start. If they kept on with the system it woulda been great.....Karnage29The Dreamcast was a great system with the last Sonic game I for one actually enjoyed. It had a ton of good games and a ton of potential.
Yeah, the Dreamcast had ton of AAA and an AAAAE. But yeah, we should really be comparing the PS3 to the Atari Jaguar. Hahaha![QUOTE="Mario2007"][QUOTE="PAL360"]true! Dreamcast in its litlle lifetime had far more great exclusives than PS3 has now...PAL360
true :P
the only thing that makes PS3 better than Jaguar, CDi, CD32, 3DO, etc is the fact that there are legions of sony fans that will buy it at any cost :?
But why? It probably has something to do with both the ps1 and the ps2 dominating the competition last gens. Maybe they were expecting Sony to do the same this gen.
[QUOTE="jakarai"]Dreamcast only sold 10 million consoles. PS3 is well on its way to 20 million units by years end. Developers won't ignore 20 million consoles on the market.PAL360
1 - half of that ps3s were sold as a bluray players (I would love a link for this)
2 - Dreamcast was a great system with far more A, AA and AAA exclusives than ps3 in the same amount of time. (But PS3 has more A,AA,AAA not to mention 2 AAAA, one being exclusive.)
3 - playstation name was a lot more powerfull and influent in the beggining of this gen than sega/dreamcast in 1999. (At various different points Nintendo, Sega and even MS's year head start had more influence on the industry)
basically, your post failed :?
[QUOTE="PAL360"][QUOTE="Mario2007"]Yeah, the Dreamcast had ton of AAA and an AAAAE. But yeah, we should really be comparing the PS3 to the Atari Jaguar. Hahaha! dark-warmachine
true :P
the only thing that makes PS3 better than Jaguar, CDi, CD32, 3DO, etc is the fact that there are legions of sony fans that will buy it at any cost :?
But why? It probably has something to do with both the ps1 and the ps2 dominating the competition last gens. Maybe they were expecting Sony to do the same this gen.
for sure. But why buy a system that is more expensive than the others and have a smaller lineup just because its prequels were a success?
[QUOTE="PAL360"][QUOTE="jakarai"]Dreamcast only sold 10 million consoles. PS3 is well on its way to 20 million units by years end. Developers won't ignore 20 million consoles on the market.FragTycoon
1 - half of that ps3s were sold as a bluray players (I would love a link for this)
2 - Dreamcast was a great system with far more A, AA and AAA exclusives than ps3 in the same amount of time. (But PS3 has more A,AA,AAA not to mention 2 AAAA, one being exclusive.)
3 - playstation name was a lot more powerfull and influent in the beggining of this gen than sega/dreamcast in 1999. (At various different points Nintendo, Sega and even MS's year head start had more influence on the industry)
basically, your post failed :?
Well...thats my opinion. I still think dreamcast >>>>>>>>> PS3 ;)[QUOTE="dark-warmachine"][QUOTE="PAL360"]true :P
the only thing that makes PS3 better than Jaguar, CDi, CD32, 3DO, etc is the fact that there are legions of sony fans that will buy it at any cost :?
PAL360
But why? It probably has something to do with both the ps1 and the ps2 dominating the competition last gens. Maybe they were expecting Sony to do the same this gen.
for sure. But why buy a system that is more expensive than the others and have a smaller lineup just because its prequels were a success?
For the same reason most of people bought PES 2009 over FIFA 09, and Need For Speed franchise still being popular, despite PES and NFS franchises turning into crap.Dreamcast only sold 10 million consoles. PS3 is well on its way to 20 million units by years end. Developers won't ignore 20 million consoles on the market.jakaraiThis^
[QUOTE="FragTycoon"][QUOTE="PAL360"]1 - half of that ps3s were sold as a bluray players (I would love a link for this)
2 - Dreamcast was a great system with far more A, AA and AAA exclusives than ps3 in the same amount of time. (But PS3 has more A,AA,AAA not to mention 2 AAAA, one being exclusive.)
3 - playstation name was a lot more powerfull and influent in the beggining of this gen than sega/dreamcast in 1999. (At various different points Nintendo, Sega and even MS's year head start had more influence on the industry)
PAL360
basically, your post failed :?
Well...thats my opinion. I still think dreamcast >>>>>>>>> PS3 ;) Sorry dude but you cant post a valid opinion on something you never used or owned ( common sense )PS3 has some good games......But the Dreamcast had better. I mean it had Sonic,NBA 2K series was hot,Loved The street Fighters on that system. I wish it woulda gotten far. But PS1 was by far better..... And 64 well..........it was ok...Karnage29
In Your Opinion.
[QUOTE="PAL360"][QUOTE="FragTycoon"]Well...thats my opinion. I still think dreamcast >>>>>>>>> PS3 ;) Sorry dude but you cant post a valid opinion on something you never used or owned ( common sense )basically, your post failed :?
micky4889
I have a dreamcast and to be honest i have almost every system since nes and still see no reason to get a PS3.
So...i need to get a system to have an opinion about it? Im sure every single cow have the 360 then...
[QUOTE="Karnage29"]PS3 has some good games......But the Dreamcast had better. I mean it had Sonic,NBA 2K series was hot,Loved The street Fighters on that system. I wish it woulda gotten far. But PS1 was by far better..... And 64 well..........it was ok...dark-warmachine
In Your Opinion.
Well yea in my opinion. Forgot to put that....
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment